‘Unacceptable' Pa. bill could protect LGBTQ members during adoption process
PENNSYLVANIA (WTAJ) — Multiple senators have announced plans to introduce a bill that would protect LGBTQ+ people from discrimination during the adoption process.
The bill, authored by Sen. Carolyn Comitta, Judith Schwank, Patty Kim and Maria Collett, would prohibit a service provider from denying any person the opportunity to become an adoptive or foster parent or delaying or denying the placement of a child based on the real or perceived disability, race, creed, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry or any communicable disease, including HIV.
There are 13,000 – 15,000 children in the foster care system in Pennsylvania, with 3,000 waiting to be adopted. However, historically LGBTQ individuals have been excluded as foster and adoption parents, which the bill calls 'unacceptable.'
Thirty-four states already have laws protecting LGBTQ parents from discrimination in the foster care system. Pennsylvania, on the other hand, is one of the only sixteen states that have no protections, the senators noted in the bill.
'For the sake of the children waiting to be adopted and our friends and neighbors in the LGBTQ community, nondiscrimination laws are needed to protect the rights of families and allow more children the chance to find a permanent home,' the senators wrote.
In 2002, Pennsylvania law began allowing both married and unmarried couples to adopt, regardless of whether the couple is same-sex or not. Nationally, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of gay marriage in Obergefell vs. Hodges (5-4) in 2015, however, the ruling was never codified.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
California beach ‘Resist!' protest pushes ‘kindness' while calling to ‘86 47' in anti-Trump message
Nearly 1,000 people gathered at Main Beach in Santa Cruz, California, on Saturday for a Pride Month protest aimed squarely at President Donald Trump. Participants formed a massive human banner that spelled out "Resist!" in rainbow colors as part of a demonstration organized by Indivisible Santa Cruz County. The 220-foot-wide display, with letters reaching 70 feet high, was designed by longtime left-wing activist Brad Newsham. Organizers described the event as a peaceful act of resistance and a show of solidarity with the LGBTQ+ Mayor Accused Of Lying After Blaming Christian Rally For Park Violence "It's very important, the more people [who] can show our neighbors, our politicians in the world, that nonviolent resistance is the way to express our dissatisfaction with the way our country's going," said event organizer Becca Moeller to Lookout Santa Cruz. But just above the colorful banner was a very different kind of message: "86 47," a phrase many interpreted as a call to "get rid of" the 47th President of the United States. In slang, "86" typically means to cancel, eliminate, or even destroy. Combined with "47," the number now associated with President Trump's second term, the phrase has raised alarms among critics who say it crossed a this month, former FBI Chief James Comey posted a similar message in the sand, but instead of kelp, they were shells. He has since removed the post after widespread criticism and action by law enforcement. Read On The Fox News App Seattle Mayor Blames Christian Rally For Inspiring Violent 'Anarchists' Who 'Infiltrated' Counter-protest "We don't need a king. We want to go back to the way we were. We want to make America kind again," said protester Beth Basilius to Lookout Santa Cruz. While the event promoted "kindness" and inclusivity, the imagery told a more conflicted story. "They claim they want to make America 'kind' again, but then they spell out '86 47' in the sand. That's not kindness — that's a coded call to eliminate someone they disagree with. It's hypocritical," said Mike LeLieur, chair of the Santa Cruz County Republican Party to Fox News Digital. LeLieur said local conservatives face growing hostility from the political left. "We've had vehicles vandalized, tires slashed, and windows broken. I was forced off the road and attacked just for having a Trump sticker. At our State of the Union watch party, we were swarmed by angry protesters. It's been nonstop hostility — and these are the same people who call themselves the 'Party of Peace.'" Just 8.5% of voters in the city of Santa Cruz are registered Republicans, according to the most recent data from the California Secretary of State. Supporters of the protest claimed that "86 47" was a symbolic rejection of Trump's agenda, not a literal threat. But critics say that argument falls flat in a political climate where coded language carries real-world consequences. "In California — and especially in Santa Cruz County — the left is creating a political environment of non-acceptance and persecution," said Daniel Enriquez, a representative of the California Republican Assembly. "It's consistent with the goals of socialist movements throughout history." Jenny Evans, co-leader of Indivisible Santa Cruz County, defended the event. "When a great number of people come out to do something like this, it just is one more thing to show that we're not all saying, 'Fine, fine. We'll go along with whatever you want,'" she said to Lookout Santa Cruz. The event was also part of Santa Cruz's 50th Pride celebration. Participants were instructed to dress in matching rainbow colors, coordinated with fabric laid out across the beach starting at 7 a.m. The protest was peaceful, but critics say calling for kindness while displaying "86 47" sent a message that was anything article source: California beach 'Resist!' protest pushes 'kindness' while calling to '86 47' in anti-Trump message
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oklahomans kick off Pride Month in the metro with packed parade on 39th Street
