
Scott Maxwell: With migrants fleeing, Florida seeks child labor
The Newsweek headline looked like satire: 'Florida May Replace Immigrant Workers With Child Labor.'
Savvy Floridians know, though, that you can't fictionalize stories more absurd than this state's reality. And Florida lawmakers are, in fact, trying to roll back the state's child-labor laws.
Basically, if employers in this state can't exploit immigrants, the governor and Legislature want them to be able to legally exploit your children.
The latest proposal would allow teens to work longer hours, without breaks and even overnight shifts on school nights. Take that, Myanmar.
Up next, maybe we can emulate Burkina Faso where more than half the kids are in the labor force, some as young as 7. Now there's a country with values.
What you're witnessing is a real-life version of the dog that chased cars without thinking about what he'd do if he actually caught one. In this case, Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state's GOP legislators have fumed for years about undocumented workers without having the slightest clue about how they'd respond if those workers actually walked off Florida job sites.
So now they're panicking and want your kids to fill the bill.
DeSantis favors replacing 'dirt cheap' labor from illegal migrants with teens 14 and older
Normally, in a free-market economy, if an employer can't find workers, it would just raise wages until people start applying. That's how supply and demand works.
But Florida's GOP politicians don't want to ask their campaign donors to raise wages. They'd rather flood the market with another class of exploitable workers — teenagers.
Maybe you used to dream of your teen becoming an engineer or architect. Well, forget that Ivy League, ivory-tower fiddle-faddle. Florida's economy needs them harvesting tomatoes and cleaning motel rooms.
In some ways, it makes sense to put our kids to work. We're sure not educating them. Florida's SAT scores have dropped to 47th in America. And our state's eighth-graders just posted the lowest math and reading scores in 20 years.
So, if we're not preparing them for higher education or high-paying jobs, we might as well get them primed for the low-wage tourism and agriculture jobs that make this state hum.
Florida test scores drop again, and all we get are excuses | Commentary
Senate Bill 918, would eliminate restrictions on how many hours 16- and 17-year-olds can work. It would end guaranteed meal breaks and also lift restrictions for kids as young as 14 who are home schooled or enrolled in virtual school. (So if you want your rugrat pulling down a paycheck, just yank 'em out of traditional school.)
The Florida Policy Institute summarized the bill by saying it would allow Florida to work teens 'for unlimited hours, any time day or night, seven days per week and without breaks.'
Welcome to childhood in Florida.
Not all Republicans think this is a boffo idea. Sen. Joe Gruters, a former chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, joined Democrats in opposing the bill, saying: 'I think we need to let kids be kids.'
Gruters chose his words carefully: 'Let kids be kids' is a line DeSantis uses a lot, usually when he's pushing censorship laws.
Apparently, in DeSantis' worldview, teens aren't mature enough to see certain drag performers, even alongside their parents — but are mature enough to work right through the night until school starts at 7 am. That's just kids being kids.
As I've said before, I'm a fan of teens having jobs. I had a paper route in middle school and landed my first real job at a drugstore when I was 14 — old enough to legally sell condoms and tampons, but still immature enough to giggle about it. (Basically, if you ever entered a Revco in the 1980s, nervous about making a purchase, I was your worst nightmare.)
But here's the thing: I believe teens should get jobs when they and their parents want them to get jobs — not because we need to plug labor holes in our low-wage economy.
Keep in mind: DeSantis didn't promote his roll-back-child-labor-laws ideas at a panel discussion on building teen character. He did it at panel discussion on immigration. After noting that undocumented workers provided 'dirt cheap labor,' DeSantis asked: 'Why do we say why we need to import foreigners, even import them illegally, when you know teenagers used to work at these resorts?'
This is just about swapping one exploitable labor class for another … in a state that already turns a blind eye to companies that break labor laws.
Remember Florida's 'mandatory' E-Verify law? It explicitly said that the state couldn't even fine companies caught breaking the law until they're caught three times. And that law-breaking employers must be given 30 days to stop breaking the law before they're punished. What other laws work like that?
This is a state that gives companies a pass on labor-law violations and now wants to give them a younger workforce. What a dangerous combo. Even moreso when you consider GOP lawmakers also want to let businesses subvert minimum wage laws for some workers 'younger than 18 years of age.'
