Trump proposes US takeover of Gaza
WASHINGTON, Feb 4 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Tuesday proposed a U.S. takeover of Gaza where Israel's military assault in the last 16 months has killed tens of thousands, after he earlier suggested that Palestinians in the enclave should be permanently displaced.
Trump's earlier comments that Palestinians should move to Egypt and Jordan were rejected publicly by Palestinian leaders and leaders of the Arab world while being condemned by human rights advocates as amounting to a proposal of ethnic cleansing.
Trump did not offer much detail on his proposal. Here are some remarks that he made and questions that he answered during a press conference on Tuesday at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
WHAT DID TRUMP SAY?
"The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it too. We'll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site, level the site, and get rid of the destroyed buildings, level it out, create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area," Trump said in his opening remarks at the press conference.
WHO DID HE SAY WILL TAKE PALESTINIANS FROM GAZA?
Trump said Washington will ask other neighboring countries to take in Palestinians displaced from Gaza. Since Jan. 25, he has repeatedly asked Egypt and Jordan to do so. They and other Arab states have rejected his proposal.
"Instead, we should go to other countries of interest with humanitarian hearts, and there are many of them that want to do this and build various domains that will ultimately be occupied by the 1.8 million Palestinians living in Gaza, ending the death and destruction and frankly, bad luck. This could be paid for by neighboring countries of great wealth," Trump said on Tuesday.
Gaza's population before the war was 2.3 million.
WILL THE U.S. SEND TROOPS FOR TRUMP'S PLAN?
"We'll do what is necessary. If it's necessary, we'll do that. We're going to take over that piece. We're going to develop it, create thousands and thousands of jobs, and it'll be something that the entire Middle East can be very proud of," Trump said when was asked if Washington would send U.S. troops to Gaza under his proposal.
DOES TRUMP SUPPORT A TWO-STATE SOLUTION?
The United States has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. Trump was asked if under him Washington no longer supported that.
"It doesn't mean anything about a two state or one state or any other state, it means that .. we want to give people a chance at life ... because the Gaza Strip has been a hell hole for people living there," Trump said without directly answering the question.
WHO WILL LIVE IN GAZA UNDER TRUMP'S PLAN?
"I envision world people living there, the world's people," Trump said when asked who did he envision living in Gaza.
"Palestinians also, Palestinians will live there, many people will live there," he added without elaborating further.
CONTEXT
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on Oct. 7, 2023, when Palestinian Hamas militants attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Israel's military assault on Gaza has killed over 47,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry, and led to accusations of genocide and war crimes that Israel denies.
The assault has also internally displaced nearly Gaza's entire population and caused a hunger crisis. The fighting has currently paused amid a fragile ceasefire.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Officer who used excessive force allowed to plead guilty to misdemeanor after felony conviction
LOS ANGELES — A Los Angeles sheriff's deputy will serve four months in prison on a misdemeanor conviction for using excessive force after the new Trump-appointed U.S. attorney offered an unusual plea deal despite a jury convicting him of a felony. The victim's attorney asked a federal appeals court to reinstate the felony conviction, but the court declined to do so on Thursday. Deputy Trevor Kirk was recorded tackling and pepper-spraying an older woman while she filmed a man being handcuffed outside a supermarket in June 2023. A federal jury in February found Kirk guilty of one felony count of deprivation of rights under color of law, a crime that carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years. Felony convictions also prevent law enforcement officials from continuing to serve or owning a gun. But when U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli took office a few months later, federal prosecutors offered Kirk a plea deal — a dismissal of the felony if Kirk pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor, and a recommendation of one year of probation. A judge agreed to the lessened charge but sentenced Kirk to four months in prison on Monday. Essayli said in a video posted online that prosecutors also offered Kirk a misdemeanor plea agreement under the prior administration, which he turned down. "After reviewing this case extensively and thoroughly and carefully reviewing the facts and the law, I made the decision to re-extend the misdemeanor plea agreement to Deputy Kirk," Essayli said. In court filings signed off by