logo
EXCLUSIVE Women's rights campaigners storm male pond at Hampstead Heath in false beards, wigs and moustaches in protest over self-ID rule at ladies-only pool

EXCLUSIVE Women's rights campaigners storm male pond at Hampstead Heath in false beards, wigs and moustaches in protest over self-ID rule at ladies-only pool

Daily Mail​06-05-2025

Women's rights campaigners stormed the male pond at Hampstead Heath shouting 'no goolies in our poolies' in protest over bosses refusing to ban trans women from an adjacent ladies' only pond following the Supreme Court ruling.
Around 30 female protesters wearing false beards, wigs and moustaches descended on the male-only pond on Bank Holiday Monday demanding to be let in because they self-identified as male.
But they were met by security guards and police who locked a gate to prevent them from entering while insisting that protests were not allowed.
The protest was organised after officials from the City of London Corporation which runs the ponds in Hampstead Heath north London ruled that trans women or men who identify as women could continue swimming in a nearby ladies' pond.
Protesters demanded that the Corporation now ban trans women or men identifying as women from using the ladies' only pond following the Supreme Court ruling that the legal definition of a woman should be based on biological sex.
Waving placards declaring 'Let Women Swim' and 'No Peens in our Pond,' the women protesters marched on the male natural bathing pond loudly singing: 'The law says no. Men must go. No goolies in our poolies.'
On a day they dubbed 'Bank Holiday Man-Day', dog walkers and visitors to the Heath looked on bemused as the women then gathered on the edge of the pond singing: 'If the person has a penis, he's a man.'
After being denied entry, the women remonstrated with a police officer standing behind a locked iron gate demanding that they be permitted entry because 'we are men.'
Amy Desir, a gender-critical campaigner who organised the protest, insisted: 'If you allow trans women or men who identify as women into the ladies only pond then why can't us women, who identify as men, just for today, be allowed into the male only pond? '
Another protester screamed: 'I'm very manly. I have short hair and flat shoes. Let me in.'
A third shouted: 'Let us lads in.'
The police officer smirked and then admitted that he was a bit confused, particularly over which pronoun to use asking them: 'How should I refer to you all?'
The women replied: 'Sir or gentlemen or he or him. Or even your lordships,' leading to widespread laughter amongst those involved in the standoff.
As protesters remonstrated and joked with the officer about their 'manliness', five of them broke away, jumped over a wooden fence and dived into the chilly water of the male-only pond as their supporters cheered and clapped.
Ms Desir, who was wearing a bright, oversized novelty swimsuit was one of the first to breach the pond's defences.
She told MailOnline: 'We are not transphobic, we are pro-women and want to maintain safe spaces for women. The City of London Corporation is in breach of the law because only biological women should be allowed to use the women's only pond.
After swimming for around 20 minutes, the female protesters jumped in the air and waved to their supporters
'The Corporations self-identity policy is driving women away from the women's pond. They don't feel safe there anymore because of transwomen or predatory men being let in because they say they're a woman.'
She added: 'The whole situation is ridiculous. People who in the eyes of the law are not women are being allowed to use the women's pond and that is disgraceful.'
Hannah Clarke, who also jumped into the male pond, said: 'The Supreme Court has made the definition of a woman categorically clear and that's somebody who is born a woman. The City of London Corporation should be complying with the law, it's as simple as that.'
After swimming for around 20 minutes, the female protesters jumped in the air and waved to their supporters while standing on a wooden platform that jutted out over the men's pond.
Venice Allen, who shivered after leaving the pond and was drying herself with a towel thar read, 'Let Women Swim,' told MailOnline: 'The water was very cold, but it was worth it. This is a very important protest to fight for women's rights.
Ms Desir, who was wearing a bright, oversized novelty swimsuit was one of the first to breach the pond's defences. She was joined by Ms Clarke
Venice Allen (pictured), who shivered after leaving the pond and was drying herself with a towel thar read, 'Let Women Swim,' told MailOnline: 'The water was very cold, but it was worth it. This is a very important protest to fight for women's rights.'
'We will be returning until the women's pond is once again exclusively for women.'
The UK's sole women-only natural bathing pool became a flashpoint in the trans debate after the City of London Corporation adopted a 'self-ID' policy in 2019, meaning trans women or men identifying as women can use the female changing rooms and swim there.
It has chosen to stick with this policy despite the Equality and Human Rights Commission advising that trans women should not use women's facilities in workplaces or public spaces following the Supreme Court ruling.
The City of London Corporation has said that it is 'carefully considering the judgment' while awaiting statutory guidance from the Commission.
A spokesman for the City of London Corporation told the media: 'These accusations are completely false. The City Corporation is compliant with existing UK law.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's travel ban is here: What to know as U.S. shuts the door
Trump's travel ban is here: What to know as U.S. shuts the door

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump's travel ban is here: What to know as U.S. shuts the door

