logo
Exiled prince looks to lead Iranian people in ending Islamic Republic: 'Our Berlin Wall moment'

Exiled prince looks to lead Iranian people in ending Islamic Republic: 'Our Berlin Wall moment'

Yahoo4 hours ago

The exiled prince of Iran has proposed leading the country's democratic transition to end the Islamic Republic in a new speech Monday.
"Today, it is clearer than ever: The Islamic Republic is collapsing," Reza Pahlavi, the eldest son of the late last shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, said. "Credible reports indicate that Ali Khamenei's family – and the families of senior regime officials – are making preparations to flee Iran. The regime is on its last legs, in towns and cities across the country. The military is fractured. The people are united. The foundations of this 46-year tyranny are shaking."
"This is our Berlin Wall moment," Pahlavi said from a press conference he called in Paris.
The Missing Mullah: Iran's 'Supreme Leader' A No-show For Negotiations, Then Hid As Us Pounded Nuke Sites
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was reportedly hiding out in a bunker as the U.S. military pounded three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. Amid concerns that he could be assassinated, Khamenei has cut off all electronic communications to his commanders, relying on a trusted aide to relay orders, the New York Times reported.
Pahlavi, whose father was the last monarch overthrown during the 1979 Iranian Revolution, said Monday that Iran currently stands at a crossroads, warning that the West handing the current regime a lifeline would only result in more bloodshed.
Read On The Fox News App
"The difference in these two roads depends on one factor and one factor alone: whether the current regime in Iran is allowed to survive," he said. "If the West throws the regime a lifeline there will be more bloodshed and chaos – because this regime will not submit or surrender after it has been humiliated. It will lash out. As long as it is in power, no country and no people are safe: whether on the streets of Washington, Paris, Jerusalem, Riyadh or Tehran."
He argued for a "peaceful and democratic transition" and said the only way to achieve peace was through "a secular, democratic Iran."
"I am here today to submit myself to my compatriots to lead them down this road to peace and a democratic transition," Pahlavi said. "I do not seek political power, but rather to help our great nation navigate through this critical hour toward stability, freedom, and justice."
Pahlavi accused Khamenei of using the Iranian people as "human shields" by hiding out in his bunker.
"Seeing the images of the people of Tehran forced to flee our beautiful capital, the explosions in Isfahan, the fires along the Persian Gulf, all fill me with pain. But more than pain, I am filled with anger because this war is the result of the selfishness, hatred, and terror of one man: Ali Khamenei," he said. "While he directs this war from the safety of his hidden bunker, he uses our people as human shields. It is time to end the suffering."
In a direct message to Khamenei, Pahlavi said, "Step down. And if you do, you will receive a fair trial and due process of law. Which is more than you have ever given any Iranian."
He said other senior regime officials would have to face justice but promised not to "repeat the mistakes made in other failed transitions."
Pakistan Flip Flops On Trump Nobel Peace Prize Nomination After Less Than 24 Hours
"To those of you who are loyal to the Iranian nation, and not the Islamic Republic: there is a future for you in a democratic Iran, if you join the people now," Pahlavi said. "The choice is yours to make. I know these officers, these soldiers, these brave men exist because they are reaching out to me and telling me they want to be part of this national salvation. But now, greater coordination is needed."
Pahlavi announced that he is establishing "a formal channel for military, security, and police personnel to reach out directly to me, my team, and our expanding operation." He promised that it was a "secure platform to efficiently manage the growing volume of inbound communications and requests from those breaking with the regime and seeking to join our movement."
He said the international community was right to be concerned about stopping nuclear weapons and securing regional stability. Although the destruction of the three nuclear sites at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow has "diminished the regime's domestic nuclear enrichment," Pahlavi warned that the U.S. strikes did "not diminish the regime's intent to acquire and use nuclear weapons."
"The regime, enraged and emboldened, will be seeking revenge and can acquire nuclear weapons from other rogue regimes like North Korea," he said. "The destruction of the regime's nuclear facilities alone will not deliver peace."
Pahlavi said he was "stepping forward to lead this national transition – not out of personal interest but as a servant of the Iranian people." He said he has a "clear plan for transition and national renewal" based on three core principles: Iran's territorial integrity; individual liberties and equality of all citizens; and separation of religion and state. Pahlavi proposed convening a "national unity summit" of activists, dissidents, business leaders, professionals, experts and other groups outside of politics.
The goal would be for them to together develop a roadmap to democratic transition, and he said the "final form of this future democracy we seek will be for the Iranian people to decide in a national referendum."
Pahlavi also said he developed a three-phase, comprehensive plan for the "economic reconstruction and social stabilization" of the country. He promised that his team of experts "will publish the plans for the first 100 days after the collapse of the Islamic Republic based on this work."
"We are bringing together some of the world's greatest investors, builders, entrepreneurs, and experts who care about Iran and see its immense potential," he said.
Before opting for U.S. military intervention, President Donald Trump reportedly was working with Turkey to coordinate a diplomatic resolution to the Israel-Iran conflict and cut a nuclear deal, but the ayatollah did not engage. According to Axios, sources said Trump offered to send Vice President JD Vance and White House envoy Steve Witkoff for negotiations, and Trump offered to come to Turkey himself if it meant meeting with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Turkey relayed the proposal to its Iranian counterparts, who reportedly could not reach Khamenei for hours. Without the ayatollah's sign-off, the proposed meeting was called off.Original article source: Exiled prince looks to lead Iranian people in ending Islamic Republic: 'Our Berlin Wall moment'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump seals his ‘President Badass' cred — and makes US foes think twice
Trump seals his ‘President Badass' cred — and makes US foes think twice