Amnesty-for-employers still part of Florida's immigration 'crackdown' | Commentary
Kids in Florida who say they have financial 'hardships' can surrender even more workplace protections. Basically, the poorer you are, the more you can be exploited. So it ain't gonna be the private, prep-school kids working farm fields and cleaning motel rooms at 3 in the morning.
DeSantis seemed particularly interested in using kids to fill the theme parks' job needs. But the proposed rollbacks would also allow teens to work longer hours waxing floors, painting houses, stocking shelves, doing landscaping and working in fast food. Kids would still be banned from doing particularly dangerous jobs like mining or tarring roofs higher than six feet.
So teens could be asked to work overnight shifts right up until the start of a school day. That's just 'kids being kids.' But we'd draw the line at boiler rooms and phosphate mines. A state has to have standards, after all.
smaxwell@orlandosentinel.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is Elon Musk right to oppose the budget bill? What Americans said in a new poll
During his public falling out with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk slammed the president's proposed spending bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — claiming it will balloon the deficit. It turns out, most Americans agree with his critique, new polling reveals. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked to react to a statement from Musk on the GOP-backed spending bill, which passed in the House without a single Democratic vote. The legislation, Musk wrote on X on June 3, 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and burden (American) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' A majority of respondents, 56%, said they agreed with this statement, while just 17% said they disagreed. More than one-quarter, 27%, said they were unsure. The answers were largely linked to partisan affiliation, with Democrats largely siding with Musk for a change. Seventy-two percent of Democrats said they concurred with the billionaire's statement about the spending bill, as did 55% of independents. Among Republicans, a plurality, 44%, said they agreed. The poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6-9 — posed the same statement before the other half of respondents, but this time, it did not attribute it to Musk. Without reference to Musk, a slightly smaller share, 49%, said they agreed with the statement, while 23% said they disagreed. Smaller shares of Republicans, independents and Democrats agreed, though Democrats saw the largest decrease in support — from 72% to 60%. The poll has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The spending bill, which provides funding for fiscal year 2025, passed in the House in a 215-214 vote in late May and is now under consideration in the Senate. It contains many pieces of Trump's agenda, including a road map to extend the 2017 tax cuts, as well as an increase in funding for the Pentagon and border security, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. At the same time, it slashes funding for social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Further — to Musk's point — it would increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency. In addition to Musk, the bill has received criticism from several other prominent conservatives in Congress. One of the most vocal opponents has been Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wrote on X that 'the spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt.' Other Republican lawmakers have come out in defense of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has said the legislation will deliver 'historic tax relief, ensure our border stays secure, strengthen our military, and produce historic savings.' Meanwhile, Democrats have been united in their opposition. In a statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled the bill 'the GOP Tax Scam' and said it would rip 'healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.'

Politico
43 minutes ago
- Politico
More Republican money for Cuomo
GRAND OLD PARTY OF CUOMO: Mayoral front-runner Andrew Cuomo has raked in nearly $400,000 from donors registered with the Republican and Conservative Party, public records show. New campaign filings from late May reveal the former governor accepted over $270,000 from 167 Republican donors between March 14 and May 19. In the previous filing period, Playbook reported he raised over $120,000 from Republican and Conservative Party donors. At least a dozen of the new donors have also given to President Donald Trump. Cuomo's raised nearly $3.9 million and, with public matching funds, had $5.7 million on hand, as of the most recent filing last month. Many of his Trump and Republican aligned donors have also given to other Democrats. The boost in GOP cash comes as the former governor has taken an increasingly antagonistic posture to Trump, whose Justice Department launched a probe last month into whether Cuomo lied to Congress during testimony about his handling of covid in nursing homes. 