
Parents' Rights Are Making a Comeback
Commentary
The right to opt out one's children from studying a sinister collection of sexually explicit storybooks in suburban Maryland, and the right to opt in to a Catholic Virtual charter school in Oklahoma, were heard last month at the Supreme Court. That these two cases are under review by the high court is a strong indication that—after decades of being ignored by our educational system and the courts—parental rights are back.
The first case,
Objections were raised by parents from faith traditions including Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox Christianity, and Islam. Their religious views do not endorse the ideologies pushed in the collection and they don't want their children indoctrinated. When their pleas to opt their young children out of this curriculum were rejected by their school board, they
A district court
When it comes to protecting the interests of parents in their children's education and religious formation, there is no better guardian than this Supreme Court. Just think back to 2020 when the Court
Related Stories
4/27/2025
4/22/2025
39
amici
filed briefs with the Supreme Court in support of the Montgomery County parents' simple quest to shield their children from what is 'antithetical to what they teach at home.' The Trump administration also
Like some of the objecting parents in Montgomery County, many parents of faith are also unable to afford the tuition to send their children to private religious schools and similarly find themselves trapped by official ideology. The Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa responded to their plight, planning to operate St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School as a charter school. While the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board
Clearly the Oklahoma Attorney General and state supreme court haven't been paying much attention to the Supreme Court in recent years. In addition to invalidating Montana's discriminatory scholarship program, the Court in 2022 found that Maine
Just as excluding religious schools from scholarships and vouchers is an unconstitutional form of religious discrimination, so too is categorically denying an otherwise qualified religious school from charter school certification simply because they are religious.
This Supreme Court has made clear time and again that the failure to respect religious freedom in education is odious to the guarantees of the Constitution. Although some local school boards and state officials seem to be ignoring this, parents of faith are not willing to put up with it any longer. And now, finally, it seems that they have the support of the most powerful institutions in the land.
From
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
42 minutes ago
- Fox News
Hunt for Father Accused of Killing Three Daughters
Hunt for Father Accused of Killing Three Daughters, Sean 'Diddy' Combs is asking for a mistrial, President Trump appeared at a Ultimate Fighting Championship match in New Jersey. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk
President Trump said he assumes his relationship with Elon Musk has ended and that he has no desire to repair it after the pair publicly fell out last week. "I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken," Trump said of the billionaire in a phone call with NBC News' Kristen Welker. The big picture: Trump's comments also came with a warning to Musk when the president said the Tesla CEO could face "serious consequences" should he fund Democratic candidates in the next election running against Republicans who vote for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The billionaire, who contributed more than $290 million to Republicans in the 2024 election but has since said he'd cut back on political spending, posted last week that politicians "who betrayed the American people" should be fired in November. Trump declined to elaborate on what the consequences would be for Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that it would be a "big mistake" for Musk to go after Republicans who vote for the bill. Driving the news: Trump said he has no plans to speak to the Tesla CEO during the Saturday phone interview with Welker. Asked if he thought his relationship with Musk was over, Trump said he "would assume so." He accused the once-close administration ally of being "disrespectful to the office of the President." Catch up quick: The alliance between Trump and the former chainsaw-wielding face of DOGE exploded last week as Musk continuously campaigned against the massive tax-and-spending package, blasting it as a "disgusting abomination." Speaking to reporters during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Thursday, Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk, who he claimed was very familiar with the inner workings of the legislation. While Trump talked, Musk fired back in real-time on X, claiming in one post that Trump would have lost the election without him. Zoom in: In one post that appears to have been deleted, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files." Trump told NBC that it's "old news."


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Ex-DHS official warns Trump deploying National Guard could increase tensions
CNN national security analyst and former DHS official Juliette Kayyem warns that Trump's National Guard deployment is highly unusual and could escalate tensions rather than ease unrest.