
Italian papers react to Inter Milan's Champions League final defeat: ‘This is a nightmare'
PSG were irresistible on their way to a first triumph in the competition, with Desire Doue among their attacking talent to sparkle en route to a 5-0 victory.
The final had looked an intriguing clash of styles but the defensive solidity that Inter had showed at times on their run to the decider was no match for the French capital club's heavily-resourced forward line and creative midfield.
'Inter, this is a nightmare', sports daily La Gazzetta dello Sport said, before questioning if this was the club's worst performance ever.
'For Inter, it was the worst match of the year - and of history? - in the most important match of the entire season, after losing the Scudetto, Coppa Italia and Supercoppa. The feared number zero in the titles category (excluding the Club World Cup). In March, after [beating] Feyenoord, Inzaghi raised three fingers to indicate the "treble". All he has left is his fist.'
Rome sports newspaper Corriere dello Sport, meanwhile, said that PSG had 'humiliated' Inter. 'Two years ago, Inter emerged from the defeat against [Manchester] City with their legs and spirit shattered but their minds stronger. Because they had put under pressure for a long time what was, at the time, the strongest team in Europe. Last night, on a warm early summer night in Bavaria, Inter left the wonderful Allianz Arena in Munich in pieces. From every point of view.'
The verdict of prominent sports columnist Paolo Condo in Milan newspaper Corriere della Sera was damning about the coaching of Simone Inzaghi after the defeat, with it suggested that the Inter manager made all the wrong substitutions, and Condo questioning where all the qualities shown in the wins over Bayern Munich and Barcelona had gone.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Lamine Yamal disagrees with Trent Alexander-Arnold after Jamie Carragher blast
Lamine Yamal's words will be music to the ears of Barcelona and Spain supporters - and they are in contrast to those of Trent Alexander-Arnold in the past concerning the Ballon d'Or Barcelona and Spain superstar Lamine Yamal is not yet concerning himself with the prospect of winning the Ballon d'Or as he attempts to lead his national team to more success. The teenager is in Germany for the semi-finals of the Nations League as Spain look to add another title to the Euro 2024 victory they record last year. Luis de la Fuente will have to lead his team past France, and a contender for the label of best player in the world in Ousmane Dembele, before potentially facing off against Germany or Portugal in the final. And the Spanish boss will be pleased his young starlet's aspirations are centred on team trophies rather than individual accolades. The 17-year-old racked up 18 goals and 25 assists in 55 appearances as Barcelona won La Liga and reached the semi-finals of the Champions League. And Yamal is already thinking about winning the latter competition and the World Cup next year. "I don't think about the Ballon d'Or; I think you'll end up badly if you only think about that," he said. "I think about winning. "Imagine if I win the World Cup and the UCL next year, then the Ballon d'Or will come by itself. But the most important thing is to enjoy football." Asked about a potential battle between himself and Paris Saint-Germain ace Dembele, Yamal refused to add too much fuel to the hype behind their meeting. "I am confident that we [Spain] will win on Thursday, but whether we win or not, I would still vote for the best player in the world,' Yamal told COPE. "If Thursday doesn't go the way I want or Dembele wants, then what? You're voting for someone else who plays on Sunday? "I'm the kind of person who votes for the best player over the whole year. But if people want to risk it all on one game, well… we can play that game then." Yamal's approach to the Ballon d'Or is somewhat in contrast to that of a new La Liga rival. Trent Alexander-Arnold joined Barcelona rivals Real Madrid at the start of the window, and has previously suggested he'd like to win the accolade over earning Champions League glory. It is a moment that irked some Liverpool supporters and club legend Jamie Carragher. The former defender said on Sky Sports: "Trent was asked whether he'd want to win the Champions League or the Ballon D'or and he said Ballon D'Or – even if he thinks that, it's not the right answer for a local player at Liverpool. "The club has to come first. That showed Liverpool supporters he's not a player who thinks about the club more than himself. He's a brand. He's an amazing footballer and that's why Real Madrid want him."


