Former Capitol riot defendant is convicted of gun charges stemming from his arrest near Obama's home
A military veteran whose Capitol riot case was erased by a presidential proclamation was convicted Tuesday of charges that he illegally possessed guns and ammunition in his van when he was arrested near President Barack Obama's home in the nation's capital.
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols also convicted Taylor Taranto of recording himself making a hoax threat to bomb a government building in Maryland. The judge decided the case without a jury after a bench trial that started last week in Washington, D.C.
Taranto was arrested in Obama's neighborhood on the same day in June 2023 that Trump posted on social media what he claimed was the former president's address. Investigators said they found two guns, roughly 500 rounds of ammunition and a machete in Taranto's van.
Taranto was livestreaming video on YouTube in which he said he was looking for 'entrance points' to underground tunnels and wanted to get a 'good angle on a shot,' according to prosecutors. He reposted Trump's message about Obama's home address and wrote: 'We got these losers surrounded! See you in hell, Podesta's and Obama's.' He was referring to John Podesta, who chaired Hillary Clinton's 2016 Democratic presidential campaign.
Taranto wasn't charged with threatening Obama or Podesta. But the judge convicted him of making a hoax bomb threat directed at the Gaithersburg, Maryland-based National Institute of Standards and Technology, which is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Taranto's lawyers said he didn't have any bomb-making material and wasn't near the institute when he made those statements on a livestreamed video. During the trial's opening statements, defense attorney Pleasant Brodnax said the video shows Taranto was merely joking in an 'avant-garde' manner.
'He believes he is a journalist and, to some extent, a comedian,' Broadnax said.
But the judge concluded that a reasonable, objective observer might have believed Taranto's statements on the video. While some viewers may have thought his words were of a "madcap nature," others could have interpreted them as coming from 'an unbalanced narrator willing to follow through on outlandish claims,' Nichols said.
Nichols, who was nominated by Trump, didn't immediately schedule a sentencing hearing for Taranto. He has been jailed for nearly two years since his arrest because a judge concluded that he poses a danger to the public.
After reading his verdict from the bench, the judge said he would entertain a request by defense attorney Carmen Hernandez to release Taranto from custody until his sentencing. Nichols said he intends to rule on that request later this week.
Taranto, a Navy veteran from Pasco, Washington, is one of only a few people charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol who remained jailed after President Donald Trump 's sweeping act on clemency in January. Trump pardoned, commuted the prison sentences or ordered the dismissal of charges for all of the more than 1,500 people charged with crimes in the riot.
Before Trump's pardons, Taranto also was charged with four misdemeanors related to the Jan. 6 attack. Prosecutors said he joined the crush of rioters who breached the building. He was captured on video at the entrance of the Speaker's Lobby around the time that a rioter, Ashli Babbitt, was shot and killed by an officer while she tried to climb through the broken window of a barricaded door.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Five Proud Boys leaders sue DOJ for $100 million over their Jan 6 prosecution
Five Proud Boys leaders who were convicted of spearheading the January 6 Capitol riot are suing the federal government and claiming that their constitutional rights were violated. The lawsuit, which was filed on Friday in a federal court in Florida, is seeking $100 million in restitution and comes after President Donald Trump pardoned almost all of the January 6 defendants on the first day of his second term, The Hill reports. The five men bringing the suit are Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Zachary Rehl, Joe Biggs and Dominic Pezzola. Four of the men were convicted on charges of seditious conspiracy. Pezzola was acquitted but was convicted on other felonies associated with the infamous riot. They are claiming that "political prosecution" violated their constitutional rights. 'What follows is a parade of horribles: egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal,' their lawsuit alleges. In the filing, the Proud Boys accuse the FBI of using paid informants to spy on their defense team, allege they were denied bail, and claim that federal agents had altered what they say was exculpatory evidence relevant to their defense, according to the New York Times. The lawsuit will force the Department of Justice under Trump to either defend its prosecution of Capitol rioters or offer a payout to the right-wing gang members. Ed Martin, who is now the Justice Department's pardon attorney, has said he believes that the Capitol riot convicts deserve compensation for what he claimed was mistreatment by the federal government. Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison, the longest for any January 6 defendant before he was pardoned by Trump. The Proud Boys' lawsuit cites Trump's pardon in its language, arguing that it sought to "end a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years."
