Legislation would make it easier to restrain and forcibly move Maine students
Principal Victoria Duguay of River View Community School said that under the current law, educators aren't allowed to escort students to safe spaces unless they consent — something that doesn't always happen in the midst of a behavioral crisis. (Photo by Troy Bennett/ Maine Morning Star)
Driven by increasing reports of student misbehavior, some teachers and administrators want to make it easier for staff to physically restrain students, a practice which is only supposed to be used in emergency situations under current state law.
Most states have some limitations on when schools can use restraints and seclusion, temporarily immobilizing students and putting them in empty rooms until they can calm down.
Before Maine passed its current law in 2021, the state was restraining students at the highest rate in the country per capita, and secluding them at the second highest rate per capita, according to federal data cited by Disability Rights Maine at the time.
These incidents disproportionately involved students with disabilities, leading disability rights advocates to push for the current law, which requires school staff to justify the use of restraint, only rely on them in cases where there was 'imminent danger of serious physical injury,' use the least amount of force necessary and end interventions as soon as the danger has passed.
But in light of increasing behavioral challenges, some administrators and teachers want the lower the legal threshold for restraint and seclusion. On Wednesday, the Maine Legislature's Education and Cultural Affairs Committee is holding a public hearing on legislation, introduced by Rep. Holly Sargent (D-York), that would make several changes to state law.
Specifically, the proposal would broaden the definition of 'physical escort,' striking the word 'voluntary' from descriptions of how staff can move or touch a student. The bill, LD 1248, would also decrease the level of danger posed from 'serious physical injury' to just 'injury.'
Restraint and seclusion practices across the country have been linked to trauma, serious injuries, and even death. Disability rights advocates are warning that any changes must prioritize student safety and mental health, and that the use of restraint and seclusion generally goes against both.
Before the law was passed, schools would sometimes drag students to seclusion rooms without classifying the action as a restraint, said Ben Jones, a former lawyer for Disability Rights Maine who now serves as director of legal and policy initiatives for Lives in the Balance, a nonprofit that advocates against punitive, exclusionary disciplinary practices in schools.
Research suggests state not doing enough to help Maine districts manage student behavior
The push for relaxing the rules is coming from districts like MSAD 11 in Gardiner, where administrators say frequent behavioral incidents, especially among younger students, have left them without the tools to respond.
Principal Victoria Duguay of River View Community School said that under the current law, educators aren't allowed to escort students to safe spaces unless they consent — something that doesn't always happen in the midst of a behavioral crisis.
'When a student is dysregulated to the point where they're clearing a classroom and potentially shutting a building down, we didn't have any tools available to escort a student to a safe room if the student didn't want to go on their own,' Duguay said.
She also pointed to the aspect of current law that requires a threat of 'serious physical injury.'
'Not having that ability to be able to get that child to a safe place is that piece in the law that we're struggling with, because they're not presenting that serious physical harm,' she said.
Attorneys consulted by the district said that because most of the third to fifth graders the community school serves are young, they do not present a serious risk of injury to adults even when they lash out.
Because of educator feedback, Maine's largest teachers union, the Maine Education Association, is supporting this legislation, along with a few other bills intended to offer de-escalation training and mental health support in schools, said MEA President Jesse Hargrove.
'We want to make sure that we are following least restrictive interventions, but we also want to make sure that other students and staff are safe,' he said.
'The state law is an effort to sort of create some space so that the folks at the local level have a bit more flexibility to address the concerns that they are seeing within their districts and school sites.'
When asked if they are worried about the use of restraints increasing under a more relaxed law, MEA and Gardiner administrators, Duguay and Superintendent Patricia Hopkins, said they trusted educators to use the least restrictive processes possible.
However, Atlee Reilly, managing attorney of Disability Rights Maine's educational advocacy, said he's concerned about the potential impacts of the bill. For example, because the proposal would remove the word 'voluntary' from the text that covers how a student could be physically moved, the law would no longer count involuntary movements as a restraint.
