
Sassa R4m fraud case latest: Court dismisses bail bid of accused
Jumping the gun: The bail bid of one of the 11 accused in the multimillion-rand Sassa fraud case has been dismissed by the high court.
The 11 accused in the R4 million Sassa fraud scheme appears at the Lenasia Magistrate's Court on 29 April 2025. Pictures: Gallo Images/ Fani Mahuntsi
The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg dismissed the urgent bail application of Phumelele Myeza, one of the accused in the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) fraud case, on Thursday, 22 May.
The judgment comes after the defence approached the high court for the accused to be released on bail, arguing that the postponement period set by the Lenasia magistrate's court was excessively long and therefore irregular.
Myeza and her 10 co-accused—who include eight Sassa officials—have a pending and uncompleted bail application before the Lenasia Magistrate's Court. They face more than 1,000 charges ranging from cybercrime to fraud to identity theft.
Sassa fraud case: 'Complex scheme' of fake beneficiary profiles
The state alleges that the accused orchestrated a complex scheme involving the creation of fake Sassa profiles, into which more than R4 million was deposited.
They then allegedly used these profiles to withdraw large sums of money from various Sassa pay points.
ALSO READ: Sassa millions 'heist' in Rosebank underground car park
Multiple postponements
The case, which first made headlines in 2024, has faced multiple postponements.
'The court is expected to continue with the 11 accused's bail applications on 10 and 11 June 2025 and may set a trial date as the National Prosecuting Authority prepares to present key witness testimony,' stated NPA spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane after the group's last appearance on 29 April 2025.
Witness interference?
The defence attorneys representing the Sassa employees alleged potential witness interference during the bail hearing, claiming a Sassa official had visited their clients in prison to ask them to sign documents.
State prosecutors, however, dismissed the allegations of witness interference, stating that the prison visit by Sassa officials was related to internal disciplinary processes rather than the criminal case.
'Complex scheme of fake Sassa profiles'
The state alleges that the accused orchestrated a complex scheme involving the creation of fake Sassa profiles, into which more than R4 million was deposited.
They then allegedly used these profiles to withdraw large sums of money from various Sassa pay points.
ALSO READ: Sassa grant: June payment dates and claims of 'double pay'
'No irregularities': Lack of evidence in Sassa fraud accused's bail bid
In opposing Myeza's bail bid on Thursday, Senior State Advocate Matshediso Phatlanyane emphasised that the accused prematurely approached the high court since the decision of the magistrate is pending.
She further stated that there were no irregularities upon which the high court could interfere.
Phatlanyane pointed out that the magistrate requested further evidence to be presented for her to make a decision.
This because – according to the state advocate – there was insufficient evidence before the high court for it to arrive at a decision.
The court concurred with the state, ruling that the applicant had not provided enough evidence for the high court to grant her bail, especially with a pending application in a lower court.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
A national embarrassment? ‘Scorpions 2.0' bill pitched to save failing NPA
The DA says the NPA should at least prosecute one major case successfully to regain public trust. National Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Shamila Batohi during a media briefing in Silverton where she introduced the new Investigating director at the NPA head office on Friday, 24 May 2019. Picture: Gallo Images / Phill Magakoe Lawyers for the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) are under scrutiny for their inability to secure convictions in high-profile cases. The NPA has failed to secure court victories and convictions in several major cases, including controversial Nigerian Pastor Timothy Omotoso's rape case, and other prominent cases linked to ANC politicians and State Capture. In 2024, former prosecutor and now DA parliamentarian Glynnis Breytenbach proposed a set of reforms aimed at bolstering successful prosecutions. This includes introducing a 'Scorpions 2.0' bill, which is expected to establish an independent Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). This commission will have the power to investigate and prosecute high-level corruption, free from political interference. The DA also wants to amend the constitution to ensure the head of the NPA is appointed by parliament and not the president. 'I did not expect that there would be a huge appetite for this bill, for obvious reasons. But I believe it is the only solution to the current problem. 