
Booking community centres in Chandigarh may soon be a costlier affair
Residents looking to host their celebrations at community centres in Chandigarh may soon have to set aside a fatter budget, as the municipal corporation has proposed an up to three-fold hike in their booking charges.
The proposal, aimed at generating much-needed revenue for the cash-strapped MC, is set to be tabled in the House meeting scheduled for June 3.
Depending on the facilities offered, the community centres located across the city are classified into three categories. Category A centres, earlier available for ₹44,000, will cost ₹60,000 — a 36% jump — if the proposal goes through.
The booking charge for Category B centres is set to be doubled from ₹22,000 to ₹40,000, while the steepest hike is proposed for Category C centres, with an up to three-fold increase — going up from ₹5,000- ₹22,000 earlier to ₹15,000- ₹30,000.
Weddings of women from families living below the poverty line, along with medical camps, blood donation camps, UT/MC events, and meetings of RWAs, senior citizens' bodies and pensioners' associations will continue to be exempted from the booking charge.
But memorial prayer meetings, such as rasam pagdi and kriya bhog, which were also free earlier, will now entail 25% of the booking fee.
An earlier draft had proposed booking charges for even weddings of economically weaker families and RWA meetings, but the move faced strong resistance from various organisations, leading to its withdrawal.
Membership model similar to clubs on anvil
According to the agenda, residents will now be able to become members of community centres, similar to clubs.
Annual membership fees have been proposed as follows: Category A and B centres: ₹1,000 for general members and ₹500 for senior citizens. Category C centres: ₹500 for general members and ₹250 for senior citizens.
Members will receive discounts on bookings, and will also get access to gym facilities and indoor games. A community centre administrative committee will be constituted to oversee operations and service improvements.
This committee will follow a mayor-led structure, with the area councillor serving as chairperson and nominated councillors as vice-chairpersons. Sub-divisional engineers from various wings will be part of the committee.
Water connections outside Lal Dora area
The proposal to allow water connections outside the Lal Dora limits of 22 villages will be tabled again during the House meeting. Though approved in March, it will now be presented after legal vetting as per the water bylaws.
Pet bylaws may finally go through
The draft of the 'Pet Dogs and Community Dogs Bylaws, 2025' will be presented for final approval. Initially passed on March 11, 2024, and sent to the secretary, local government, the draft was subjected to public feedback for 30 days. Incorporating suggestions and objections, the revised version is now ready for adoption.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
Trump Presses Reluctant GOP Senators to Embrace House's Tax Bill
President Donald Trump worked the phones Monday and took to social media to try to sway Republican holdouts on his multi-trillion dollar tax bill, encountering conflicting demands from GOP senators even as he urged them to move swiftly. The legislation, which last month passed the House by one vote, faces opposition from both moderates and ultra-conservatives in the Senate, where Trump can afford to lose no more than three votes. 'With the Senate coming back to Washington today, I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. The president gave lawmakers at odds with one another the feeling that he was on their side. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who wants more deficit reduction and also opposes clean energy cuts in the House bill, said he expected Senate leaders to present Trump with a draft of tax and Medicaid revisions by this weekend. But he acknowledged that the process could take much longer. Republicans, Tillis said, have to put ideas from senators 'in the funnel and get a work product, I'd say over the next ten days, ten-to-fifteen days.' That tight timeframe would be needed to get the legislation to Trump's desk by his July 4 deadline but would be hard to meet. Earlier: Trump Tax Bill Narrowly Passes House, Overcoming Infighting If the Senate passes a revised bill, the House must then take it up again. And any changes risk undoing the fragile coalition that narrowly supported the measure in that chamber. Senate Republican leaders intend to make permanent many of the temporary tax cuts in the House bill, a move that would increase the bill's more than $2.5 trillion deficit impact. Yet doing so risks alienating fiscal hawks already at war with party moderates over the bill's safety-net cuts. The biggest of those is the House bill's cuts to Medicaid, which are projected to end health care coverage for about 7.7 million people by changing eligibility requirements. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri said in a mid-afternoon social media post that he 'just had a great talk' with the president on the legislation and they agreed no Medicaid benefits would be cut. Hawley later said he supports the House bill's work requirements, as well as efforts to go after fraud, but opposes that measure's changes to the Medicaid provider tax and cost sharing. The House legislation seeks to limit a practice whereby states tax hospitals and other Medicaid providers in order to bolster their federal reimbursement levels, a move critics call an accounting gimmick. It also imposes new copays on Medicaid beneficiaries. The senator added that the president made clear to him he didn't support making even deeper cuts to Medicaid than in the House bill that some Senate Republicans are demanding. Trump also spoke with Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, a GOP holdout who has demanded $5.5 trillion to $6.5 trillion in cuts over the next decade, and pressed him to support the bill, he told reporters. He said Trump was receptive to his ideas. Johnson said he'd sit down with Trump's economic team to review the numbers and would be open to something similar to the House bill with assurances of legislation later that makes deeper cuts. 'I want to work with the president,' Johnson said. Trump also met Monday with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, whose said they discussed many subjects including 'a lot about the big beautiful bill.' With assistance from Chris Cioffi. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Steep property tax hike in Ghaziabad sparks protests
