‘Loss for the nation': Is this ancient, felled oak tree London's Sycamore Gap?
Police are investigating the felling of a centuries-old oak tree that has 'more ecological value than the Sycamore Gap' amid outrage from local residents and conservationists.
Reports were made to Enfield council in London earlier this month regarding the 'criminal' felling of an ancient oak tree in Whitewebbs Wood, an ancient woodland in the north of the capital.
Lawrence-Thor Stephen, CEO of London-based tree care company Thor's Trees, said the felling was a 'loss for Enfield' and 'a loss for the nation'.
The tree is estimated to be up to 500 years old, and Mr Stephen said that, due to its age, it is more ecologically valuable than the 200-year-old Sycamore Gap tree near Hadrian's Wall, which was felled in 2023.
'I can't believe this has happened,' he said. 'This is a loss of a National Treasure.'
A statement from Ergin Erbil, leader of Enfield council, said the felling has been reported to the police and a tree preservation order was put in place to protect it from further damage.
The tree is a Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur), with a girth of 6.1 metres and it is officially verified on the Woodland Trust 's Ancient Tree Inventory.
Mr Stephen told The Independent that thousands of species of birds, bats and insects rely on the tree to survive. He added that the tree will take centuries to replace.
"When an ancient tree falls, it's nature that's wounded and a community,' he said.
'But from this, we have the chance to build something better: stronger protections, greater awareness, and a renewed commitment to the trees that quietly support all life around us.
'Let's make sure this story is not just one of loss but a turning point for action.'
The three councillors for the Whitewebbs Ward said in a joint statement that the tree's felling is 'enormously distressing and the perpetrators must be 'brought to justice'.
'Crucially, the council also needs to make clear how it will ensure that this is never allowed to happen again', they added.
Mr Ebril said in a statemen that while the felling occurred on April 3, the council wasn't made aware until last week, carrying out an immediate inspection of the site.
'We are treating the matter as criminal damage and have reported it to the police,' he said. 'We will work closely with the police as they continue their investigation into this matter.'
The Metropolitan Police confirmed it had received a report from Enfield Council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
33 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
‘TikTok addicted' mum-of-two, 29, who stole £300k from her firm to spend on ‘tokens' for favourite creators is jailed
Dozens of her colleagues faced redundancy due to her thieving RABBIT HOLE 'TikTok addicted' mum-of-two, 29, who stole £300k from her firm to spend on 'tokens' for favourite creators is jailed Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A SOCIAL media "addicted" mum who stole £300,000 from her employer to blow on TikTok "tokens" has been jailed. Katherine Greenall was in tears in the dock yesterday as she was told she'd be locked up for pinching the vast sum from a car company where she worked as an accounts manager. 3 Katherine Greenall, 29, spent a whopping £300,000 on TikTok tokens Credit: Merseyside Police 3 TikTok tokens can be bought for real money and used to send creators virtual gifts Credit: Getty 3 Greenall was sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court on Friday Credit: PA:Press Association The mum-of-two, 29, spent the vast majority of the cash on TikTok tokens, which users can gift to their favourite creators. However, the court also heard Greenall also treated herself to holidays, hotel stays and Amazon purchases during her year-long "voyage of fraud and misadventure", reports the Manchester Evening News. The thief claimed she now has only a few hundred pounds left in her bank account. Liverpool Crown Court heard on Friday afternoon, Greenall began working for St Helens-based New Reg Ltd, a technology firm which specialises in purchasing vehicles for clients, in a lesser role in April 2021. The mum, of the town's Gloucester Street, was promoted in December 2022, giving her access to business bank accounts. Prosecutor Christopher Taylor was considered "vital" to the growing firm and described as "both trusted and respected" before it was found she was siphoning off the funds into her own accounts. Analysis of Greenall's bank statements showed during 2023 she received 53 unauthorised deposits totalling £57,036 from her employer. During this period, she also began increasing her spending at supermarkets, as well as other food outlets, sports retailers and Amazon Prime. The court heard she also used the funds to pay for a family solicitor. Her spree ramped up in the early months of the following year, boosting her bank balance by another £196,364.26 by April 2024. Such large sums going missing raised suspicions amongst Greenall's superiors and were put to the defendant in a meeting with the company director on May 1. She pledged to investigate before making a "final deposit" of £20,000 immediately after and then left the office claiming there was an illness in her family. Greenall would later admit criminality during a meeting six days later and she was arrested on May 13. She told detectives she had been "living a lavish lifestyle" and had only £700 in her bank account. The mum said initially she'd been using the stolen money to pay for household purchases before she began funding her TikTok "obsession". Tokens on the platform can be bought with real money and exchanged for virtual gifts that users can send to creators during live streams, which can then be exchanged back to real cash. Greenall said the crime spree