
Ukraine's drone attack on Russian air bases is a lesson for the West on its vulnerabilities
The targets were Russian warplanes, including strategic bombers and command-and-control aircraft, worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The weapons were Ukrainian drones, each costing under $1,000 and launched from wooden containers carried on trucks.
'Operation Spiderweb,' which Ukraine said destroyed or damaged over 40 aircraft parked at air bases across Russia on Sunday, wasn't just a blow to the Kremlin's prestige. It was also a wake-up call for the West to bolster its air defense systems against such hybrid drone warfare, military experts said.
Ukraine took advantage of inexpensive drone technology that has advanced rapidly in the last decade and combined it with outside-the-box thinking to score a morale-boosting win in the 3-year-old war that lately has turned in Moscow's favor.
How deeply the attack will impact Russian military operations is unclear. Although officials in Kyiv estimated it caused $7 billion in damage, the Russian Foreign Ministry disputed that, and there have been no independent assessments. Moscow still has more aircraft to launch its bombs and cruise missiles against Ukraine.
Still, the operation showed what 'modern war really looks like and why it's so important to stay ahead with technology,' said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
For Western governments, it's a warning that 'the spectrum of threats they're going to have to take into consideration only gets broader,' said Douglas Barrie, senior fellow for military aerospace at the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London.
In the past decade, European countries have accused Russia of carrying out a sabotage campaign against the West, with targets ranging from defense executives and logistics companies to businesses linked to Ukraine. Unidentified drones have been seen in the past year flying near military bases in the U.S., the U.K and Germany, as well as above weapons factories in Norway.
High-value weapons and other technology at those sites are 'big, juicy targets for both state and non-state actors,' said Caitlin Lee, a drone warfare expert at RAND in Washington.
'The time is now' to invest in anti-drone defenses, she said.
Low-cost options to protect aircraft include using hardened shelters, dispersing the targets to different bases and camouflaging them or even building decoys.
U.S. President Donald Trump last month announced a $175 billion 'Golden Dome' program using space-based weapons to protect the country from long-range missiles.
Not mentioned were defenses against drones, which Lee said can be challenging because they fly low and slow, and on radar can look like birds. They also can be launched inside national borders, unlike a supersonic missile fired from abroad.
Drones 'dramatically increase' the capacity by a hostile state or group for significant sabotage, said Fabian Hinz, a missile expert and research fellow at IISS.
'How many targets are there in a country? How well can you defend every single one of them against a threat like that?' he said.
In 'Operation Spiderweb,' Ukraine said it smuggled the first-person view, or FPV, drones into Russia, where they were placed in the wooden containers and eventually driven by truck close to the airfields in the Irkutsk region in Siberia, the Murmansk region in the Arctic, and the Amur region in the Far East, as well as to two bases in western Russia.
Ukraine's Security Service, or SBU, said the drones had highly automated capabilities and were partly piloted by an operator and partly by using artificial intelligence, which flew them along a pre-planned route in the event the drones lost signal. Such AI technology almost certainly would have been unavailable to Ukraine five years ago.
SBU video showed drones swooping over and under Russian aircraft, some of which were covered by tires. Experts suggested the tires could have been used to confuse an automatic targeting system by breaking up the plane's silhouette or to offer primitive protection.
'The way in which the Ukrainians brought this together is creative and obviously caught the Russians completely off guard,' Barrie said.
Satellite photos analyzed by The Associated Press showed seven destroyed bombers on the tarmac at Irkutsk's Belaya Air Base, a major installation for Russia's long-range bomber force. At least three Tu-95 four-engine turboprop bombers and four Tu-22M twin-engine supersonic bombers appear to be destroyed.
Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, the outgunned and outnumbered Ukrainian military has adopted a creative approach to warfare . Its forces deployed wooden decoys of expensive U.S. HIMARS air defense systems to draw Russia's missile fire, created anti-drone units that operate on pickup trucks, and repurposed captured weapons.
