Starmer says he ‘deeply regrets' using ‘island of strangers' phrase
The Prime Minister said he had not been in the 'best state' to give the press conference, in which he insisted on the need for tighter border controls, as he reeled from an alleged arson attack on his family home.
He said he had considered pulling out of the speech after the fire at the property in Kentish Town left him and his wife Lady Victoria Starmer 'really shaken up.'
The Prime Minister had warned Britain risked becoming an 'island of strangers' without tighter immigration controls (PA)
The Prime Minister ended up going through with the conference as planned on May 12, hours after the blaze.
In it, he warned Britain risked becoming 'an island of strangers' without tougher immigration controls – rhetoric that sparked an immediate backlash and was denounced by critics, including within Labour ranks, as divisive.
At the time, Downing Street doubled down on the remarks and said Sir Keir 'completely rejects' suggestions he had echoed Powell's infamous 'rivers of blood' speech that was blamed for inflaming racial tensions in the 1960s.
But in an interview for the Observer the Prime Minister struck a more conciliatory tone, saying the language 'wasn't right'.
'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell,' he said.
'I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either. But that particular phrase – no – it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it.'
He added: 'It's fair to say I wasn't in the best state to make a big speech… I was really, really worried. I almost said: 'I won't do the bloody press conference.'
'Vic was really shaken up as, in truth, was I. It was just a case of reading the words out and getting through it somehow… so I could get back to them.'
Critics drew parallels between the phrase and a passage from Powell's 1968 speech in which he claimed white Britons were at risk of becoming 'strangers in their own country'.
The Prime Minister stressed he was not seeking to use the alleged arson attack as an excuse and does not blame his advisers, saying he should have read through the speech properly and 'held it up to the light a bit more'.
He also backed down on language in his foreword to the policy document linked to the speech, which said record high numbers of migrants entering the UK under the last government had done 'incalculable damage'.
Sir Keir insisted the issue needed addressing because the party 'became too distant from working-class people on things like immigration', but said 'this wasn't the way to do it in this current environment'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
15 minutes ago
- The National
Labour MPs call for 'reset' from No 10 after 'year of poor management'
It comes as the fallout from the welfare rebellion, which saw 129 Labour MPs oppose Keir Starmer's plans to cut £5 billion from disability payments, threatens to cause lasting damage. A late-night climbdown on the cuts from Number 10 may have seen off the threat of Starmer's first major Commons defeat, with rebels suggesting they now expect the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to pass its first hurdle on July 1. But speaking to the PA news agency, a number of Labour backbenchers expressed deeper frustration with how Downing Street has handled its backbenchers since last year's election. READ MORE: Can Keir Starmer find any policy that Anas Sarwar won't support? One warned that discontent and low morale among MPs would 'continue to fester' without a 'wider reset' in relations between Number 10 and the Parliamentary Labour Party after 'a year of poor party management'. Another accused decision-makers in Government of operating as an 'exclusive club' and showing 'disregard' for both backbenchers and experts outside Westminster. They told PA: 'I think the Government have got to stop pretending they know everything and start listening, because they might learn something.' Several backbenchers pointed to the Prime Minister's words at a press conference on Wednesday, in which he referred to keeping a 'focus on the change that we want to bring about' rather than the 'noises off'. Although Government sources suggested Starmer was talking in more general terms, rebels have taken his 'noises off' comment as referring to them. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has angered his own backbenchers (Image: Paul Currie/PA Wire) One said: 'A lot of colleagues are sickened at language being used, from the PM's 'noises off' to the senior source saying they thought Keir and Morgan [McSweeney, the Prime Minister's chief of staff] had cleansed the party of self-indulgent rubbish.' But their frustration is not shared by all Labour backbenchers, with others suggesting Friday's U-turn on welfare cuts shows Downing Street is willing to listen. One told PA: 'They're a new team, they're a year in and occasionally teams do need to have a moment where things come to a head and they learn.' Arguing that some backbenchers needed to 'chill out and have a cup of tea', they added they thought the Prime Minister had 'clocked that it's important that we work as part of a team. READ MORE: Labour's 'minor' climbdown will leave benefits system 'woefully inadequate' 'All of us want him to succeed and all of us want the Government to succeed,' they said. One rebel said that he remains opposed to the bill and described the welfare system in the UK as 'in a mess'. Dr Simon Opher, who represents Stroud, said in a statement that he is glad the Government 'are listening', but that the changes 'do not tackle the eligibility issues that are at the heart of many of the problems with Pip'. 'The bill should be scrapped and we should start again and put the needs of disabled people at the centre of the process,' he said. A Number 10 spokesperson insisted on Friday that the Prime Minister 'remains fully committed to engaging with parliamentarians'. Reports said that the concessions had cut the number of rebels to around 40-50, who are expected to sign a new amendment opposing the passage of the bill.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tax hikes Reeves could impose after the £3bn benefits U-turn