came "at a time when she was low", the court heard. Overall, she pinched £443,523.26 out of the company over 121 separate transactions, and spent £301,162.55 on TikTok tokens. Her actions jeopardised the future of the firm and placed over 30 former colleagues at risk of redundancy. Paul Becker, defending, told the court that his client "may have been suffering from a form of addiction to TikTok", but stated that she had "no formal diagnosis to such an addiction". Greenall's two children, an 11-year-old boy with severe ADHD, and a six-year-old girl, are anticipated to be looked after by their mum's sister. The defendant admitted one count of fraud by abuse of position and was jailed for 28 months. One of her supporters told her "I love you" from the public gallery as Greenall was led away. Judge Neil Flewitt KC said: "It is a tragedy that those children are going to suffer as a result of your dishonesty. "I have taken the view that there is simply no way to avoid what I am sure you have been advised is the inevitable sentence of imprisonment. "This is simply too much money and too much damage caused here." Do you know more? Email
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Man fined £1,000 for putting bins out one day early
A Labour council has been accused of acting like the 'Stasi' after fining a resident £1,000 for putting his bins out a few hours early. Hammersmith and Fulham Council claimed Clyde Strachan had been fly-tipping when he placed rubbish sacks and a food recycling bin outside his home at noon the day before the refuse collection. Now the west London council's 'law enforcement team' - its 'eyes and ears' - has been criticised as 'overzealous' after it refused to give an official warning despite the 37-year-old resident saying he put them out early because he was going away. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, rounded on the local authority. 'Instead of cracking down on genuine anti-social behaviour, the state tries to reassert itself by punishing well-meaning people for tiny infringements. It's the easy thing to do but it's counter-productive and unfair,' he told The Telegraph. 'This huge fine for putting the bins out a few hours early veers into Stasi-like control of people's lives. This man was clearly doing the right thing in the circumstances.' Within two hours of The Telegraph contacting the council, the fine was withdrawn and town hall bosses issued a statement saying Mr Strachan, a lead engineer at a technology company, was 'not a persistent fly-tipper'. The local authority insists that the 'number one priority' for the 72 officers in its enforcement team is keeping 'residents and visitors safe'. However, they issued more than 2,200 fines in 2024. In May, Mr Strachan was leaving his West Kensington home for a few days and decided to help refuse collectors by putting his rubbish out shortly before midday. 'I deliberately put them out of the way on the pavement, tucked to one side against the wall so they weren't in anyone's way,' he said. 'It meant I had put them out about six or seven hours before the evening when I would normally take them there.' When he returned from his trip he discovered an 'environmental enforcement notice' demanding he make contact. 'I spoke on the phone to one of the council officers and said I was willing to receive a warning but felt a £1,000 fine was excessive. 'I said I had put the bins out early as I was not available the next day. It was an honest mistake. I didn't feel as though I needed to grovel, but it felt like that was what he was after.' A week later a £1,000 fixed penalty notice (FPN), with an early £500 option, arrived stating: 'There was one large box, six bags of waste, and one food bin deposited on the pavement and left. It isn't collection day so it shouldn't be there.' The notice said: 'There is no formal right to appeal, however the council will accept representations from you within seven days…' 'It was excessive, completely shocking and quite unbelievably unfair. It feels like an abuse of their powers', Mr Strachan said, adding that he often picks up litter on the street or cleans up if a fox has ransacked bins. Challenging the penalty Mr Strachan challenged the penalty, claiming the 'extreme fine' was not appropriate for a 'minor infringements', adding it was tantamount to 'bullying and coercion.' William Yarwood, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the huge fine for such a minor transgression was 'completely disproportionate'. 'This was a clear case of an honest mistake, not fly-tipping - yet overzealous enforcement officers have treated it like a serious offence. Residents expect fair treatment, not to be targeted for trying to do the right thing. 'Councils should focus on real issues, not hammering taxpayers with excessive fines for trivial matters.' Councillor Jose Alfonso, leader of the Tories at the council, said enforcement officers should be restricted to 'working with the police to keep our streets safe - not trying to catch residents out on technicalities'. He said the 'contemptuous and high-handed approach' was 'the hallmark' of the Labour council. 'We thought we were getting a law enforcement team, but it appears we've ended up with a council revenue collection team.' A council spokesman said: 'Mr Strachan asked for a review of the FPN on May 28 when he let us know that the reason he put the rubbish out early was that he had been going on holiday the following day.' The following day, they froze the fine pending a review. 