Experts compared Sunday's attack to Israel's operation last year in which pagers used by members of the militant group Hezbollah exploded almost simultaneously in Lebanon and Syria. Israel also has used small, exploding drones to attack targets in Lebanon and Iran.
The U.S. used Predator drones more than a decade ago to kill insurgents in Afghanistan from thousands of miles away. Developments in technology have made those capabilities available in smaller drones.
Hinz compared the state of drone warfare to that of the development of the tank, which made its debut in 1916 in World War I. Engineers sought to work out how to best integrate tanks into a working battlefield scenario — contemplating everything from a tiny vehicle to a giant one 'with 18 turrets' before settling on the version used in World War II.
With drones, 'we are in the phase of figuring that out, and things are changing so rapidly that what works today might not work tomorrow,' he said.
The Tu-95 bombers hit by Ukraine are 'effectively irreplaceable' because they're no longer in production, said Hinz, the IISS expert. Ukraine said it also hit an A-50 early warning and control aircraft, similar to the West's AWACS planes, that coordinate aerial attacks. Russia has even fewer of these.
'Whichever way you cut the cake for Russia, this requires expense,' said Thomas Withington of the Royal United Services Institute in London. 'You can see the billions of dollars mounting up,'
Russia must repair the damaged planes, better protect its remaining aircraft and improve its ability to disrupt such operations, he said. Experts also suggested the strikes could force Moscow to speed up its program to replace the Tu-95.
While underscoring Russian vulnerabilities, it's not clear if it will mean reduced airstrikes on Ukraine.
Russia has focused on trying to overwhelm Ukraine's air defenses with drones throughout the war, including the use of decoys without payloads. On some nights last month, Moscow launched over 300 drones.
'Even if Ukraine was able to damage a significant portion of the Russian bomber force, it's not entirely clear that the bomber force was playing a linchpin role in the war at this point,' Lee said.
Ukrainian air force data analyzed by AP shows that from July 2024 through December 2024, Russia used Tu-22M3s and Tu-95s 14 times against Ukraine but used drones almost every night.
Sunday's operation might temporarily reduce Russia's ability to launch strategic missile attacks but it will probably find ways to compensate, Lee said.
——-
Associated Press writer Hanna Arhirova in Kyiv, Ukraine, contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Transgender troops face a deadline and a difficult decision: Stay or go?
WASHINGTON (AP) — As transgender service members face a deadline to leave the U.S. military, hundreds are taking the financial bonus to depart voluntarily. But others say they will stay and fight. For many, it is a wrenching decision to end a career they love, and leave units they have led or worked with for years. And they are angry they are being forced out by the Trump administration's renewed ban on transgender troops. Active duty service members had until Friday to identify themselves and begin to leave the military voluntarily, while the National Guard and Reserve have until July 7. Then the military will begin involuntary separations. Friday's deadline comes during Pride Month and as the Trump administration targets diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, saying it's aiming to scrub the military of 'wokeness' and reestablishing a 'warrior ethos.' 'They're tired of the rollercoaster. They just want to go,' said one transgender service member, who plans to retire. 'It's exhausting.' For others, it's a call to arms. 'I'm choosing to stay in and fight,' a noncommissioned officer in the Air Force said. 'My service is based on merit, and I've earned that merit.' The troops, who mainly spoke on condition of anonymity because they fear reprisals, said being forced to decide is frustrating. They say it's a personal choice based on individual and family situations, including whether they would get an infusion of cash or possibly wind up owing the government money. 'I'm very disappointed,' a transgender Marine said. 'I've outperformed, I have a spotless record. I'm at the top of every fitness report. I'm being pushed out while I know others are barely scraping by.' Some transgender troops decide to leave based on finances Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said this is President Donald Trump's directive and what America voted for. The Pentagon, he said, is 'leaving wokeness & weakness behind' and that includes 'no more dudes in dresses.' Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, a veteran, and 22 other Democratic senators have written to Hegseth urging him to allow transgender troops to keep serving honorably. Already, more than 1,000 service members have voluntarily identified themselves as transgender and are slated to begin leaving, according to rough Defense Department estimates. Defense officials say there are about 4,240 active duty transgender troops but acknowledge the numbers are fuzzy. For many, the decision is financial. Those who voluntarily leave will get double the amount of separation pay they would normally receive and won't have to return bonuses or tuition costs. Those who refuse to go could be forced to repay reenlistment or other bonuses as high as $50,000. That was the tipping point for Roni Ferrell, an Army specialist at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma, Washington. Ferrell, 28, lives on base with her wife and two children and had planned to stay in the Army for at least another decade. But she said she felt 'backed into a corner' to sign the voluntary separation agreement, fearing she would have to repay an $18,500 reenlistment bonus. 'My commander basically said it was my only option in order to make sure my kids are taken care of,' Ferrell said. The Marine, who has served for more than 25 years, said she had planned to stay and fight, but changed her mind. Lawyers, she said, told her an involuntary separation would put a code in her record saying she was forced to leave 'in the interests of national security.' That designation, she said, could mean those involuntarily separated could lose their security clearances, hurting future job prospects. In a statement Friday, a defense official said the code 'is not intended' to trigger clearance revocations and that gender dysphoria is not a security reporting requirement, according to the director of national intelligence. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver, senior director of litigation for Human Rights Campaign, said it's important for troops to talk with judge advocates general in their services to ensure they understand the different procedures being implemented. Other transgender troops plan to stay despite the ban The Air Force service member and a transgender officer in the Army National Guard both said they plan to stay and fight. Lawsuits over the ban continue and could change or block the policy. For troops involved in the court battles as plaintiffs, leaving voluntarily now would likely hurt their standing in the case. For others, it's simply dedication to their career. 'I've really embraced military culture, and it's embraced me,' the Air Force member said. 'It's not about money. It's the career that I love.' The Guard soldier echoed that sentiment, saying he will stay on 'because it is important to me to serve. Frankly, I'm good at it, I'm well trained so I want to continue.' Others without bonuses to repay or who have been in the military only a short while and won't get much in separation bonus pay may opt to stay and see what happens. National Guard troops face a particular problem National Guard members who are heading to their monthly drill weekend or annual two-week drill in June could be required to go but serve as the gender they were assigned at birth. That means they would have to wear uniforms and haircuts of that gender, use that bathroom and be referred to as 'sir' or 'ma'am' based on that gender. For many, that could be close to impossible and create uncomfortable situations. 'If I were to show up to drill this weekend, I'd be expected to use all female facilities, I would be expected to wear a woman's uniform,' said the Army Guard officer, who transitioned to male about five years ago and says others in his unit know him as a man. 'I don't look like a woman. I don't feel like a woman. It would be disruptive to good order and discipline for me to show up and to tell my soldiers, you have to call me 'ma'am' now.' It's not clear if Guard units are handling it all the same way, and it could be up to individual states or commanders. Some may allow troops to postpone the drill or go on administrative leave. What happens next for transgender troops? The service members interviewed by The Associated Press said they don't know what will happen once the deadline passes to leave voluntarily. Some believe that unit commanders will quickly single people out and start involuntary separations. Others say the process is vague, may involve medical review boards and could take months. The defense official said Friday that as the Pentagon takes these steps, it 'will treat our service members with dignity and respect.' Under Hegseth's directive, military commanders will be told to identify troops with gender dysphoria — when a person's biological sex does not match their gender identity — and send them to get medical checks to force them out of the service, defense officials have said. The order relies on routine annual health checks — so it could be months before that evaluation is scheduled. 'My real big sticking point is that this administration's whole push is to reform this country based around merit, and that gender, race, etc., should have no factor in hiring,' the Air Force service member said. 'If that's true, I'm solely being removed for my gender, and merit is no longer a factor.' ___ Associated Press writer R.J. Rico in Atlanta contributed to this report.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia and Ukraine Are Both Still in This War for the Long Haul
