
‘It takes over your life': Fraud cases up 33 per cent as AI, crypto and social media increase risk for millions of victims
Fraud cases in England and Wales surged by more than 1 million last year, new figures reveal, with some victims losing tens of thousands of pounds to scammers.
Over 2024, there was a 33 per cent rise in fraud incidents compared to the previous year, rising from an estimated 3 million cases to 4.1 million, according to new data from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW).
Fraud can take many different and increasingly sophisticated forms in the digital age - with one man losing £75,000 through a complex scam involving AI, cryptocurrency and two famous figures.
'It just takes over your life. It destroys everything,' Des Healey, a scam victim who is still in debt, told the Independent.
Last year had highest number of fraud incidents on record since the data was first collected in 2017, meaning 7 per cent of adults were targeted by a scam.
'This huge rise underlines the simple fact that not enough is being done to prevent fraud or bring criminals to justice,' said Wayne Stevens, national fraud lead at charity Victim Support.
'Being a victim of fraud can unravel your entire life. We have supported people who have lost life changing amounts of money – forcing them to sell treasured possessions, or in extreme cases, into bankruptcy or homelessness.'
Fraud is defined as 'a person dishonestly and deliberately deceiving a victim for personal gain of property or money, or causing loss or risk of loss to another'.
More than £649 million was lost to investment fraud alone last year, ActionFraud figures show.
As a little-understood investment, cryptocurrencies are touted in two thirds of all cases.
Des Healey, a 60-year-old from Brighton, was one such victim.
In August 2023, Mr Healey saw a video on Facebook which featured tech billionaire Elon Musk and money guru Martin Lewis praising a new bitcoin investment scheme.
He did not know at the time, but the video had been manipulated using AI, to falsely show endorsement from Mr Musk and Mr Lewis.
Intrigued, Mr Healey responded to the ad with some personal details: his name, phone, and number. There was no money exchanged - yet.
That was all it took. From that point on, Des communicated with a man calling himself 'Carl Heinz', who promised him lucrative investments if he continued to send money.
'I'll be totally honest with you, when all this started, I thought I was going to get a couple of hundred quid for Christmas. And then this guy is talking about thousands, but I have to invest now,' said Mr Healey.
The scammer told Mr Healey to download a remote access app - meaning that his phone screen and control would be shared - in addition to Revolut and Binance, which was used to funnel money.
Mr Healey was sent simulated websites showing his investments rising, gaining more and more money; though he wasn't allowed to withdraw.
' They put you under a spell. They take over your life. They use human emotions, like guilt, trust and friendship,' he said.
After an initial £5,000 and further £10,000 of his own money, Mr Healey was pressured into taking out loans totalling £70,000 from four different banks.
When his son flagged concern, he eventually went to the police and realised he had been conned.
In their last call, Mr 'Heinz' tried to manipulate Mr Healey into giving him access to clear out his accounts -- before lashing out when he realised it was over.
'That's when I finally heard the real person,' said Mr Healey, who previously believed he had a friendship with Mr Heinz.
In the year and a half that has followed, two banks (MBNA and Barclays) have forgiven the loans taken out in his name, of which he says he 'did not see a cent'.
But he still owes £10,000 plus interest each to Asda/Lendable and Vanquish, both of whom hold him responsible for the credit even though he was scammed.
Now, Mr Healey says his debt is at £27,000, which he cannot pay, and he is on the brink of bankruptcy.
'They're just about to send bailiffs around my house. It's obviously hit my credit rating. I've been to my GP suffering from stress. I'm on antidepressants,' he added.
Since appearing on national news and a podcast with Martin Lewis himself, people have reached out to Mr Healey, sharing that they experienced the same (or similar) scam; including a young mother who lost £150,000.
Mr Healey was victim to what is known as Authorised Push Payment (APP) scams, a type of fraud where people are tricked or manipulated into sending money.
New UK regulation introduced in October means that APP scam victims using mobile banking can expect reimbursement up to £85,000 as standard.
But since Mr Healey lost money a year earlier, his case isn't covered.
What do the numbers say on fraud?
In most cases of fraud, people lose money (75 per cent).
