New hope for the R60 billion class action against banks
Advocate Douglas Shaw, who is spearheading the R60 billion class action against the major banks, is hopeful that the matter will be heard soon, as a judge has now been allocated to adjudicate the matter.
Image: Zelda Venter
The wheels of justice often grind slowly, especially when courts are facing a shortage of judges, with some cases taking years before they are heard, and the R60 billion class action against the big four banks is facing the same problems - massive and continual delays.
This is according to Advocate Douglas Shaw, who is spearheading the class action against the major banks for repossessing homes and selling them far below market value.
While hundreds of dispossessed homeowners have been eagerly awaiting the certification of the action for some years, Shaw said things may now run more smoothly as the Office of the Gauteng Judge President this week moved the matter to a judge to adjudicate.
'Once the class action is certified, it is hoped that things will run much faster and that the banks will then pay the hundreds of claimants who are now in dire financial need after losing their homes,' Shaw said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He gave the assurance that he is doing what he can to obtain compensation for those who have lost their homes.
Shaw, who has worked hard to secure justice for these individuals, stated that in an attempt to expedite the process, they are also launching a volunteer project for people to help with the administrative side of things.
While he is trying to get the class action certified as soon as possible before the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, there are still some hurdles to overcome.
He explained that they must first face an objection by the banks regarding the structure of some of the affidavits filed by the claimants, to which the banks have objected.
'All that is needed is for dates for heads of arguments to be given, and then shortly afterwards, for a set down date for the matter to be heard.'
Commenting on the backlog in civil trials in the Gauteng division, Shaw said that he has many matters against banks waiting for court dates for years.
On the other hand, he said, banks seem to get dates against his clients much more easily. Apart from Road Accident Fund matters clogging the civil trial roll, a large part of the roll consists of house foreclosures and municipality overcharges - cases which should not be there.
'The banks are still trying to get orders to sell people's houses when it is not a last resort.'
He explained that many people fall in arrears with their bonds as they lose their jobs.
But, he said, there are alternatives, such as when bondholders obtain new employment and are once again able to pay. Shaw said the banks should consult with the clients before repossessing their homes.
FirstRand Bank, in a sentiment shared by the other banks, said in its opposing papers in the R60 billion action that there is a notion that the banks sell properties at auctions recklessly and without regard to the property owners, which is 'simply not true'.
FNB said it takes 'every reasonable measure to avoid selling properties in execution'.
The bank stated that consumers are told about their rights, such as that they may take a 'payment holiday' if they fall in arrears and that they only revert to selling a property in execution as a last resort.
Shaw, meanwhile, said people who want to join the class action can contact his team at banksoldmyhouse@drdouglasjshaw.co.za (if your house has already been sold) or if your house is about to be sold, email them at now@drdouglasjshaw.co.za.
Those who want to help with the administration of the cause can email the team at volunteers@drdouglasjshaw.co.za
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
5 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Nissan aims to delay supplier payments to preserve cash flow, internal emails show
Nissan Motor has asked some suppliers to allow it to delay payments to free up short-term funds, according to several emails and a company document reviewed by Reuters, as the troubled Japanese carmaker scrambles to boost cash. New CEO Ivan Espinosa, who took over in April, has unveiled plans to shed about 15% of Nissan's global workforce and close seven plants as he targets ¥500bn (R60,528,840,000) in cost cuts over the next two years. Battered by slumping sales and weighed down by an ageing vehicle line-up, the car maker reported a $4.5bn (R80,111,672,100) net annual loss in the financial year that ended in March and has declined to give a forecast this year. Now, Nissan has asked some suppliers in Britain and the EU to accept delays in payment, according to the correspondence reviewed by Reuters and a person with knowledge of the matter. The move would allow it to have more cash on hand at the close of the April-June first quarter and follows similar requests before the end of the last financial year in March, the emails showed. It is not uncommon for companies to request payment extensions from suppliers to help free up cash. In a statement to Reuters, Nissan said it had incentivised some of its suppliers to collaborate under more flexible payment terms, at no cost to them, to support its free cash flow. 'They could choose to be paid immediately or opt for a later payment with interest,' Nissan said. The correspondence, which has not been previously reported, gives a detailed look at Nissan's effort to conserve cash in the short term, even if that means paying suppliers more down the line. The emails were exchanged among Nissan employees in Britain and the EU, including staff in its purchasing and treasury departments, according to their profiles on LinkedIn. One employee told co-workers in emails this month that suppliers were 'again' being asked for an extension of payment terms. It was in line with the aim to bolster free cash flow 'requested from CEO top down', the employee told colleagues.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Homeowners rise: Class action against SA banks echoes Erin Brockovich's fight for justice
