Yoon requests change in special counsel questioning schedule set for Monday
Lawyers representing former President Yoon Suk Yeol on Sunday requested a schedule change for his next summons by the special counsel team, which has been investigating insurrection charges tied to his Dec. 3 declaration of martial law.
The special counsel had notified Yoon to appear for a second round of questioning on Monday, just a day after a marathon session held over the weekend.
"It is an extremely tight schedule that does not take into account the suspect's health and his right to prepare for ongoing trials," Yoon's legal team said in a statement. "We submitted a written request to the special counsel this afternoon, seeking to reschedule the appearance."
After a 15-hour session, Yoon left the Seoul High Prosecutors Office in southern Seoul early Sunday, following questioning over allegations that he ordered the Presidential Security Service to block his arrest when investigators attempted to execute a warrant in January.
The special counsel team has notified Yoon to appear for questioning again on Monday. It plans to summon him for questioning indefinitely until it wraps up the investigation.
Special prosecutors questioned Yoon for about five hours during the marathon session, which was partially suspended due to objections from Yoon's lawyers over the presence of a police investigator whom they claimed was unfit to question the former president.
Yoon was questioned about a Cabinet meeting that took place just before his martial law declaration, his alleged attempt to obstruct the National Assembly from passing a resolution to lift martial law, and treason charges.
Yoon's lawyers told reporters after the session that the former president responded to the questions to the best of his knowledge.
The special counsel team plans to resume questioning Yoon at 9 a.m. Monday over allegations he ordered officials to delete records of secure phones used by those allegedly involved in martial law operations.
Yoon's legal team said it would hold talks with the special counsel over scheduling the next session.
"(He) will obviously respond to a summons that follows due process," Song Jin-ho, one of Yoon's lawyers, told reporters.
The questioning took place two weeks after the special counsel probe was launched and 85 days after he was removed from office.
It marked the ousted president's first appearance before an investigative body in about five months, following his arrest and questioning by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials in January.
The CIO attempted to detain him in early January but failed due to a prolonged standoff with presidential security personnel. He ended up being detained on Jan. 15, making him the first sitting South Korean president to be arrested.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Judges fail to reach consensus on Lee trial
Judges divided over Supreme Court case involving President Lee A national meeting of South Korean judges ended without agreement on Monday, as members remained divided over how to respond to the Supreme Court's decision to order the High Court to reconsider it's acquittal of President Lee Jae Myung's for election law violations. According to the National Association of Judges, the Monday meeting was to address the ongoing controversy surrounding the judiciary, sparked by the Supreme Court ruling, issued during President Lee's presidential campaign. Proposals related to key issues such as judicial independence and public trust in the courts were largely opposed, and all five motions put to a vote were rejected. The judges had previously decided not to pass a resolution, opting instead to continue discussions after the June 3 presidential election due to concerns that their decision could influence the election. One of the key issues was the association's commitment to ensuring fair trials by monitoring the legal procedures in Lee's case, analyzing the causes of the controversy and discussing measures to resolve it. Among the 90 judges who attended the Monday meeting, 56 expressed the view that the proceedings of Lee's election law violation case were conducted legally, and so the association decided not to issue an additional statement on the matter. Another item on the agenda was whether judicial independence was undermined by the Democratic Party of Korea's lawmaker-led decision to summon and investigate Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de after the ruling. While 19 judges believed that the then main opposition party's measure constituted a serious breach of judicial independence, 67 opposed the motion. The remaining proposals were also voted down. These included proposals that would have addressed criticism directed at the Supreme Court's unusually swift handling of Lee's criminal case — including its expedited appeal trial and selective review of the lengthy case record — which had Lee supporters had used to question the court's political neutrality. Controversy surrounding the case has been growing since the Supreme Court moved to review it in a full bench session on April 22. It issued its verdict on May 1, despite the court having until June 22 to reach a decision within the legal deadline. The top court's justices held their first two hearings in the case within three days. And this was perceived as an unusually swift move for cases referred to the full court, which typically convenes only once a month. When the Supreme Court ruled to overturn Lee's acquittal and sent the case back to the Seoul High Court for retrial, citing legal errors in the lower court's decision, some liberal lawmakers and judges insisted that Jo's alleged misconduct had led to the unusually swift ruling and public distrust in the judiciary. The Democratic Party publicly called for Jo's resignation and attempted to make various legislative measures, such as expanding the number of Supreme Court justices and introducing retrial petitions in response to the controversy involving the top court. These moves have raised concerns that judicial independence was being undermined. The special meeting, held by judges from courts at all levels nationwide, is convened to express opinions or make recommendations on judicial administration and the independence of the judiciary.