'We have since cancelled the FPN as we agree that Mr Strachan made an honest mistake and is not a persistent fly-tipper' he added, claiming officers respond to 'numerous complaints from local neighbours about fly-tipping and waste on pavements in this neighbourhood' and it acts 'both firmly and fairly when residents ask us to deal with the ugly scourge of fly-tipping.' Council's 'eyes and ears' The council website says the enforcement team was set up in 2021, serves as its 'eyes and ears' and is 'one of the largest' such forces in Britain. It claims 'uniformed staff patrol the borough day and night, seven days a week,' adding that they issued 2,270 fines in 2024, but 'are not the police'. Council taxpayers foot the team's £2.1 million annual bill. A separate web page explains how bags should be put out 'before 6am on your normal collection day, or after 9pm on the evening before.' It adds: 'Putting your bins out on the wrong day or in the wrong way could result in action against you for dumping rubbish.' However, that page does not mention £1,000 fines for fly-tipping. In 2024, the council announced that it was introducing 'hefty new fines for fly-tipping' to 'act as a deterrent'. Fines were increased from £200 to £1,000, with a pledge that money raised will fund clean-up operations and 'enforcing the new rules'.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pro-Palestinian activist who avoided prosecution after chanting 'I love the 7th of October' is Islamist refugee granted asylum in Britain
A pro-Palestine activist who avoided prosecution after he chanted 'I love the 7th of October' is a Muslim refugee granted asylum in the UK, it emerged today. Mohammad al-Mail, a 27-year-old Kuwaiti national granted refugee status in the UK in 2017, also shouted 'I like an organisation that starts with H' through a megaphone at an anti-Israel protest in Swiss Cottage, north-west London, last September. Mr Al-Mail was arrested by police after the chants over alleged terrorism offences, but after eight months a decision was taken by the CPS not to charge him. He is said to have avoided prosecution by telling officers that the organisation he claimed to love was actually the Home Office, and not terror group Hamas. This is despite him operating a campaign group which states its aim is to achieve 'Islamic supremity' and which has criticised terror groups such as Al-Qaeda for failing to advance global jihad. Meanwhile at the same rally, a Jewish counter-protester was also arrested for holding a placard mocking deaths during attacks involving explosive pagers in Lebanon. The attack targeted Hezbollah members and leaders, and the placard depicted the leader of the proscribed terror group holding a pager, with the word 'beep' repeated three times. The man was charged over the incident in May, but the case has since been dropped. Earlier this year, Mr Al-Mail appeared to make light of the accusations against him, telling an Arabic language podcast the case 'fell apart', the Telegraph reports. He described his answer to police when asked what he meant by the letter H: 'Immediately, I answered, 'It could be the Home Office', you know, the ministry of the interior. 'I love the ministry of the interior', and so on. 'Truly, as the saying goes, 'The worst calamity is the one that makes you laugh'. The Met referred the case twice to the CPS, but both times it decided not to press charges - reportedly due to the issue of it relying on 'speculation' to infer support for a proscribed terror organisation. During the podcast, Mr Al-Mail told listeners to 'take advantage' of October 7, which saw 1,200 people killed by an Hamas incursion into Israel. The resulting war has resulted in almost 57,000 Gazans being killed, many of whom civilians. 'Not every day is like October 7,' Mr Al-Mail added. 'If an opportunity arises, we must fully exploit it. If you strike, make it hurt.' The refugee's views are reiterated by his campaign group Upper Hand Organization, which lists its 'pillars' as 'rightism' and 'Islamic Supremacy'. The English version of his site reveals the group was founded in 2016 in Kuwait, before being banned. It states: 'The Upper Hand Organization is a global movement dedicated to working with and for Muslims worldwide through all means and fields - committed to channeling resources toward strategic projects to achieve Islamic dominance.' It adds that the group 'operates as an entity that asserts its responsibilities extend beyond national borders, with a revolutionary agenda grounded in Islam.' In November, some two months after the march, Mr Al-Mail told his supporters he would surrender to police over the chants but told his followers to 'continue the path of Jihad', claiming peaceful followers of Islam are 'slaves and dwarves'. He added: 'What is coming to you is terrifying – either our annihilation or yours.' After leaving Kuwait, Mr Al-Mail was convicted of 13 offences including defaming the Emir and sentenced in his absence to 53 years in prison. Claiming asylum, he said these were politically and religiously motivated and was granted allowed to remain in the UK on May 5 2017. He later received a partial pardon. Shadow Policing Minister and Conservative MP Chris Philp told the Telegraph: 'The police must urgently re-investigate the incident with a view to re-arresting the man concerned'. He added: 'I am deeply worried that someone came here, was granted asylum and then abused the UK's generosity by expressing extremist views. This is why our human rights and asylum laws need to be changed.' Lord Walney, the Government's former extremism tsar, said the revelations are 'disturbing and raises serious questions for the Metropolitan Police'. 'The fact officers were apparently unaware of this open source material when they submitted the case to the Crown Prosecution Service suggests an alarming lack of rigour in their initial investigation,' he said. 'In light of this, it is vital that the police reopen the case to ensure national security can be protected.' It is understood the CPS is 'urgently' reviewing the decision not to charge Mr Al-Mail.