On the morning of June 1, in what it called Operation Spiderweb, Ukraine launched over 100 drones from the backs of trucks it had used to smuggle them inside Russia. With the trucks positioned near several Russian airfields thousands of miles apart, the drones attacked and successfully destroyed a third of Russia's bomber fleet. The operation suggests that Ukraine learned a lesson from the 'failure' of its 2023 offensive: Keep it secret—even from the U.S., according to the latest reporting, so as to not raise expectations or risk word of the operation being leaked. Indeed, while the strike does hold implications and lessons for how drones could be deployed in future wars, Kyiv's successful maintenance of operational security is what many observers found most impressive. As WPR columnist and European security expert Ulrike Franke observed, 'One could argue that this attack, is actually less of a drone story, than a covert operation story. … [T]he impressive bit is pulling this off.' In many ways, the operation's combination of surprise and tactical ingenuity shared similarities to Ukraine's surprisingly successful counteroffensive in 2022, when Kyiv utilized deception and precision force deployment to push back Russian forces and retake the city of Kharkiv. After this weekend's attack, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed that Operation Spiderweb was over a year in the making. Given that timeframe, the attack may have been part of his much-touted 'Victory Plan' unveiled in October. As he explained on social media, the purpose of the operation was to demonstrate that 'Europe, together with America, has better weapons than Russia. We also have stronger tactical solutions.' That demonstration, and the losses Russia incurred, are in Zelenskyy's view, 'what will push [Moscow] toward diplomacy.' When combined with the successful signing of a mineral deal with Washington as a means of ensuring continued U.S. material support to Ukraine, it seems that Zelenskyy's October plan is indeed starting to come together. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. Unfortunately, there is another way to view the operation, one that is more sobering. Simply put, Zelenskyy's military and diplomatic coup should not lead to inflated expectations. The operation did prove that Ukraine can stand up to Russia and can inflict great harm, if more evidence was even needed. It further demonstrated that Ukraine will not go down without a fight—and that it has a lot of fight left. But we've been here before. Ukraine's successful counteroffensive in October 2022, which rolled back much of Russia's initial gains, was followed by the battlelines stabilizing and largely stalling into trench warfare. The Wagner mutiny of June 2023, which led to speculation about the possibility of regime change in Moscow, was followed by Russian President Vladimir Putin consolidating power and control over the Russian military. The sinking of substantial portions of Russia's Black Sea fleet, which led to a Russian naval withdrawal in 2024, didn't alter the dynamics on the ground. Similarly, this operation is not likely to bring the Russians to the bargaining table with a sincere interest in striking a deal to end the war. The war will instead rage on. In fact, all reports indicate that Russia can weather these heavy losses to its air capability. As Franz-Stefan Gady of the International Institute for Strategic Studies noted, 'For all its complexity, creativity, and audaciousness, the raid's immediate impact on Russian operations in Ukraine is likely to be limited.' Russia uses only a few of its bombers to carry out cruise missile attacks, so these losses, while not trivial, will not impede its ability to continue those operations. Moreover, as the Wall Street Journal recently reported, Putin has the Russian economy retooled for war, so much so that reaching peace could lead to more economic disruptions than continuing the fighting. As a February report from the Center for European Policy Analysis put it, the Russian economy is 'addicted to war.' Indeed, Russia launched a drone attack of its own against Kharkiv almost immediately after Operation Spiderweb, and according to U.S. President Donald Trump, Putin promised to retaliate against Ukraine in a phone conversation they held earlier this week. Russia can sustain its strategy of trying to punish Ukraine into submission. It may not be able to win outright, but that doesn't mean it will lose. But as the attack illustrates, Ukraine can also inflict damage. Some commentators and policymakers, including U.S. Vice President JD Vance, point to Russia's long-term advantages in personnel and material as proof that Ukraine cannot win a long war. Yet the U.S. has yet to cut off its support for Kyiv. Even if it does, European nations have agreed, under prodding from the Trump administration, to shift their focus from supporting a postwar peacekeeping force to stepping up their wartime material