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Talks underway for Lee-Trump summit but timing not finalized: Seoul
Talks are underway between Seoul and Washington to set up the first summit between South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump, an official at the presidential office said Monday, adding that the exact timing has yet to be finalized. The comment came after a report by local daily Donga Ilbo that the summit would be held in July. Citing an unnamed diplomatic source, the newspaper claimed that both sides are coordinating to hold the potential summit in the fourth week of July, and 'preferably before August.' Detailed negotiations, including the time, location and agenda of the potential summit, are expected to kick off after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's likely visit to South Korea around the time of the ASEAN Regional Forum foreign ministers' meeting in Malaysia in early July, according to the report. Joseph Yun, the acting US ambassador in Seoul, recently said Trump is considering inviting Lee to Washington to hold the summit there. The latest report follows Lee's decision not to attend last week's NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, despite talks of a meeting with Trump. Lee's presidential office cited domestic priorities and growing uncertainty in the Middle East as key reasons behind his decision to skip the summit. In June, a planned meeting between the two leaders failed to materialize during the G7 summit in Canada after Trump left the event early. Though the agenda for the upcoming planned summit has yet to be set, Seoul officials and observers pointed to tariffs and defense spending as two main items. Seoul has been seeking exemptions from the US' reciprocal tariffs and new duties on steel, aluminum and automobiles, which are South Korea's key export items. The Trump administration has recently signaled an openness to extending the pause on the new tariffs, which is slated to end on July 8. The tariffs, including 25 percent duties on South Korea, took effect on April 9, but Trump suspended them until July 8 to allow room for negotiations. Meanwhile, Wi Sung-lac, national security adviser to President Lee, told reporters after attending the NATO summit last week, on behalf of Lee, that Seoul and Washington have begun working-level talks on increasing Seoul's defense spending. This is aligned with a new NATO commitment to raise military budgets to 5 percent of gross domestic product by 2035.
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Judges' meeting on judicial independence ends without consensus
Judges divided over Supreme Court case involving President Lee A national meeting of South Korean judges ended without agreement on Monday, as members remained divided over how to respond to the Supreme Court ruling on President Lee Jae Myung's alleged election law violations. According to the National Association of Judges, the Monday meeting was to address the ongoing controversy surrounding the judiciary, sparked by the Supreme Court ruling issued during President Lee's presidential campaign. Proposals related to key issues such as judicial independence and public trust in the courts were largely opposed, and all five motions put to a vote were rejected. The judges previously decided not to pass a resolution, opting instead to continue discussions after the June 3 presidential election due to concerns that their decision could influence the election. One of the key issues was the association's commitment to ensuring fair trials by monitoring the legal procedures in Lee's case, analyzing the causes of the controversy and discussing measures to resolve it. Among the 90 judges who attended the meeting, 56 expressed the view that the proceedings of Lee's election law violation case were conducted legally, and so the association decided not to issue an additional statement on the matter. Another item on the agenda was whether judicial independence was undermined by the Democratic Party of Korea's lawmaker-led decision to summon and investigate Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de after the ruling. While 19 judges believed that the then main opposition party's measure constituted a serious breach of judicial independence, 67 opposed the proposal. The remaining proposals were all voted down. These included proposals that would have addressed criticism directed at the Supreme Court's unusually swift handling of Lee's criminal case -- including its expedited appeal trial and selective review of the lengthy case record -- which raised doubts about the court's political neutrality. The National Association of Judges announced that it would not announce any official statement or make proposals as its members were divided, with some believing the top court's ruling undermined public trust in the judiciary, while others argued that a collective opinion on the validity of the ruling could be seen as judicial overreach. The special meeting, held by judges from courts at all levels nationwide, is convened to express opinions or make recommendations on judicial administration and the independence of the judiciary.
