
Washington called itself a sanctuary city. Then Trump came back to town
Immigration
Donald Trump
Immigration politicsFacebookTweetLink
Follow
The sky is still dark and the sidewalks are eerily empty when Soledad heads to work.
The sound of sparrows chirping on a rainy morning is punctuated by the occasional crackle of tires rolling on wet pavement. The city is still waking up. Soledad is, too, walking in the drizzle to a bus stop near her apartment.
In about 30 minutes, she'll punch in and begin her day working as a janitor in a government building where she keeps bathrooms and kitchens clean. A short bus ride from her neighborhood leaves just enough time to grab a quick cup of coffee before her shift begins.
At a downtown DC bakery, the cashier flashes a warm smile when she recognizes Soledad walking in. '¿Como está?' she asks. How are you?
Soledad pauses. So many worries are weighing on her. 'Pues, aquí,' Soledad says. Well, I'm here.
Because yes, she is here, in a city where she's lived for more than two decades. But she doesn't know how much longer she will be.
Soledad has what's known as Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, which provides legal work permits and blocks the government from deporting her and many other immigrants who otherwise would be undocumented. That protection's days could be numbered; already the Trump administration has said it plans to end TPS for hundreds of thousands of people. Before long, Soledad fears TPS for Salvadorans like her could be next. She agreed to share her perspective with CNN, but asked to be identified only by her first name, and for her face not to be shown, because she fears speaking out could affect her case.
Reminders of the looming threats are everywhere. As she walks from the bus stop to her janitor job, Soledad often passes the White House, where President Trump and administration officials have made no secret of their mass deportation plans.
And at a recent meeting of local activists, the 49-year-old Salvadoran immigrant says she posed a question she'd never expected to ask: 'Is Washington a sanctuary city, or isn't it?'
'It makes you feel like you've been left alone, like you've been abandoned.'
—Soledad, a Salvadoran immigrant who's lived in DC for more than 20 years
During the previous Trump administration, DC's leaders were vocal about protecting immigrant residents. Lately, Soledad says, their silence has spoken volumes.
'It makes you feel like you've been left alone, like you've been abandoned,' Soledad says.
There's not one official definition for 'sanctuary city,' and different governments have different meanings for the term. Some see the label as more of a symbolic gesture than a move that actually impacts people's lives. But immigrant rights advocates have long argued that local officials play a critically important role. A city policy can be the difference between someone simply getting a traffic ticket or ending up in deportation proceedings.
'Right now the immigrant community has two ways to defend ourselves. One is the courts, and the other one is local officials,' says Jaime Contreras, executive vice president of the Service Employee International Union's 32BJ Capital Area District. 'And if local officials are running away from our community, that…has a devastating effect.'
Nearly one in four residents of Washington and its surrounding metro area are immigrants, according to Census data. And in the past, Mayor Muriel Bowser frequently called Washington a 'proud sanctuary city.'
'In November, I reaffirmed Washington, DC's status as a sanctuary city, and now we are doubling down,' Bowser said in January 2017, just days before Trump's first term began.
Her comments were part of an announcement of $500,000 in grant funding for legal work helping immigrants in the district. And for years, a press release with the quote was archived on the city's website. Now that page is gone, along with several others that used the 'sanctuary city' term.
Asked about the pages' apparent removal in recent months, first reported by Axios, a spokesman for the mayor referred to her remarks in a February press conference but declined to comment further. At that event, when asked by a reporter why she'd stopped using the term 'sanctuary city,' Bowser called the phrase 'misleading.'
'I think it's misleading to suggest to anyone that if you're violating immigration laws, this is a place where you can violate immigration laws,' she said. 'You are vulnerable to federal immigration enforcement.'
Asked what message she'd send to undocumented immigrants in the city, Bowser instead offered what sounded more like a response to conservative critics.
'We don't have a migrant crisis in our city, so I don't want anybody to think that we have been overrun and we have a migrant crisis, because we don't,' she said.
Bowser's shifting response on immigration matters is one of a number of ways the mayor, a leading figure in the Democratic resistance during Trump's first term, is now striking a less defiant tone.
The changing approach comes as Trump repeats attacks on DC and its leadership, threatening to 'take over' the city.
