Angry farmers take over Welsh town with tractors to deliver Keir Starmer message
Angry farmers take over Welsh town with tractors to deliver Keir Starmer message
The restrictions on animals travelling due to Bluetongue is the latest source of anger
Tractors line the promenade in Llandudno to protest against UK and Welsh Governments
(Image: Matt Horwood )
Farmers once again lined up along the promenade in Llandudno in the latest protest against UK and Welsh Government policies. Farm vehicles and tractors were lined up as Prime Minister Keir Starmer gave a speech to Welsh Labour members at the party's conference in Llandudno.
It is the latest protest - the first was when then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak visited Llandudno. Keir Starmer has now faced two equivalent protests on visits to Llandudno and there have been events in Cardiff Bay, the largest of which took place at the Senedd.
Food prices, as well as hcanges to inheritance tax rules prompted the latest protests
(Image: Matt Horwood )
Alan Hughes farms on the Shropshire Powys border between England and Wales. He said the protest was farmers having to take extreme measures to keep their farms afloat. "At the moment we're being forced to take second jobs to stay afloat to afford to produce food for the public at a loss. We can't continue to do this. Supermarket prices are going through the roof but in the last month since the EU trade deal the price of beef has dropped by £1 a kilo, that's a sixth. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
"We're pretty much on break even now," he said.
He is having to work two other jobs, in engineering, he said to cover the household bills. He said he blames both UK and Welsh Governments. "Both their policies are driving us bust," the beef and sheep farmer said.
Article continues below
Swansea farmer Liam Payne is one of the organisers of previous protests. The core issues haven't changed, he said, saying "there are new problems being added to it".
"Sixteen months ago we organised the Senedd protest, that was about TB testing, NVZ zones and TB. They're all still here. Then the Westminster government came in and put the inheritance tax on us, and two weeks ago, Huw Irranca-Davies [the Welsh rural affairs minister] put bluetongue zone which is going to affect all breeding stock sales on the borders."
The Welsh Government say its introduction of restrictions will keep the disease at bay for as long as possible, but it cannot keep the disease out forever.
Article continues below
Liam said: "We ourselves go to Scotland to buy rams every year and we won't be able to do that this year, and that means creating a smaller gene pool of breeding because we can only buy within Wales."
There is no idea how long the restrictions will be in place, he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
With friends like Andy Burnham, who needs Jeremy Corbyn?
Former Labour MPs, now safely ensconced in powerful positions in local government and having little to do with benefits, can taste blood in the water. They are using their national profiles to make life as difficult as possible for their party leader and the Prime Minister. Last week we had London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, encouraging Labour MPs to rebel over the cuts. And now that other aspiring party leader, Manchester's Andy Burnham, has helpfully put the boot into the Government too, urging his former parliamentary colleagues to continue their rebellion. This is despite last week's humiliating U-turn by Keir Starmer, who agreed to water down the cuts in the face of the prospect of more than 100 Labour MPs voting against the Bill. Starmer must be wondering if the last Labour Government's (and the last Tory one's) eagerness to set up powerful mayors across the country was wise after all. Both Khan and Burnham are not accountable to the Labour whip at Westminster, and neither has any power to impact on the levels of benefits paid out by the Department of Work and Pensions, yet both are keen to burnish their soft-Left political credentials by jumping on the anti-cuts bandwagon and making life even less comfortable for Starmer than it already was. With friends like these, etc. Any kind of genuine benefit reform – reform aimed squarely at those who have given up trying to get a job and have decided they would prefer to rely on benefits long-term – requires a degree of consensus, not just across the political spectrum but within the Labour Party itself. Starmer's majority in the Commons is higher than the total number of Conservative MPs, so it is Labour who will decide how serious the current appetite for change actually is. The problem for the Government is, firstly, the Treasury. Any reforms worthy of the label will initially cost more money than they save – for example, moving wholesale to face-to-face interviews. The benefit to the Government would be obvious in terms of the number of claimants who would develop cold feet and choose not to press ahead with their application based solely on their reluctance to defend their claim face-to-face. Yet for the bean-counters at the Treasury, any increase in costs, even in the short term and even if such costs would pay for themselves within a year or three, this would be unacceptable. It is this kind of change that is missing from the Bill currently set to go before the House and