Dor Turgeman told Rangers transfer is stepping stone from 'boring' league to better things by former Celtic flop
One time Celtic flop Eyal Berkovic has urged Dor Turgeman to join Rangers despite playing in a "boring" league as it could win him a move to England
Record Sport revealed the Ibrox side are locked in discussions over a £4million move for the Maccabi Tel Aviv striker and a deal is expected to be completed.
Advertisement
Berkovic - who failed to live up to his £5.75million price tag after arriving at Parkhead in 1999 under John Barnes - reckons Turgeman should make the move to Glasgow, even only as a stepping stone to the English Premier League.
READ MORE: Celtic transfer explosion as Balikwisha talks 'personal terms', striker on brink and Angulo brings the house down
READ MORE: Celtic close in on defender as Yang gears up for VIP Gangwon return – Parkhead transfer bulletin
Berkovic said: "Rangers and Celtic are both big clubs who play in the Champions League often....but also in a very boring league.
"But the big difference between going to Scotland and say somewhere like FC Copenhagen is that Rangers and Celtic are on British TV every week.
Advertisement
"So if you are a star for them, you are watched by English Premier League clubs every week. That's the difference between Scottish and Danish football.
"The problem would be to adapt. I can give you examples of dozens of our players who moved to Europe, America and Japan...and disappeared.
"It's not easy for an Israeli player to play in zero degrees for six or seven months. It's not easy to live there."
Follow Record Sport on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram for all of the up-to-the minute breaking news, video and audio on the SPFL, the Scotland national team and beyond.
You can get all the news you need on our dedicated Rangers and Celtic pages, and sign up to our newsletters to make sure you never miss a beat throughout the season.
Advertisement
We're also WhatsApp where we bring all the latest breaking news and transfer gossip directly to you phone. Join our Rangers community here and our Celtic community here.
Tune in to Hotline Live every Sunday to Thursday and have your say on the biggest issues in Scottish football and listen to Record Sport's newest podcast, Game On, every Friday for your sporting fix, all in bitesize chunks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool have no Florian Wirtz alternative as truth about transfer spend emerges
Even before an agreement with Bayer Leverkusen had been reached over £116m Florian Wirtz, Liverpool were being subjected to the sniping of rivals. 'That's the last of the Phillippe Coutinho money' went the prod in the direction of the Premier League champions, with tongues firmly pressed into cheeks. The inference being, of course, that the Reds have somehow pretended to stretch the £142m fee received from Barcelona over seven years ago in an effort to present a false reality of a club who don't spend heavily in the transfer market. Advertisement For the avoidance of doubt, the sale of Coutinho in January 2018 did facilitate the arrivals of £75m Virgil van Dijk and £65m Alisson Becker, which, quite neatly rounded up to a nice, even £140m and almost directly led to Jurgen Klopp's Liverpool going from pretenders to contenders and then serial winners of every major trophy between the years 2019 and 2022. READ MORE: Liverpool could have another mega transfer to come with dream signing and Arsenal hijack considered In short, the departure of the Brazil playmaker was one of the greatest deals in modern football. But, of course, Liverpool have not made a habit of such an extraordinary outlay that is being paid for Germany international Wirtz. In fact, only two senior players have officially been signed for the Reds since the transfer window closed in August 2023. Jeremie Frimpong's £29m release clause was triggered last month to add to the £12m addition of Federico Chiesa last year. Advertisement That means that the Reds have spent, inclusive of add-ons, £41m in two years. That is around £10m more than Brighton & Hove Albion have just paid to land Charalampos Kostoulas from Olympiakos. The imminent arrival of goalkeeper Giorgi Mamardashvili, at £29m, takes the Reds to £70m on sporting director Richard Hughes's watch. Throw in the addition of Wirtz at £116m, which is, again, inclusive of all add-ons, and it takes Liverpool's spending in the Arne Slot era to £186m, which, while not an insignificant amount, pales in comparison to the likes of Chelsea, whose spendthrift model has seen them lay out the thick end of £350m during that same timeframe. Such has been the Londoners' disorienting level of recruitment, in fact, that they have named a 28-man squad for this month's Club World Cup and have still been able to omit £47.5m Raheem Sterling, £38.5m Axel Disasi, £45m Ben Chilwell and £45m Joao Felix. Manchester City, meanwhile, are careering towards a total of £320m themselves since the start of last season, while Manchester United continue to spend good money after bad on a string of players unsuited or ill equipped to perform at Old Trafford. Just the £209m spent last summer, for those keeping score. Advertisement Since the start of the decade, Liverpool sit outside the top 10 for money spent in the Premier League and the eye-watering and potential British-record addition of Germany international Wirtz only moves them into eighth, around £30m short of West Ham United. So no, the Coutinho is long gone at Anfield, spent wisely on two of the greatest players the club have ever had in Alisson and Van Dijk and that, ironically, is the level Wirtz is being viewed at internally at Anfield. That means the pressure is on immediately and at that sort of price, the pitch forks will be out from those hoping it falls on its face as hopelessly as many of those aforementioned Chelsea deals. But if a risk-averse and often parsimonious strategy to signings has taught anything over the last few years at Anfield, it's that Liverpool often get it right when it's time to spend big. For them, unlike some of their rivals, there is no alternative.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Arise, Sir David: But what does Beckham's knighthood entail, and what does it mean?