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump seals his ‘President Badass' cred — and makes US foes think twice

The word 'badass' was bandied about a lot after the first assassination attempt on Donald Trump last year. Famously, the bloodied Republican candidate raised his fist in defiance. In a different context, the same pungent word applies to his 2 a.m. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Advertisement Trump the TV star has a knack for the theatrical and grand gesture. That obviously matters in domestic politics, but in international affairs, too, where projecting strength and command are just as important. We don't know where the war heads from here, and need to learn more about the damage that was inflicted. Still, it was an operation with a distinct and very useful element of Trump badassery. Advertisement It's not that Trump always follows through on his threats: He doesn't, with his on-and-off 'liberation day' tariffs an ongoing example of backing off and recalibrating. But when he makes good on a threat, it leaves a mark. He's said how foreign adversaries in his first term didn't always believe his threats 100%; they might believe him some percentage less than that, but it'd still be enough to make them wonder. Advertisement After this, whatever that number is just went up another 30% or so. Trump's signature military operations haven't been particularly complex: smashing ISIS, killing Iraqi Gen. Qassem Soleimani, bombing Fordow and other Iranian nuclear facilities. They haven't required mustering big international coalitions or launching, say, amphibious landings. But they achieve an outsized effect, thanks to the stark terms in which they are promised (e.g., bombing 'the s–t' out of ISIS), or the sheer audacity of the operation. Advertisement Killing Soleimani was a very limited action, but one that was shocking all the same. Bombing Fordow and the other sites was also quite focused, but the operation came as a strategic thunderclap. One way to put it is that the 'shock and awe' bombing campaign before the second Iraq war was much less awesome than advertised, and a prelude to a grinding, drawn-out conflict. Trump's operations tend, in contrast, to be all shock and awe, and for real. He represents the opposite approach of Robert McNamara during the Vietnam War. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Basically, the former business executive and LBJ defense secretary believed that talented managers could micromanage their way to success in government — complicated problems required complex analysis, shorn of a human element. The Trump method is to simplify everything and apply blunt-force solutions, undergirded by a very human psychology of dominance. Advertisement To wit, Iran can't have a nuclear bomb: Diplomacy would be ideal, but if it doesn't work, military force will be necessary. Tinker to Evers to Chance. QED. Trump proved immune to any subtle and counterintuitive theories about Iran, displaying the attitude toward the regime that you'd expect of any commonsensical American who's lived through the last 45 years. Advertisement Another way to look at Trump's strike is as the bookend of Desert One in 1980, Jimmy Carter's misbegotten hostage-rescue operation. The failure of that attempt represented a humiliation that was another blow to our national self-confidence and was a symbol of the reduced state of the post-Vietnam US military. It also spoke to the staying power of the Iranian regime at its inception. This is the opposite. The strike showcased the remarkable reach and proficiency of the US military, and a president willing to wield it as necessary. Advertisement The operation may eventually — although this is less certain — be seen as a prelude to the end of a decrepit regime. Again, who knows how this all plays out, and it may be that there are unanticipated downsides and mission creep. Trump posted the other day about regime change. The Iranians might believe that's merely bluster — but they need to take it more seriously than only a couple of days ago. Advertisement Such is the effect of Trump's badass move, and we should hope it is being felt not just in Tehran but in every capital of a country that wishes us harm. Twitter: @RichLowry

Trump ropes Fed into debt fight
Trump ropes Fed into debt fight

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump ropes Fed into debt fight