which would reduce the benefits bill – in time – far more effectively than the piecemeal and miserly short-term cuts currently planned. There are others that could be enacted even without legislation, for example, the scrapping of monetary bonuses to staff who get through a high number of claims in as short a period as possible, which only encourages approval of claims without proper assessment. But even these changes would meet political opposition from within Labour, including from the King in the North and the Bus Driver's Son in City Hall. The key to progress lies with neither of these ambitious men, but with Rachel Reeves herself. Consider this quote from the Chancellor: 'We are not the party of people on benefits. We don't want to be seen, and we're not, the party to represent those who are out of work. Labour are a party of working people, formed for and by working people.' Granted, Reeves said this long before the burden of responsibility for the nation's finances was placed on her shoulders. In fact she said it ten years ago when she was the shadow work and pensions secretary under Ed Miliband. But as her leader continues to struggle with what he actually believes about welfare reform and grapples with his more recalcitrant parliamentary colleagues, perhaps some of Reeves's erstwhile radicalism could help rescue her party from the quagmire it has constructed for itself. Aid is certainly not going to come from those who left parliament years ago to grandstand from afar.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
'Very concerned' Ofcom says BBC has 'questions to answer' after streaming anti-IDF chants at Glastonbury
The BBC has questions to answer over the live streaming of Bob Vylan's set in which a band member shouted "death to the IDF", according to a media watchdog. Ofcom it was "very concerned" about the stream, which showed rapper Bobby Vylan lead crowds at the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of: "Free, free Palestine" and: "Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)" on Saturday. An Ofcom spokesperson said on Monday: "We are very concerned about the live stream of this performance, and the BBC clearly has questions to answer. "We have been speaking to the BBC over the weekend and we are obtaining further information as a matter of urgency, including what procedures were in place to ensure compliance with its own editorial guidelines." Video showed some of the crowd joining in with the chant, while the group performed in front of a screen that claimed Israel's actions in Gaza amount to "genocide". The latest development follows severe condemnation from the prime minister on Sunday. Sir Keir Starmer said there was "no excuse" for "this kind of appalling hate speech". He also referenced a previous statement that Belfast rap group Kneecap should have been removed from the line-up after one member was charged with a terrorism offence. "I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence," he said. "The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast." Festival organiser Emily Eavis said Bob Vylan had "very much crossed a line". She added: "Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence." The Israeli embassy said it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric", adding that the slogan chanted "advocates for the dismantling of the State of Israel". Please refresh the page for the latest version.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Relief for Reeves as 0.7% growth is confirmed for first quarter of 2025… but economists warn slowdown is already hitting amid tax hike fears
was handed some relief today as the economy was confirmed as growing 0.7 per cent in the first quarter. Official figures showed the powerhouse services sector expanding by 0.7 per cent between January and March. Production was also up 1.3 per cent over the three months, although construction recorded a mediocre 0.3 per cent improvement. Overall the expansion was the best in a year. However, economists have been warning that a slowdown is already happening after the impact of Labour 's huge tax raid on businesses and Donald Trump 's trade war. GDP fell by 0.3 per cent in April. Fears are mounting that the Chancellor will have to hike taxes again to fill a burgeoning black hole in the government's spending plans. The situation has been worsened by Keir Starmer 's humiliating U-turns on winter fuel and health and disability benefits. Those two changes alone could leave the Treasury having to find another £4billion a year by the end of the Parliament, while pressure it ramping up for more spending on defence. While quarterly growth was unrevised, the performance in March was slightly better than the 0.2 per cent initially detected, at 0.4 per cent. January saw zero growth and February saw expansion of 0.5 per cent, both unrevised. Liz McKeown, ONS director of economic statistics, said: 'While overall quarterly growth was unrevised, our updated set of figures show the economy still grew strongly in February, with growth now coming in a little higher in March too. 'There was broad-based growth across services while manufacturing also had a strong quarter. 'The saving ratio fell for the first time in two years this quarter, as rising costs for items such as fuel, rent and restaurant meals contributed to higher spending, although it remains relatively strong.'