Households are on alert for further potential tax hikes in autumn after Keir Starmer handed major concessions to rebels in a bid to salvage flagship legislation on health and disability benefits. On Friday, the government confirmed a U-turn on its cuts to disability benefits in order to avert a rebellion by more than 120 Labour backbenchers. The reversal leaves a £3billion hole in Chancellor Rachel Reeves ' financial plans, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation warned that tax rises may be needed for her to now meet her fiscal rules. The initial benefit reforms would have saved the government £5.5billion by the end of the Parliament. The planned cut to personal independence payments eligibility was set to raise the bulk of this saving, £4.5billion. However, according to the IFS, the revised package of reforms will save only £2.5billion, so will cost the government £3billion relative to their previous plans. Under the change in tack, people who currently receive personal independence payments (PIP), or the health element of universal credit, will continue to do so. Instead, planned cuts will now only hit future claimants. Liz Kendall, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, said: 'We have listened to people, we are in a good place now'. Most economists and think tanks think tax rises in the Autumn Budget 2025 are now inevitable. Tom Waters, an associate director at IFS, said: 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult Budget balancing act that much harder. 'The decision is to protect existing health-related benefit claimants from the reforms, thereby making the savings entirely from new claimants to these benefits. 'This will create big differences – thousands of pounds a year, for many years in some cases – between similar people with similar health conditions who happen to have applied at a slightly different time.' Samuel Mather-Holgate, an independent financial adviser at Mather and Murray Financial told Newspage: 'With Starmer doing more U-turns than someone doing the bleep test, taxes are going up. 'There's no way that other departments can mitigate these changes to their budget.' Which taxes could be increased? Reeves has ruled out taxes on the working people, including income tax , National Insurance for employees, VAT and corporation tax. Other taxes will be in her sights. Capital gains tax Higher capital gains tax could be one option for Reeves. Capital gains tax is levied on profits from assets ranging from shares to second homes, buy-to-let properties and personal possessions. The rates for stocks and shares gains were hiked in the 2024 Autumn Budget to 18 per cent for basic rate taxpayers and to 24 per cent for those paying higher rates of tax. The profits from assets like sharers tend to come from people taking a risk, whether an entrepreneurial one or an investment one, making capital gains tax a likely target for hikes. Inheritance tax Reeves could have inheritance tax in her sights again It is a growing money-spinner for the government, with the number of households falling in scope for it rising. In the 2024 Autumn Budget, Reeves capped the availability of Business Relief and Agricultural Relief, and halved the relief available on Alternative Investment Market shares. Reeves also unveiled plans to bring pensions into the scope of inheritance tax from 2027. Further tweaks and amendments could happen. Pensions Pensions are a major source of wealth for many people, making them a prime target for Reeves. Last year, while Reeves dragged unused pension assets into the inheritance tax net from April 2027, she did not go as far as some experts feared. That is not to say that she will not meddle with pensions later this year. HMRC recently announced a consultation on salary sacrifice - when people forgo a pay rise or bonus and add to their pension instead, which helps avoid higher marginal tax rates. It has prompted speculation that Reeves could introduce a cap on the amount of salary sacrifice people can use. There is also speculation about the reintroduction of the pensions lifetime allowance. The Chancellor could also look at reforming income tax relief on pension contributions. Tax thresholds freeze The freeze on certain tax thresholds since 2021 has created a huge stealth tax raid in recent years. The frozen basic rate threshold, currently £12,570, drags more people into paying income tax and means that the real value - adjusted for inflation - of the tax-free allowance has been diminished. Stalling the higher rate threshold at £50,270 has shifted more people and a greater slice of earnings into the 40 per cent bracket. John Woolfitt, a director at Atlantic Capital Markets, told Newspage: 'A "stealth tax" manoeuvre will be high on the cards. 