support to Kyiv. As Dmytro Kuleba recently wrote—in a reference to Trump's assertion during his infamous Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy that Kyiv 'doesn't have the cards' to defeat Russia—'Ukraine could certainly hold better cards, but the country is not so desperate that it must fold now.' In other words, Ukraine is also poised to sustain its war effort. But if this attack isn't enough to turn the tide, what could do so? What would actually constitute a turning point in the conflict? Some think that, as the invasion is for all intents and purposes 'Putin's war,' only his death or removal from power will end it. But it seems that support for the war, at least within the key decision-making circles of the Russian government, extends beyond Putin himself. Putin's delusions of grandeur, predicated on a desire to recreate the Russian Empire, may be his principal reason for carrying on with the war. But Russian interest in controlling, dominating or even annexing all of Ukraine, coupled with distrust of the West, are not limited to him. Another possibility is that, like the last great wars of Europe, a major outside power directly enters the war and throws its weight into massively tipping the balance of power. But that also seems unlikely. The U.S. under Trump may not abandon Ukraine, but it is inconceivable that it would enter the war on its behalf or countenance its European allies to do so. Hence, we're sadly still on the path for this to become at worst a version of the Iran-Iraq War and at best a frozen conflict along the lines of the Korean War. In short, the ebbs and flows of the battlefield are unpredictable and punctuated. One side can seem to be working against the tide, and then suddenly gain a novel tactical victory, as Ukraine did this past weekend. But in a war of attrition of the kind in which Ukraine and Russia remain embroiled, material and strategic capacity matters more than tactical ingenuity. And what Ukraine's successful strike last weekend showed above all is that both nations still have the capacity to sustain the war for the long haul. Paul Poast is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago and a nonresident fellow at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. The post Russia and Ukraine Are Both Still in This War for the Long Haul appeared first on World Politics Review.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump offers Germany US gas deals, but no promises on Ukraine aid or Russia sanctions
U.S. President Donald Trump offered to increase supplies of American energy exports to Berlin but did not pledge additional military support to Ukraine or sanctions on Russia in a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on June 5. The meeting was Merz's first visit to the White House since becoming chancellor. When asked whether Trump would impose additional sanctions on Russia, the president dodged the question by boasting that he "ended Nord Stream 2" and hinting at future energy deals with Germany. "We have so much oil and gas, you will not be able to buy it all. ... I hope we'll be able to make that part of our trade deal," Trump said during a joint press conference with Merz. While Merz spoke of a "duty" to assist Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression, Trump did not make any commitments to further military aid for Kyiv. In the same press conference, he compared Russia and Ukraine to fighting children and refused to name a deadline for imposing sanctions on Moscow. Merz nonetheless praised Trump's role as a peacemaker between the two nations. "I told the president before we came in: He is the key person in the world who can really (end the war) by putting pressure on Russia." Read also: 'Sometimes you're better off letting them fight,' Trump says on Russia-Ukraine war Trump has frequently brought up Europe's reliance on Russian energy when questioned about Washington's role in pressuring the Kremlin or supporting Ukraine. Nord Stream 1 and 2 are gas pipelines running between Russia and Germany under the Baltic Sea. Nord Stream 2 has never been activated, and the pipes shut down after suspected sabotage in 2022. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed in March that discussions were underway with the U.S. to resume gas flows through the pipelines. Trump has pursued warmer relations and stronger economic ties with Moscow since his inauguration in January 2025. Merz said on May 28 that the German government will "do everything to ensure that Nord Stream 2 cannot be put back into operation," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on May 28. The leaders' discussion on June 6 focused primarily on Russia's war against Ukraine, NATO, and trade policy, Merz said in Berlin the day after the meeting. Merz insisted that Trump remains committed to NATO, despite the U.S. president's history of disparaging the alliance. Read also: EU tariffs on Ukrainian goods return after 3 years of war, complicating Kyiv's path to European integration We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.