Essayli, prosecutors wrote they believed that Kirk's actions fell on the lower end of the excessive force spectrum, the woman did not suffer "serious bodily injury," and that the case was prosecuted improperly. Some former prosecutors and police conviction experts called the step highly unusual, especially without any indication of prosecutorial misconduct, ethical violations or new evidence in the case. It follows President Donald Trump's vow to "protect and defend" law enforcement officers from prosecution and his efforts to assert greater control over the U.S. Justice Department. "It's very unusual to offer a plea deal after a conviction," said Jeffrey Bellin, a former federal prosecutor from Washington, D.C., who is now a law professor at William and Mary Law School. In cases where it could happen, there's usually new evidence of innocence, "not just the same evidence from a different perspective," he said. Kirk's attorney, Tom Yu, said they filed a motion for acquittal that was denied but planned to appeal the decision. The encounter Caree Harper, who represents the woman Kirk injured, said in court filings that the federal government changed its account of the incident to make Kirk's actions seem justified. In the original indictment, prosecutors wrote Kirk "violently" threw the woman to the ground. In the new plea agreement, the government alleged the woman "swatted" at Kirk and "resisted," Harper wrote, which she said was not proven in the criminal trial nor testified to in civil litigation. She said her client did not commit a crime, had no weapon, and did not try to flee or resist. She suffered from a black eye, a fractured bone in her right wrist, multiple bruises, scratches and significant chemical burning from the pepper-spray. Harper said the plea agreement sent a "dangerous message" that law enforcement officials could be convicted of a felony and still "cut a backroom deal after the trial." Philip Stinson, a former police officer and attorney who studies police misconduct, said the plea deal offered to Kirk was "seemingly without precedent" in federal court cases prosecuting police officers for their on-duty crimes, according to his search of an internal database of more than 24,000 arrest cases in the last 20 years involving sworn law enforcement officers. LA County Sheriff's Department spokesperson Nicole Nishida said Kirk will remain employed with the agency but relieved from duty while it conducts an internal investigation to determine if any policy or procedures were violated. A new approach by federal prosecutors Kirk's case is the latest showing the Trump administration's plan to take a lighter hand in the federal government's traditional role in prosecuting police misconduct. Trump's April executive order on policing promised the "unleashing" of law enforcement and support for their legal defense. The Justice Department announced in May it was canceling proposed consent decrees reached with Minneapolis and Louisville to implement policing reforms in the wake of the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. The department also announced it would retract its findings in six other sweeping investigations into police departments that the Biden administration had accused of civil rights violations. Trump-appointed federal judges have also played a hand in dismissing cases against police officers, including murder charges against a former Atlanta police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man hiding in a closet in 2019. Experts say the reliance on the federal government to perform this policing oversight comes from the close relationship between local prosecutors and police officers, who regularly work together to investigate crimes. "We are often looking at the federal government to serve as a check and balance for local law enforcement officials who are accused of really egregious activity toward the public," said Devin Hart, a spokesperson for the National Police Accountability Project. All four members of the original prosecutors withdrew from the case after the new plea deal was presented, and at least one resigned from the office, according to court filings. Two others took the buyout offered to federal employees, spokesperson Ciaran McEvoy confirmed.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tesla shares take $150bn plunge as Musk vs Trump erupts
Tesla shares fell sharply in US trading on Thursday after the sudden eruption of a public spat between boss Elon Musk and President Donald Trump sparked fears of reprisals for the electric car giant. Trump threatened to terminate 'Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts' on his social messaging service Truth Social after a disagreement over the President's budget bill saw the pair exchange accusations and insults. US subsidies and contracts at Federal and state level are worth billions to Tesla, which also currently benefits from a $7,500 tax credit available for electric vehicle purchases. Trump wrote: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Tesla shares fell more than 14 per cent by the end of US trading, wiping $150billion off the carmaker's market capitalisation. Analysts at Wedbush said: 'The quickly deteriorating friendship and now 'major beef' between Musk and Trump is jaw dropping and a shock to the market and putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead. 