Around two thirds of victims managed to fully recover their money last year, according to the crime survey; but this still leaves nearly one million (909,000) incidents where victims lost out.
The most common instance is bank and credit account fraud, making up around 2.4 million incidents in the last year alone.
This can include fraudulent use of your bank details to take out money or make online purchases, or even using your name to open new accounts.
Card fraud continues to rise despite efforts from banks and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to increase awareness and warnings around fraud.
Consumer and retail fraud has also seen the biggest increase, rising by 35 per cent last year to 1.1 million incidents.
This largely includes product-related fraud, where consumers are duped into buying something or receive a fraudulent product.
One example is falling for misleading advertising, and paying for something which doesn't fulfil its promises.
Oasis fans have recently lost over £2 million to ticket scams, new research today from Lloyds Bank shows; as fraudsters target areas where buyers are desperate due to high demand.
Another is counterfeit goods, where people might unknowingly buy a fake product from a third-party retailer but pay full price.
In other cases, people buy goods online which never show up.
Fraud in the digital age
These days, most (but not all) cases of bank or credit fraud see full reimbursement, where there is evidence of card details being used without authorisation.
Victims of consumer fraud are less likely to get their money back; with 52 per cent of them only recovering a fraction of losses, or none at all.
Consumer fraud often takes place through online marketplaces or third-party transactions.
Tracking the end bank account or cryptowallet to find a responsible party is increasingly difficult.
Some further 149,000 Brits were victims of computer viruses last year, the crime survey also estimates; and of those who lost money, none were able to fully recover their losses.
'If you're on your computer and you happened to click on a piece of malware which infects your computer, who's your reimbursement going to come from?' said Nick Stripe, head of crime statistics at the ONS.
'There's not really a route to reimburse whatever damage has been done there. Unless you've got good a good cyber insurance policy in place, which is unlikely for private individuals.'
The wealth of personal information available on social media also makes it easier for scammers to appear more authentic; for example, checking in on your birthday, or impersonating friends and family using public photos or details.
Previous crime survey data shows that just 1 in 7 fraud offences are reported to the police or Action Fraud.
'Sadly, there is a lot of shame and stigma associated with fraud, and it is vital that victims do not blame themselves,' explained Mr Stevens from Victim Support.
'Victims can struggle with their mental health, sometimes becoming too afraid to leave their home or go online. If you have been impacted, contact Victim Support for free, confidential support.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TONY HETHERINGTON: When is a bank not a bank?
Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. D.L. writes: I have an account with Suits Me, an internet bank authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority. But my account has been hacked – someone called the bank and transferred £4,200 to themselves, leaving me very little to live on and pay my bills. Tony Hetherington replies: You spent more than six hours on the phone to Suits Me, and when you finally reached the 'disputes team' you were told because you did not transfer the £4,200 the transaction required an investigation, which might take months. Suits Me said your money went to an account at Revolut, as instructed by the mystery caller. This left you with barely any money to support yourself and your 11-year-old child. You called the police, but they referred you to Action Fraud – which means it is unlikely there will be any police enquiries. I contacted Suits Me, which is based in a modernised cattle shed at a farm in Knutsford, Cheshire, and I supplied your signed authority to discuss the loss of your money. The company's boss Matthew Sanders refused to honour this. He said: 'Unfortunately, we cannot comment on individual accounts or disputes as I am sure you would expect.' He said his firm has 'rigorous' security procedures, adding: 'At Suits Me, we pride ourselves on our customer service and security.' You may disagree, of course. You assured me: 'I have two-factor authentication on my phone app and emails, and my phone has not been out of my sight.' You have not shared the account details with anyone, and they are not even written down. I tried again with Mr Sanders, but got a brief response that 'it is our strict policy not to debate individual customers' circumstances in the media'. So while every big bank is happy to respond when the customer allows it, Suits Me regards an invitation to comment as a 'debate'! But it did send you a lengthy letter. Banks operate a voluntary scam-victim refund scheme called the Contingent Reimbursement Model Code, they said – but Suits Me has not signed up to it. There is a