Air India chaos at 35,000 feet as ‘up to 11 passengers & crew fall ill with food poisoning' on 9-hour flight from London
UP to 11 passengers and crew reportedly fell ill with food poisoning on a nine-hour Air India flight from London.
Passengers said they felt dizzy and nauseous on the hellish flight to Mumbai on Monday.
1
Air India confirmed the incident but said just five passengers and two crew members were ill.
But earlier eyewitness accounts suggested as many as 11 people, including six crew, were affected.
Air India said in a statement to Hindustan Times: "On board flight AI-130 from London Heathrow to Mumbai, five passengers and two crew reported feeling dizzy and nauseous during different phases of the flight.
"Our medical experts were prepared to offer prompt medical aid after the airplane safely touched down in Mumbai.
"Two passengers and two cabin staff members who were still feeling ill after landing were brought to the hospital room for additional testing before being released. We have informed the regulator and are looking into the incident."
The Boeing 777 landed safely in Mumbai, with medical teams on standby.
Two passengers and two crew members who still had symptoms after landing were rushed to the airport's medical facility for observation and tests and were later discharged.
The airline has informed aviation regulators and says a full investigation is underway.
Initial theories about a cabin pressurisation issue were dismissed, as oxygen masks did not deploy during the flight.
An expert familiar with the situation noted that food poisoning is now considered a more plausible cause.
Common symptoms like vertigo and queasiness can also result from low oxygen levels, but this scenario seems unlikely in this case.
While they consume the same meals as passengers, standard aviation safety practices often include serving the commander and first officer food prepared in separate kitchens to reduce risk in such situations.
The incident comes amid heightened scrutiny of in-flight safety protocols, particularly following a recent tragedy in Ahmedabad involving a Boeing 787—though a different aircraft model was involved in this case.
More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online
Thesun.co.uk is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/thesun and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
BBC newsreader changes ‘pregnant people' to ‘women' on live broadcast
A BBC News presenter has gone viral after replacing the term 'pregnant people' to 'women' while reading the autocue during a live broadcast. Martine Croxall was reporting on research from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine that warned of nearly 600 expected heat-related deaths on Saturday (21 June). Reading from the autocue, the presenter said: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people - women - and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions." Ms Croxall address the broadcast on X on Sunday and said: "A huge thank you to everyone who has chosen to follow me today for whatever reason. It's been quite a ride.'
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour's benefit cuts may discriminate against disabled women, say charities
Downing Street's disability cuts will have a 'devastating' impact on women's health and dignity and could breach equality law, the government has been warned. Charities and disabled people's organisations including Scope, Spinal Injuries Association, Inclusion London, ME Association and WinVisible told the Guardian that tightening eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) would mean disabled women being discriminated against, due to their higher personal care needs compared with men. Under the new rules, to be voted on by MPs next week, a claimant must receive four points in a single daily living category to qualify for the payment. Washing below the waist will score just two – half the number given to needing assistance between the shoulders and waist. It means the new four-point rule won't take into account menstruation or some women's extra toilet requirements, such as incontinence from pregnancy, unless they have additional needs. More than 100 Labour MPs have signed a Commons bid to halt the cuts in their tracks, enough to threaten Keir Starmer's majority. Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on an amendment declining to give the welfare reform bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on 1 July. The rebellion, the prime minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. 'The proposed changes to the Pip assessment criteria ignore fundamental aspects of women's health and dignity,' said Dharshana Sridhar, campaigns manager at the Spinal Injuries Association. The decision to award fewer points for assistance with personal care below the waist overlooked the realities of menstruation, incontinence and intimate hygiene; needs that were especially complex and often more acute for women with spinal cord injuries, Sridhar said. 'By failing to recognise the distinct and disproportionate impact of these changes on disabled women, the proposals risk breaching the Equality Act 2010, both in terms of sex and disability discrimination, and the Public Sector Equality Duty. A benefits system that systematically disregards menstruation, personal care, and continence management for disabled women cannot credibly claim to meet its legal obligations to promote equality and eliminate discrimination.' Hat Porter, a spokesperson for the menstrual justice charity Irise, said: 'Already PIP applicants with conditions like endometriosis and fibroids face a much lower than average application success rate, with claimants' debilitating symptoms being dismissed as 'just a period'. 'Tightening the eligibility criteria would make it even harder to access financial support. For those who use Pip to cover the costs of carers or social care fees, having this lifeline stripped away could leave them without the support they need to manage tasks like changing period products. That would have a devastating impact on their dignity as well as health.' There are wider concerns that women will be more likely to miss out on Pip under the new rules, after the government's own impact assessment showed more women than men currently score fewer than four points on descriptors while getting a daily living award. The ME Association said that Pip's existing 'majority of the time' rule – which says a claimant must be unable to do an activity over half the time to qualify – would compound the discrimination against women. 'Menstrual symptoms, by definition, occur intermittently and may not affect a woman for over 50% of the time – meaning they are often excluded from consideration, regardless of how severely disabling they are when present,' said Ella Smith, the charity's welfare rights consultant. 'In practice, this could lead to many women losing eligibility under the proposed 4-point rule, not because their support needs are minor, but because those needs are dispersed across multiple activities or occur cyclically. With Pip being positioned to replace the work capability assessment as the sole gateway to assessing work capability, it is imperative that the new system takes account of intermittent yet profoundly disabling experiences such as menstruation.' Jessica Leigh, campaigns manager at Scope, said the charity had heard from 'hundreds' of disabled people who rely on benefits to afford sanitary products, incontinence pads, and needing to do more laundry. 'Disabled people are extremely concerned their personal hygiene and health will be among the many devastating costs of these cuts,' she said. The Pip changes come amid strained NHS community and social care, which several DPOs told the Guardian had already led to 'basic' hygiene being treated as a 'luxury' for some disabled women. Tumu Johnson, a spokesperson for Sisters of Frida, a disabled women's group, says: 'Disabled women have been told [by local councils] to wear incontinence pads instead of being provided support to use the toilet. They have also been told to use the hormonal pill to stop their periods instead of support to manage their menstruation the way they choose. We've heard from many disabled women who are scared that the Pip changes mean they could now lose vital personal care, on top of their other needs.' A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: 'The vast majority of people who are currently getting Pip will continue to receive it. We're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick and disabled people while always protecting those who need it most. 'At the heart of this is our review of the Pip assessment to ensure it is fit for the future. We will work with disabled people and a range of experts on this as we deliver our plan for change.'