Ghaziabad: Protests against the civic body's new property tax structure has gained support from RWAs, industry associations and residents' groups. The revised rates, implemented on April 1, haven't gone down well due to an increase of up to four times the previous rates, which residents claim violates existing municipal laws that allow corporations to increase property taxes once every two years. The GMC board had last hiked the house tax on 4.28 lakh properties by 10% in Jan 2023. The rates, which were in effect till April 1 this year, required properties along roads less than 12m wide to pay Rs 0.3 per square foot to Rs 1.6 per sqft, those on 12-24m roads to pay Rs 0.5 per sqft to Rs 2 sqft, and properties on wider roads to pay Rs 0.65 per sqft to Rs 2.4 per sqft. Under the revised tax structure, rates now range from Rs 0.7 to Rs 4 per sqft, which means homeowners may have to pay Rs 5,000 more in taxes annually. Recently, an industry association, under the banner of Mahanagar Udyog Vypar Mandal, staged a protest at GMC's Nayvug Market headquarters against the "steep" hike. "According to the municipal rules, GMC can hike property tax once every two years. In FY 2023-24, the tax was increased by 10%, and for this financial year, it has been increased again, which is about three to four times higher," Brijmohan Singhal, a representative of the organisation, said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Knochen-auf-Knochen? Probieren Sie diese bionische Kniebandage. Mrjoint Mehr erfahren Undo Sriram Nair, president of Shalimar Garden Extension-2, B-Block, said they have submitted a memorandum to the municipal commissioner stating that the hike in property taxes was not as per the law and urged him to roll it back. "On average, there will be an annual increase of Rs 4,000 to Rs 5,000 in house tax rate in this fiscal year. The hike has led to discontent among residents. If there is no course correction, GMC should be ready for mass protest," he said. Former councillor Rajendra Mittal threatened to take the matter to court. "The steep hike will only put an additional financial burden on residents. The GMC Board had earlier mandated a hike of 10% every two years, but now, as one can see, it is about four times the rate of last year. I have documents to support that the new tax slab is not as per the municipal laws, and if it is not taken back, we will have to seek refuge in court," Tyagi said. Mayor Sunita Dayal, on the other hand, said that they were holding consultations with councillors and GMC officials. "GMC calculates the tax based on the annual rental value (ARV) of a property. In March, the board passed the proposal to link house tax with DM circle rate, so to say that it is unconstitutional is not true," said a GMC official. Over the last two fiscal years, the number of properties in the city has gone up from 4.5 lakh to 6.3 lakh. With the revised rate, the house tax is to increase GMC's revenue collection by Rs 60 crore.


Mint
13 hours ago
- Mint
Donald Trump's tax bill heads to Senate: Speaker Mike Johnson says, ‘millions not losing Medicaid unless they want to'
House Republicans narrowly passed President Donald Trump's tax and policy bill, sending it to the Senate where it faces intense scrutiny and potential revisions. The more-than-1,000-page bill includes deep tax cuts, changes to social welfare programs, and a $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. Despite Speaker Mike Johnson's call to make as few modifications to this package as possible, at least a dozen Senate Republicans have signaled their intent to seek changes. One of the bill's most contentious elements is a $625 billion cut to Medicaid, which includes new work requirements for able-bodied adults without children. Critics argue the provision could push 7.6 million Americans off health coverage. Speaker Johnson defended the measure on saying: '4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so.' He called the new rules 'commonsense' and dismissed criticism that the requirements are too burdensome: 'You're telling me that … young men, for example, [can't] volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week? I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it,' Johnson said speaking with NBC. The legislation also introduces additional paperwork and verification requirements, including more frequent eligibility checks and address confirmations. Johnson argued that these measures are minimal and necessary. 'The people who are complaining that these people are going to lose their coverage because they can't fulfill the paperwork, this is minor enforcement of this policy, and it follows common sense,' he said. Another point of friction is the bill's rollback of renewable energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act. Senators from states benefiting from clean energy jobs are concerned. Even Trump ally Elon Musk criticised the House-passed version. 'I'm disappointed. It increases the deficit and undermines the work the DOGE team is doing,' Musk said on May 30 outside the White House, referencing his preferred crypto initiative. The budget package, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' passed along party lines in the House but has faced backlash at Republican town halls, particularly regarding cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Democrats and other critics argue the bill slashes hundreds of billions in funding for vital social programs. Despite the criticism, Johnson expressed confidence the bill will advance in the Senate and reach President Donald Trump's desk by July 4.