Reilly argued that while the number of reported incidents would likely decrease, that 'doesn't mean that people are going to be putting their hands on kids less.' He added, 'I think that is almost certainly going to go up.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
With less than two weeks left, lawmakers still debating budget plan
The offices of the Joint Standing Committee on Appropriations and Financial Affairs in the State House in Augusta. (Photo by Jim Neuger/ Maine Morning Star) 'We will make it work. We're going to be done by the 18th, so just buckle up for the ride.' That's what Sen. Peggy Rotundo (D-Lewiston), co-chair of the Maine Legislature's Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, told Rep. Ken Fredette (R-Newport) when he asked late Thursday afternoon if there was a deadline the committee is working toward to finalize a budget proposal. Legislative leaders have said the intention is to complete all work by June 18, what had been the statutory adjournment date for the first regular session. Though, the Legislature is now in a special session, without a formal deadline. In March, the Democratic majority pushed through a roughly $11.3 billion, two-year budget plan without Republican support and formally adjourned in order to start the clock for those funds to become available in 90 days. Senate Republicans refused to back an alternative short-term plan that would have immediately filled the current deficit for MaineCare, the state's Medicaid program, because it did not include structural reform to the program. The budget that did pass continued funding for state services at the same level while also providing one-time funding for MaineCare and other urgent needs. The two-year budget was 'not the last word.' Here's what comes next. But with those appropriations not available until June 20, health care providers have warned of depleted funds hampering services. The budget did not include any of the policy changes Gov. Janet Mills proposed, such as tax increases and program cuts, to address the deficit and flattening revenues. These proposals and others from lawmakers are now being weighed by the appropriations committee as it crafts the next iteration of the budget. During the committee's last meeting on Thursday, it made a handful of decisions. The majority of its members rejected a tax on Maine pharmacies the governor had proposed, while voting in favor of additional funding and rate reform for nursing homes. The pharmacy tax would have imposed a 70-cent tax on every outpatient prescription filled by Maine pharmacies, the revenue from which the Mills administration said it would use to leverage additional federal dollars and eventually increase MaineCare reimbursements. 'I haven't voted for any items,' said Republican budget lead Jack Ducharme of Madison on Thursday. 'Yet, this will be my first, because I believe that we already collect too much taxes.' With a 10-2 vote, other Republicans backed removing the tax too, though the hold outs noted that their opposition was because of a lack of clarity about the overall budget plan. 'I applaud the work of the majority in terms of removing this,' Fredette said. 'However, I will be consistent in reviewing the overall global budget in determining whether or not I will support it.' That sentiment was also shared ahead of the committee voting 9-3 in favor of $20 million in additional funding for nursing homes over the biennium. This includes a $6.5 million investment for rate reform to support the direct care workforce and incentivize permanent staff, which would in turn unlock $12.2 million in funding from the federal government. 'Nursing home rate reform is very important to us, however at this particular time we have not had a discussion about where additional general funds come from that we're going to need,' Ducharme said. 'In order for me to support this, even though I would historically support something like this, I want to know where the money's coming from.' Other Republicans had a different take. While Rep. Amy Bradstreet Arata of New Gloucester would also like to know where the funds are coming from, 'I feel right about supporting this,' she said. 'I might not support the entire package, but I feel better knowing that this is in there, ultimately.' In a statement shared after the votes, Rotundo said supporting access to health care is a priority this session. 'It's important to note that a budget isn't built all at once,' Rotundo added. 'It comes together line by line, through careful consideration of the proposals and thoughtful votes like the ones we took today in committee.' Those line-by-line votes will be continuing this week, including on the governor's other proposed taxes on cigarettes, cannabis, streaming services, pensions and ambulances. The committee will also consider Mills' proposals to cut certain child and health care programs. Governor, Democrats split on regressive or progressive tax changes to close budget gap The proposed cuts include reversing the state's recent investments in child care by reducing worker stipends by $30 million to bring them back to 2022 levels, a roughly $8 million cut to low-income food assistance for asylum seekers who have received work permits but are looking for employment, and cutting funding for two crisis receiving centers established by the Legislature in the wake of the Lewiston mass shooting. Mills also proposed adding stricter limits to General Assistance, some of which were considered in the change package that failed but not ultimately included in the initial two-year budget passed in March. Advocates and lawmakers rallied in Augusta last week to urge the Legislature to reject Mills' proposed cuts and instead continue to fund these programs by taxing the wealthy. Such proposals are in LD 1089, which would raise taxes on incomes over $1 million to fund public education, and LD 1879, which would raise the tax rate on corporations to support the agricultural economy. Another proposal, LD 229, would adjust the state's tax brackets. These bills have yet to receive floor votes. These decisions are also clouded by federal uncertainty, with Maine's Revenue Forecasting Committee already discussing the possibility of having to return this summer after a federal budget is passed to adjust revenue expectations. As the appropriations committee continues to shape the budget plan this week, lawmakers are also expected to cast hundreds of votes on other legislation. Among the bills already passed, more than 100 have been placed on the appropriations table to vie for funding. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Legislative recap for Thursday, June 5