separate scheme operated by the UK Payment Systems Regulator – but guess what, Suits Me works in partnership with a Gibraltar business so falls outside this refund programme, too. The company rejected your complaint, but offered you £35 for the time wasted on hold when you rang. It said if you were not happy, you could complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). This puzzled me because I was pretty sure that Suits Me was not covered by the FOS, so I questioned Mr Sanders and he admitted: 'The letter sent to Mr L contained an error in that it said he can raise a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman. This is not correct.' If you were unhappy, you should complain to a company called IDT Financial Services in Gibraltar. I did, and IDT explained it is a regulated issuer of Visa and Mastercard cards, and Suits Me is its distributor. You could file a complaint in Gibraltar, it said. Then two days ago, and without issuing any comment, Suits Me put the missing £4,200 back into your account. You were stunned, but delighted and relieved! The big question remains: how it is possible to operate a quasi-bank which sidesteps the ombudsman, is outside the compensation scheme and dismisses questions as a mere 'debate'. Why does the Government allow it? So what is Suits Me... and how does it work? 'Looking for a bank account? Suits Me offers personal accounts for everyone.' This is the bold statement on the company's website. But Suits Me is not a bank. Who says so? Its own boss says so. Matthew Sanders told me: 'Suits Me is not a bank. It is a distributor of e-money.' And if you search long enough on its website, it explains: 'An e-money account, like the personal account offered by Suits Me, is an account that stores money in electronic form which can be used to make payments.' Open an account and you can set up direct debits, pay bills and have a debit card. What you don't get is an overdraft or credit. And you also don't get plain speaking from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Suits Me appears in the FCA's public register of authorised firms, with the advice that 'you may be able to complain about this firm to the Financial Ombudsman Service', and 'you may be able to claim compensation from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme'. But the FCA says bluntly that the compensation scheme 'will not be able to consider a claim against this firm if it fails'. And whether the FOS will intervene 'depends on the activity'. The FCA answers leave customers to take the risks. Who would sign up with a bank that isn't a bank? Suits Me offers accounts in three minutes, with gamblers and debtors welcome. All asylum seekers need 'is a selfie for ID and a card issued by the Home Office'. If you believe you are the victim of financial wrongdoing, write to Tony Hetherington at Financial Mail, 9 Derry Street, London W8 5HY or email Because of the high volume of enquiries, personal replies cannot be given. Please send only copies of original documents, which we regret cannot be returned.

Finextra
3 days ago
- Finextra
Binance unveils new AI-powered app interface
Binance, the global blockchain ecosystem behind the largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume and trusted by over 275 million users worldwide, today announced Binance UI Refined — its new app user interface and user experience (UI/UX) powered by AI with a customizable homepage that can be adapted to each user's preferences, giving millions around the world a new and personalized crypto trading experience. 0 Released in conjunction with Binance's upcoming 8th anniversary, Binance UI Refined has been rated positively by 91% of surveyed users during beta testing[1] - underscoring Binance's commitment to innovate and make crypto easier to use and more accessible for users of all levels. The new UI/UX will provide users with a clearer progression of basic to advanced features. Novice users can start with a simplified experience to focus on learning while advanced and professional users can effortlessly customize their homepage to focus on more sophisticated features. As the global digital assets leader, Binance is also catering to varying regional and cultural preferences of different markets by making it easier for users to choose their layout and design elements such as information density levels. By moving beyond a 'one-size-fits-all' model, Binance is redefining the industry standard for crypto trading UI/UX through personalization and intelligent design. Jeff Li, VP of Product at Binance commented, 'Binance UI Refined marks a fundamental shift in how users engage with crypto. Instead of forcing everyone into the same layout, we're giving each of our millions of users the power to shape their own experience — with AI-powered widgets, personalized layouts, and smart recommendations that reflect their level, interests, and region. As the crypto industry evolves, we're setting a new standard for intuitive, inclusive, and intelligent product design.' Use of AI to Support User Journey Binance's AI technology enhances the user journey by recommending selected widgets based on the user's experience level, allowing novice users to focus on learning while advanced users can easily choose to trade on a layout with