'This situation between Musk and Trump could start to settle down and the friendship continues but this must start to be calmed down on the Musk and Trump fronts and it's not good for either side. 'This feud does not change our bullish view of Tesla and the autonomous view but clearly does put a fly in the ointment of the Trump regulatory framework going forward.' Musk's relationship with the President has been a major driver of Tesla's fortunes, for better and for worse, over the last two years. Tesla shares rose more than 60 per cent between the start of November when Trump was elected to the end of 2024. But investor pressure over Musk's controversial role in the White House ultimately led to him to stepping down from his unofficial 'DOGE' department, which had sparked protests and vandalism directed at Tesla. The controversy also appears to have weighed on Tesla sales. Tesla shares were on a run more recently, however, after Musk confirmed the group would be testing an autonomous, driverless 'robotaxi' service in Austin, Texas, this month. Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Investing in Tesla isn't for the faint of heart, and Musk's enthusiasm for topics close to heart is both a blessing and, at times, a curse. 'Let's not forget, Tesla has its own battles, with disappointing sales numbers and brand damage weighing on sentiment in the near term. 'For now, markets are willing to look past the weakening auto business with AI and automation the real prizes. But with such a pivotal few months ahead for the autonomous strategy, investors will want to see Musk give his full attention back to Tesla.' Richard Hunter, head of markets at Interactive Investor, added: 'Perhaps more importantly, the latest feud has also heightened unease that the President's seemingly irascible and erratic behaviour is symptomatic of the environment which has been created on a global scale. 'Companies have already been stepping back from providing guidance comments for the next few months, while consumer sentiment is brittle given the wider context of what could be a weakening outlook.'
Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Jake Paul blasts Elon Musk and Donald Trump spat before Kanye West weighs in
As political tensions rise in the US, Jake Paul joins a growing list of public figures weighing in on the feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump Jake Paul has urged Elon Musk and President Donald Trump to end their very public feud and has called for more maturity from the two biggest high-profile figures in the US at the minute. The boxer and influencer, 28, weighed in after a heated exchange between the Tesla CEO and the President on Thursday, which saw Musk call for Trump's impeachment and Trump threaten to revoke federal contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. The disagreement stemmed from a Republican-backed spending bill, which Musk described as a 'disgusting abomination' that would deepen the U.S. deficit. Posting on X, Paul wrote: 'One of the problems with the Republican Party is on display today... (As a current Republican) We unfortunately have these Alpha male egos and leaders who aren't mature enough sometimes. "They're 50+ years old and diss tweeting each other... Elon and Trump are great but they need to work together and not make America look bad," he added. Kanye West also appeared to call for peace, writing: 'Broooos please noooooo. We love you both so much.' Comedian Jon Stewart offered a more critical perspective, mocking Trump's decision to give Musk access to sensitive government systems during his time in office. 'Good thing Trump didn't willfully hand over the entirety of our country's operating system to Elon and his… oops,' Stewart posted. The online row began after Musk claimed credit for Trump's re-election, writing: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election... Such ingratitude." Trump then responded by criticising Musk's opposition to the spending bill, saying: 'I'm very disappointed with Elon... He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut [the] EV mandate." Earlier this week, Trump urged to "deport Elon Musk immediately" amid the pair's blistering row. Trump has also been encouraged to scrap all of the tech billionaire's contracts and launch several investigations into the world 's richest man. Musk, 53, had this week denounced Mr Trump's signature domestic policy bill as an "abomination" and, since then, tensions between the pair have escalated. Musk quit his role as advisor, after previously admitting he "probably spent a bit too much time on politics". The comment came during an interview after another SpaceX rocket exploded on a test launch in Texas, US. The bitter clash has highlighted growing tensions within the Republican Party, with high-profile allies now openly divided over economic policy and leadership direction.