'To rebuild, the NPA is going to take 20 years. We cannot wait 20 years for these prosecutions to take place; to fill up an anti-corruption commission with competent staff would be much easier,' said Breytenbach. Breytenbach believes that other problems that plague the NPA include budget cuts, which limit the organisation's ability to do its work. 'If you do not have a budget, it becomes difficult and then impossible to prosecute these cases in court, and that is why we see these debacles in court because there has not been sufficient consultation with subject-matter experts,' she said. Sabotage in the NPA? On Thursday, National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shamila Batohi expressed concern about the NPA's inability to deliver successful prosecutions. 'That actually makes me worry sometimes, that the NPA is actually being infiltrated by people who do not have the rule of law at heart. 'I do not sleep comfortably at night because of that, not because I think the NPA is a failing organisation,' she said. Breytenbach said she believes that Batohi has done her best and cannot be completely blamed for all the failures in prosecutions. She said some of the bad elements in the ranks of the NPA are known, but there seems to be no political will to root them out. 'We all know who they are. She (Batohi) has not managed to get rid of all of them either because she has not tried, but some of them we know that she has tried, and she has been hampered in the process,' she said. ALSO READ: NPA 'taken aback' over Moroadi Cholota extradition ruling, hints at appeal NPA a haven for politically connected? ActionSA parliamentary leader Athol Trollip stated that the NPA has become a haven for the politically connected. 'It has become a place where accountability is avoided, justice is delayed, and prosecutions collapse with shocking regularity. 'Under Shamila Batohi's leadership, the NPA reels from one scandal to the next. 'South Africans are left wondering if these failures are merely a result of incompetence, or is there a deliberate agenda to protect the corrupt?' he said. NOW READ: NPA 'infiltrated by those against the rule of law' – Batohi says


The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Defence raises concerns over new evidence about Longwe Twala in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial
The state is awaiting a two-minute video clip from a broadcaster. State Prosecutor George Baloyi is seen at Pretoria High Court on 15 September 2022. Picture: Gallo Images/City Press/Tebogo Letsie There was an exchange in court on Friday as the defence in the Senzo Meyiwa murder trial challenged the state's attempt to introduce new evidence. Proceedings resumed in the Pretoria High Court, following the conclusion of cross-examination of lead investigator Brigadier Bongani Gininda. State seeks to introduce new evidence in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial During proceedings, state prosecutor George Baloyi sought to re-examine Gininda regarding additional photographs retrieved from the cellphones of accused number two, Bongani Ntanzi, and accused number three, Mthobisi Mncube. 'The role purpose of such re-examination is to put a full and fair picture before the court to enable the court to adjudicate on the issues that are in dispute namely the identity of the perpetrators who invaded the Khumalo home on the 26th of October 2014 and killed the deceased. 'It is, therefore, our submission that the evidence is relevant,' he said. Baloyi explained that the defence opposed this move on the grounds that it constituted new evidence not previously addressed. ALSO READ: 'This is what happens in a SA run by blacks': Senzo Meyiwa trial judge fires off explosive rant However, he argued that it was the defence that raised the issue of the accused's identity during Gininda's cross-examination, which justified revisiting the matter. 'Even if the re-examination of Brigadier Gininda on these additional photos can be regarded as new matters that do not arise out of cross examination, we submit the new evidence can still be canvassed with the leave of the court and may allow further cross examination on the new evidence.' He also pointed out that legislation governing hearsay evidence permits its provisional admission, provided the individuals who obtained the data are recalled to testify. The court previously heard that Mncube, also had photos of guns, ammunition, an axe and a panga on his phone. One image with a firearm was saved under the name 'my killing machine'. Furthermore, Baloyi revealed that the state is awaiting a two-minute video clip from broadcaster eNCA. The footage relates to a claim previously made by late defence lawyer Thulani Mngomezulu during Gininda's testimony that Meyiwa was shot by Longwe Twala, the son of renowned music producer Sello 'Chicco' Twala. Mngomezulu had also alleged that Longwe accidentally shot himself in the foot during the incident. 