What Georgia Lawmakers Are Doing About Your Sky-High Utility Bills
Ariana Brazier is sick of paying sky-high light bills.
The 31-year-old Decatur resident said she's seen her Georgia Power electric bill surge from about $90 a month in 2023 to roughly $300 a month this year. The added financial stress has left her in a 'constant panic' over ways to reduce her expenses.
She's one of many Black Georgians dealing with rising energy costs in recent years who want regulatory agencies in charge of approving utility rate hikes to stop greenlighting them at the expense of consumers struggling to make ends meet.
'It feels unfathomable to me that these monopolistic companies like Georgia Power have any reason to hike rates,' Brazier told Capital B Atlanta on Tuesday.
Roughly 100 Black Georgians like Brazier recently joined the voter engagement group Black Voters Matter for its Feb. 25 visit to the Gold Dome in Atlanta. Organizers said the goal of the trip was to bring voters from across the state to speak with lawmakers about the issues important to them, such as the elevated cost of living in metro Atlanta.
For many, that included advocating for passage of Senate Bill 94, a measure introduced by Georgia Sen. Chuck Hufstetler, R-Rome, in early February that would restore an advisory group called the Consumers' Utility Counsel. If enacted, the counsel would represent the interest of utility customers in matters brought before the state's Public Service Commission, a five-member elected body that regulates electric, natural gas, and telecommunications services in Georgia and decides what utility service rates are fair and reasonable for most of the state.
Some Georgia residents and consumer advocacy groups have accused the PSC of rubber-stamping rate hikes for Georgia Power, leaving customers grappling with higher energy bills. The group has approved six Georgia Power rate hikes since 2023, the last of which took effect in January.
Georgia Power provides electricity to more than 2.7 million people throughout the state, including most of the people living in the Atlanta region. Since 2023, the average residential customer is paying $43 more per month on their electric bill, according to WABE. The latest 3.5% hike alone resulted in customers spending about $5.48 more on their typical household bill, according to the Georgia Recorder.
PSC spokesman Tom Krause says the rubber-stamping accusation against the commission is 'demonstrably false,' and shows a lack of understanding of how the regulatory body works.
He said PSC commissioners litigate rate increases requested by Georgia Power like court cases, and noted that the commission already has staff members who evaluate Georgia Power utility rate increases on behalf of consumers.
'They go through the entire process of what Georgia Power has asked for in a rate case,' Krause said of the Public Interest Advocacy staff. 'They litigate that, literally, with expert witnesses, with testimony in public hearings before the Public Service Commission.'
Hufstetler told Capital B Atlanta that he was reintroducing SB 94 to give Georgia citizens more input on utility rates. A similar measure he introduced during last year's legislative session stalled in the state House after passing in the state Senate.
The state House or the state Senate must pass the legislation by the General Assembly's Crossover Day deadline on Thursday for it to be signed into law as a standalone bill this year. (Proposals that don't make the Crossover Day deadline can still be added as amendments to other bills).
Former Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue shut down Georgia's previous Consumers' Utility Counsel in 2008 to save money during the state's Great Recession-related budget crisis.
Hufstetler said Georgia is one of a handful of 'states that don't have a consumer utility protection person that looks out for their interest, and we certainly need it.'
'Somebody needs to have some representation for the consumers,' he added.
An amendment approved in February would make the Consumers' Utility Counsel an affiliate of the state attorney general's office that would weigh in on PSC matters.
As of Tuesday, SB 94's fate resides with members of the Senate Rules Committee, where state Sen. Matt Brass, R-Newnan, serves as chairman.
Brionte McCorklé, executive director of Georgia Conservation Voters, an environmental advocacy group, advised Black folks who want to have greater say in how much they're paying on their energy bills to reach out to Brass as well as their district's state lawmakers and tell them to pass SB 94.
She said lawmakers opposed to measures like SB 94 often argue they're not supported by the public.
'It's incredibly important that you call your senator, you call your representative, you tell them, 'Hey, look, I want this Consumer Utility Counsel. I'm tired of my bills being high,'' McCorkle said. 'Tell them how high your bills are. Tell them what you've been dealing with, because they try to act like it's not a big deal and people aren't concerned.'
All five PSC commissioners are Republicans. Two of them, Tim Echols, whose district includes part of east Georgia, and Fitz Johnson, whose district includes metro Atlanta, are up for reelection in November.
Echols noted that PSC didn't raise rates at all during the pandemic and that energy bills are up across the United States, not just in Georgia.
'Every state is experiencing higher energy bills due to higher fuel cost, wages and grid improvements,' Echols told Capital B Atlanta via email on Monday. 'Utility bills are still just 3% of the average family's total expenses because everything else has gone up in price too.'