So, arise, Sir David Beckham, and welcome to the small and exclusive band of people from the football industry to receive one of the highest honours in the United Kingdom — a knighthood from the royal family. The announcement was made in The Gazette, the official organ of public record, as part of King Charles III's official birthday honours — one of the two occasions each year when the ruling monarch honours a selection of people for their 'significant contributions' to the country. Advertisement Beckham, the former England captain and now joint owner of MLS team Inter Miami, will be invited to an investiture ceremony to make everything official, including his wife, formerly a pop star with the Spice Girls, becoming Lady Victoria. The wait is finally over for the man she famously christened Goldenballs in his playing days, whose desire to become a Sir has been depicted at times as almost obsessional. 'Growing up in east London with parents and grandparents who were so patriotic and proud to be British, I never could have imagined I would receive such a truly humbling honour,' said Beckham. 'It will take a little while for the news to sink in but I'm immensely proud and it's such an emotional moment for me to share with my family.' Not everyone will wish to join in the celebrations, bearing in mind the honours system — described by The Gazette as 'classes of appointment' to the Order of the British Empire — is regarded by many of its anti-Establishment critics as outdated and elitist and, as such, brings some strong opinions. 'Truly deserved,' writer, author and broadcaster Brian Reade responded on X after the story of Beckham's knighthood was leaked to the UK's Sun newspaper. 'Never before has a man scraped and crawled so hard to get three pointless letters stuck in front of his brand name.' Others, however, will find it hard to begrudge Beckham after a career that took in Manchester United, Real Madrid, LA Galaxy, AC Milan and Paris Saint-Germain (plus a loan spell at Preston North End as a youngster), as well as 115 appearances for England's national team and some prodigious work for charity, principally Unicef. Now 50, Beckham will be the 14th name on a list of football knighthoods (excluding administrators) featuring four former England managers — Walter Winterbottom, Alf Ramsey, Bobby Robson and, most recently, Gareth Southgate — as well as celebrated figures such as Tom Finney, Stanley Matthews and Geoff Hurst. Advertisement Charles Clegg, a former England international who became chairman/president of the English Football Association, was the first person from the sport to be knighted, in 1927. It was Kenny Dalglish's turn in 2018 and, before that, Trevor Brooking in 2004. And the other names on the list mean that Manchester United can now claim to have contributed four knights of the realm — more than any other club. One was Matt Busby, the manager who led United from the horrors of the 1958 Munich air disaster to winning the European Cup a decade later. Bobby Charlton, who was alongside him during those moments of tragedy and glory, was another. Then, of course, there is Alex Ferguson, whose knighthood was rushed through in 1999 only weeks after he steered United to an unprecedented treble of Champions League, Premier League and FA Cup. So, how does it all work? And how does the honours committee — a body made up of politicians and senior civil servants — go about informing the relevant people they are under consideration? With great secrecy, is the short answer. 'You get a few months' notice,' says Brendan Foster, the former long-distance runner who was knighted in 2020. 'An email comes through saying they are minded to give you a knighthood, and asking whether you would want to accept; and you have to keep it a secret, otherwise you're in trouble.' Foster, regarded as the voice of British athletics because of his long and distinguished commentary career with the BBC after retiring from the sport, is also the founder of the Great North Run, the largest half-marathon in the world. He received his knighthood from Princess Anne, once an equestrian athlete who had competed with him in Great Britain's squad at the 1976 Olympic Games, rather than her mother, Queen Elizabeth II. 'You think about the people who have helped you get where you are,' says Foster, recalling his knighthood ceremony. 'You think about your parents, your coaches, the guys you trained with and everyone else who helped. But you also think about the country. This is a great country and anybody who accepts the honours is, by definition, saying, 'I'm proud of the country I live in'.' Advertisement Most of the time, the knights-elect receive their insignia at either Buckingham Palace in London or Windsor Castle, when the protocol is to kneel on your right knee while the King, or another member of the royal family, touches your right shoulder, then the left one, with a bare sword blade. For females, the equivalent is to be made a Dame. After that, it is the individual's choice whether they want to use their new title. Foster, for example, says he is '50-50' about using 'Sir', though he jokes that it comes in handy when he needs to make a restaurant booking. Anthony Hopkins, knighted by the Queen in 1993, also found it a dilemma. 