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Samantha Womack: ‘Following my instincts saved my life'
Although she felt fit and healthy, actress Samantha Womack had a gut feeling that something was wrong with her. So she had a private ultrasound scan of her breasts which found a 4cm cancerous tumour. Advertisement Three years after the shock discovery, Womack is clear of cancer after having the tumour removed, plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sam Womack (@samzjanus) But she's urging other women to follow their instincts if they're concerned about their health in any way, and stresses: 'If anything feels wrong, you just have to get as much information as you can and get it checked out, because it literally saved my life 'I wasn't quite 50, and I didn't have a lump – I didn't have any symptoms. I was generally healthy, and for some reason I just had an instinct that maybe something wasn't right. So in the middle of two shows, I went to get an ultrasound, and saw a black shadow there. Immediately, when I saw it was an irregular shape, I thought 'I know what that is'.' Womack, who played Ronnie Mitchell in EastEnders until 2017, was diagnosed with an aggressive grade three invasive ductal carcinoma in her right breast. The cancer had already started to travel to her lymph nodes, and she had five nodes removed. 'The journey then became very much about listening to my instincts and responding to what my body needed, and getting as much information as I could about the cancer,' she explains, 'because what if I hadn't listened to my intuition, my other voice? My diagnosis and treatment would have been very different.' Advertisement (Alamy/PA) Now Womack, 52, who divides her time between the UK and her home in the mountains near Valencia in Spain, is championing a campaign to get women who are undergoing breast cancer tests to ask whether their breast tissue is dense or not. The Keep Abreast of your Breast Density campaign by private cancer care provider GenesisCare explains that although mammograms are an excellent breast cancer screening tool, it's harder to spot tumours in mammograms of dense breast tissue, which is a measurement of how much fibroglandular tissue there is in a woman's breast versus fatty tissue. GenesisCare says dense breast tissue is found in around half of women aged over 40, and women with extremely dense breasts are six times more likely to get breast cancer than those with fatty breasts. However, women in the UK are not currently informed about their breast density following a mammogram, and no further additional imaging is offered for women with dense breasts. Womack says she still doesn't know if she has dense breasts herself, pointing out: 'During the whole process, I hadn't understood about dense breasts – no-one had mentioned the term to me. But then when I understood, I learned that the denser your breasts, an all-clear with a mammogram doesn't necessarily mean you're clear. If you've got fatty breasts, tumours are easy to see, but as they become more fibrous, it's more difficult.' Advertisement Womack is urging women to ask doctors whether they have dense breasts or not, and if they have, then decide whether they want any further tests after a mammogram. 'We still have this mentality of doctors know best and you shouldn't really push the health service because they're doing all they can,' she says. 'A lot of the time that's right. But if you feel like there's anything wrong, and you're not quite 50, or you're over 50 and you've had a mammogram and you've been given the all-clear, but something still doesn't feel right, the information about whether you have dense breasts can massively change your treatment. 'I just realised how ill-informed we are, and how nervous sometimes we are to ask questions. It's about taking control of your own body. If anything feels wrong, if you've got a lump that's persistent and won't go away, if you've had a mammogram and it doesn't feel right, or something is telling you that you should go back, you should listen to that. 'And you absolutely should ask what density your breasts are, because it really makes a difference in terms of finding tumours.' Advertisement Womack now has check-ups every six months, and says she's trying to lead a healthier lifestyle, enjoying walking her six rescue dogs in the mountains around Valencia, where she lives part-time with her partner, actor Oliver Farnworth who plays John Sugden in Emmerdale. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sam Womack (@samzjanus) 'I've just chosen to be around nature – it's a calmer lifestyle. It's quieter,' she says happily. 'That's not just because of the cancer – I just enjoy it. I walk the dogs every day, and I try to make good choices about my body. I'm just listening to my body a lot more, I think, rather than being panicked about what I eat and how much I sleep. You can be neurotic about those kind of things. I'm sensible. 'But the main thing is if anything's wrong, I follow my instinct and I get it checked out. And I really encourage all women to do the same and not be afraid to ask questions.' But what do independent experts have to say about dense breasts and cancer screening? Advertisement View this post on Instagram A post shared by Breast Cancer Now (@breastcancernow) Sally Kum, associate director of nursing and health information at the Breast Cancer Now charity, confirms: 'Having dense breasts both increases the risk of breast cancer and makes it harder to identify potential cancers on a routine mammogram.'
