Mexico City bans violent bullfighting, sparking fury and celebration
Mexico City lawmakers on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly to ban violent bullfighting, triggering outrage from aficionados and celebration from animal rights advocates.
The legislation, approved by a 61-1 vote, prohibits the killing of bulls and the use of sharp objects that could injure the animals. It also sets time limits on how long bulls could be in the ring, all part of an initiative dubbed 'bullfighting without violence.'
The decision sparked angry protests from bullfighting supporters and matadors, some of whom tried to breach a police barricade at the local Congress. Some carried signs that read 'Being a fan of la fiesta brava (bullfighting) is not a crime, it's a point of pride.'
Animal rights protesters celebrated, and were joined by Mexico City Mayor Clara Brugada of the ruling Morena party, who said the decision will help the Mexican capital become a place 'that respects the rights of animals and that will not tolerate them being subjected to abuse or violence.'
Tuesday's vote appeared to be an attempt to broker a compromise between two warring sides of the debate after years of back-and-forth about the practice.
Bullfighting has long been considered a tradition and a pastime in Latin American nations, but has come under criticism for animal cruelty because bulls are often killed at the end of the fight. Animal rights groups say that approximately 180,000 bulls are killed every year in bullfighting worldwide.
The tradition, which has long drawn big crowds to arenas across Mexico, was dealt a blow when a judge in Mexico City banned the practice in June 2022, shutting down an arena that has been billed as the world's largest bullfighting ring. The judge ruled that bullfights violated city residents' rights to a healthy environment free from violence.
While animal rights advocates celebrated it as a victory, and a step toward ending the bloody tradition, bullfighters said it dealt an economic blow to the city. The National Association of Breeders of Fighting Bulls in Mexico says bullfighting generates 80,000 direct jobs, and 146,000 indirect jobs across the country.
In 2023, Mexico's Supreme Court overturned the ban without explanation, allowing bullfighting arenas to be flooded once again with fans of the so-called 'fiesta brava."
____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
ICE slammed for overspending amid ‘egregious' funding mismanagement in House report
A 168-page House report has slammed the Department of Homeland Security for 'egregious' funding mismanagement. The House Appropriations Committee released its report on Wednesday for the Homeland Security funding bill, conveying complaints regarding departmental policies. The report also included guidance on how it would like the funding for the 2026 fiscal year to be spent. One of the concerns included Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) spending more money than it had received. Lawmakers from both the Democrats and the Republicans have made such complaints amid the Trump administration's ratcheting up of deportations. This comes as the White House waits for Congress to pass a spending package, which may include billions of dollars in funding for immigration enforcement. 'Actions already taken in fiscal year 2025 are especially egregious —ICE began spending more than its appropriated level shortly after the fiscal year commenced and operations now far exceed available resources,' the report states. Fiscal year 2025 began in October. 'While the Committee recognizes the dynamic environment in which ICE must function, neither ICE nor the Department should rely on other components to fund the deficits that ICE itself often creates,' it adds. 'Not only does that presuppose that other missions within DHS are less important, but it also sets the precedent that the Department can shift funding away from congressional priorities within other components to compensate for ICE's budgetary mismanagement.' The report states that such mismanagement is 'unacceptable' and calls on ICE to update the committee on a monthly basis, 'to ensure appropriate congressional oversight.' The Homeland Security appropriations subcommittee chair, Republican Rep. Mark Amodei of Nevada, told ICE Director Todd Lyon during a recent hearing that the agency was at risk of violating the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from incurring expenses before Congress has approved the spending. 'I would appreciate it if you, for your part, would let folks know up your chain of command that this information, if it's not coming in real time, is not useful,' Amodei told Lyons, according to Politico. He added that they 'have to keep in mind things like the Antideficiency Act … and I'll just be honest with you, speaking for me, I don't know that I have the information that I need to make sure that we're doing our job in the context of that.' The report also states that there are concerns about the TSA, FEMA policy, cybersecurity, as well as the Coast Guard, in addition to the other agencies operated by DHS. The full committee will mark up the bill on Thursday; however, Republican leadership in the House hasn't announced any floor action as of yet on any of the bills handling fiscal year 2026. Bipartisan funding negotiations haven't started with less than four months until the start of the next fiscal year. Additionally, the White House has yet to send a full budget request. Two-thirds of federal law enforcement spending is taken up by immigration and border issues for the 2025 fiscal year, the Cato Institute noted. That includes roughly $19 billion for CBP, $10 billion for ICE, $3.2 billion for DHS general offices, and $281 million for USCIS. ICE spending has increased significantly since its creation in 2003. Recently, its budget has gone from $8.4 billion in 2023 to $9.6 billion in 2024, according to the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Homeland Security Appropriations Bill for 2026 currently includes proposed funding for ICE of $11 billion, about $960 million more than this year. While congressional Republicans have shared concerns about the Trump administration spending too much on deportations, the White House is so far pushing ahead anyway, according to Politico. The administration is pushing legislators to pass the 'big, beautiful bill,' which would add billions of dollars for border security. The Big Beautiful Bill Act would direct $168 billion to immigration and border security, according to the Congressional Budget Office, compared to $34 billion in fiscal year 2025. This comes as Trump aide Stephen Miller is pushing for at least 3,000 arrests of illegal immigrants a day. Lyons noted earlier this month that ICE is currently averaging about 1,600. An administration official told Politico earlier this month: 'It's not just the Democrats saying they'll throw a wrench in this. It's the Republicans, too, questioning why we're spending beyond our means.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Democrat congresswoman's sexism slur prompts outrage in congressional hearing
