logo
Plans to lift two-child benefit cap will land UK's biggest jobless families with windfalls costing taxpayer £3.5bn

Plans to lift two-child benefit cap will land UK's biggest jobless families with windfalls costing taxpayer £3.5bn

The Suna day ago

THE UK's biggest jobless families could receive a windfall of £3.5billion funded by the taxpayer if plans to lift the two-child benefit cap go ahead.
Since 2017, parents have only been able to claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children, if they were born after April 2017.
3
3
An exception is made for children born as a result of rape.
Now, Labour and Reform are both pushing to ditch the policy brought in by the Tories.
The Labour party has long been divided over the issue, with Sir Keir Starmer ruling out scrapping the cap in 2023.
However, on Thursday the PM hinted he's ready to heed the demands of Labour rebels and scrap the two-child benefit cap.
Sir Keir gave his strongest indication yet that he will remove the threshold that limits handouts for a third kid.
Analysis of official figures shows that ditching it would hand thousands of pounds a year in extra benefits to 180,000 large families in which no one goes out to work.
But critics of the cap claim it has worsened child poverty.
The hard-hitting rule, which slashes payments like Universal Credit and Child Tax Credit, is costing struggling households an average of £4,300 each, says a new report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Official figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show a staggering 450,000 families were stung by the cap last year.
Most of those hit - around 280,000 families – have three kids, while 120,000 have four, and 56,000 are raising five or more little ones.
The DWP doesn't reveal exactly how much the biggest families are missing out on.
However, separate stats from HMRC show child benefit - which isn't affected by the cap - is still being paid to some 15 families with a whopping 13 children or more.
More than 16,000 families are getting child benefit for six kids, and over 5,000 are claiming for seven.
Incredibly, nearly three in five of the families hit by the cap have at least one adult in work - proving that even grafting parents aren't safe from the squeeze.
However, this leaves around 180,000 where no one in the household is in any kind of paid work.
But former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey last night said the figures underlined the case for keeping the cap in place.
She said: "Encouraging people to have children that they cannot afford themselves, and expecting others to pick up the tab for them, is financially and morally indefensible.
"I expect nothing better from Labour, but it is a mistake for Nigel Farage to chase Labour to the Left."
Laying the groundwork for a U-turn on his election claim the cap won't be abandoned, Sir Keir said earlier this week that he was 'determined to drive down child poverty'.
Visiting a glass manufacturing plant in Warrington, on three occasions he wouldn't rule out a change in policy.
Amid growing pressure from furious backbench MPs, Sir Keir insisted ministers were 'looking at all options' around tackling poverty among kids.
And Nigel Farage raised eyebrows when he announced that a Reform-led government would ditch the cap completely.
How many children does the cap affect?
Then work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith first proposed the policy in 2012 under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government.
It was not until 2015 that then chancellor George Osborne announced a cap would be introduced from the 2017/2018 financial year.
The coalition said it made the system fairer for taxpayers and ensured households on benefits faced the same financial choices around having children as those not on benefits.
Government figures show one in nine children (1.6m) are impacted by the two-child limit.
In the first three months Labour were in power, 10,000 children were pulled into poverty by the cap, the Child Poverty Action Group found.
In May, it said another 109 children are pulled into poverty each day by the limit, adding to the 4.5 million already in poverty.
The Resolution Foundation said the cap would increase the number of children in poverty to 4.8 million by the next election in 2029-30.
Torsten Bell, the foundation's former chief executive and now a Labour Treasury minister, said scrapping the cap would lift 470,000 children out of poverty.
3

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HAIR THIS I'm ‘obsessed' with an £8 Amazon buy for hair growth – it reversed my post-partum hair loss in weeks
HAIR THIS I'm ‘obsessed' with an £8 Amazon buy for hair growth – it reversed my post-partum hair loss in weeks

The Sun

time31 minutes ago

  • The Sun

HAIR THIS I'm ‘obsessed' with an £8 Amazon buy for hair growth – it reversed my post-partum hair loss in weeks