The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Doctor Who's ‘woke, boring rubbish' storylines have caused staggering number of fans to turn off
MORE than half of Brits who used to watch Doctor Who say they turned off because it had become 'woke, boring rubbish'. That is the result of an independent survey conducted as star Ncuti Gatwa exited the Tardis with a paltry 2.3 million viewers on Saturday. 4 4 In a shock twist, he appeared to regenerate into the Doctor's former companion Rose Tyler, played by Billie Piper — but many are not convinced she is the Time Lord's 16th incarnation. The Sun exclusively revealed last month that Ncuti, 32, would be leaving the role after two series — the shortest tenure of any actor in the role since Christopher Eccleston, who left the rebooted BBC show after one series in 2005. The survey quizzed 2,135 adults and found 42 per cent of current and former viewers said it had got worse since its relaunch two decades ago, with stories increasingly preachy and worthy. Even one in three current viewers think it has got worse. Plotlines over the past three years have featured trans heroines, non-binary baddies and drag-queen villains — and the Doctor coming out as gay, and crying in most episodes. James Johnson of pollsters JL Partners said: 'This is the first ever major poll done on attitudes to Doctor Who and the results are bleak. 'The public believe a once-great show has lost its way — and their biggest complaint is it puts pursuit of wokeness above entertainment value. 'The main words associated with it are rubbish, boring, and woke. 'If the BBC want to grow the show's audience once more, they will need a total revamp. 'And to get back to telling entertaining stories rather than preaching lessons that simply do not have an audience among the British public.' Dr Who gone Woke The poll found 46 per cent of current viewers think it puts social justice and woke issues above quality, compared with 37 per cent who believe the show puts quality first. Those who have stopped watching say it puts social justice and woke issues first by a ratio of three to one. The average age of current viewers is 42, compared with 51 for ex-fans. They are also heavily Labour voters compared to a more politically diverse former audience. The wokery ratcheted up after Doctor Who was taken over for a second time by showrunner Russell T Davies in 2023. He was the man who rebooted the show in 2005 with Eccleston, followed by David Tennant. 4 Who has starred in Doctor Who? Which actors have portrayed the famous Time Lord over the years? First Doctor: William Hartnell (1963 - 1966) Second Doctor: Patrick Troughton (1966 - 1969) Third Doctor: Jon Pertwee (1970 - 1974) Fourth Doctor: Tom Baker (1974 - 1981) Fifth Doctor: Peter Davidson (1982 - 1984) Sixth Doctor: Colin Baker (1984 - 1986) Seventh Doctor: Sylvester McCoy (1987 - 1989) Eighth Doctor: Paul McGann (1996) Ninth Doctor: Christopher Eccleston (2005) Tenth Doctor: David Tennant (2005 - 2010) 11th Doctor: Matt Smith (2010 - 2013) 12th Doctor: Peter Capaldi (2014 - 2017) 13th Doctor: Jodie Whittaker (2018 - 2022) 14th Doctor: David Tennant (2023) 15th Doctor: Ncuti Gatwa (2023 - present) A respectable 5.1 million tuned in to see his 'comeback episode' with David returning to play the Doctor for a second time in 2023. The actor then handed over to Ncuti who had his first full series as the Fifteenth Doctor last year. One Whovian writing on X/Twitter, said: 'Thanks to RTD (Russell T Davies) Ncuti is tainted and '15' will be remembered as the worst Doctor with the worst era in the history of Doctor Who.' The Sun revealed BBC bosses were considering a hiatus for the show, though execs maintained they would not make a decision until the second series had aired. Russell T Davies teased a return on Saturday, saying: 'After 62 years, the Doctor's adventures are only just beginning!' But that seems optimistic given their current multimillion-pound deal partnership with Disney+ is facing an uncertain future — and the viewing figures for one episode of the last series fell as low as 1.6 million. A spokeswoman for Doctor Who said: 'Doctor Who remains one of the biggest dramas on the BBC and is the most watched drama for under-35s, as well as being one of the most popular brands on BBC iPlayer. 'As we have previously stated, a decision on any future deal between the BBC and Disney+ regarding Doctor Who is yet to be made and any other claims are pure speculation.' WARNING: ALIENS AHEAD By Thomas Godfrey A THEATRE adaptation of sci-fi novel The War of the Worlds has been slapped with a woke warning — as it features Martians. The alien invaders, who try to destroy humanity in H.G. Wells' 1895 book, have been included in a list of potential triggers. The 3D immersive experience at central London's Hallmark Building also has warnings about violence. A spokeswoman said: 'The notices ensure transparency and inclusion.' But ex-Tory minister Sir Alec Shelbrooke said last night: 'They clearly think the public is stupid.' 7 Hints that Billie's no true Doc BILLIE Piper's arrival on Saturday as Ncuti Gatwa left was seen as a sign the show would continue. Known for playing past companion Rose Tyler, Billie appeared to debut as the 16th Doctor. But Whovians think she may not be the true Time Lord, meaning a big question mark hangs over the troubled show's future. TV Editor Rod McPhee looks at seven clues: NOT CREDITED AS THE DOCTOR: Every new Time Lord has been introduced as the Doctor in the end credits. In Saturday's episode, hers simply read: 'introducing Billie Piper'. RUSSELL T. DAVIES WON'T EVEN SAY: After the twist, Doctor Who's own showrunner said of Billie's return: 'Quite how and why and who is a story yet to be told.' BILLIE HINTED SHE'S STILL ROSE: Just after her return, Billie posted on Instagram a picture of herself holding a rose with the caption: 'A rose is a rose is a rose.' TENNANT'S RETURN WAS CLEARER: When Jodie Whittaker regenerated into David Tennant in a similar twist, execs immediately confirmed he was the Doctor. ROSE IS LINKED TO THE TARDIS: Ncuti tapped into the Tardis before regenerating. Fans reckon it caused Rose to return, since she held the power of the Tardis in 2005. SHE STILL SEEMS TO BE REGENERATING: Billie is still glowing when the episode ends, suggesting the transformation is incomplete and the true Doctor is yet to emerge. THE BBC DON'T CALL HER THE DOCTOR: The corporation avoids calling her the Doctor in a news item released soon after the episode.