But Black families in metro Atlanta and around the state are struggling with high energy costs, according to Melinee Calhoun, senior organizing manager for Georgia's Black Voters Matter division. The energy burden endured by Black Georgians in rural parts of the state, such as South Georgia, is also substantial, she added.
'We have communities such as Dougherty County where we have families living in public housing that are paying $1,000 light bills,' Calhoun said. 'If you live in public housing and your utilities are shut off, you immediately get an eviction notice. So not only [are] utilities an energy burden issue. It's a housing issue.'
The post What Georgia Lawmakers Are Doing About Your Sky-High Utility Bills appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
NorthWestern Energy announces another rate increase
(Photo by Scott Olson | Getty Images) NorthWestern Energy's electric customers could get a double whammy this summer. On May 30, NorthWestern Energy said it planned an increase of $9.04 on a typical residential electric bill as part of a quarterly adjustment on electric supply. Earlier last month, the monopoly utility announced it was pushing up rates 17% without regulatory approval, effective May 23. The earlier increase amounts to $17.07 a month on top of a typical residential bill of $101.14, according to NorthWestern Energy. If the Montana Public Service Commission signs off on the most recent increase, the average residential customer will be paying $127.16 in July, according to information from the agency. Altogether, that would be a more than 25% increase from May 1 to July of this year. NorthWestern Energy spokesperson Jo Dee Black said the latest change reflects dollars for electric supply costs generally passed through to customers and adjusted quarterly since 2023. 'This approach helps avoid large, once-a-year adjustments,' Black said in an email. However, an engineer for the Montana Environmental Information Center said the increase shows NorthWestern's argument the large gas plant it built in Laurel isn't offsetting bills as the company promised. Nick Fitzmaurice, energy transition engineer for the energy watchdog, also said customers will be paying 39.4% more a month this July than they did in August 2022. 'NorthWestern' subversive tactics unfairly hide the truth from Montanans, who are now paying the price with skyrocketing electric bills,' Fitzmaurice said in an email. PSC spokesperson Alana Lake said the agency routinely examines a utility's accounting to ensure accuracy, and the Commission had questions about this recent increase, so it has yet to sign off on it. However, Lake also said the increase will be implemented unless the PSC finds an error in NorthWestern's calculations. 'It is important to note that these rates will only be in effect until September 2025,' Lake said, if they are approved. 'At that point, (NorthWestern) must file an application with justification for final approval of these adjustments, which will need to be reviewed and approved by the Commission.' The 17% hike is separate, already in effect, and part of an upcoming hearing on an application for rate increases NorthWestern Energy filed with the PSC in July 2024. NorthWestern earlier defended the increase it implemented prior to approval by the Montana Public Service Commission — and the PSC confirmed the utility acted legally. The monopoly energy company said regulators didn't act on its application for a rate increase in a timely fashion, so it used a law that allows it to implement one on its own in the meantime, after nine months have passed. However, PSC President Brad Molnar earlier said NorthWestern is responsible for delays in the case, and its customers are going to feel pain as a result of the increase, which he characterized as 'crushing.' A hearing on the rate case will take place starting Monday, June 9, and run possibly through June 20. If the PSC decides NorthWestern erred in the increase, the company will return the extra money to customers, plus 10%. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
NorthWestern Energy ‘not as in touch with Montanans' as rate case unfolds
The Montana Public Service Commission is hearing NorthWestern Energy's rate case this week and next. (Photo by fhm | Getty Images) Even before the Public Service Commission approved a settlement that meant a 28% rate increase for NorthWestern Energy customers, Chris Blazer's friend struggled. Blazer, of Helena, said her friend lives on just $2,000 a month. 'Even five years ago, before the big rate increases, she was living in darkness and cold so that she could feed herself and her horses,' Blazer said. Blazer made her comments Wednesday to the Public Service Commission during a hearing on the monopoly utility's rate case. She said some people do not realize the impact so-called 'minor increases' have on customers' lives. In August 2022, NorthWestern Energy's electric customers paid $91.27 a month, according to its own records. On July 1, likely before the PSC issues an order in the current case, those same customers could be paying $127.24, a 39.4% increase in three years. NorthWestern Energy said rates could drop compared to the current rate if the PSC approves a settlement in the case — the PSC put June rates at $118.20 for the average electric customer. But a couple of other adjustments are pending in the meantime, and a group of organizations intervening in the case are asking commissioners to take a closer look at costs. At the hearing this week, a lawyer representing the group also quizzed a NorthWestern Energy vice president about the utility's response to an earlier order requiring the utility to assess its programs to help people with lower incomes. In a discussion about rate increases nationally, PSC President Brad Molnar said NorthWestern customers pay the 12th lowest electric rates in the U.S. 'So we're actually living pretty well,' Molnar said. *** On the witness stand earlier in the week, NorthWestern Energy CEO Brian Bird agreed with Commissioner Annie Bukacek's perspective that the utility's rates are reasonable in comparison to other expenses people pay. Bird said coffee can be $5 and a Big Mac meal can be $9.99. By comparison, he said, NorthWestern Energy powers all appliances in a person's home and supplies all of its natural gas for $6 a day. 