The mayor has a good reason to tread carefully, according to Abel Nuñez, executive director of the Central American Resource Center in Washington, an organization that serves the city's Latino community.
'There's no reason to poke the bear. … You have to choose what your battles are.'
—Abel Nuñez, executive director of the Central American Resource Center in Washington
DC's status as a federal district puts the city and its more than 700,000 residents in a uniquely precarious position, Nuñez says. In 1973, Congress passed a statute allowing DC residents to elect local leaders to run day-to-day affairs, but lawmakers have threatened to reverse that arrangement.
'That can be taken away at any moment. We get treated like children. That's just the reality of it,' Nuñez says. 'We're allowed to manage our own affairs until they don't see fit for us to do so.'
And no leader would risk her city's entire future for one group, he says.
'There's no reason to poke the bear. … You have to choose what your battles are. Dying on the hill of the 'sanctuary city' moniker, I don't think that's the right thing to do. I agree with the mayor,' Nuñez says. 'You need to tone it down, shut down the website, do the things you need to do so that you can quietly negotiate.'
But some advocates for immigrants are more critical.
Contreras, who represents thousands of cleaners, security officers and maintenance workers at the SEIU, says workers will remember their local leaders' actions the next time elections come around.
'Some of these elected officials…benefitted for years from having the support of a certain community, the immigrant community, in particular,' he says. 'And then, when it comes time to defend our community, they run away from the issue as opposed to leaning in and saying, 'Wait a minute, these are human beings, these are workers, these are not criminals.' They run away from us, and that is frustrating and insulting.'
And for immigrants in the community, the impact isn't just emotional, he says.
'It has a devastating effect on how they go about their day. They have to be looking over their shoulders all the time. They see a police officer, they get scared. They see a crime, they're not going to report it. For safety reasons, it's just not good,' he says.
Minutes after stepping to the podium earlier this month for his final press conference as DC's interim US attorney, Ed Martin said he had a warning for the city's citizens.
The district's status as a sanctuary city is 'crippling' local law enforcement efforts to make DC safer, Martin said.
'There needs to be a robust discussion now about DC's sanctuary status, and its justice system and its judges, and if that means that home rule is on the table, then so be it,' he said.
In the past, DC officials have used the sanctuary city term to describe things like the Metropolitan Police Department's policy of not asking people about their citizenship or residency status, or city funding for immigrant legal services. In 2020, the City Council passed a 'Sanctuary Values Amendment Act,' which limits the city's Department of Corrections from cooperating with federal immigration authorities 'absent a judicial warrant or order issued by a federal judge.'
Many of the largest cities in the country have sanctuary policies in place. Supporters of the measures argue they keep communities safe by fostering trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement. Critics — including President Trump — say they endanger public safety.
The second Trump administration has made cracking down on sanctuary cities a pillar of its enforcement strategy, with the president calling them 'death traps' that protect criminals. A federal judge recently ruled against the administration's efforts to block federal funding to sanctuary cities, finding that portions of Trump's executive orders were unconstitutional.
Meanwhile the Justice Department has threatened to prosecute state and local officials who resist the federal immigration crackdown.
Republican leaders in Congress also have criticized sanctuary cities, most notably in a March hearing before a House committee, where lawmakers grilled mayors of prominent sanctuary cities: Boston, Chicago, Denver and New York. DC's mayor wasn't asked to appear.
But officials have homed in on the capital's sanctuary policies in other ways.
Trump's 'Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful' executive order, issued in late March, created a federal task force whose mission includes 'monitoring the district's sanctuary-city status and compliance with the enforcement of federal immigration law.' The order also calls for the task force to direct 'maximum enforcement' of federal immigration law, and to redirect available law enforcement resources 'to apprehend and deport illegal aliens in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.'
And Republicans in the House and Senate have introduced legislation aiming to remove DC's sanctuary laws, arguing they have 'devastating, real-life consequences.'
'President Trump's efforts to enforce immigration laws should not be undermined by local leadership anywhere in the United States, let alone Washington, DC.'
—Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tennessee
As he introduced the Senate's version of the bill last month, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tennessee, called DC's policies 'unconscionable.'
'President Trump's efforts to enforce immigration laws should not be undermined by local leadership anywhere in the United States, let alone Washington, DC,' he said.