Advocate Douglas Shaw is spearheading the class action lawsuit against banks. Image: Supplied In what reads like a modern-day David vs. Goliath, more than 100 000 former homeowners are taking on South Africa's 'Big Four' – Absa, Standard Bank, Nedbank and FirstRand – in a R60 billion class-action lawsuit set for February 2026. The reputations of these banks are on the line. For institutions that constantly tout putting the customer first, this legal showdown threatens to take a wrecking ball to that image - one they may struggle to recover from. It's a major headache, and it could very well be a turning point in how banks are held to account in South Africa. This class action is not just about money. It's about power, dignity, and justice. It's a wake-up call to all of us that even the most powerful institutions are fallible - and can be challenged. The applicants in this case have stepped forward, and it's heartbreaking to consider what they've endured. These are people who fell on hard times, couldn't meet their mortgage payments, and had their homes repossessed. But the real scandal lies in what happened next: the homes were sold at auctions, sometimes for as little as R1 000 - often with no reserve price, no regard for actual market value, and no concern for the human cost. This was allowed under pre-2017 rules, when South African courts didn't require a minimum sale price. Thankfully, that loophole has since been closed. But for those who suffered under the old regime, the scars remain. As a homeowner myself, I can't begin to imagine what they went through. How powerless they must have felt going up against the might of the banking system. Blood, sweat, and tears went into trying to keep their homes. In the end, they lost not just property, but dignity. Now, after seven long years, these former homeowners are finally getting their day in court. It's worth remembering that justice in South Africa is not always accessible. Our courts are under-resourced, backlogged, and too expensive for the average person. But in this case, the Lungelo Lethu Human Rights Foundation has taken up the fight, led by Advocate Douglas Shaw. Shaw says banks should have thought about the Constitution before acting - and he's pushing for a criminal investigation into each sale. 'When I go to court, I go up against 27 people,' he told Stephen Grootes on The Money Show. 'Me versus large numbers of people from the top banks in the country. It's a scary thing to do. Most lawyers would say no. It's difficult.' Interestingly, Shaw's research shows that having your house sold for much less than the market value has only happened in South Africa. He is appealing to people to step forward, tell him your story and to get get your case out there. "You can help us help you by filling your case into our class action, which will in turn make you viable for reinbursement of the money you have lost," he says on his website. This isn't just a legal case—it's a moral one. And it's one the country will be watching closely. It brings to mind the story of Erin Brockovich, the woman played by Julia Roberts in the film, who took on a massive corporation in a fight for justice. Brockovich was an ordinary person who refused to be silent, and her courage changed lives. In the film Brockovich, a legal clerk named Erin Brockovich uncovers a massive cover-up by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) involving the contamination of Hinkley, California's water supply with hexavalent chromium. The contamination, linked to a PG&E compressor station, caused serious illnesses among residents. Brockovich, along with her boss Ed Masry, spearheaded a class-action lawsuit against PG&E, culminating in a record-breaking $333 million (R5.9 billion) settlement for the affected residents. The case highlighted the dangers of industrial pollution and brought Brockovich to national attention, later inspiring the 2000 film. That same spirit is alive here. South Africa's former homeowners may not wear suits or command boardrooms, but they are standing up, together, against a system that failed them. If Erin Brockovich marked a moment of reckoning in the US, this could be ours. A moment when ordinary citizens remind powerful institutions that they are not untouchable. And if the banks are found guilty? The implications are massive. Will they absorb the cost or pass it on to consumers? Will trust in the financial system crack even further? It's unlikely the banks will lose their licences—such a move could shake the entire economy—but their reputations may never fully recover. One thing is certain: South Africa's financial sector will not be the same again. Philippa Larkin, is the executive edior of Business Report. Image: Supplied Philippa Larkin in the executive editor of Business Report. If you need help against the banks from Dr Advocate Shaw and his team: contact Dr Advocate Shaw· If your house has already been sold at:banksoldmyhouse@ If your house is about to be sold at:now@ If you want to help the cause at:volunteers@ BUSINESS REPORT
