
DOJ: Some Jan. 6 defendants should be repaid money they sent to Congress
Jan. 6 defendants whose convictions were wiped out by President Donald Trump are entitled to a refund of restitution payments they made to cover damage to the Capitol, the Justice Department said Tuesday.
The department's determination could result in hundreds of payouts from the federal government intended to cover the cost of repairing about $3 million in damage to the Capitol from the riot on Jan. 6, 2021.
The administration revealed its position in a filing to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is weighing one defendant's request to be repaid the $500 in restitution he sent to the Architect of the Capitol after his conviction on misdemeanor charges.
The defendant, Stacy Hager, argued in February that he should be reimbursed now that his conviction has been erased as part of President Donald Trump's sweeping grant of clemency to more than 1,500 people charged in the attack.
The Justice Department did not respond until Tuesday.
"The government agrees that Hager is entitled to the return of those funds," Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Dreher wrote.
Most defendants convicted for their roles in the Capitol attacks were required to pay restitution to the Architect of the Capitol, the congressional office responsible for the maintenance of the building. Those convicted of felonies typically paid $2,000 and those convicted only of misdemeanors typically paid $500.
The precise amount delivered to Congress by convicted Jan. 6 defendants is unclear, though CBS reported last year that it totaled about $437,000, roughly 15 percent of the $3 million in estimated damage.
A spokesperson for the Architect of the Capitol did not respond to a request for comment.
Spokespeople for U.S. Attorney Ed Martin, Trump's top prosecutor in Washington, D.C., also did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Prior to taking on his new role, Martin was a vocal advocate for Jan. 6 defendants, working with an organization that helped arrange and fund their legal representation. He had represented a handful of defendants himself before joining Trump in helping to unravel the investigation of the attack.
Martin has previously floated the notion of cash reimbursements for Jan. 6 defendants, calling them "reparations" for what has described as abusive prosecutions against Trump supporters.
'We should have reparations for them,' he said in a January 2024 podcast appearance. 'They should get a big pot of money.'
Thousands of Trump's supporters stormed and ransacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in an effort to block the transfer of power to Joe Biden. Rioters smashed windows, vandalized doors and furniture, stole equipment and artifacts, and damaged some of the building's historic chambers.
The Trump administration's position on reimbursement doesn't apply to all 1,600 Jan. 6 defendants. Rather, prosecutors say the reimbursements should go to those whose cases were actively being appealed at the time Trump issued his clemency.
As a result of Trump's decision, appeals courts halted all proceedings and 'vacated' the convictions, essentially erasing them from the books. Defendants who were pardoned but did not have active appeals, the Justice Department argues, are not entitled to reimbursement because their convictions remain on the books.
'Generally, a pardon 'does not make amends for the past,'' Assistant U.S. Dreher wrote, quoting 19th century case law. ''It does not give compensation for what has been done or suffered, nor does it impose upon the government any obligation to give it.''
DOJ did not identify its intended source of the funds for reimbursement. Dreher's filing notes that the Architect of the Capitol is a 'governmental entity,' which 'entitle[s] Hager to a refund of that restitution payment.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Breaking down Craigslist ad seeking seat fillers on day of Trump's DC parade
On June 11, 2025, a screenshot of an alleged Craigslist advertisement seeking "seat fillers" for an event in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2025 — the same day as a military parade on U.S. President Donald Trump's birthday — began to make the rounds on social media. The purported ad read, in part: T-Mellon Events is looking for seat fillers and extras to provide their time for space maximization and attendance perception for an event taking place in Washington DC on June 14th. Extras and Seat fillers will check in on the morning of June 14th at 9:00 a.m. Extras are required to wear Red, White and Blue clothing and will be provided a RED hat to wear. GOLD accessories are acceptable as well. The team will advise the extras where to stand or sit according to the line of sight from a VIP viewing platform area. Extras and Seat fillers will be paid a flat daily fee and will be provided a lunch of fast food and encourage people of color and ethnic groups to sign up for maximum perception control and these individuals will be prominently displayed on the televised broadcast and local viewing screens to be seen by the VIP platform. It also listed compensation as a "flat fee of $1,000 paid in cryptocurrency - Provided by FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT LLC." One X post (archived) that shared the alleged advertisement garnered more than 1 million views and 28,000 likes as of this writing: Posts about the Craigslist ad seeking seat fillers also gained traction on TikTok (archived) and Facebook (archived). Dozens of Snopes readers emailed us and searched our website to ask if the Craigslist ad was real. The ad itself was real and was posted on Craigslist (archived) on June 10, 2025. Snopes was unable to definitively confirm whether the ad was a prank or posted by someone from Trump's camp, which is why we've left this claim unrated. However, several elements of the ad suggest it may have been intended as a joke. First, the company mentioned in the advertisement was listed as T-Mellon Events. Searches for "T-Mellon Events" on Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Yahoo did not return any results directing us to the supposed company. Instead, they showed news articles and social media posts about the Craigslist ad. The alleged company name could be a reference to billionaire and Trump megadonor Timothy Mellon, heir to Pittsburgh's Mellon banking family. Snopes also looked into the photo in the ad and found it wasn't taken in the United States. Using RevEye, a reverse image search tool, we found the original image shared by The Associated Press on May 9, 2025, captioned, "Russian servicemen attend the Victory Day military parade in Moscow, Russia, Friday, May 9, 2025, during celebrations of the 80th anniversary of the Soviet Union's victory over Nazi Germany during the World War II." The ad also said participants