It wasn't long ago that many immigrants saw Washington as one of the safest places to live, according to Antonia Peña, who represents nannies, house cleaners and care workers as a leader of the DC chapter of Care in Action.
The district's policies, including its minimum wage and its protections for workers, were among the best in the region, she says. 'And in terms of immigration, Washington has always been considered a sanctuary.'
But now, she says, given the pressures DC is under from the federal government, many immigrants are starting to see the city differently.
'Washington right now is becoming the area with the least protection, legally speaking,' she says. 'And that is what we've been explaining to people, talking about it and accepting it in a way, because this is a huge impact under this administration, something that no one expected.'
Already high costs were making many workers reconsider living in the city, she says. 'Now this is going to become one more reason to move out of DC,' she says.
Just a few months into the new Trump administration, leaders of immigrant advocacy organizations in DC say fears are running high.
'The need is so big and the threats are so big. … I'm running out of resources, because we're tapped out,' says Rev. Julio Hernández of the Congregation Action Network.
Recently, he says he's gotten calls about people who've been evicted because some landlords no longer want to rent to undocumented immigrants. Many are worried the district's police department could be federalized, he says, converting the officers who patrol communities into immigration agents.
'There is a big concern of what could come,' Hernández says. 'The feeling is, if there's more funding, then there will be a greater increase in immigration raids. And DC is a pretty easy target. … If they lose their self-rule, we feel there's an even bigger danger for the city and for its residents.'
Protesters pack into a park for a rally in DC's Mount Pleasant neighborhood on a spring evening. Soledad is in the crowd.
In the past, she might have joined the speakers on stage, sharing her story. But today, she's watching from the sidelines. Organizers of this protest told her they were worried noncitizens could be targeted for speaking out.
So Soledad doesn't tell this crowd about the years she's spent fighting for immigrant rights, or about her 15-year-old daughter, a star student — and US citizen — who's often stood alongside her. Instead, she listens.
Some speakers at the rally are wearing masks to protect their anonymity.
'With the silence of our elected officials, I feel they are giving away our rights.'
A speaker at a recent protest pushing DC leaders to protect the city's sanctuary status
'How is it possible that being an immigrant in DC means living in fear?' one speaker asks.
'It wasn't until I moved to DC that I felt like I belonged in this country,' another says.
'With the silence of our elected officials, I feel they are giving away our rights. … We are the only people that can keep us safe.'
Organizers and participants at this protest say DC's leaders should do more to fight back against Trump's immigration crackdown.
'We fought hard to create the sanctuary policies, and we're not going to let Congress eliminate them without a fight,' Oliver Merino of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center tells CNN affiliate WJLA. 'The community wants the mayor, the city council, to step up and to publicly say they will protect our sanctuary policies that keep our community safe.'
An organizer onstage says that members of the City Council were invited to the event, but none of them showed up.
One by one, each council member's name is read from a list, then their photo is taped to a railing onstage.
'Is he here or is he missing?' the organizer asks, craning her neck and looking out at the crowd like a sailor scanning the horizon.
It doesn't take long for the crowd to answer: 'MISSING!'
A few council members' photos fall off the railing in the evening breeze.
'Even the papers are scared,' someone quips in the crowd.
Asked via email whether DC remains a sanctuary city, the offices of the city's 13 sitting council members didn't respond to CNN's request for comment.
It's no surprise to find critics of the president's immigration crackdowns in DC. Trump won less than 7% of votes cast here in the last presidential election.
But DC isn't like other liberal cities, according to Rick Su, a distinguished professor of law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Many cities that get in standoffs over immigration with the federal government have states to protect them, he says.
'The funny thing and the scary thing is that DC is essentially…a creature of the federal government, of Congress, of the president,' Su says.
Though it's unclear whether Congress really wants to take on the challenge of running the city again, Su says, lawmakers could pass another statute to retake control.
Given that reality, Su says it appears the city's leaders are currently pursuing a policy he's dubbed 'silent sanctuary.'
'We can still do our thing,' Su says city leaders are likely thinking, 'as long as we keep a very friendly and…submissive public face.'
Soledad walks in front of the Supreme Court carrying a tote bag emblazoned with the three red stars and two red stripes of DC's flag.