The dome of the Maine State House in Augusta. Sept. 5, 2023. (Photo by Jim Neuger/ Maine Morning Star) With a citizen-led campaign to impose voter ID requirements heading to the ballots, lawmakers discussed the issue at length Thursday before rejecting a legislative proposal mirroring the ballot initiative. Several Republican members of the Maine House of Representatives said if returning clothes and buying cigarettes requires photo identification, so should voting. They alleged rampant voter fraud by noncitizens, which Maine's Secretary of State has said is not the case. Democrats pushed back, saying Maine already has a robust system to prevent fraud, and that requiring voter ID would disadvantage students, seniors and people with disabilities. With a 72-69 vote, the bill, LD 38, was rejected. 'There is a fundamental difference between having to show an ID to buy alcohol or tobacco products or returning an unwanted item to a store,' said Rep. Kelly Noonan Murphy (D-Scarborough).'None of those things are sacred rights granted to us in the Constitution. And therefore, imposing barriers on that right … is un-American.' With papers shuffling between chambers this week, Maine Morning Star has compiled a slightly more pared down roundup again for Thursday, focusing on the biggest items of debates as well as legislation and issues that we've followed all session. Here's an overview of what happened Thursday. Both chambers have now passed an amended version of LD 1726, which seeks to improve planning for the future of the energy grid. The House supported it with a 75-69 vote, and the Senate followed suit passing the bill 19-13 Thursday afternoon. After LD 1928 squeaked through the House with a 72-70 vote, the Senate passed it 17-15. This bill would ban single-use plastic containers — such as mini shampoo bottles — at lodging establishments starting in 2030. Although Rep. Michael Soboleski (R-Phillips) said the well-intentioned legislation overlooks sanitation concerns and poses challenges for businesses, others praised it for its potential to chip away at plastic use in the state. 'A conservative estimate is that this bill could eliminate as many as 73 million single-use plastic bottles per year from Maine's waste stream as we struggle to recycle our way out of the catastrophe of microplastics, that is meaningful action,' said Rep. Vicki Doudera (D-Camden). Although the proposed net energy billing reform that could save ratepayers more than $65 million has yet to hit the floors, the Senate and House passed an amended version of LD 839, which would create a fund to offset transmission and distribution costs associated with the policy that would otherwise be passed onto ratepayers. Additionally, lawmakers backed a bill requiring internet providers to treat all broadband internet traffic equally, a concept commonly referred to as 'net neutrality.' LD 536 passed the House 79-66, while the Senate gave its approval Thursday. With a 74-67 House vote, both chambers supported LD 246, which asks courts to consider a sentence other than imprisonment for primary caregivers. Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn) said the bill is needed because 'the research is clear, children with incarcerated parents are more likely to face mental health challenges, exhibit behavioral problems, experience social isolation and suffer from economic hardship. These children are also more likely to perform poorly in school and have higher absentee rates.' With a 73-69 vote, the House also passed LD 1859, a bill that would offer regional hubs for childcare, which can serve as access points in communities, tailored to the needs of those families. The Senate approved it Wednesday. Both chambers have now rejected LD 1476, which sought to impose a new lodging fee to help fund homeless shelters in the state. A heavily amended version of LD 1787 passed in the Senate after the House gave approval Wednesday. The bill initially sought to allow candidates for district attorney, sheriff and county commissioner to participate in the Maine Clean Election Act, but the version now being considered was amended to increase the contribution limits for gubernatorial seed money donations. (Read more about other proposals related to changing Maine's clean elections here.) Legislation (LD 1900) to grant authority to certain Wabanaki Nations to develop tribal power districts and recognize the authority for child support enforcement passed the House 75-67 on Wednesday and Senate 20-12. There was also bipartisan support for LD 1886, which would extend the current penalties applied when a motor vehicle violation results in death to violations that result in serious bodily harm. Lawmakers killed a proposal (LD 1461) to prohibit school boards from adopting a mask mandate unless directed by a health agency. So far, the Legislature has only supported modest refinements to the state's paid family and medical leave. That approach continued Thursday, when two more bills looking to amend the program were rejected. LD 1169, which would allow employers to get a refund for any premiums paid into the state's plan if they are approved to use a private substitute plan, was voted down 73-68 by the House and 18-14 by the Senate. Both chambers also rejected LD 1400, which looked to exempt certain public school employees from the program. And the Senate cast a final enactment vote for LD 588, which would give agricultural employees the right to engage in certain concerted activity, which includes talking about wages, working conditions and other employment matters with other employees or the employer. (Read more about that here.) After the Senate narrowly voted it down, the House passed LD 1535, which would require the Public Utilities Commission to gather a group of municipal, police and fire officials to discuss the high electricity usage related to illegal cannabis grows in the state. During discussions Wednesday, Sen. Craig Hickman (D-Kennebec) said the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee is carrying over legislation into the next session that could provide a more comprehensive approach, including this sort of study. The Senate insisted on its original vote Thursday night. Leaving it in limbo, the