would receive a flat fee of $1,000 paid in cryptocurrency, which could be poking fun at Trump's crypto-related ventures. Fight Fight Fight LLC, the company listed in the ad as providing payment to seat fillers, administers Trump's meme coin. A customer support representative for the meme coin's website, told Snopes via an emailed statement: "It's fake, we have nothing to do with it." Snopes reached out to the White House and Craigslist for comment on the ad's authenticity, and will update this story if we receive a response. We also emailed an address associated with the ad and await a response. Social media posts that call out supposed Craigslist ads soliciting paid actors frequently pop up before events connected to Trump. Snopes investigated a Craigslist ad that offered to pay "minority actors" to hold signs at a Trump rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in June 2020, and another soliciting actors to play Trump supporters in Phoenix in November 2019. For further reading, Snopes also looked into claims that a Craigslist ad proves the 2025 anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles were orchestrated. "Seat Fillers Needed - June 14th - Constitution Avenue - DC - Talent Gigs - Craigslist." Craigslist, 10 June 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Debusmann Jr, Bernd. "Who Is Donald Trump's Reclusive New Mega-Donor, Timothy Mellon?" 21 June 2024, Accessed 12 June 2025. "AP PHOTOS: Russia's Victory Day Parade Begins." AP News, 9 May 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Weissert, Will, and Alan Suderman. "Trump Hosts Dinner for $TRUMP Meme Coin Investors, Raising Ethical Concerns." AP News, 22 May 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Khalili, Joel. "Trumpworld Is Fighting over 'Official' Crypto Wallet." WIRED, 4 June 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Ibrahim, Nur. "Did a Craigslist Ad Seek 'Minority Actors' for Trump's Tulsa Rally?" Snopes, 15 June 2020, Accessed 12 June 2025. Huberman, Bond. "Did a CraigsList Ad Seek Actors to Play Trump Supporters in Phoenix?" Snopes, 22 Nov. 2019, Accessed 12 June 2025. June 12, 2025: This story was updated to include comment from Fight Fight Fight LLC.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount-CBS And Trump Legal Teams Say They Are In 'Continued Mediation' To Settle '60 Minutes' Lawsuit, Ask Judge To Extend Some Filing Deadlines
The CBS-Paramount Global legal team and representatives for Donald Trump said that they were in 'continued mediation' to settle the president's $20 billion lawsuit against the network over the way that a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris was edited. The update came in a new filing in federal court in Texas in Friday, as the sides asked the judge for an extension of deadlines in filing motions to compel and responses. More from Deadline Networks Return To Special Reports On Iran's Retaliatory Strikes On Israel - Update Taylor Tomlinson Says Goodbye To 'After Midnight', Wishes CBS Had Replaced Her 2025 Premiere Dates For New & Returning Series On Broadcast, Cable & Streaming Trump claimed that CBS was deceptive in the way that the Harris interview was edited, as she was shown giving a different answer to the same question on the 60 Minutes broadcast in October than one shown on a Face the Nation preview the day before. CBS has maintained that there was no deception and, in standard industry practice, one part of her answer was shown on Face the Nation and the other on 60 Minutes, due to time constraints. Trump sued the network under Texas' Deceptive Trade Practices Act and the Lanham Act, typically used in cases of false advertising. The president claims that the interview cost his media entities, including Truth Social, an audience that was diverted to 60 Minutes. A number of legal experts see the lawsuit as meritless, but CBS parent Paramount Global is seeking administration approval for its merger with Skydance Media. Paramount-CBS has offered millions to settle the case, in what has been described to Deadline as an 'eight-figure discussion.' The Wall Street Journal reported that Paramount offered $15 million, but Trump's team is seeking $25 million and apology. There also has been speculation that a settlement could go even higher. The settlement talks have created consternation within the news division. Last week, in an interview with CNN, 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley said that a settlement and apology would be 'very damaging' to the reputation of CBS and Paramount. The legal teams told the judge that they are not asking him to extend a June 23 deadline for CBS to file a response to Trump's opposition to their motion to dismiss the case. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'
President Donald Trump celebrated after an appeals court signed off on his deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops against protestors in Los Angeles. 'The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!' On Thursday, a federal judge had sided against Trump, ordering him to relinquish control of California's National Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom, a Democrat who has sparred with Trump over the handling of protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in L.A., was quick to take a victory lap of his own—even as the federal government appealed the decision. 'This win is not just for California, but the nation,' Newsom wrote on X. 'It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day.' But just hours later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals intervened and paused the ruling in a one-page order, meaning that Trump can keep the troops in L.A. for the time being. The court set a hearing for Tuesday. It is still possible that Newsom could prevail over Trump once the court considers the case on its merits. The San Francisco judge who originally sided with the governor—Charles Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton—was vehement in rejecting Trump's justification for deploying the guard. 'His actions were illegal,' the judge wrote, 'both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' Trump has also moved 700 Marines to L.A., but the judge's order didn't address these troops because they have not yet been actively involved in the protests. Typically, a state's governor must sign off before the National Guard is mobilized. However, Trump invoked a law that allows the president to do so in cases where there is a rebellion. Over the last week, as protests have raged in L.A.—at times becoming violent—Newsom and Trump have traded barbs. Newsom has likened Trump to 'failed dictators,' calling his deployment of troops a 'brazen abuse of power.' The president, meanwhile, has called Newsom 'grossly incompetent,' suggesting that he could be arrested for his handling of the protests.