'There is footage available that we want to show the court. READ MORE: 'No proper investigation was done': Defence frustrated over missing evidence in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial 'We have started this process since December 2024 to obtain the footage but there is a certain procedure that is involved.' Baloyi explained that a Section 205 application, authorised by the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Shamila Batohi, was granted to gain access to the footage. 'A section 205 subpoena was issued for the footage but there has been toing and froing with the legal representative from eNCA, but two days ago they undertook to furnish the state with the footage.' Defence pushes back as Senzo Meyiwa murder trial postponed The defence insisted that the state was introducing new evidence. Advocate Charles Mnisi, representing Mncube and accused number one, Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya, argued that the state must make a formal application to reopen its case. 'As much as we realise that there is nothing stopping the state from adducing that evidence, but that evidence cannot be introduced through re-examination. 'Procedurally, the state needs to finalise its re-examination, make an application to lead this new evidence which needs to be contexualised in its case.' Other defence lawyers echoed similar sentiments. Advocate Zandile Mshololo, representing accused number five, Fisokuhle Ntuli, warned that bypassing proper procedure could compromise the accused's right to a fair trial. She added that Sergeant Moses Mabasa and Warrant Officer Thando Ndlovu – both of whom previously testified on data downloaded from the accused's phones – would need to be recalled. 'The new evidence cannot be introduced through this witness [Gininda],' Mshololo told the court. Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng ultimately ruled in favour of the defence. The trial is set to resume on Monday. NOW READ: 'That is the law': Judge intervenes as lawyers squabble in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial


The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sassa grant payments delayed due to undisclosed income
THE South African Social Security Agency (Sassa), in collaboration with registered Credit Bureaus, has identified 210 000 social grant beneficiaries who appear to be receiving income that was not disclosed to the agency. As a result, this month's grant payments will be delayed for some of the affected beneficiaries. Sassa said according to the Social Assistance Act and its regulations, beneficiaries are legally required to fully disclose all sources of income during their initial application. Also read: Metro police enforce zero-tolerance policy on illegal truck parking Beneficiaries are also obligated to inform Sassa of any changes to their financial circumstances after their application has been approved. Spokesperson for Sassa Paseka Letsatsi said failure to comply with these requirements constitutes a violation of the Act and may result in corrective action. 'As part of this initiative, social grant payments for the affected beneficiaries will be delayed in the June 2025 payment cycle. These individuals are required to present themselves at their nearest Sassa local offices for a grant review within 30 days from this notice date, in line with Regulation 30 of the Social Assistance Act. Beneficiaries who fail to comply with this process risk having their grants suspended. Continued non-compliance may lead to the permanent lapsing of their grants,' said Letsatsi. Letsatsi said the initiative is aimed at ensuring that beneficiaries confirm any changes in their financial circumstances and update their personal details. 'It also seeks to address potential inclusion errors in the current social security system. A beneficiary may have qualified for a grant at the time of application, but improved material conditions over time may render them ineligible,' said Letsatsi. Also read: How to apply for an ID For further details on the Sassa social grant fraud cases, click here. Sassa has encouraged all beneficiaries to disclose any alternative sources of income and to report any additional bank accounts not previously declared. Those beneficiaries still using the green bar-coded ID book are urged to replace it with the smart ID card, due to the increased risk of fraud associated with the older ID format. 'Sassa reiterates its zero-tolerance stance on fraud, and should there be evidence of any officials colluding with beneficiaries to defraud the system, immediate disciplinary and legal action will be taken to safeguard the integrity of the Agency and prevent financial losses,' Letsatsi added. For more information on grant reviews, clients are urged to contact the Sassa toll-free customer care line on 0800 60 1011 or GrantEnquiries@ For more Southlands Sun news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and get news delivered straight to your inbox. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!