'I only ever use the title in the U.S.,' the actor explained. 'The Americans insist on it, and get offended if I don't.' Ferguson, statistically the most successful manager in British football history, had some misgivings of his own, despite having previously been given an OBE (Officer of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire) and CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire) — two of the awards beneath a knighthood in rank — in 1985 and 1995 respectively. He and his wife were worried about the extra commitments the new title might involve (although there are no special requirements) and how it might look, with them hailing from a working-class background in the Scottish city of Glasgow, to be known as Sir Alex and Lady Cathy. 'I put it to the family,' Ferguson revealed in a 2000 interview with the official Manchester United magazine, 'and Cathy was a bit, 'Oh, I don't know, what would your father think?'. And my son said, 'Mum, it's nothing to do with Dad's parents. They're gone. They'd be proud of him — you can't refuse this, it's recognition of what he's done'. We had a discussion and decided it was right.' In 2020, it was revealed that the number of people refusing an honour was 68 out of 2,504 offered (2.7 per cent), whereas there were only 277 occasions from 1951 to 1999 when somebody took that stance. So the frequency with which people say 'Thanks, but no thanks' is going up. Realistically, though, Beckham's name was never going to be added to a list that includes singer David Bowie, physicist Professor Stephen Hawking, the ex-Formula One boss Bernie Ecclestone and, on five occasions for various honours including a knighthood, artist LS Lowry. The only awkwardness here is that Beckham, awarded an OBE in the Queen's birthday list in 2003, will probably never be allowed to forget the controversy in 2017 when leaked emails, from four years earlier, showed his anger about being rejected for a knighthood. The emails had been hacked from a company associated with his then-representative, Simon Oliveira, and were published by a variety of newspapers, showing him branding the honours committee 'unappreciative c**ts' and insisting he didn't 'care about being knighted'. The email exchanges also revealed the UK authorities had concerns over Beckham's tax affairs. Advertisement And now? Nobody should be surprised he has finally got his wish, bearing in mind his career achievements and several other factors that may or may not have counted in his favour. He is, after all, on friendly terms with Prince William, Charles' eldest son, and has banqueted at Buckingham Palace as a guest of the King (they are said to have bonded over a shared love of making honey). Plus, who could forget Beckham standing for 12 hours in the queue of people to see the late Queen lying in state in central London's Westminster Hall following her death in 2022? All that is left, perhaps, is to see whether the six-time Premier League champion chooses to call himself Sir David or takes a similar approach to the manager who gave him his professional debut. 'Ferguson found the title uncomfortable for a while,' Michael Crick wrote in The Boss, his 2002 biography of the Scot, noting how the subject of the book 'refused to sign himself 'Sir Alex' when asked to by a woman autograph-hunter shortly afterwards.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How to watch PSG vs Inter Milan for FREE: TV channel and live stream for Champions League final today
Paris Saint-Germain and Inter Milan face off tonight in the Champions League final. The pinnacle of European club football concludes with the showpiece as nearly-men PSG take on seasoned veterans Inter in a fascinating Munich showdown. Advertisement CLICK HERE TO FOLLOW PSG VS INTER MILAN LIVE! PSG brushed aside Arsenal in the semi-finals - despite Mikel Arteta's claims his side were the best team in the competition - while Inter saw off Barcelona in one of the great European knockout ties, which ended 7-6. Both teams are well worth their spot in the final as PSG's thrilling, free-flowing side takes on Inter's stylish yet efficient machine. PSG are bidding to become the first French side since Marseille in 1993 to be crowned Europe's best, while Inter are looking to win their fourth title in their seventh final. In the three previous finals Inter have lost, the winning side were completing a treble. And that is exactly what PSG hope to achieve this evening. How to watch PSG vs Inter Milan for free TV channel: In the UK, the Champions League final is being shown live on TNT Sports. Coverage gets underway at 6pm BST ahead of kick-off at 8pm. Advertisement Live stream: TNT Sports subscribers can also watch the game live online via the Discovery+ app and website. There will also be a free live stream available through the Discovery+ app, though those without a subscription will need to register their details to access the broadcast. Prime Video customers, who have access to a basic Discovery+ account will also be able to watch the final through the Prime Video app. Live blog: Follow all the action with Standard Sport's LIVE blog, featuring expert analysis from Dom Smith in Munich!