'I think people don't really appreciate that when we can do that as affordably as we have,' Bird said. Customer Jocelyn Leroux, however, said NorthWestern Energy executives don't appreciate the financial pressures Montanans face — for some, an extra $20 on a bill is money that used to pay for groceries. 'Imagine having to choose between sweating through the night to save on electricity, or turning on the air conditioning, and going light on food for the week,' said Leroux, with the Montana chapter of the Sierra Club. 'These are the kinds of calculations that many people are forced to make.' She said the reason customers are forced into these choices is NorthWestern executives 'seem to be prioritizing their own financial status' over more affordable and cleaner energy sources — despite all the wind and solar potential in Montana. A NorthWestern Energy shareholder report on the utility's website outlined compensation for executive officers in 2024, including salary, stocks, deferred compensation and other pay: Brian Bird, CEO: $4.81 million Crystal Lail, CFO: $1.74 million Shannon Heim, general counsel: $1.00 million Bobbi Schroeppel, VP customer care, communications, HR: $892,457 John Hines, VP, supply/MT government affairs: $929,887 In an introduction to the report, Bird encouraged shareholders to review the information in preparation for an April 30th meeting. The executive pay section describes its aim. 'Our executive pay program is designed to align the long-term interests of our executives, shareholders, and customers,' the report said. But some Montanans still need help paying the bills. Tuesday, lawyer Jenny Harbine asked if NorthWestern Vice President Schroeppel had reviewed data that showed 20% to 50% of Montana households with incomes of less than $75,000 said they needed to reduce or forego spending on basic necessities to pay their utility bills. Harbine represents a group of organizations that are asking the PSC to reject a settlement in the case. They argue NorthWestern is falling short when it comes to responsibly planning for the future, taking climate change into account and ensuring reasonable bills, especially for customers with lower incomes. When it comes to household budgets, though, Schroeppel said the reverse is true at times, and some households forgo paying their electric bills to afford other items. Harbine also wanted to confirm some of those families might not be buying daily lattes and burgers. 'Can we agree that Mr. Bird's testimony about the cost of a daily soda or Big Mac or coffee may overlook the experience of these families?' Harbine asked. 'I can't speak to that,' said Schroeppel, vice president of customer care, communications and human resources. Harbine asked if Schroeppel was aware the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program reached only 15% of the eligible population in Montana in 2024. Schroeppel said she's seen numbers as high as 20% across the state. However, she said the figure includes customers served by other utilities. In response to Harbine, however, she conceded the majority of that population is made up of NorthWestern customers, although she also said LIHEAP is a program run through the state health department, not the utility. In an order in January 2024, the Public Service Commission directed NorthWestern Energy to evaluate the efficacy of low-income energy assistance programs. The PSC ordered the utility to, 'at a minimum,' address information gaps about trends in affordability for low-income customers, barriers to programs, and the most effective outreach. Harbine wanted to know if NorthWestern had made any changes since the order. The group Harbine represents is comprised of the Montana Environmental Information Center, the Human Resource Council District XI, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the NW Energy Coalition. Schroeppel said the utility had not made changes, 'but I don't read the commission order to indicate that that's what they were looking for.' Rather, she said, the directive was to pull a stakeholder group together to understand why customers don't participate in programs and determine the best way to reduce barriers and communicate. To that end, she said NorthWestern is evaluating significant customer research that's 'hot off the press' and includes national data as well as information from its own customers. After reviewing the research, Schroeppel said, the utility will talk to the stakeholder group, start 'strategizing around (the PSC's) objectives,' and likely hire a consultant to 'further facilitate the stakeholder group' and look at data to understand what needs to change. Harbine wanted to know if the group had produced any recommendations based on the PSC order. Schroeppel said the group is at that point right now, saying it has 'a whole host of recommendations,' including, for example, to allow 'categorical eligibility.' That would mean a customer could be automatically eligible for utility assistance if the person already qualifies for, say, Medicaid. Harbine wanted to know if the group would make a proposal that addressed the PSC's order before its next rate case, but Schroeppel said she anticipated it would issue findings and an update instead. 'The proposal would come more along the lines if we were going to come in and ask to change something,' Schroeppel said. 'And you don't anticipate asking to change something?' Harbine said. Schroeppel said NorthWestern does not anticipate changing anything yet because it needs to do more work around analytics and the cost of different ideas. 'I think some of the barriers can probably be just worked on between the various agencies and the stakeholder group,' Schroeppel said. Harbine wanted to know if Schroeppel believed NorthWestern was committing enough resources to address affordability concerns, and Schroeppel said she does. But Schroeppel said the consultant will help, and she anticipates that work will extend 'beyond the scope of what this initial commission order was' and look at 'future programs,' including ideas from other utilities. The hearing is expected to continue through June 20.


Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
China Is Set To Outpace the US in Clean Data Dominance
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. There is a new menace in America that is doubling down on fossil fuels, ratcheting up planet-warming emissions, overwhelming energy grids, and raising energy prices for communities. It's the rapid, unfettered burgeoning of data centers powering our rising artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud use. Whether in Virginia, Georgia, Utah, Illinois, Arizona, or Nevada—which host some of the world's biggest data centers—these massive energy-and-water-sucking facilities are cropping up everywhere to meet rising data demands. All those videos we post account for half of the internet traffic, but now AI use will soon dominate the cloud. ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, and Perplexity app icons are seen on a Google Pixel smartphone. ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, and Perplexity app icons are seen on a Google Pixel smartphone. Getty Images Here's the problem. That data growth requires massive amounts of energy to keep videos streaming and AI generating. Rather than investing in clean, renewable energy sources to provide the energy required to meet the growing need, power companies are instead expanding use of pollution-causing fossil fuels. Georgia Power, for example, is requesting permission from regulators to reverse course on clean energy and invest heavily in fossil fuels to meet data centers' demand. Although Georgia Power is seeking a plethora of options like renewables, fossil fuels, and nuclear to power these data centers, the fact remains that they're asking for more coal and gas-fired plants. Atlanta has overtaken Northern Virginia as the country's top data center market for leasing activity in 2024, according to data from CBRE. This, coupled with the announcement of a new mega data center coming to the Atlanta region—which will require more energy than the maximum output of one of Georgia Power's two new nuclear reactors—should give everyone in the Atlanta metro pause. Data-dependent industrial giants like Amazon and others, meanwhile, are lobbying legislators to quash state efforts to curb emissions from data centers. Some state legislatures remain undeterred, thankfully, and are pushing back. A bipartisan group of Virginia lawmakers is trying to establish energy and environmental guardrails for the data center industry, which has largely gone unchecked. Legislators in Georgia, Texas, and California have also introduced bills to protect rate-paying residents. But with Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Oracle, and OpenAI planning to spend tens of billions of dollars on data centers in places like Ohio, Louisiana, and Texas, unless guardrails are in place the U.S. will witness one of the largest increases of CO2 emissions, at a time when we should be reducing the amount of carbon going into the atmosphere. There is another way that isn't so fossil fuel dependent, and it's one in which China is leading. Chinese data centers are witnessing massive growth, similar to what we're seeing in the U.S. and metro Atlanta, and they are expected to triple their data centers' electricity demand by 2030. They've put in place a goal of powering more than 80 percent of their data center footprint with clean energy by the end of this year. China is the world's leader—by far—in terms of renewable energy investments, though it remains to be seen whether they'll meet their 80 percent goal. At least they've got an aspirational goal, which the U.S. lacks. Without goals or guardrails, we face a race to the bottom with uncontrolled, harmful carbon emissions polluting our air and water, with millions suffering health challenges as a result. To be fair, Google, Apple, Amazon, and other data giants have made significant investments in renewable energy to offset their data centers. Google, for example, announced new plans to site wind, solar, and battery projects adjacent to their data centers to lighten the load on the energy grid and the planet. This is good, and we need more of it. Co-locating data centers with renewable energy and battery storage should be the default. America has plenty of clean wind and solar power and space to do it, like in Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, and in Georgia. This is what energy security can look like, and it's how we lessen the load on the grid and ensure new power is clean, not polluting. None of this will happen without visionary goal setting, like what we're seeing in China. They have already outpaced America in renewable energy production, and they're planning to outpace us in clean data dominance, too. We could meet this challenge with the kind of American ingenuity that put us on the moon. Or we can watch the U.S. get outperformed. We choose to meet the challenge and put America on the map for its forward-thinking clean data dominance. Now is the time to lead. Hank Johnson, a U.S. congressman from Georgia, is a senior member of the House Judiciary and Transportation & Infrastructure committees and a longtime advocate for the environment and clean energy. Michael Shank is an adjunct professor at New York University's Center for Global Affairs and George Mason University's Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.