enhanced market depth and order book visibility. Users will also be presented with widget recommendations that are popular in their region to provide them with a better localized experience, reflecting the diverse and different trading behaviors and preferences of Binance's global userbase. Personalized App Homepage Binance UI Refined lets users personalize their app homepage by adding, arranging, and resizing widgets to fit their needs. With intuitive drag-and-drop functionality and dynamic layout adjustments, the interface adapts seamlessly to different devices and screen orientations. Smart and Flexible Widgets Binance UI Refined includes a powerful suite of smart widgets designed to enhance trading, learning, and market awareness — all from the user's homepage. Highlights include the AI Trending Widget, which analyzes real-time posts from X (formerly Twitter) and Binance Square to identify tokens gaining social momentum, and users can get a deeper Bullish/Bearish Sentiment breakdown that is updated continuously as new social posts roll in. Other widgets cover everything from helping users track assets across spot, futures, or newly listed categories, following top-performing lead traders to ETF flows, yield-earning products, market sentiment, and more — giving users the tools they need to make smarter decisions, faster. A 'For You' module at the top of the widget library recommends widgets based on the user's profile — helping make personalization even easier. Users can learn more about the currently available widget here and Binance will be introducing more widgets for users to enjoy. Refined Visual Design and a New Midnight Black Color Theme Binance UI Refined comes with a sleeker visual design that is made for readability, looks and feels lighter, and the design spacing has been adjusted for consistency throughout the app, all helping to reduce screen glare and provide more background theme options for users. Binance UI Refined presents users with new fonts and icons that have been enhanced for a contemporary and professional edge so users can enjoy greater clarity and focus. iOS users can also switch to a new Midnight Black color theme which offers a dark mode that reduces eye strain. Binance UI Refined is now being rolled out progressively and is targeted to be available to all users over the coming weeks.


Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
'No one cares what happened to you - you are not Brittany Higgins': Political staffer with a disturbingly familiar story exposes $2.4m taxpayer funded compo double standard
A parliamentary researcher who allegedly suffered a similar rape and bullying ordeal to Brittany Higgins says the government treated her completely differently. Anna Hough, 46, alleges she was raped as a young woman in politics and then bullied and discriminated against by her bosses after she raised it with them. Ms Hough claims she was sexually abused and raped by a political staffer while volunteering for the Australian Democrats between 2000 and 2001. When Ms Higgins went public in 2021 to famously disclose her alleged rape by Bruce Lehrmann, Ms Hough said it triggered her trauma from her own experience years earlier which led her to finally tell her bosses. But Ms Hough alleges that instead of being offered support by the Department of Parliamentary Services, she was sidelined and bullied by her managers. The mother-of-three from Canberra lodged a legal claim against the Federal Government in September 2023 covering both the alleged historic assaults and alleged bullying. But while Ms Higgins was given a $2.4million settlement after one day of mediation, Ms Hough claims she was instead treated like a 'second-class victim'. She told Daily Mail Australia she has been twice asked to sign non-disclosure agreements by the Labor Government and was given low-ball cash offers to settle. Now, after the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) found on Thursday there was 'no corruption issue' with Ms Higgins' huge settlement - which was signed after a day partly to avoid 'ongoing trauma' - Ms Hough has spoken out. 'I was a victim of alleged parliamentary workplace rape, sexual assault, bullying and discrimination but the Commonwealth has shown no concern about ongoing trauma to me,' Ms Hough told Daily Mail Australia. 'Instead, I have been offered a tiny fraction of the compensation, told repeatedly by lawyers and journalists that "no one cares what happened to you because you are not Brittany Higgins", and pressured to sign NDAs.' Ms Hough said some of the reasons she had been given by lawyers for the dramatic difference in settlement figures included that, 'you weren't a Liberal staffer', and 'that was a political decision'. '(But) we are supposed to have equality before the law in Australia,' she said. 'That should mean that if the Prime Minister, say, gets a speeding ticket he has to pay it the same way you or I do. 'And that if I am mistreated in the workplace, I get the same compensation as someone else who is similarly mistreated, whether they are the CEO or the cleaner.' Ms Hough stressed that her issue was with the government's handling of her own case, not how Ms Higgins' was treated. 