Hegseth Pentagon Ridiculed Over ‘Next Level Cringe' AI Flub
The Department of Defense got absolutely shredded after uploading an AI-generated picture of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth with his pinky missing.
Posted by the DOD Rapid Response's account on X, the image features a stern-faced rendering of Hegseth standing beside a border fence beneath a billowing American flag while raising a three-fingered hand as a trio of nefarious figures watch on. One of the masked men holds a box of ever-so-subtly labelled 'DRUGS' with the caption '100% Operational Control.'
Many online commentators were quick to point out that Hegseth not only appears to be standing on the wrong side of the fence but is also facing away from the bad guys and even raising his sadly mutilated hand as if acting like their bodyguard.
Others wondered which of America's 50 states the 32 stars on Hegseth's flag are supposed to represent as well as which one of the original 13 colonies appears to have been dropped from its stripes.
The blunder comes at a delicate time for Hegseth as rumours mount about the White House's dissatisfaction with his performance after a series of embarrassing gaffes, security breaches, and unhinged public appearances over the past few weeks.
The most acute criticism has focused on his central role in the Signalgate scandal, which first broke after The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was accidentally added to a group chat in which Hegseth and other top members of the Trump administration discussed highly sensitive details of imminent missile strikes in Yemen.
In the weeks since, it has emerged that the defense secretary also shared details of those plans via chats with his lawyer, wife, and brother in addition to bypassing security protocols to install the app on his office computer at the Pentagon. He also used the same phone number on various other platforms, including WhatsApp, Facebook, Airbnb, and a fantasy sports site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Popular Stephen Starr restaurants boycotted by Democrats
Top Democrats in the House and Senate are boycotting hot Washington, D.C. restaurants that include those owned by famed Philadelphia restaurateur Stephen Starr over labor disputes. Why it matters: The targeted restaurants in Starr's empire include some of the buzziest spots for Democratic fundraisers. Driving the news: More than 50 House and Senate Democrats have signed onto Unite Here Local 25's pledge to avoid six D.C. venues. Zoom in: Starr, who is a Democratic donor, is facing boycotts of his Le Diplomate, Osteria Mozza and The Occidental. The other three boycotted restaurants are founded by chef Ashok Bajaj of Knightsbridge Restaurant Group. The list: Among the signers are some of Democrats' top fundraisers and biggest names, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are also on the list. Meanwhile, Philly Reps. Brendan Boyle, Dwight Evans and Mary Gay Scanlon signed the boycott list, per Unite Here's website. U.S. Sen. John Fetterman and Philly-regional Rep. Madeleine Dean were not on the pledge list as of Friday. Between the lines: Political groups and candidates have spent thousands of dollars at those spots over the past year, federal campaign records show. Former President Obama and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos made headlines when they dined at Osteria Mozza in January. Then-President Biden was a repeat customer at Le Diplomate during his presidency. What they're saying: Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told Axios: "We can have big policy debates, but we also have to show the American people some concrete examples." He added: "This is our opportunity when we're here in Washington, D.C. to not just go vote in the Capitol but actually go out in the community and make a difference." "We can say that all members on the list are personally boycotting," Benjy Cannon, a spokesperson for the union, told Axios in a message. "Many of them have been meeting personally with STARR and Knightsbridge workers all year." The other side:"Local 25's call for a boycott is baseless," Starr restaurants said in a statement. "A boycott of any kind can result in lost hours, wages, and tips that hardworking employees rely upon." "It is unfortunate that an organization that claims to want to represent employees would call for an action that would harm them." "We respect our employees' wishes," Bajaj said. "How many of these congress members even know themselves that they're signing?" Zoom out: Starr's restaurant group has accused Unite Here Local 25 of overly aggressive tactics. That includes union reps showing up with petitions outside employees' homes, leading one bartender to sign it even though she planned to vote against a union, as Eater reported in February. Francisco López, a Le Diplomate server of five years, told Axios some employees are holding counter protests to the union.
17 minutes ago
NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense
LONDON -- LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday. Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Rutte's speech. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defense spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Trade war: China isn't getting rid of its controls over rare earths, despite 90-day truce with US
Despite a 90-day truce in its trade war with the United States, China appears to be maintaining tight control over its rare earth exports – preserving a key source of leverage in future negotiations amid intensifying strategic rivalry with Washington. As part of last week's trade agreement in Geneva to temporarily roll back tariffs, China pledged to suspend or remove the 'non-tariff' countermeasures it imposed on the US since April 2. That has left businesses scrambling to find out whether that promise applies to China's export controls on seven rare earth minerals and associated products, which were imposed on April 4 as part of its retaliation against US President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs on Chinese goods. Magnets made of these heavy rare earth elements are an essential part of everything from iPhones and electric vehicles to big-ticket weapons like F-35 fighter jets and missile systems. Yet their supply is completely dominated by China. Fresh off the plane from the trade talks in Geneva last week, US trade representative Jamieson Greer sought to ease concerns surrounding this potential vulnerability. In a Fox News interview, he answered affirmatively when asked whether China had agreed to lift its export restrictions on rare earths as part of the truce. 'Yep, the Chinese have agreed to remove those countermeasures,' Greer said. 'If they don't do those things, we're going to be back in a different situation. But I expect they'll remove them.' However, there's little sign to suggest China is removing its newly imposed rare earth export control regime. If anything, according to experts and industry insiders, Chinese authorities appear to be strengthening implementation and ramping up oversight. The system, introduced in April, does not ban exports outright, but requires government approval for each shipment. That had caused weeks long holdups as companies navigated the new regime, fueling fears among a wide range of American industries from automobile to defense. 'I would not be shocked to find that Mr Greer is expressing what he hopes will happen versus what has actually been negotiated to happen,' said Jon Hykawy, president of the Toronto-based industry advisory firm Stormcrow Capital. 'These controls are intended … to ensure that China does not run short of some materials that are needed for domestic Chinese priorities,' said Hykawy. Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), said China's export licensing regime is 'here to stay' and 'may stay for a long time,' allowing Beijing to retain its leverage in future trade talks with the US. If the US were to turn around and renege on their tariff policy, China can easily withhold the required licenses, she said, adding that the licensing policy is dynamic by design, giving Beijing the power to decide which companies or countries can access its rare earth minerals and magnets at any given time. Following the Geneva talks, China's Commerce Ministry removed 28 US firms from its dual-use export control list and pulled 17 American companies from another trade and investment backlist. But the ministry made no mention of any changes to the exports control on rare earth minerals and magnets. A spokesperson for the ministry said she had 'no information to share' on whether China is lifting the export controls at a regular news conference last Friday. Instead, Chinese authorities launched a crackdown on the smuggling of critical minerals – a broader category of resources that include rare earth elements. On May 12, the day US and China announced the tariff cuts, Chinese export regulators convened a meeting with authorities from multiple mineral-rich provinces with the aim to 'prevent the illegal outflow of strategic minerals' and 'strengthen oversight across every link of the production and supply chain.' On the same day, Yuyuan Tantian, a social media account affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV, said in a post that 'China's rare earth export controls are continuing.' Meanwhile, after weeks of delay, China has started to issue export permits for rare earth magnets – a development that experts say shows the new licensing system is up and running, rather than restrictions being eased. Two Chinese rare earth magnet producers told CNN they had recently received licenses for exporting products containing dysprosium and terbium – elements that are often added to create more heat resistance in high-performance magnets commonly used in the automobile, aerospace and military industries. The approvals are granted under a 'one batch, one license' rule, meaning a new permit is required for each shipment and cannot be reused, according to the companies. One of the companies received its first export license for a shipment heading to Southeast Asia. It has since been granted several other licenses for exports to Europe, including the carmaker Volkswagen in Germany. 'We haven't received any indications about the (export control) system easing up,' a person close to the company told CNN. Volkswagen said in a statement that its suppliers have received indications that 'a limited number of export licenses have been granted.' Baskaran, from CSIS, said that instead of lifting the export controls on rare earths, China removed 28 American firms from its export control list. That means those companies, mostly aerospace and defense firms, are no longer banned from accessing dual-use materials from China, and their Chinese suppliers can now apply for export licenses for rare earth magnets. But it remains to be seen whether Beijing will ultimately give out licenses to American defense firms. China's rare earth export controls were 'specifically designed to hit the US defense industry, and I cannot envision China stepping back from that,' said Thomas Kruemmer, director of the Singapore-based mineral and metal supply chain firm Ginger International Trade and Investment. Under the new rules, exporters must include information about end-users in their applications, which take up to 45 working days to be approved. 'I am sure that in case of defense contractors, the Chinese Commerce Ministry will raise pesky questions, which the Americans may be unwilling to answer or may need Pentagon permission to answer,' Kruemmer said. 'This way they can conveniently delay the issuance of dual-use product export licenses beyond the self-set 45-day deadline, perhaps even beyond this 90-day (truce) window. And it still has the option to reject the license applications anyway.' The licensing rules can also offer China visibility into where the rare earth magnets end up. 'You can still get the material, but you have to fill out paperwork, describe to China who the end user is. You're going to give all this information and then (China) can see inside your downstream customer base and use and look for further vulnerability,' said James Kennedy, president of Three Consulting, a rare earths consultancy based in St Louis, Missouri. 'So it's very smart. They get a looking glass into what you're doing.' For decades, the US and other countries have been dependent on China's supply of rare earth minerals, which are difficult, costly and environmentally polluting to extract and process. China accounts for 61% of global mined rare earth production, but its control over the processing stage is much higher at 92% of the global output, according to the International Energy Agency. The April export controls are far from the first time Beijing has leveraged its dominance in the industry. In 2010, China halted shipments of rare earths to Japan for nearly two months over a territorial dispute. In late 2023, it imposed a ban on rare earth extraction and separation technologies. Beijing has also curbed exports of other critical minerals that are vital to the economy and global supply chains – including outright bans on the shipments of gallium, germanium, antimony and so-called superhard materials to the US. 'China's control over rare earths, cobalt, gallium and all these critical materials is a geopolitical weapon of never-before measured and seen effect,' Kennedy said. 'And at the end of the day, what this does is, it creates a lot of uncertainty. And that in itself is a powerful weapon.' Baskaran said that by granting some of its first export licenses of rare earth magnets to Volkswagen, China is sending a pointed geopolitical message. 'Germany is at the height of geopolitical crossfire. The US is unhappy that Germany has been overtly quite friendly with China. So, by giving it one of the first licenses, China is sending a very positive signal in the Chinese-German relationship,' she said. 'In this era of rising tension between the world's two geopolitical superpowers, the licensing system may stay as a larger form of power.' CNN's Joyce Jiang contributed reporting.