The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Shameful pic of French cops watching migrants sail to Britain proves we've got to take action to stop small boats
SOMETIMES it takes a photograph to shift political debate. Hopefully, one such image will be that of French border guards standing on a beach watching on as yet another boat-load of migrants set sail across the Channel in a dinghy, heading for sanctuary in soft-touch Britain. 2 2 One of them seems even to be filming the occasion on his phone. The boat load they were watching was just one of 19 which made it across the Channel on Saturday. Between them, they carried 1,195 migrants, more than enough to fill yet one more migrant hotel. In case anyone had forgotten, we British taxpayers have handed £480million over the past year to the French authorities supposedly to police the shores and prevent boats from setting off. That was under a deal negotiated by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in 2023, in which Britain agreed to fund a doubling in the number of French border control guards from 400 to 800. Go through the motions A more expensive and pointless job-creation scheme would be hard to imagine. Since Britain agreed to cough up the money, the proportion of would-be migrants being intercepted before they reach UK waters has fallen from 46.9 percent in 2023 to 38 percent so far in 2025. People-smugglers have got around the extra patrols by finding a new way to play the system: Rather than launch a boat- load of migrants directly from the beach they push the boats a few yards offshore and ask their clients to wade into the waters. That, apparently, confounds the French border guards ' rules of engagement, hence they just stand and watch. But let's be frank and ask: Do the French really have any intention of stopping these boats? Starmer 'loses control' as over 1,000 migrants cross Channel in biggest daily total of 2025 – as French cops watch on Needless to say, every migrant who leaves French territory is one fewer the French authorities have to worry about. It makes perfect sense for the French to take our money and then go through the motions of pretending to stop migrants, while in practice letting them go. If Emmanuel Macron 's government really wanted to stop the boats it could do so in an instant by doing a deal with Britain in which it agreed to the systematic return of every migrant who made it across the Channel. If asylum seekers were obliged to do as international treaties supposedly insist they do, and make their claim in the first safe country in which they arrive, Channel crossings would all but cease. Let's be frank and ask: Do the French really have any intention of stopping these boats? There would no longer be any point in making a dangerous journey only to be shipped back immediately to France. But of course France won't do that sort of deal because it doesn't want the burden of thousands of extra asylum seekers to process. Meanwhile, our own government has thrown away the one tool which Sunak had painstakingly added to Britain's feeble border force armoury: The Rwanda scheme. How foolish Labour's rejection of the scheme looks now. Keir Starmer is now talking about a similar plan to process asylum claims in the Balkans, but sorry, it is too late. Labour tries to claim the credit for a fall in overall net migration, which was entirely the result of visa changes by the Conservatives, while hoping we will somehow fail to notice the sharp rise in small- boat crossings since it came to power 11 months ago. The Border Command which was supposed to tackle people-smugglers has proved to be a farce. Since the election, 38,054 migrants have arrived by small boat, with numbers this year running ahead of any previous year. The Rwanda scheme might have been expensive in terms of the cost per migrant, but that misses the point. In practice, we may have ended up having to send rather few asylum seekers to Rwanda because migrants would have had such a disincentive to travel to Britain in the first place. In the end we have the worst of all worlds. We have more and more migrant arrivals while we are still picking up the tab for the abortive Rwanda scheme. Paying dearly Accommodation funded by us to house our asylum seekers now looks like being used by migrants sent there from other countries. Nor has Starmer made use of another obvious piece of leverage. Two weeks ago he renegotiated Britain's Brexit agreement, extending French fishing boats' access to UK waters without making it dependent on France putting a genuine effort into stopping the boats. Why didn't he at least say: You can fish in British waters only if you agree to take back every single migrant who makes it illegally across the Channel? As Kemi Badenoch said last week, every time Labour negotiates, Britain loses. But then the previous Tory government hardly set an example, either, in handing France nearly half a billion a year to pretend to tackle illegal migration. Truth is that we are all paying dearly for French border guards to stand around photographing the flotilla of migrant boats setting sail for Britain — and then again to feed and house the migrants once they arrive on our shores.