'To be clear, I am not attacking Brittany Higgins, I am attacking the government and its inconsistency,' she said. The NACC said on Thursday that 'a critical consideration during the settlement process was avoiding ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins'. The former Liberal Party staffer's claim for alleged bullying and victimisation - not the rape itself - took about 11 months before it was resolved after a single day of mediation. 'But mine has now taken 20 months and counting,' Ms Hough said. 'The Commonwealth took four months just to respond to our first settlement offer. 'No one has shown any interest in avoiding ongoing trauma to me.' On Thursday morning, the NACC took the extraordinary step of revealing its preliminary findings into Ms Higgins' case to 'clear the air' around the 'scrutiny and speculation' surrounding the payout. It found that there was 'no corruption issue' involving any public officials. It also stated that the resolution of mediation after just a day was 'unexceptional' and revealed that Ms Higgins actually received less than the maximum amount recommended by external legal advice. Ms Higgins' former boss Senator Linda Reynolds, who lodged the original complaint, said she was 'bitterly disappointed' by the findings. 'My primary concern has always been how the Commonwealth could possibly settle unsubstantiated and statute barred claims made against me, alleging egregious conduct on my part without taking a single statement from me or speaking to me at all,' she said. Senator Reynolds has also launched legal action against the Commonwealth over the compensation payment, alleging that government lawyers were 'hopelessly conflicted'. The NACC said the question of whether Ms Higgins told mistruths during the pay-off talks was outside of their remit. 'Whether Ms Higgins made misrepresentations during the negotiations is not within the scope of the Commission's jurisdiction, as at the relevant time she was not a Commonwealth public official,' the NACC statement said. In his judgment in the Bruce Lehrmann defamation case last year, Federal Court Judge Michael Lee found that Ms Higgins made at least nine untrue representations when negotiating her settlement with the commission. Senator Reynolds noted that 'the NACC highlighted that whether or not a corruption issue exists is a different issue from whether there has been any breach of duty, misfeasance or negligence by the Commonwealth or its lawyers in relation to the settlement'. 'This distinction further reinforces the importance of my decision to pursue these issues in the Federal Court,' she added. Ms Reynolds is also awaiting the outcome of a blockbuster defamation claim she brought against Ms Higgins and her husband David Sharaz over social media posts the pair made about her. A judgement is expected to be handed down in the Supreme Court of Western Australia later this month. Ms Hough first went public with her allegations in an interview with Sky News in April. Ms Hough said her motivation was the 'principle that all survivors deserve justice - regardless of their profile, role, or the media attention their case attracts'. 'I've been silenced for too long,' she added. 'Given the ALP's response to an alleged Parliament House rape cover up last election, the hypocrisy on display in their treatment of me, particularly in trying to silence me, is quite something.' Ms Hough has not had an affiliation with a political party since 2012 and has never been a member of the Liberal Party. She was a 21-year-old university student working as a volunteer for the Australian Democrats when she alleges she was raped and sexually assaulted by a political staffer between April 2000 and May 2001. 'The power imbalance, combined with a total lack of reporting mechanisms and a culture of silence, made it impossible for me to speak up,' she told Sky News. 'When I sought help outside the party after the first assault, I was made to feel that it was my fault. No one suggested I report the assault, seek counselling, or speak to the police.' It was later, during the MeToo era, when Ms. Higgins came forward with her own trauma, that Ms. Hough started suffering PTSD symptoms. At that stage, she had been working in the Department of Parliamentary Services since 2016. She disclosed her trauma to her bosses who allegedly failed to offer support. 'Instead of being supported, I was pressured to step down from a more senior acting role, denied a promotion, and treated as a burden,' she added. 'The bullying and discrimination I faced at DPS were re-traumatising.' She quit her role in April 2023 and filed her legal claim against the Commonwealth five months later. Ms Hough claims she was twice asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement during settlement negotiations. But a spokesperson for the Attorney-General's Department has previously denied that they would ask any victims to stay silent with the use of non-disclosure agreements. Daily Mail Australia approached the Attorney-General's department for further comment. During her time working in parliament, Ms Hough contributed to the Set the Standard report, which examined workplace behaviour and culture in the corridors of power. She has also continued to call for the establishment of a redress scheme for survivors of abuse in Commonwealth parliamentary workplaces.