'Income tax allowance and the higher-rate threshold currently rise with inflation . Freezing or delaying future increases effectively raises income tax, without officially having to announce a hike.' He added: 'Targeting high earners and wealth transfers could also be seen and a populist move as the government tries to sure up support from the broader electorate.' According to the Resolution Foundation, extending the freeze in personal tax threshold by one year will save £4billion a year, 'though further consolidation is likely to be needed in the Budget this Autumn.' Property Businesses Higher employer national insurance contributions are already hammering businesses across Britain. However, under growing pressure to boost the Treasury's coffers, Reeves could set her signs on corporation taxes, VAT exemptions or other duties. 'This would really impact the already fragile business confidence in the UK', Woolfitt said. Wealth tax Some campaigners believe Reeves should impose a wealth tax to boost the tax-take and quash inequality. Tax Justice UK is calling on more taxes for the super-rich to be introduced by the current Government. It wants to see a 2 per cent wealth tax on assets over £10million, which it says will raise up to £24 billion a year. It also wants to apply national insurance to investment income, close inheritance tax and non-dom loopholes, and introduce a 4 per cent tax on share buybacks. It remains unclear whether a wealth tax is on Reeves' agenda and how it would work in practice. An unprecedented 16,500 wealthy Britons are predicted to leave this year amid higher taxes and a gloomy economic outlook.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Welfare concessions 'common sense', says PM - as he defends U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer said changes to his welfare bill "strike the right balance" after making concessions to his backbench MPs. The prime minister described the U-turn as "common sense" and said it means "we can now get on with the job". Sir Keir faced a significant rebellion over plans to cut sickness and disability benefits as part of a package he said would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work. Speaking to reporters on Friday, he stood by his position that the welfare system needs reform as "it doesn't work, and it traps people". He added: "We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. "We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward. "For me, getting that package adjusted in that way is the right thing to do, it means it's the right balance, it's common sense that we can now get on with it." The concessions include exempting existing Personal Independence Payment claimants (PIP) from the stricter new criteria, while the universal credit health top-up will only be cut and frozen for new applications. 5:45 More money will also be front-loaded into helping people find jobs, though it is not clear how much beyond the £1bn already announced. The changes came after 127 Labour MPs signed an amendment calling for the cuts to be delayed and consulted on with disabled people. Rebels feared the reforms wouldn't actually help people find work while pushing thousands of disabled people and children into poverty, as per the government's own impact assessment. The discontent threatened to derail the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill when it comes before the Commons for a vote on Tuesday, on the week that marks a year of Starmer in government. Asked what he would do about a "hole" in the public finances that the changes are said to leave, Sir Keir said the funding will be set out in the autumn budget "in the usual way". The concessions on PIP alone will protect an estimated 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation have both suggested that the changes could reduce savings intended in the original package by up to £3bn. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is also under pressure to find money to pay for the U-turn on cuts to winter fuel, which followed a drubbing at the local elections in May. Asked about the series of U-turns, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall earlier said: "Sometimes there's strength in listening. "I really believe that to be the case, that you end up in the right position when you talk to all of those with knowledge and experience and actually, if you want decisions to be the right ones and to last for generations to come, I believe that's how you make the right changes." However, she would not guarantee the bill will pass next week. Some 83 Labour MPs would need to rebel for the government to be defeated. 0:43 Last night Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, hailed the concessions as "massive changes" to protect vulnerable people and involve disabled people in the design of future reforms. However, not all the rebels have been satisfied with the changes, with several suggesting they would create a "two-tier system". Sky News is aware of at least 20 MPs who currently intend to still vote against. Many others are undecided. The concessions came after Downing Street publicly stuck to its guns while engaging in a frantic ring-around to get rebels onside, which further angered MPs. Many have called for a reset in relations with Downing Street, as the fallout from the rebellion threatens to cause lasting damage. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch criticised the U-turn, saying the government's failure to make "minor savings" on welfare showed they were unable to deal with major issues.