The Big Story President Trump is pushing the Federal Reserve to go beyond its legal mandate and help him manage the national debt as Republicans face growing pressure over the nation's finances. © AP President Trump is pushing the Federal Reserve to go beyond its legal mandate and help him manage the national debt as Republicans face growing pressure over the nation's finances. In a series of remarks and social media posts, Trump has ripped Fed Chair Jerome Powell for refusing to lower interest rates, insisting he should help the White House manage the costs of servicing more than $36 trillion in national debt. ''Too Late' Jerome Powell is costing our Country Hundreds of Billions of Dollars. He is truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government, and the Fed Board is complicit,' Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social, a day after the Fed held interest rates steady. While Trump has spent most of his two White House stints berating Powell to cut rates, only recently has he tied those demands to the country's deteriorating fiscal health. 'We're beginning to see what I think are the early warning signs that the Fed is going to be increasingly called upon to keep the government solvent,' said David Beckworth, senior research fellow and monetary policy director at the Mercatus Center, a libertarian-leaning think tank at George Mason University. 'When you begin to see this type of rhetoric, it's a clear sign that people are beginning to get nervous,' Beckworth explained. 'And how else can we save money? Well, let's turn into the Fed and put pressure on them.' I have more here. Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter, I'm Sylvan Lane — covering the intersection of Wall Street and Pennsylvania Avenue. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads Key business and economic news with implications this week and beyond: New York planning first large US nuclear plant in years: Hochul New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) ordered the state's public power utility this week to start working on a zero-emissions advanced nuclear energy site that would be the nation's first major nuclear plant project in nearly two decades. Iranian-aligned hackers claim responsibility for Truth Social cyberattack Hackers aligned with Iran have claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on President Trump's Truth Social platform, according to the cyber nonprofit Center for Internet Security (CIS). Schiff unveils presidential crypto ban legislation Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced legislation Monday seeking to bar public officials, including the president and his family, from certain cryptocurrency-related activities amid growing concerns about President Trump's involvement in the industry. Oil prices up amid Iran conflict Oil prices in recent days have hit their highest point in months amid the escalations between the U.S. and Iran. Tax Watch Thune says senators will stay in DC to wrap tax law Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) announced Monday that the upper chamber will remain in Washington until it is able to pass President Trump's ambitious tax cut package, raising the chances of scuttling a planned recess next week. 'Senators return to Washington today and we will remain here until this reconciliation bill is passed,' Thune said in an op-ed. 'By placing it on President Trump's desk by the 4th of July, we will be ensuring that future generations of Americans can live in safety and prosperity,' he added. Senators are scheduled to be on recess during the week of July 4, which has been the party's deadline to pass Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill.' Thune, though, had made clear to lawmakers in recent weeks he will nix that plan if they need the week to secure passage of the massive proposal. At this point, it is looking increasingly likely that the Senate GOP's work will spill into next week as it struggles to win over the requisite 51 votes as a number of holdouts remain. — Al Weaver Tax Watch is a regular feature focused on the fight over tax reform and extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts this year. Email a tip The Ticker Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: In Other News Branch out with more stories from the day: Federal Reserve's Bowman says rate cut should be on table in July WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve governor Michelle Bowman on Monday said the central bank should … Good to Know Business and economic news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Top stories on The Hill right now: Supreme Court lifts third country deportation limits; liberals pen scathing dissent The Supreme Court on Monday lifted judge-imposed limits on the Trump administration's deportations to countries where migrants have no ties over a scathing dissent from the court's liberal justices. Read more Former ambassador to Russia: Putin, Xi will celebrate Trump's 'preemptive war' in Iran Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul offered warnings on Saturday of how U.S. strikes on Iran could influence U.S. adversaries around the world. Read more What People Think Opinions related to business and economic issues submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

JD Vance Said the Iran Strikes Set Their Nuclear Program Back ‘Substantially.' He's Wrong.
JD Vance Said the Iran Strikes Set Their Nuclear Program Back ‘Substantially.' He's Wrong.

Politico

time39 minutes ago

  • Politico

JD Vance Said the Iran Strikes Set Their Nuclear Program Back ‘Substantially.' He's Wrong.