She sets it down near the building's steps and pulls out several banners and a megaphone she's tucked inside. Soledad and dozens of others are holding a vigil to support Temporary Protected Status, which the Trump administration has said it's ending for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans. In a matter of weeks, a Supreme Court decision will clear the way for the administration's plan to take effect while legal challenges over the matter continue in court.
But on this evening in early May, Soledad and the other protesters say they're pushing to bring attention to their cause before it's too late.
Even though it's been raining all afternoon, a sizeable crowd has gathered, and the sun is coming out. But many of those gathered are worried – not just about the court's looming decision, but about reports and rumors that have been swirling in the city all week.
Homeland Security Investigations agents served more than 100 notices of inspection at businesses around the DC area. The agency said it was an effort to ensure compliance with immigration and employment laws.
Bowser told reporters the district's police weren't involved, and that she was 'disturbed' by what she'd heard had unfolded.
'It appears that ICE is at restaurants or even in neighborhoods,' she said, 'and it doesn't look like they're targeting criminals. It is disrupting.'
A coalition of immigrant advocacy groups slammed the mayor for appearing at an event with Trump while reports of the enforcement effort left immigrant communities in the city terrified.
Soledad is worried ICE agents could show up at this protest, and she knows others are concerned about that, too.
Recently she's been more cautious about speaking out. At a protest she attended earlier this month, she loaned out her megaphone to amplify someone else's voice.
With each day that passes, though, she's growing more concerned about what could happen if she doesn't speak out than what will happen if she does. For her and so many others whose lives are at stake, she says, staying quiet simply isn't an option.
She can't imagine being forced to abandon the life she's worked hard to build or having to take her daughter away from the only home she's ever known.
'Un pueblo únido jamás será vencido,' she shouts into the megaphone. A people united will never be defeated.
Following her lead, the crowd repeats the popular protest mantra. Then Soledad belts out a less common line that's become her favorite chant:
'Un pueblo callado jamás será escuchado.'
The people who are silent will never be heard.
CNN's Gabe Cohen contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces new steel and aluminium tariffs in blow to global markets
Donald Trump has announced plans to double tariffs on steel imports from next week, intensifying his trade war and unsettling global markets. Addressing a rally of steel workers in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, on Friday, the US president revealed that tariffs would rise from 25% to 50%, claiming the measure "will even further secure the steel industry in the United States." Mr Trump later confirmed on Truth Social that the new tariffs, which also apply to aluminium imports, would take effect from Wednesday. He declared that American "industries are coming back like never before." "This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum (sic) workers," he wrote, adding: "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" In a separate statement, he said: "We don't want America's future to be built with shoddy steel from Shanghai - we want it built with the strength and the pride of Pittsburgh!" However, a UK government source told Sky News that Britain will remain exempt from the new tariff rates, following the signing of a US-UK trade deal earlier this month. The source highlighted this agreement as evidence of why reaching an early arrangement with the Trump administration had been critical. Under the deal, the US agreed to "promptly construct a quota at most favoured nation (MFN) rates" for British steel, aluminium and derivative products. The escalation follows Mr Trump's claim earlier that China had "totally violated" an agreement designed to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions on critical minerals. "So much for being Mr Nice Guy," he wrote on his social media platform. Initially, Mr Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports in March as part of an effort to protect US manufacturing and jobs, making foreign imports less appealing to domestic industries. These increased tariffs threaten to raise costs for American consumers, affecting products from cars to canned soft drinks. Trump previously warned Canada it could face tariffs of up to 50% on steel imports, prompting Ontario's provincial government to threaten to increase electricity charges by 25% to American customers. Ontario supplies electricity to more than 1.5 million US homes and businesses in Minnesota, New York, and Michigan. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney previously described the potential tariffs as an "attack" on Canadian workers, families, and businesses. Currently, roughly a quarter of steel used in the US is imported, predominantly from countries including Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, and Germany. In 2024, the US imported 6.6 million tonnes of steel from Canada and 3.5 million tonnes from Mexico. The US also heavily relies on imported aluminium, receiving 3.2 million tonnes from Canada last year.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
We must ‘get real' about Trump abandoning Ukraine, Europe admits