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Claims that 'ANC politicians are behind' Zwelinzima Vavi's Standard Bank woes
Sources close to South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) General Secretary Zwelinzima Vavi have alleged that ANC politicians are targeting him through Standard Bank. The allegations stem from the bank's failed attempt to foreclose on Vavi's Sandton home, despite him consistently paying off arrears on his home loan. According to insiders, Vavi's vocal criticism of the ANC, particularly regarding corruption and policy direction, has made him a target. "Vavi has been too critical of the ANC in recent years and was outspoken about President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala scandal... He has also been critical of the corruption that has been taking place within the ANC in recent years, making him a target," a source revealed. The High Court in Johannesburg, last week, ruled in favour of Vavi, dismissing Standard Bank's bid to foreclose on his home. Judge Stuart Wilson slammed the bank for its "disproportionate" attempt, stating that Vavi had shown "an apparently perfect adherence" to paying his monthly installments. The judge also criticised the bank for demanding over R160,000 in legal costs, almost double the outstanding arrears. Vavi's history with the ANC and Cosatu has been marked by controversy and criticism. He was previously fired from Cosatu due to escalating tensions and disagreements with the federation's leadership. His criticism of the ANC's corruption and policy direction further strained his relationship with the party. ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu did not respond to questions sent to her. Cosatu's spokesperson Matthew Parks said the Federation was aware of the matter but were not buying into claims that there was a political controversy around the issue. "We don't buy the story that he (Vavi) was targeted political party owns a bank or can influenece a bank. "We obviously sympathise with the judge was scathing towards Standard Bank in his ruling. We always say that there should be a better way to resolve these issues, other than going to court," Parks said. The Vavi case is not an isolated incident. Standard Bank has faced criticism for handling mortgage arrears and foreclosure proceedings. A R60-billion class-action lawsuit against major South African banks, including Standard Bank, highlights systemic issues with how banks handle mortgage arrears. Advocate Douglas Shaw, leading the lawsuit, alleges that banks frequently proceed with sales even when foreclosure is not a last resort, and often impose excessive legal costs. "We often see banks act in a manner we consider irresponsible. You cannot trust them to do what most people would see as 'the right thing',' Shaw said. In another case the bank was again accused of using underhanded tactics to short change its clients, claiming that a couple had defaulted in their bond repayments after they were allegedly overcharged by the bank. Shamilla Pather and her husband Roman, of Pinetown, said at the time that they were overcharged by the bank which, they say, has also prolonged court processes intended to resolve the matter. They accused the bank of expecting her and her husband to pay R600,000 or more over a 10-year period in lieu of one month of arrears of R8,800. In another case in 2023, a couple Patrick and Polin Anthony from Gauteng, defaulted on their mortgage payments for their home in Forest Hill, Gauteng. However, Standard Bank debited an amount of R124,047,34 from Anthony's family bank account allegedly after increasing the interest rate from prime -1% to prime +1% from August 1, 2009. This allegedly resulted in an overpayment of R135,301,30, according to financial investigator Emerald van Zyl, who said the overpayment was revealed by an independent actuary as he accused the bank of having allegedly increased the prime rate through internal policy. Standard Bank did not respond to the claims that political interference had led to banking action against Vavi, but responded to other questions. The bank's spokesperson Ron Derby said the bank wished to clarify that on 12 June 2025, Vavi's matter was postponed, and no final court order was granted dismissing the bank's application. 'Regarding this matter, the home loan account has been in arrears since 2015. Over the years, the bank has extended multiple opportunities to the homeowner to get the account up to date. Legal proceedings were only initiated in 2022, after all other avenues to resolve the matter amicably had been exhausted…Legal action is never our first course of action — it is a measure of last resort. 'With regards to the matter of Mark Rowan and Shamilla Pather, Standard Bank has engaged directly with the clients to discuss an amicable resolution. Any resolution arrived at is subject to confidentiality agreements and therefore the details cannot be made publicly available. "We are committed to supporting our clients through financial challenges and strongly encourage clients to engage with us at the earliest signs of financial distress. Early engagement enables us to work collaboratively to find solutions that are sustainable and mutually beneficial,' Derby said. [email protected]