An unconventional approach melding immigration reforms and national security policy has resulted in the most dramatic restructuring of admissions policy in a generation, with the second Trump administration taking full advantage of a rare do-over in government. President Trump bans travel from 12 nations, partially restricts entry from seven others Trump expands first term policies to target new countries The Supreme Court in 2018 gave Trump permission to keep out foreign nationals whose presence the administration says would be detrimental to U.S. interests. Trump reinstituted and expanded a program last week that puts full or partial restrictions on travel to America from the citizens of 19 nations, with notable exceptions. Citizens of 12 countries were completely banned from entry beginning on June 9: Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Visitors from another nine countries, including Cuba and Venezuela, were hit with partial immigration and travel bans. More: LA, Olympic officials have 'every confidence' travel ban won't disrupt 2028 Games Athletes, relatives and coaches traveling for sporting events like the 2026 World Cup and the Los Angeles Summer Olympics in 2028 were exempted. So were immediate family members of some existing visa holders, Afghan nationals who were employed by the U.S. and ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran. Trump's administration also said Chinese students connected to China's communist party or studying in critical fields would no longer be welcome. And tried to stop international students from studying at Harvard. A leaked State Department cable also revealed the administration may require prospective international students at other universities to undergo social media vetting. The administration has also taken steps to deport pro-Palestinian demonstrators. Trump crackdown on legal entry draws less attention On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order that slammed America's doors to new refugees, halting admissions from Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Iraq and other war-torn countries. Trump moved to end temporary protected status for roughly 350,000 Venezuelan nationals in February, and is not expected to renew TPS for an upcoming batch. His administration also declined to extend TPS for Afghans and rescinded an extension for 521,000 Haitians that had been approved by the Biden administration. Citizens of Cameroon, in West Africa, will lose the protections in June. Without an extension, Hondurans' TPS will expire in July. Supreme Court lets Trump revoke safe-haven program for Cubans, Haitians, Venezuelans and Nicaraguans The administration also ended humanitarian parole for Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan and Venezuela immigrants, making them eligible for deportation. Trump's claw-back of temporary protected status for citizens of countries experiencing conflict - a program run through the Department of Homeland Security that former President Joe Biden greatly expanded - also removes work authorizations and deportation protections. Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, said Trump is pursuing the "same sort of anti-legal immigration push" he pursued in his first term, the refugee program was substantially curtailed. "The areas that he has the clearest legal authority over are the ones that he is reducing," Nowrasteh said. While the number of refugees who come to America varies from year to year, 60,050 people were admitted in 2023, according to DHS. Trump's administration is only allowing refugees from one nation, white South Africans known as Afrikaners. He has repeatedly alleged, without evidence, that they are the victims of genocide. Stephen Miller, the president's Homeland Security adviser, told reporters in May, as he sought to justify the policy, that the U.S. refugee program has historically been used as a solution to global poverty and it should not be. "Wherever there's global poverty or wherever there is dysfunctional governments, then the U.S. refugee program comes in, swoops them up, relocates them to America, and you have multi-generational problems," Miller said. "The U.S. refugee program has been a catastrophic failure." Trump administration cites national security concerns The administration has cited broad national security concerns for many of its actions while refusing to go into detail on individual cases. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters during a May 29 briefing that seemingly disparate actions such as Trump's slashing of foreign aid, directives to universities and revisions to visas were all part of the administration's pledge to get serious about security. Bruce, who was being pressed to say how many Chinese students would be affected by new visa restrictions, stressed: "What the story is here is that the issue of being serious about safety for the country matters, and we're going to look at that at every single front." Trump's approach "perhaps has not been done before," Bruce said in the remarks, which preceded Trump's travel ban. An analysis of State Department data by the American Immigration Council, which opposes Trump's moves, found the policy could prevent 34,000 immigrant visas and more than 125,000 non-immigrant visas - typically for business and tourism - from being issued each year. The group's analysis of 2022 data found that 298,600 people from affected countries came to the United States. The countries included were identified by the Trump administration as nations "for which vetting and screening information is so deficient" to warrant a full or partial travel ban and those whose nationals "pose significant risks of overstaying their visas in the United States." Of the countries on Trump's list, Haiti had the most overstays in 2023, by far. Stephanie Gee, the senior director for U.S. Legal Services at the International Refugee Assistance Project, a group that has taken Trump to court, criticized "very arbitrary exceptions" for people like athletes. "I think it raises questions around that rationale that they're picking and choosing how to say and when to say somebody is a national security threat," she said. Trump did not explain in his order why athletes were a lesser concern. But the Olympics allows athletes from all nations to participate, and Los Angeles is hosting in 2028. Contributing: Erin Mansfield, USA TODAY

Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance
Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance

Concern raised over public confidence in Police Scotland and its stance on the gender ruling from the Supreme Court. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... People are still 'none the wiser' as to how Scotland's national police force has amended its policies in light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling on gender, according to a board member of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA). The comment made at a SPA committee meeting on Tuesday comes amid warnings the force's stance risked impacting its operational impact and public confidence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Katharina Kasper said while Police Scotland was working in a 'dynamic environment', she had a 'degree of frustration' that after the Supreme Court ruling, its position was still unclear. Celebrations outside the Supreme Court in London after the ruling on gender. Picture:Addressing a meeting of the SPA's policing performance committee, which discussed the ongoing review in relation to sex and gender within Scottish policing, Ms Kasper said: 'For a member of the public at this stage looking at this, I don't think anybody is still none the wiser as to whether or not the Supreme Court judgement, which was very, very clear, has been adopted into Police Scotland's policies 'When it comes to recording the sex or gender of people who come into contact with the police, what is the current policy?' Asking if there was a 'policy vacuum", Ms Kasper, who also chairs the SPA's complaints and conduct committee, said while she understood the reasons for the process taking time, she had misgivings about the knock-on effects. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Police Scotland officers | PA 'I am concerned about the operational implications on this,' she said. 'I'm concerned about the public confidence in Police Scotland because this process has been taking so long, and I'm also concerned about the impact on officers and staff.' The force's deputy chief constable, Alan Speirs, said last month that Police Scotland planned to bring forward an 'extensive and advanced' document to this week's SPA meeting. But the six page-long document in question does not set out a definitive stance, noting the force was continuing with its ongoing review. The report, prepared by Assistant Chief Constable Catriona Paton, states: 'It is critical that we take time to consider all relevant legislation, national guidance and stakeholder feedback, to ensure our proposals are well-informed and evidence based. Our aim is to conduct this review carefully and to do it right and in a way which builds trust and confidence across all communities.' Reflecting on the report, Ms Kasper said she was 'a little bit disappointed' by it. She said: 'We had been promised a substantial product by DCC Spiers and having read this paper, it is an interim update on all the work that's been done. But I'm still none the wiser as to the actual substance of the issue.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Responding to Ms Kasper's criticisms, Ms Paton stressed 'context is everything', telling her: 'I appreciate your comments around the approach we've taken and I certainly acknowledge aspects of your frustration around pace. 'I think the Chief [Constable Jo Farrell] also acknowledged the desire for people to move quickly in this space, and the importance to get it right when we do that. Policing is not immune to the reality and the complexity of this, around how our terminology and understanding, as it is related to sex and gender, has changed, has at times been used interchangeably.

Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance
Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Gender row Scotland: Public 'none the wiser' about Police Scotland's gender ruling stance

Concern raised over public confidence in Police Scotland and its stance on the gender ruling from the Supreme Court. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... People are still 'none the wiser' as to how Scotland's national police force has amended its policies in light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling on gender, according to a board member of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA). The comment made at a SPA committee meeting on Tuesday comes amid warnings the force's stance risked impacting its operational impact and public confidence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Katharina Kasper said while Police Scotland was working in a 'dynamic environment', she had a 'degree of frustration' that after the Supreme Court ruling, its position was still unclear. Celebrations outside the Supreme Court in London after the ruling on gender. Picture:Addressing a meeting of the SPA's policing performance committee, which discussed the ongoing review in relation to sex and gender within Scottish policing, Ms Kasper said: 'For a member of the public at this stage looking at this, I don't think anybody is still none the wiser as to whether or not the Supreme Court judgement, which was very, very clear, has been adopted into Police Scotland's policies 'When it comes to recording the sex or gender of people who come into contact with the police, what is the current policy?' Asking if there was a 'policy vacuum", Ms Kasper, who also chairs the SPA's complaints and conduct committee, said while she understood the reasons for the process taking time, she had misgivings about the knock-on effects. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Police Scotland officers | PA 'I am concerned about the operational implications on this,' she said. 'I'm concerned about the public confidence in Police Scotland because this process has been taking so long, and I'm also concerned about the impact on officers and staff.' The force's deputy chief constable, Alan Speirs, said last month that Police Scotland planned to bring forward an 'extensive and advanced' document to this week's SPA meeting. But the six page-long document in question does not set out a definitive stance, noting the force was continuing with its ongoing review. The report, prepared by Assistant Chief Constable Catriona Paton, states: 'It is critical that we take time to consider all relevant legislation, national guidance and stakeholder feedback, to ensure our proposals are well-informed and evidence based. Our aim is to conduct this review carefully and to do it right and in a way which builds trust and confidence across all communities.' Reflecting on the report, Ms Kasper said she was 'a little bit disappointed' by it. She said: 'We had been promised a substantial product by DCC Spiers and having read this paper, it is an interim update on all the work that's been done. But I'm still none the wiser as to the actual substance of the issue.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Responding to Ms Kasper's criticisms, Ms Paton stressed 'context is everything', telling her: 'I appreciate your comments around the approach we've taken and I certainly acknowledge aspects of your frustration around pace. 'I think the Chief [Constable Jo Farrell] also acknowledged the desire for people to move quickly in this space, and the importance to get it right when we do that. Policing is not immune to the reality and the complexity of this, around how our terminology and understanding, as it is related to sex and gender, has changed, has at times been used interchangeably.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store