Democrat Congresswoman Linda Sanchez has been accused of playing the sexism card against Trump's treasury secretary Scott Bessent Sanchez was interrupted by Bessent after she claimed in a Congressional hearing over the economy that 'prices are rising on many everyday goods.' Bessent quickly jumped in to say that was 'not true', but Sanchez raised her voice and spoke over him, repeating back that 'the time is mine.' 'Please don't interrupt me,' she said. 'I will ask you questions, and I will grant you an opportunity to answer them, but please don't interrupt me during my time.' As Bessent began answering, Sanchez added: 'I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to my questions.' The audience at the hearing responded to the sexism allegation with pained groans and boos, with one person from the crowd heard saying, 'Oh, come on.' Sanchez appeared surprised by the reaction, and shot back angrily: 'No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing.' The exchange quickly circulated social media as critics accused Sanchez of 'playing the women card', and pointed out that the US economy has strengthened since Donald Trump retook the White House. After the exchange went viral, Sanchez was branded 'embarrassing' by X users. 'Rep. Linda Sanchez with the worst, cringiest hearing questioning I have ever heard,' Congressional researcher Brendan Hartnett said. Another X user said the congresswoman was booed 'because people are SICK of this WOKE nonsense. 'They can't help but groan.' Sanchez's clash with Bessent - who is gay - comes days after the California Rep also made headlines by claiming rioters in the fiery Los Angeles protests are no different than sports fans. Sanchez told CNN that the 'vast majority of protestors have been peaceful', and said the mobs attacking police and ICE agents were 'just a few bad actors.' 'It's no different than when a team wins a national championship & people get overexcited,' Sanchez said. The lawmaker also used the appearance to blast the Trump administration for sending both Marines and California National Guard members to the Golden State to deal to rioters who have set vehicles on fire and hurled bricks at law enforcement officers. 'And yes, we think anybody who commits property damage ought to be arrested and ought to be prosecuted,' Sanchez noted. 'But to send in federal troops, or Marines when there isn't a war atmosphere or a war circumstance going on, is just beyond the pail. It's authoritarian flexing. It's not making anyone safer.' 'Local law enforcement has said they can handle the protest, it's no different than when a team wins a national championship & people get overexcited, and they overturn vehicles and light them on fire, local law enforcement is prepared to handle those types of situations,' Sanchez claimed.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump wants ‘big beautiful' spending bill passed ASAP. So why is Mike Johnson still messing with it?
House Speaker Mike Johnson notched his first major policy win when he herded Republicans in the House of Representatives to pass President Donald Trump's ' One Big, Beautiful Bill ' last month. By all appearances that began the process of the Senate deliberating its version of the legislation and dealing with holdouts in the upper chamber. All the better to get the signature legislation of Trump's second term onto his desk and ready for that famous Sharpie signing. Well, not so fast. The legislation technically has not been sent over to the Senate yet. Today, the House will vote on a rule that would also include a provision to make various corrections to the spending bill. The fixes are fairly minute. There is nothing on the changes to Medicaid, the size of the tax cuts or the phasing out of renewable energy tax credits or other concerns that some Republican Senators have raised. It also does not remove the ban on states regulating artificial intelligence that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she opposed despite her vote for the bill. Rather, they are mostly technical fixes, striking out various paragraphs about formatting. But that means the clock had not yet even started on the Senate's formal consideration of and debate over OBBB as Wednesday dawned. Later Wednesday, the corrected version was expected to be passed ... again ... and finally handed over to the Senate. The road to get here in the first place was circuitous at best. It ultimately took a day-long committee hearing, a last-minute deal cut behind closed doors and the deaths of older Democratic colleagues for Johnson to avoid a failure on the floor the first time around. The bill includes numerous provisions that Trump and Republicans want, such as extending the 2017 tax cuts, enacting work requirements for food assistance and Medicaid, rolling back numerous renewable energy credits and ramping up spending for oil drilling, the military and immigration enforcement. The Senate hopes to pass OBBB using budget reconciliation, which allows them to avoid a filibuster from Democrats as long as the bill relates to federal spending. Since 'big beautiful' also includes a debt limit increase, Republicans are working on a limited time table as the United States is set to hit the debt ceiling next month. Elsewhere, it removed the word 'intelligence' for a provision to spend '$90,000,000 for the development of reusable hypersonic technology for military strikes and intelligence.' It also struck a whole section titled 'Enhancement of Military Intelligence Programs.' Furthermore, the legislation removes part of the reconciliation bill that retracts a Biden administration-era public land rule that withdrew National Forest System lands from mining. Unsurprisingly, Democrats in the House and Senate are urging their Republican counterparts to, as Elon Musk famously implored, 'Kill the Bill.' 'The bottom line is this, though: a congressmember's core power is the power to vote,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said in his morning remarks. 'That's what the Constitution gave them,' Schumer said. 'And House Republicans who say they don't like the bill should exercise that power today. They have a unique opportunity to make the very changes they've been talking about for weeks.' Schumer said that Democrats flagged the flaws in the language that caused the do-over. Jim McGovern, the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, also sent a letter to his colleagues calling for them to kill the bill. 'Regardless of party, if you have sounded the alarm about this bill and vote yes on today's rule, you're complicit in what you claim to oppose,' he said. Most of these are technical changes, but they illustrate just how delicate of a process Republicans have to navigate to pass Trump's signature legislation. And that does not even begin to paper over the legitimate policy disputes between the House and Senate conference or even within the conferences about federal spending levels.