'Governor Cuomo is the candidate of New York City's working families, having spent decades delivering for them,' Cuomo's spokesperson, Rich Azzopardi, said in a statement. He cited Cuomo's record of 'raising wages for millions, passing the strongest paid family leave program in the nation, making public college tuition free for the middle class and building lasting infrastructure projects' like the Moynihan Train Hall, Second Avenue subway and Kosciuszko Bridge. 'This is why he has built the broadest coalition of support of any candidate, why he leads in every poll and why, when he's mayor, he's going to get this city back on the right track and make it more affordable and safer for all,' Azzopardi added. In the first weeks of his campaign, Cuomo was more hesitant to go toe-to-toe with the president, saying he would seek partnership and try to find common ground with one of his fellow 'Queens boys.' But amid the FBI probe and increasing immigration enforcement from the Trump administration, Cuomo has campaigned on the idea he would be the strongest voice to stand up to Trump. The nearly $400,000 in grand-ol'-party money doesn't include donors to his super PAC Fix the City, which has raked in money from the likes of Trump-loving billionaire Bill Ackman, longtime Republican megadonor Ken Langone and Jo Carole Lauder, wife of cosmetics heir Ron Lauder, who spent millions trying to elect Republican Lee Zeldin as governor in 2022. Backers to a Cuomo-aligned super PAC include big business, like real estate developer Two Trees Management, construction firm Halmar International and food delivery service DoorDash, which gave $1 million last month. Fix the City has raised $12.2 million overall, making it the best-funded super PAC in city history. Cuomo's rivals contended the GOP money flowing toward him is just one black mark on his efforts to champion progressive issues. 'It's not rocket science: landlords, billionaires, and MAGA Republicans overwhelmingly support Andrew Cuomo because they know he will raise the rent, give tax breaks to the rich, and collaborate with Donald Trump,' a spokesperson for mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, Lekha Sunder, said in a statement. Mamdani echoed similar talking points on the campaign trail today: 'New Yorkers need to ask themselves at this moment, what kind of experience do they want?' he asked, speaking from a union office in Lower Manhattan. 'Do they want the experience of a man who has been funded by the very billionaires who put Donald Trump back in the White House? Or do they want the experience of someone who is actually willing to fight for the things that they believe?' On the debate stage, he shot down any notion those donors would have any influence on policy. 'I don't care who gave me what,' Cuomo said. — Jason Beeferman ENDORSEMENT NEWS: Former mayor Michael Bloomberg is endorsing Cuomo in the mayor's race, POLITICO reported this afternoon. From the Capitol IMMIGRANT PROTESTS COME TO THE CAPITOL: Anti-ICE protestors shut down Albany's main thoroughfare for several hours this afternoon. 'On the state level, we need to be braver than we've been — Democrats need to lean into this issue,' Assemblymember Tony Simone said at a rally in favor of the New York for All Act, which would ban state and local governments from cooperating with immigration officials. A group of the rally-goers eventually occupied a section of Washington Ave. immediately outside of the Capitol, forcing police to divert all traffic from the road. They were joined by five of the six DSA members of the state Assembly – minus Mamdani, who hasn't had much of a presence in Albany recently as he campaigns for mayor. A group of state troopers eyed the protest but decided the city street was outside their jurisdiction. The Albany PD remained focused on diverting traffic rather than making arrests, and word soon spread among the protestors that Mayor Kathy Sheehan would let them continue. 'Mayor Sheehan said there would be no arrests because she supported what we were doing and the bill,' Assemblymember Emily Gallagher said as she was returning to her legislative duties after an hour sitting on a crosswalk. 'So I think this is an enormous success — that's the goal of civil disobedience, to shut down the road and to make sure that people hear the message. The mayor heard the message, so hopefully more will.' (Sheehan's office said it 'never considers the content of a protest when allowing for free speech' and was using 'the same tactics we have used for decades' to deal with protests). Still, the anti-ICE proposal might face long odds in the Legislature in the remaining days of session. 'We at the state can't stop that,' Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stweart-Cousins said yesterday when asked about the events in Los Angeles. 'We can do what we're doing — protests and help people try to pull their lives back together when their loved ones are yanked out because they went to work that day. But this is a federal issue.' — Bill Mahoney FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL BRIDGE LIGHTS BLASTED: Democratic primary rivals of Cuomo took the chance to hammer the frontrunner over the end of his bridge lights boondoggle. 