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — June is Pride Month and Oklahomans from near and far gathered across the metro to celebrate. Joy and freedom is what many at Sunday's Pride parade say it's all about. 'It's a family outside of blood. It's a family that's there for people who don't have a blood family,' said Dusty Engel. Sonja Martinez told News 4, 'It's about everybody and we all need each other, especially in today's time. We all need each other and this is our party.' Families, kids and pets packed 39th Street to kick off Pride Month, enjoying music, food and community. 'It's like kind of triumph through adversity and like, that's something to be proud of and being true to yourself and who you are and everything like that,' said David Gleeson. Gleeson is the oldest of ten siblings, teaching them about the history of Pride and why it's important. 'I've spent my life being open and, like, visible to my younger siblings. And so, I feel like that's important because, if kids see it early, then they won't become hateful as adults,' Gleeson said. In this year's legislative session, Governor Kevin Stitt signed a bill banning obscene performances adult performances in the public. Many people at Sunday's parade heard about the law. Dusty Engel said, 'People like to judge before seeing something. Come out to Pride, see what a drag queen really does with the community. They're the backbone and they're here to push our rights. They're here to just help us, they're here to educate kids. You know, they're not here to show obscenities. Gleeson added, 'If they would just come out here and have an open mind I would hope they change their minds.' Sonja Martinez said everyone in the community depends on one another. 'We all have basically the same dreams. We just want to let people love who we want to love and let us be ourselves,' Martinez said. Oklahoma City Mayor, David Holt, also kicked off the month with a post on social media reading, 'As the eyes of the world turn to our city this coming week, they will know that all people are welcome in Oklahoma City, a place of inclusion, freedom and love. Happy Pride, OKC!' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Trump pardon Diddy and end his trial?
Sean "Diddy" Combs is being tried in a New York courtroom for racketeering and sexual trafficking. Could that daily drama vanish instantly if President Donald Trump pardoned the embattled rapper? "Yes, it could," says Brian Kalt, law professor at Michigan State University College of Law, who focuses on legal issues and the presidency. According to Kalt, Trump — who appears to be in the middle of a pardoning spree — would be within his presidential rights to extend a preemptive pardon to fellow New Yorker Combs, who has been described by witnesses so far as violent and abusive. "These are federal charges (against Combs), so that's the main limit. The matter has be federal, it has to be criminal vs. civil, and related to something that's already been done," says Kalt. "But the person doesn't have to even be charged yet, or convicted. The Supreme Court has said preemptive pardons are OK." Trump weighed in on the possibility Friday, May 30, in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." 'Nobody's asked': President Trump doesn't rule out pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs Typically, one of the last gestures from an outgoing president is a pardon. In President Joe Biden's final days in office, he famously pardoned his son, Hunter, convicted of federal gun felonies and federal tax charges. At the end of Trump's first term, he granted clemency to political allies such as Roger Stone, found guilty of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and related offenses. But pardons can take place during a president's term, says Kalt. The right was established in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which among other things gives the president "power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Kalt says the power to pardon is derived from the British monarch's historic right and stems from a recognition that criminal law was often too harsh, and it was important to have a safety valve. "The president was the best person to be that safety valve because of his political accountability," he says. But that's where things get murky, he adds, noting that Republican lawmakers "don't appear willing to hold the president accountable" for granting pardons, meaning they aren't costing him in terms of political capital. In contrast, President Gerald Ford's controversial pardoning of disgraced President Richard Nixon was perceived so negatively "that it probably cost Ford re-election in 1976," Kalt says. In just over 100 days since taking office, Trump has issued pardons to a broad range of personalities. They include Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the reality show "Chrisley Knows Best," who were convicted in 2022 of swindling $36 million from Atlanta banks and being tax evaders, and rapper NBA YoungBoy, who in 2024 was sentenced to two years in prison for weapons possession. He also pardoned former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, convicted of wire fraud and extortion, and Jan. 6 participant and "Bob's Burgers" actor Jay Johnston. The reason many presidents issue pardons at the end of their terms is precisely to avoid political fallout, says Kalt. In that sense, Trump's brash approach suggests he has no concerns about such ramifications. "I don't agree with these pardons on their merits, but the fact that he did them when he is politically accountable as opposed to slinking out the door does add some legitimacy to them in that sense," he says. "With pardons, you don't need Congress, you wave your magic wand and it happens. You can see the appeal for a president, particularly one like Trump." One can also see the appeal for those such as Combs, whose ordeal could end instantly should Trump's pardon "wand" wave his way. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Trump pardon Diddy? Trial could end, experts say