SHOPPERS are raving about an £8 Amazon buy for hair growth which could help reverse post-partum hair loss. While postpartum hair loss is a common side effect of pregnancy, it makes many women feel insecure. Four to five months after giving birth, the hair will shed at an alarming rate, and it can be worrying. Our hair grows in cycles: a growing phase, a resting phase, and a shedding phase that continues to repeat. But during pregnancy, most of the hair stays in the growth phase due to those big changes in your body's hormones. Once your baby arrives and your hormones begin to change again, the level of estrogen falls, causing your thick head of pregnancy hair to begin the shedding phase. Because so much of your hair sheds all at once, the volume of hair loss seems far more substantial. But customers are hailing a "miracle" oil, which can fit into any haircare routine - applied daily or as a luxurious mask before wash day. Some shoppers have claimed it could reverse their postpartum hair loss in weeks. Mielle's original Rosemary Mint Scalp & Hair Strengthening Oil can be added to your Amazon basket for just £7.33. It promotes "amazing moisture and shine" and supports "longer, healthier hair". The product is infused with the vitamin biotin, which is also beneficial for nails and skin. There are no parabens, sulfates, paraffins, mineral oil, or DEA, and it's not tested on animals. "Mielle aims to empower women of all hair types and styles with powerful products and gentle, organic ingredients that amplify your natural beauty and are the 'root to results' that leave you looking and feeling your best," said the company. Shoppers have been raving about the hair oil, and even claimed it helped them with post-partum hair loss. "This oil has been a true saviour for me after experiencing postpartum hair loss, which left me with noticeable bald spots around my hairline," penned one. "Having used this consistently for a year, I am thrilled with the results." Another added: "This stuff is a miracle worker! Even the hairdressers at my salon noticed my hair growth and asked what have I been using! Bonus point- it's helped my nails grow as well." A third agreed: "This product has been remarkable. My hair fall have reduced significantly after the last use. Definitely recommended." This comes as a radio presenter has revealed that she suffered severe hair loss after having her second child, but a 59p buy has got it looking thick and healthy again. Meanwhile, another woman shared how she grew her hair thicker using this simple £2 remedy from Asda. She told how she took her hair from the size of a pinky in a ponytail to long and luscious using this one clever hack. Elsewhere, this is a £6 shampoo shoppers are going wild for, which makes your hair grow quickly, but it won't be in the beauty aisle. Hair loss tips We can lose between 50 and 100 hairs a day, according to the NHS. It is not usually something to worry about, but occasional it can be a sign of a medical concern. These include illness, stress, cancer treatment, weight loss and iron deficiency. The NHS advises to book an appointment with your GP to see if you can get to the cause of it. Experts at American Academy of Dermatology Association also recommend to eat healthy, limit curling irons and only use them for special occasions. They also recommend using a gentle shampoo, and make use of leave-in conditioners.

Nigel Farage told me exact moment he decided to run for PM – now he's marching to No 10 but EVERYTHING'S about to change
Nigel Farage told me exact moment he decided to run for PM – now he's marching to No 10 but EVERYTHING'S about to change

The Sun

time31 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Nigel Farage told me exact moment he decided to run for PM – now he's marching to No 10 but EVERYTHING'S about to change

WHAT a difference a year makes. Just 365 days ago Nigel Farage was all but retired, sitting out the General Election. 2 2 As the BBC put it, he had 'announced that he wouldn't try to win a seat in Parliament. . . prompting a reporter from The Sun to tease him that he was a chicken'. A year ago to the day, he blew all that up. 'I remember it very well,' he told me over the weekend. 'I was sitting at home, I'd been thinking hard for 48 hours about it. I had a group call and I just said, 'F*** it, I'm doing it. Find me a venue for tomorrow, please'.' In an age of backtracks, that might just go down as one of the most important U-turns in British political history. He insists it was more a sense of guilt — 'a feeling I was letting people down' — behind the decision as well as the 'gap in the political ­market' that saw a dying Tory Party and a uniquely uninspiring Labour who were set to win by default out of pure hatred of the Conservatives. Either way he was right — and eighth time lucky an MP. Fast forward a year and he is edging a double-digit lead in the polls, nudging that crucial 30 per cent of the vote that could, remarkably, see Reform UK form the next government. Farage's keen instinct for the political mood of the country appears to have been spot on. In Scotland, where Farage was forced to hide in a pub 12 years ago from a nationalist mob, Reform look set to push Labour into third place at a by-election this week — to the bewilderment of the cosy Holyrood establishment. We absolutely know that Sir Keir Starmer was in 'serious mode' when he launched his latest salvo against Nigel Farage If you don't believe the ­numbers, just look at the ­reaction from his rivals. Struggling Kemi Badenoch's Opposition leadership has never got off the ground due to the massive looming menace on her right flank. Her attempts to mimic Reform have fallen flat, while her attempts to ridicule them just drive ever more disillusioned Tories into their arms. And a Labour PM — who not only inherited the fastest- growing G7 economy and on-target inflation, propped up by a state broadcaster and cheered on by the chattering classes — should still be enjoying a Blair-style honeymoon. But instead, after ten months, Sir Keir Starmer leads the most unpopular ­government in British polling history. And he's in a right flap, as Reform not so much parks its tanks on Labour's lawn but napalms the entire village. The PM's attempts to paint Farage as a Putin patsy who wants to sell the NHS have flopped, as will attempts to brand him out of touch with working-class voters — who voted Reform in droves just last month. 'I hope nothing changes,' says Farage. 'I hope Kemi stays, I hope Starmer keeps obsessing about me, the poor bloke — he'll have to go see a psychiatrist before too long. 'It has way exceeded in the space of a year even my most optimistic expectations.' Teddy bears' picnic But he would be mad to rest on any laurels yet. Everything IS about to change. The fight is only getting started, and Reform has a very long way to go before asking the people of Britain to hand this untested and unknown political force the keys to No10. There is still a minimum of three years until another ­election, and in any election contest the last place you want to be is out front early, with a giant target on your back. Old Dominic Cummings warned darkly this week that the deep state is already ­gearing up to trash Reform and protect the old system of the established parties doing what they are told. Parties, government departments, newsreaders, quangos, think-tanks, unions, charities — you name it — will all line up in an onslaught that will make the battle against Brexit, and latterly Boris Johnson, look like a teddy bears' picnic. And Farage agrees, though he hopes: 'I don't really think those voters that have come to us already actually give a damn about this stuff.' But he needs to win over plenty of waverers, too. So everything possible will be escalated to stop that happening and if the Government and their pliant friends across the establishment get their message right, that poll lead could start to look rather soft. So is it wise of Farage to be giving his opponents ammunition this early in the cycle? I make the arguments I believe in, and when I start they are usually minority arguments but I'm generally good at bringing people with us. Nigel Farage This week, Reform's first foray into detailed policy away from immigration gave their opponents their first real straw to grasp at in months. Some 59 per cent of Reform voters and 42 per cent of ­Labour voters support keeping the two-child benefits cap for larger families. Labour MPs may want the PM to scrap it, but from what I hear that is still far from a done deal, amid concerns the Government is walking into a trap on increasing benefits for foreigners who tend to have more kids. But punching the bruise of the division in Labour, Farage declared Reform would abolish it, as well as take anyone earning under £20,000 out of paying income tax and reinstate all Winter Fuel Payments. He insists it's about more than just money, boldly claiming he's 'not a populist'. He said: 'I make the arguments I believe in, and when I start they are usually minority arguments but I'm generally good at bringing people with us.' But it was a multi-billion-pound spending pledge made in seconds that has drawn easy comparisons to Liz Truss's relaxed attitude about making the sums add up. Farage insists both parties don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to dodgy maths and more detail is coming on what he would cut — but he has clearly given them both some flesh to target when they were struggling to land blows Harry Cole Right on cue came the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lapped up by the BBC, who Farage accuses of 'now criticising every thing we do'. He added: 'Well, ask the question, who funds them? The Government.' Dodgy maths He's not wrong there, with the apparently independent ­fiscal think-tank receiving £13million of taxpayer funding over the past five years. But simply saying 'scrapping Net Zero ' will cover the costs of these massive pledges is fag- packet maths and a free gift to his struggling opponents. Farage insists both parties don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to dodgy maths and more detail is coming on what he would cut — but he has clearly given them both some flesh to target when they were struggling to land blows. Which leads me to the other problem Reform faces, relating to numbers and the road to No10. With just five MPs, they can barely fill a taxi let alone a Shadow Cabinet table. Farage plans to step back from much of the day-to-day media, promoting party figures like Richard Tice and Zia Yusuf instead. And the hunt is on for 'high-profile' outsiders to stand for the party as an alternative government at the next election, before they even have a seat in the Commons. Well, why not start that ­process right now? Solve two numbers problems in one go and appoint a ­prominent, respected and credible figure to be Reform's Shadow Chancellor.

Keir Starmer comes under pressure to sack his top legal adviser after he likened Right-wing British politicians to Nazis as minister refuses to say his job is safe
Keir Starmer comes under pressure to sack his top legal adviser after he likened Right-wing British politicians to Nazis as minister refuses to say his job is safe

Daily Mail​

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Keir Starmer comes under pressure to sack his top legal adviser after he likened Right-wing British politicians to Nazis as minister refuses to say his job is safe

A cabinet minister minister refused to say Lord Hermer was safe in his job yesterday after likening Right-wing British politicians to Nazis. Sir Keir Starmer is under pressure to sack his Attorney General over controversial comments he made in a speech last week that were seen as directed towards the Tories and Reform UK. Asked twice yesterday whether Lord Hermer's job was safe, Defence Secretary John Healey did not directly address the question. 'He's a really good attorney general. He made a mistake. He apologised. We move on,' Mr Healey told Trevor Phillips on Sky News. The Government's legal chief has suffered a backlash for referencing 1930s Germany as he criticised other parties for saying Britain should quit institutions such as the European Convention on Human Rights. He faced calls to quit from opposition parties for his claims that their actions are akin to those of Nazi ideologists who called for state power to trump the law. He also faced criticism from Labour MPs and Cabinet ministers. The Prime Minister's long-time friend and ally was eventually forced to apologise for his 'clumsy' language, though he 'rejected' how it had been portrayed. His remarks are also unhelpful for Labour, which is under pressure from Nigel Farage's Reform after its sweeping gains in the local elections. Ministers are looking to legally constrain judges' interpretation of international law over concerns it prevents foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers – including sex offenders – from deportation. Yesterday, Labour MP and ex-minister Graham Stringer accused the Attorney General of aiding the rise of Reform by ignoring voter concerns about immigration. He told The Mail on Sunday: 'He's convincing Labour voters [that the party] does not understand their legitimate concerns about immigration. 'It is not far-Right and Nazi to raise genuine concerns about the scale of immigration and the cost of housing migrants. He's doing Reform's work for them.' A spokesman insisted Sir Keir has full confidence in Lord Hermer, but it comes after several controversial interventions by the legal chief. He has upset colleagues over his adherence to international agreements and low-risk approach to legal challenges – and has also been accused of leading the 'surrender' of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius under the terms of a questionable deal. Mr Stringer added: 'Lord Hermer should never have been appointed in the first place. It's his ridiculous advice that has led us to spend £30billion to keep a military base we already had.' And Labour peer Lord Glasman, founder of the influential Blue Labour movements, added that the Attorney General's remarks made him 'unfit for government office'. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick and Reform deputy Richard Tice have all called for Lord Hermer to go.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store