'Cuomo massively defunded the MTA, causing the worst subway disruptions we've seen in decades, and then rashly spent over $100 million for a vanity project that never came to fruition,' said mayoral candidate and New York City Comptroller Brad Lander. 'Just like when he spent half a billion dollars on COVID equipment that never got distributed, it's classic Cuomo: ego-driven, atrocious mismanagement.' Cuomo advanced a vision to luminate every bridge in New York City with decorative, synchronized lights to make an 'international tourist attraction' in 2016. The $250 million estimated cost drew criticism as the subways melted down over what became the 2017 'Summer of Hell.' The New York Power Authority spent more than $100 million working on the project, including $37 million for lighting equipment, before the project was put on ice. Those lights have been sitting in a warehouse for years — costing more than $2 million to store — and are now being auctioned off, as POLITICO reported Monday. The current winning bid this afternoon? $26. 'This is classic Cuomo: all show and no substance,' said state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, who is also running for mayor. 'While Andrew Cuomo was busy wasting taxpayer dollars by putting colored lights on a bridge, subway riders like me were waiting for delayed, overcrowded and hot trains. New Yorkers deserve better than this Andrew Cuomo and should not rank him anywhere on their ballot.' 'Cuomo spent millions turning public infrastructure into a crappy light show — now the lights are on the auction block, like relics from a museum of failed vanity projects,' said former New York City Comptroller and candidate Scott Stringer. 'If they were worth more, I would say the money from the auction should go toward fixing the mess he left behind from his time as governor: the lack of affordable housing, a broken subway system, and an underfunded mental health-care system.' A spokesperson for Mamdani, Cuomo's chief rival, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His supporters posted on social media touting Mamdani's support for a measure directing the power authority to build new renewables, provide workforce training and reduce energy costs for low-income households. 'Cuomo made NYPA spend $100M on a failed vanity project that kneecapped their finances for years,' posted the New York City Democratic Socialists of America Ecosocialist Working Group. 'Thanks to [Mamdani], NYPA is now spending $100M to build the renewable energy New Yorkers need. Rank Zohran #1, fill out the rest of your ballot, don't rank Cuomo.' — Marie J. French 'BOY MAYOR' 2.0: If elected, Mamdani would be the city's youngest mayor in over a century, and he would hold a job with responsibilities way greater than the one he has, The New York Times reported today. The piece expounded upon concerns, even among fellow progressives, about Mamdani's inexperience as he seeks to govern the nation's largest city. Asked about it at an unrelated presser Tuesday, the 33-year-old turned the question back on the 67-year-old Cuomo. 'New Yorkers need to ask themselves at this moment, what kind of experience do they want?' he said. 'Do they want the experience of someone who has played insider party politics, who has been there all along as our failures within the Democratic Party gave rise to Donald Trump? Or do they want the experience of someone who is actually willing to fight for the things that they believe?' Cuomo, the frontrunner, is double Mamdani's age and ran New York as governor for three terms. Mamdani, who manages a government staff of five people, the Times reported, has previously pointed to the success of his campaign as a reason why he should be trusted to run the city. — Jeff Coltin IN OTHER NEWS — BRAD'S BURN RATE: Brad Lander had spent nearly $1 million more than any other candidate in the Democratic primary for New York mayor as of last month, putting himself at a significant disadvantage in the final stretch (POLITICO) — ANYBODY WANT TO BE MY LG?: Gov. Kathy Hochul's satirical video for the annual Legislative Correspondents Association dinner poked fun at her now-pressing search for a new Lieutenant Governor — and even included a cameo from former Rep. George Santos. (WATCH) — IWEN'S REDEMPTION: Ousted Brooklyn state Sen. Iwen Chu has filed to run for office again, and she says the committee is 'exploratory in nature.' (City & State) Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.


E&E News
43 minutes ago
- E&E News
Senate Republican questions megabill deadline — and says Musk ‘missed an opportunity' to shape it
Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis raised doubts on Tuesday the GOP could pass its megabill by its self-imposed Independence Day deadline. Curtis, speaking at the POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington, said, 'I think a lot of us would be surprised if it passed by July 4.' He added: 'I think that's a false deadline. I don't think that we need to put a specific deadline on it. Let's get it right.' Advertisement Curtis, who has been pushing for specific changes to the House-passed tax cut, energy and security spending budget bill, said the package would unfairly phase out tax credits from the Democrats' 2022 climate law. He said the rollbacks could harm energy workers and the economy.