British and French officials drawing up plans for a peacekeeping force in Ukraine have discussed the need to 'get real' about Donald Trump abandoning the country. Officials agreed to shift the focus from deploying European troops to back up any ceasefire to sustaining Kyiv's long-term defence against Russia's invasion without American support. There is now a genuine concern that the US president will follow through on his threat to walk away from his role as a mediator, having failed to bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table. 'Let's get real and admit the US will never be on board,' a Western official told the Telegraph, describing the dire mood at the meeting in the Hague. A European diplomat added: 'It was mostly about how to sustain the necessary support to Ukraine when we assume that the US would only continue providing some specific assets, such as intelligence. 'We also agreed on the need to step up economic pressure on Russia.' The meeting in the Dutch capital, attended by 'political directors' from foreign ministries, marked a stark change in roles of the 'coalition of the willing' devised by Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron to uphold a possible ceasefire being pursued by the Americans. Sir Keir and Mr Macron have been pushing the 'coalition of the willing' proposal under which European allies would use their soldiers to help enforce any peace deal. More than 30 nations have indicated support, although only a handful have publicly offered to put troops on the ground in Ukraine. A central question had been whether Washington is willing to provide what has been described by UK figures as a 'security guarantee' or a 'back-up' for this force. The group still hasn't publicly conceded that its intentions have changed, with the chances of peace dwindling the longer Putin holds out against international pressure for a truce. The European nations also agreed to invite Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, to the Nato summit in The Hague next month. His attendance had previously been in doubt after Mr Trump's vocal opposition to Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. General Keith Kellogg, Mr Trump's Ukraine envoy, said on Friday: 'We've said that, to us, Ukraine coming into Nato is not on the table. 'And we're not the only country that says that. You know, I can probably give you four countries in Nato, and it takes 32 of the 32 to allow you to come into Nato.' It is likely the coalition will continue to support the Trump peace efforts in public at the request of Ukrainian officials, who fear not doing so will result in the US leader ending weapons shipments and intelligence sharing. Although Washington has not signed off on deliveries of new weapons since Mr Trump took office, it continues to ship hardware agreed under Joe Biden's tenure. The US has also signed off on sales of domestically-produced kit, such as spares for F-16 fighter jets, to Ukraine, as well as allowing European nations to deliver American-made equipment. The meeting in the Dutch capital comes ahead of a key week of diplomacy. On Monday, Britain's national security adviser is expected to attend the next round of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul. Gen Kellogg told ABC News: 'We'll have what we call the E3. That is the national security advisers from Germany, France, and Great Britain…When we were in London, they kind of helped us mould a term sheet for Ukraine.' Moscow and Kyiv held their first direct negotiations in more than three years in the Turkish capital earlier this month. On Friday, the Kremlin said it would only discuss the conditions of a ceasefire at the talks in Istanbul after Kyiv demanded to see a peace memorandum prior to negotiations. Ukraine said it wanted to see a document setting out Russia's peace proposal before committing to sending officials to Istanbul. Andrii Sybiha, Ukraine's foreign minister, said: 'In order for the next planned meeting to be substantive and meaningful, it is important to receive a document in advance so that the delegation that will attend has the authority to discuss the relevant positions.' Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, announced the second round of talks earlier this week after Donald Trump further criticised Vladimir Putin. The US president had called his Russian counterpart 'crazy' and accused him of 'playing with fire' before appearing to give him a two-week deadline to secure a deal. Next week, Britain and Germany will also host a meeting of the Ukraine Defence Contact Group of 50 nations coordinating military aid to Ukraine. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
European Kindness Is Threatening Freedom of Speech
Britain and Europe have become 'a hotbed of digital censorship, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom,' according to Samuel Samson, a senior adviser to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. His punchy boss further threatens to bar European visitors to the US for 'censoring' Americans online. Vice President JD Vance also condemned European 'backsliding' on basic democratic values in a speech that outraged his audience at the Munich Security Conference last autumn. It used to be liberal progressives and radicals who denounced the state for infringing freedom of speech. Now it's the turn of the populist right to rage against 'woke' censorship. President Donald Trump's own respect for the democratic process is questionable, and administration officials, contemptuous of academic and artistic freedoms at home, make unlikely ambassadors for human rights abroad. But what if these populists have a point?