Speaking on Sunday morning, Vice President JD Vance stated that the Saturday U.S. air strikes on Iran had 'set their nuclear program back substantially.' His comments came soon after President Donald Trump said that the operation had 'completely obliterated' key nuclear facilities in the country. Satellite images of bombed buildings and cratered mountainsides certainly give credence to these claims. But these statements from Vance and Trump are far too confident. In reality, Iran can likely reconstitute its program rapidly — perhaps in a year or so. What's more, after the U.S. strikes, there is also now a real danger that Tehran will make the decision to go further than enriching and amassing uranium and actually build a bomb. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Dan Caine, stated that all three sites targeted by the United States, including Iran's underground enrichment facility at Fordow, appeared to have sustained 'extremely severe damage and destruction,' though he also warned that a final assessment 'will take some time.' Even so, Iran probably retains highly enriched uranium, centrifuge components and expertise — a triad that will allow it to reconstitute its program rapidly. First, it's unclear how much weapons-grade or near-weapons-grade uranium the strikes even destroyed. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran had accumulated about 900 pounds of uranium enriched to 60 percent by May 17 — that's enough for a handful of nuclear weapons after further enrichment. The organization's director general, Rafael Grossi, has publicly indicated that, before hostilities began, Iran likely moved some or all of this material from the storage facility where it was under IAEA monitoring. Indeed, Vance had hinted hours earlier that that the material was still in Iranian hands. Iran has a decent shot at keeping that highly enriched uranium safe and secret. Such material is typically stored in small cylinders that are roughly the same size and shape as scuba tanks. Tracking them will be extremely difficult — even for the United States and Israel, despite their exquisite intelligence capabilities. The equipment to further enrich this material is also likely still at Iran's disposal. Even if Israel has destroyed all of its centrifuge production facilities (and that's far from certain), Iran has a large stockpile of centrifuge components. The IAEA lost the ability to monitor these components when the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — aka the Iran Nuclear Deal — fell apart following the United States' withdrawal in 2018. Like highly enriched uranium itself, centrifuge components are small, easy to move and difficult to detect. Moreover, given that Iran evacuated key facilities before the U.S. strikes, most of Iran's cadre of skilled scientists and technicians have presumably survived. Starting with uranium enriched to 60 percent and just 100 or 200 operating centrifuges, they could likely produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb in just a few weeks. The required facility would be much smaller than Fordow (which was designed for a few thousand centrifuges), let alone Natanz (designed for tens of thousands). It could be hidden in plain sight in a small industrial facility built for some other purpose or buried inside a taller mountain than the one that housed Fordow. Iran may not start construction of such a facility right away since its immediate focus is likely to be keeping its material, equipment and personnel as secure as possible. Once it gives the go-ahead, however, Iranian technicians could likely get a facility of this size up and running within a year — quite possibly rather more quickly given the speed at which they have recently been able to get centrifuges operational. To make matters worse, the U.S. and Israeli strikes may have increased Iran's resolve to proliferate. For over 20 years, Iran appears to have wanted the capability to acquire nuclear weapons at short notice but not the weapons themselves. Ahead of the U.S. attack, however, the intelligence community reportedly assessed that striking Fordow would likely induce Tehran to make the political decision to build the bomb. If Tehran does make that decision, it will need to 'weaponize' its highly enriched uranium — turn it into a functional, deliverable bomb. There has reportedly been disagreement between the United States and Israel, and also within the U.S. government, over how long this would take. Spy agencies' most optimistic estimate, from the United States' perspective, is about a year. Since Iran's efforts to produce highly enriched uranium and design a nuclear weapon could largely run in parallel, the weaponization process is unlikely to slow Iran's acquisition of a nuclear weapon by all that much. This estimate — that, even after U.S. air strikes, Iran might be able to produce a nuclear weapon within a year from the decision to start — is just that: an estimate. There's plenty of uncertainty. But it's a median estimate, neither the best nor the worst case. The worst case is that Iran already has a secret operational enrichment facility, a nearly mature design for a nuclear weapon and can manufacture one in a few months. The best case, which is far from the most likely, is that further military action destroys Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium and centrifuge components. Even this outcome is hardly good, however. Because Iran retains knowledge and expertise, it could likely rebuild its entire nuclear program in a few years. This should be no cause for celebration; critics attacked the Iran Deal because (in their overly simplistic narrative) its limits lasted a mere 10 to 15 years. I want to be wrong. I hope that Iran will now accept a comprehensive, verifiable and permanent denuclearization agreement. Better still, I hope that the current regime is replaced by a liberal, transparent, Western-oriented democracy whose nonproliferation promises are as credible as New Zealand's. Yet, these outcomes seem highly unlikely. Iran has stated, all too credibly, it will cut back on its cooperation with the IAEA and has even threatened Grossi. Moreover, even if the current regime collapses, it is likely to be replaced by one that is similarly, if not more, deleterious to Western interests. President Trump's declaration of victory risks becoming a 'mission accomplished' moment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store