ITV News
21 minutes ago
- ITV News
Man wrongly deported to El Salvador back in US to face human trafficking charges
A man wrongly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration has been brought back to the US to face federal charges for human trafficking, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported in March due to an 'administrative error,' according to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official. He was one of hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members sent to El Salvador's mega-prison, where he was held for weeks before being moved to another jail. For months, the US president's administration has been locked in a tense standoff with federal courts over orders to return Abrego Garcia from El Salvador - a dispute one judge warned could trigger a 'incipient crisis' between the two. Abrego Garcia has now been charged in Tennessee with conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal immigrants for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal immigrants for financial gain. Officials said on Friday that he will be prosecuted in the US and, if convicted, will be sent back to El Salvador once the case is over. 'This is what American justice looks like,' Attorney General Bondi said on Friday in announcing the return of Abrego Garcia and the criminal charges. "This defendant trafficked firearms and narcotics throughout our country on multiple occasions. They were using vehicles, SUVs, with added seats in the back, floors that had been ripped out, guns, narcotics, children, women, MS-13 members. That is what the grand jury found. "A co-conspirator alleged that the defendant solicited nude photographs and videos of a minor. A co-conspirator also alleges the defendant played a role in the murder of a rival gang member's mother. These facts demonstrate Abrego Garcia is a danger to our community." The charges also allege that Abrego Garcia took part in a years-long conspiracy to illegally transport thousands of undocumented migrants, including alleged MS-13 members. He and his family deny any links to the gang, saying he fled violence in El Salvador. What compelled authorities to press charges? The case began with a 2022 vehicle stop by the Tennessee Highway Patrol, who suspected Abrego Garcia of human trafficking. Last month, Tennessee authorities released bodycam footage of a 2022 traffic stop showing Abrego Garcia having a calm and friendly exchange with officers. A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report from April noted that none of the passengers had luggage, but all gave the same address as Abrego Garcia. Abrego Garcia was never charged and was only given a warning for an expired driver's licence, the DHS report said. The report said he was travelling from Texas to Maryland via Missouri to transport workers for construction jobs. In April, his wife said in response to the report that he sometimes moved groups of workers between sites, making the stop 'entirely plausible,' and insisted he was never charged or cited. The Trump administration publicised Abrego Garcia's past police encounters, despite a lack of corresponding criminal charges, as it faced federal court orders and congressional calls to bring him back to the US. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said after the footage's release that it showed no evidence of a crime. 'But the point is not the traffic stop — it's that Mr Abrego Garcia deserves his day in court,' he said in May. Abrego Garcia illegally arrived in the US in 2012 at the age of 16. Seven years later, he was arrested and handed over to immigration authorities, fearing he could be sent back to El Salvador. An immigration judge later ruled in his favour, blocking his removal to his home country.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Elon Musk's crash-out killed conservatives' momentum — and likely guaranteed passage of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Earlier this week, it looked like Elon Musk had delivered arch conservatives a gift when he trashed President Donald Trump's ' One Big, Beautiful Bill.' On Tuesday, Musk called the legislation an ' outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' It seemed like a boon for some of the fiscal conservatives in the Senate like Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin who criticized the fact the bill still blows up the deficit. Had Musk stopped there, he probably would have given fiscal conservatives additional leverage. House Speaker Mike Johnson had spent much of the first part of the year getting every faction of the House GOP on board with the bill despite fiscal conservative grumbling. But Johnson admitted during his weekly press conference that he had tried to call Musk with no response. Immediately, House Republicans and members of the Freedom Caucus — including its former chairman Scott Perry and Andy Ogles, who has tried to allow Trump to run for a third term — voiced their criticisms of the bill that they had when it was being deliberated. They could have voiced them at any moment but did not. It clearly showed that they had abandoned their fiscal conservative principles in fear of the pressure campaign from Trump. Had Musk kept his critiques strictly to the bill, the tech tycoon could have offered an effective counterweight to give conservatives leverage against leadership given his immense wealth and his wide reach as owner of X. But the world's richest man chose to blow that to smithereens when he turned the attacks personal. First, he said that Trump would not have won the presidency, Republicans would have lost the House and would have a smaller minority in the Senate had it not been for Musk's money, before huffing 'such ingratitude.' Then Musk lobbed the ultimate grenade when he said that Trump had not fully released the 'Epstein files' —information related to the late — because Trump was mentioned in them. The Tesla founder took it a step further by calling for Trump's impeachment. Not only did Musk's words permanently spike any chance for reconciliation, it killed any chances for budget reconciliation, the arcane process through which Republicans hope to pass the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who has spent much of the legislative process in the House trying to make the bill more conservative but ultimately voted for it, tried to split the difference. 'He's got concerns with the bill, he's a free American, and he can speak freely and and God bless him for what he's been doing to try to make improvements,' Roy told The Independent. 'Again, is it what Chip Roy would draft? Not even close. But did it move in the right direction to get to a place that I felt comfortable sending it to the Senate to see if they could make it better? Sure.' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who has spent much of the new Congress trying to declassify information related to Epstein, said it was too early to tell about the Senate bill since text did not exist. 'I've always been a big fan of going back to pre-Covid spending levels,' Luna told The Independent, but understood it would require negotiation. Rep. Andy Harris, the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, who ultimately voted 'present' on the bill last month, said he agreed. 'I still think his concerns about the deficit are real,' he said. But the damage might already be done. If Republican elected have learned anything in the past decade, they've learned that their voters are not so much devoted to conservative ideals; they're devoted to Trump. Deviation from Trump, even in the name of conservative principles like restraining spending and balanced budgets, amounts to heresy. Musk's decision to start talking about forming another political party further alienates him from the GOP. He is now no longer part of the Trump coalition or even the Republican coalition. That means that fiscal conservatives cannot depend on him to drop millions of dollars for people opposed to the reconciliation bill or if he does, that it will immediately be tainted as money coming from a heretic. This makes Senate and House leadership's job easier. It gives them a foil to oppose and allows critics of the bill to tied to Musk. And they've already seen that most Republicans' bluster about spending levels are just that given that they will ultimately fold. Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee spent much of the early parts of the reconciliation process intimating to reporters that he would not vote for the bill only to fold. As votes wrapped on Thursday, he did not seem worried about it all. 'It's just two biggest dogs in the pound, they're both gonna fight a little,' he said. Except now, Musk just defanged fiscal conservatives.