House did not again take up LD 810, the bill seeking to modify the law born out of a 2021 referendum question requiring the Maine Legislature to approve any new high-impact transmission lines. It fell shy of passage in the House with lawmakers voting 72-75 before ultimately killing the bill under the hammer. However, the Senate passed the bill 18-16 Wednesday. During an evening session, the Senate rejected LD 1036, which would prohibit landlords from refusing to rent to tenants solely because they rely on programs such as General Assistance or housing vouchers. Since the House passed the proposal 72-70 on Wednesday, the lower chamber will need to take it up again. Sen. Chip Curry (D-Waldo) said this is an important issue, but asked the Senate to reject the measure simply because the Judiciary Committee is carrying a similar bill into the next session to allow more time to work on it. Although the House rejected LD 1236 earlier in the day on Thursday, the Senate voted 22-10 in favor of its passage after a failed 16-16 vote to reject the bill and impassioned floor speeches about the importance of addressing the presence of fentanyl in the state. The amended version of the bill seeks to create a Class A crime for aggravated trafficking of fentanyl when it results in an overdose. While no one refuted that fentanyl poses a crisis, Curry said the state can't incarcerate its way out of it. Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart said he supports a multipronged approach to solving the substance use crisis including access to treatment and other supports, but argued that this bill could bolster that. The Senate advanced two bills that aim to support mobile home park residents in purchasing their parks. (Read more about that here.) Maine is one step closer to joining its New England peers who all have so-called food waste bans on the books now that the Senate has approved a slightly amended version of LD 1065. The bill would prohibit significant generators of food waste, which could include schools, hospitals, food producers and others, from disposing of food waste if they are close to a facility that could compost or otherwise dispose of the waste. The House passed a bill (LD 1078) expanding access to needle exchange programs in a 74-65 vote. The bill would allow certified programs to operate additional locations within the same county. (Read more about our syringe service program coverage here). SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Bill making it easier to restrain and seclude students passed by Maine lawmakers
Gardiner-area Superintendent Patricia Hopkins testifies at an education committee public hearing in favor of a bill that would ease restrictions on restraint and seclusion. (Photo by Eesha Pendharkar/ Maine Morning Star) Both chambers of the Maine Legislature advanced a version of a bill that would make it easier for school staff to restrain and seclude students, weakening a law passed in 2021 restricting the use of practices that experts say cause lasting trauma. Maine has historically led the country in its use of these practices, which include physically immobilizing students and placing them in small rooms, with educators predominantly using them on students with disabilities. Restraint and seclusion practices have been used more than 22,000 times in Maine in some years, and the real number is even higher, since many large districts do not submit their data to the state despite reporting being required by the 2021 law. This year, citing increased issues with student behavior, some teachers and administrators pushed to relax the restrictions. 'It broke him, and it broke me': Parents, educators describe trauma from restraint and seclusion Despite disability rights advocates sounding the alarm at the public hearing for the bill, lawmakers in both the Maine House of Representatives and the Senate voted to pass LD 1248. 'While most states are looking at bills this session that provide greater protections for students and more resources for educators, Maine is one of the few states that is looking to roll back protections for students,' said Ben Jones, director of legal and policy initiatives for Lives in the Balance, a Maine-based national nonprofit that offers training for schools on how to move away from restraint and seclusion.'It is a serious disappointment.' Under Maine law, restraint and seclusion are only supposed to be used in case of emergencies, where the student's behavior poses 'imminent risk of serious physical injury' to themselves or others. The original proposal changed that to risk of injury after some educators said they interpreted the law to mean they couldn't use these practices to prevent a potentially dangerous situation unless a teacher could be injured severely enough to seek outside medical care. 'Staff are being hit, they're being bit, but it doesn't meet the threshold of serious imminent danger, because a 5-year-old isn't going to [cause] an injury that requires medical care,' said Gardiner-area Superintendent Patricia Hopkins during the April 23 public hearing. The amended version of the bill defines 'serious physical injury' to mean 'any impairment of the physical condition of a person, whether self-inflicted or inflicted by someone else, that requires a medical practitioner, including, but not limited to, a school nurse, to evaluate or treat the person.' This definition was already included in Chapter 33, the Maine Department of Education rules governing restraint and seclusion. Another aspect of the bill allows educators to move students without their consent without having to document the incident as a restraint. Atlee Reilly of Disability Rights Maine told lawmakers at the work session for LD 1248 that if the bill passes, schools will no longer have to report these kinds of incidents where staff forcibly move students, which he explained will likely mean the number of documented restraints could decrease. 'What we're going to do is take a whole class of stuff — like the physical management of students that I think most people would look at and say, that child's being restrained — and say it's no longer restraint,' Reilly said. He added, 'It doesn't mean that people are going to be putting their hands on kids less.' Jones said these changes 'were conjured up by schools' lawyers who will surely use the new language as legal cover to protect schools, not kids.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE