UK F-35 parts exports to Israel is lawful, High Court rules
The UK's High Court has rejected a case brought by campaigners trying to stop the transfer to Israel of all British-made spare parts for US-produced F-35 fighter jets, saying it didn't have the constitutional authority to intervene.The government suspended about 30 arms export licences to Israel last September because of a risk of UK-made weapons being used in violations of international law in the Gaza Strip.But the UK supplies components to a global pool of F-35s which Israel can access. The government had argued it could not pull out of the defence programme without endangering international peace.Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch expressed their dismay at the ruling.
Both groups had intervened in the case. "The horrifying reality in Gaza is unfolding in full view of the world: entire families obliterated, civilians killed in so-called safe zones, hospitals reduced to rubble, and a population driven into starvation by a cruel blockade and forced displacement," said Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK."This judgment does not change the facts on the ground, nor does it absolve the UK government of its responsibilities under international law."The two judges said the case was not about whether the UK should supply arms and other military equipment to Israel - because the government had decided it should not.They were being asked to decide on a particular issue: whether the UK "must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration" because of the prospect that some UK-manufactured parts may be supplied to Israel and used in contravention of international law in the conflict in Gaza."Under our constitution, that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," they ruled.UK industry makes 15% of every F-35, according to the Campaign Against the Arms Trade.Oxfam, which provided evidence to the court, said: "It is unconscionable that the government would continue to license the sale of components for F-35 jets knowing that they are used to deliberately attack civilians in Gaza and destroy their means of survival, including vital water supplies."The case was brought by al-Haq, a group based in the Israel-occupied West Bank, and the Global Legal Action Network against the Department for Business and Trade.The court said that Business Minister Jonathan Reynolds was "faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve out or withdrawing from the F-35 programme and accepting all the defence and diplomatic consequences which would ensue".The government also argued pulling out of the defence programme could undermine US confidence in the UK and Nato.But human rights groups argue that the global rule of law is under threat over Gaza."The atrocities we are witnessing in Gaza are precisely because governments don't think the rules should apply to them," said Yasmine Ahmed, UK director of Human Rights Watch. "Judicial deference to the executive in this case has left the Palestinians in Gaza without access to the protections of international law, despite the government and the court acknowledging that there is a serious risk that UK equipment might be used to facilitate or carry out atrocities against them."The government says it will continue to keep its defence export licensing under review."The court has upheld this government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter," a spokesman said.Lawyers for the human rights groups are considering if they can find grounds to appeal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
24 minutes ago
- Sky News
Culture secretary Lisa Nandy hits out at BBC over Glastonbury controversy
Why you can trust Sky News The culture secretary has claimed there is "a problem of leadership" at the BBC, as the controversy over Bob Vylan's Glastonbury performance deepens. Lisa Nandy criticised the corporation over its decision not to pull the livestream after the band's frontman shouted "death, death to the IDF" - referring to the Israel Defence Forces - on Saturday. A criminal investigation has been launched into the Glastonbury performances of both Bob Vylan and Kneecap after the police reviewed footage. Ms Nandy condemned the "appalling and unacceptable scenes" at Glastonbury and said the government would not tolerate antisemitism. She said she had called BBC director-general Tim Davie after the broadcast of Bob Vylan's set to find out why it had aired, and why the feed had not been cut. "I expect answers to these questions without delay," she said. Later, when asked in the Commons about the BBC's editorial processes and who would be held accountable, Ms Nandy replied: "When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership." Ms Nandy said she had spoken to members of the Jewish community, including attendees at Glastonbury, who said they were concerned by imagery and slogans and ended up creating their own "safe space". Mr Davie has been facing calls for his resignation. Yesterday, drummer Bobbie Vylan released a video statement on Instagram - saying politicians who have spent time criticising the band should be "utterly ashamed" for giving "room" to this over other issues. The punk rap duo have had their US visas revoked and been dropped by their US representative, United Talent Agency. He also addressed what was said on stage, saying: "Regardless of how it was said, calling for an end to the slaughter of innocents is never wrong. To civilians of Israel, understand this anger is not directed at you, and don't let your government persuade you that a call against an army is a call against the people." Shortly after it was posted, the video was no longer available to view. Israel denies targeting civilians in its war in Gaza. During Kneecap's set, one member suggested on stage starting a "riot" outside his bandmate's forthcoming court appearance, before clarifying he meant "support". In a statement, Avon and Somerset Police said that after reviewing footage of the performances of Kneecap and Bob Vylan, further enquiries are required and a criminal investigation is now being undertaken. "A senior detective has been appointed to lead this investigation," a spokesperson said. "This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our enquiries are at an early stage." The force said the investigation will be "evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes". "We have received a large amount of contact in relation to these events from people across the world and recognise the strength of public feeling," it added. "There is absolutely no place in society for hate." What happened? During Bob Vylan's set, the duo performed in front of a screen that showed several messages, including one that said Israel's actions in Gaza amount to "genocide". Bobby Vylan also led chants of "death to the IDF". The set was live streamed by the BBC as part of its Glastonbury coverage, but has not been made available on demand. Politicians including the prime minister have criticised the performance. Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis said the chants "crossed a line" and that there was no place at the festival for "antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence". A BBC spokesperson said the broadcaster respected freedom of expression "but stands firmly against incitement to violence". They added: "The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves... "The team were dealing with a live situation, but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen." 2:32 Media watchdog Ofcom said it was in talks with the BBC and that the broadcaster "clearly has questions to answer" over the stream. Irish-language rap trio Kneecap were on stage afterwards. Before their appearance at the festival, there had been calls for Glastonbury to remove them from the bill - as rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh (who performs as Mo Chara) is facing a terror charge, accused of displaying a flag in support of the proscribed group Hezbollah at a gig in London last November. Glastonbury organisers kept them on the line-up, but the BBC chose not to stream their set live. An edited version was later made available on demand. On stage, the band led chants of "f*** Keir Starmer". O hAnnaidh's bandmate Naoise O Caireallain (Moglai Bap) said they would "start a riot outside the courts" for O hAnnaidh's next appearance, before clarifying: "No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine." Hundreds of people turned out in protest for his first court appearance earlier this month. Bob Vylan were set to perform in Chicago, Brooklyn and Philadelphia in the autumn. They are due to perform at Radar Festival in Manchester on Saturday and Boardmasters, a surfing and music festival in Newquay, Cornwall, in August. Sharing a statement on Instagram after the Glastonbury set, Bobby Vylan said: "Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place. "As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us." The war in Gaza started after Hamas militants launched attacks in Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. More than 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, more than 400 of them during the fighting in Gaza. Israel's offensive in Gaza has devastated the enclave and killed around 56,500 people, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, which does not differentiate between civilians and combatants, but says more than half of the dead are women and children.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour in chaos as rebels demand more welfare concessions
Labour MPs are rebelling against proposed benefit reforms, despite amendments, as 150,000 people are still projected to be pushed into poverty. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall introduced changes to the bill, including protecting current Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and promising a review, to quell the rebellion. Senior figures like Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan have criticized the reforms, with Mr. Burnham calling the amendments a "half U-turn." Rebel Labour MPs are demanding further changes or the withdrawal of the "rushed" legislation, with some suggesting a delay until a promised review is completed. Concerns persist over the financial savings of the cuts, now estimated at £2.5 billion, and polling indicates low public trust in Labour 's handling of disability benefits.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour could make paternity leave a ‘day-one right'
Angela Rayner has announced a full review of parental leave policies that could see more paternity leave enshrined in law. Ministers believe the current rules, which allow women to take 39 weeks of leave on reduced pay and men to take two weeks, may be holding back productivity. Meanwhile, the Department of Business and Trade, which is carrying out the 18-month review into parental leave, will explore making paternity leave and unpaid parental leave a 'day one right' for employees. One in three new fathers do not take up paternity leave, while the uptake of shared parental leave, when the period of absence can be shared between a couple, is low. The Government could also change the rules to allow paternity leave to be taken after a period of shared parental leave, which is not currently permitted. Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, said: 'Those early years are the most special time for families, but too many struggle to balance their work and home lives. 'Supporting working parents isn't just the right thing to do – it's vital for our economy. 'Through our Plan to Make Work Pay, we're already improving the parental leave system with new day 1 rights. This ambitious review will leave no stone unturned as we deliver for working families.' 'The best chance in a generation' The review was welcomed by paternity leave campaigners, who have long argued that unequal rules for men and women can be harmful to both partners and their child. George Gabriel, co-founder of The Dad Shift, said: 'The Government's review of parental leave is the best chance in a generation to improve the system and make sure it actually works for working families. 'When the last Labour government introduced paternity leave it was groundbreaking. But that offer, unchanged since, is now the least generous in Europe. 'Our broken parental leave has been overlooked for years, and finally sorting it out would be good not only for parents and children but for businesses too.' 'Precious early years' The review comes amid warnings about the UK's productivity levels, which lag behind other rich countries. The UK's fiscal watchdog is widely expected to downgrade Britain's productivity forecast this summer. Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, who is facing a backlash to her welfare reforms among Labour MPs, said changes to the rules would be appreciated by parents and businesses. 'Every parent should have the chance to spend time with their children during those precious early years,' she said. 'This review delivers on our Plan for Change to support families and give children the best start in life. 'By listening to parents and employers across the country, we'll build a system that works for today's working families.'
