logo
Maria Teresa Horta, the Last of Portugal's ‘Three Marias,' Dies at 87

Maria Teresa Horta, the Last of Portugal's ‘Three Marias,' Dies at 87

New York Times11-02-2025

Maria Teresa Horta, a Portuguese feminist writer who helped shatter her conservative country's strictures on women, died on Feb. 4 at her home in Lisbon. She was 87.
Her death was announced on Facebook by her publisher, Dom Quixote. The Portuguese prime minister, Luis Montenegro, paid tribute to her on X, calling her 'an important example of freedom and the struggle to recognize the place of women.'
Ms. Horta was the last surviving member of the celebrated writers known as the 'Three Marias,' who together wrote the landmark 1972 book 'Novas Cartas Portuguesas' ('New Portuguese Letters'). A collection of letters the women wrote to one another about their problems as women in Portugal, it opened up a world of repressed female sexuality, infuriated the country's ham-fisted dictatorship and led to their arrest and criminal prosecution on charges of indecency and abuse of freedom of the press.
'To feminists around the world, as well as to champions of a free press, the police action against the Portuguese women in June 1972 was an outrage that slowly became the focus of an international protest movement,' Time magazine wrote in July 1973.
The Three Marias — Ms. Horta, Maria Isabel Barreno (1939-2016) and Maria Velho da Costa (1938-2020) — became international feminist folk heroes, and the book's fame alerted the world to repression under the Portuguese dictatorship. Simone de Beauvoir, Marguerite Duras and Adrienne Rich were among the writers who declared their public support. The National Organization for Women voted to make the case its first international feminist cause.
The case was not Ms. Horta's first brush with controversy.
In 1967 she had been 'beaten in the street' after the publication of her breakthrough volume of poetry, 'Minha Senhora de Mim' ('My Lady of Me'), she told her biographer Patrícia Reis in 2019. That book 'challenged something deeply rooted in this country,' she said: 'the silencing of female sexuality.'
Frequent knocks on the door by the Portuguese secret police became part of her life.
The themes of her work grew from what she characterized as a dual oppression: being a woman in Portugal's male-dominated society and growing up in a police state.
'I was born in a fascist country, a country that stole liberty, a country of cruelty, prisons, torture,' she told an Italian interviewer in 2018. 'And I understood very early on that I couldn't stand for this.'
She also wouldn't stand for the oppression of women in Portugal's traditional macho culture. 'Women are beaten or raped just as much by a doctor, a lawyer, a politician, whoever, as by a worker, a peasant and so on,' she told the Lisbon daily Diário de Notícias in 2017. 'Women have always been beaten and have always been raped. People do not consider the violence that goes on in bed, in the sexual act with their husband.'
In 1971, these preoccupations inspired Ms. Horta to start meeting every week with two friends and fellow authors, Ms. Barreno and Ms. da Costa, to share written reflections on the common themes that troubled them.
They were inspired by a classic work from the 17th century, 'Letters of a Portuguese Nun,' supposedly written by a young woman shut up in a Portuguese convent to the French cavalry officer who had abandoned her. Scholars now believe the work was fiction, but its powerful expression of pent-up longing and frustration resonated with the three Marias.
Like the nun in the book, they used letters to one another, as well as poems, to express their unhappiness as women in their early 30s, educated by nuns, married and with children, in a Lisbon stifling under a 35-year dictatorship, rigid Catholicism and ill-judged colonial wars in Africa.
When they published the writings as 'New Portuguese Letters,' they vowed never to reveal to outsiders, much less the police, who had written what.
'Their views and natures were far apart,' Neal Ascherson wrote in The New York Review of Books in a review of the 1975 English translation, titled 'The Three Marias.' 'Maria Isabel the coolest, Maria Teresa the gaudiest personality, Maria Fátima the one who swerved away from pure feminism toward social and psychological analyses of a whole people's oppression.'
The strange hybrid — Mr. Ascherson called it 'a huge and complicated garland' — is suffused with repressed rage at the condition the women find themselves in.
'They wanted the three of us to sit in parlors, patiently embroidering our days with the many silences, the many soft words and gestures that custom dictates,' one of the letters says. 'But whether it be here or in Beja, we have refused to be cloistered, we are quietly, or brazenly, stripping ourselves of our habits all of a sudden.'
Another letter says, 'We have also won the right to choose vengeance, since vengeance is part of love, and love is a right long since granted us in practice: practicing love with our thighs, our long legs that expertly fulfill the exercise expected of them.'
Although Mr. Ascherson found the book 'often maddeningly imprecise, self-indulgent and flatulent,' he said that 'where it is precise, the book still bites' and 'where it is erotic, it is neither exhibitionist nor coy but well calculated to touch the mind through emotion.'
A few Portuguese reviewers welcomed it as 'brave, daring and violent,' as the author Nuno de Sampayo put it in the Lisbon newspaper A Capital. They predicted a difficult reception.
Prime Minister Marcello Caetano attempted to put the authors in jail, calling them 'women who shame the country, who are unpatriotic.'
On May 25, 1972, the state press censor banned the book. The next day it was sent to the criminal police department in Lisbon. When the authors' trial opened in 1973, the crowd was so great that the judge ordered the courtroom cleared.
In May 1974, nearly two years after their arrests and two weeks after the Portuguese dictatorship was overthrown, the Three Marias were acquitted.
Judge Artur Lopes Cardoso, who had been overseeing the case, became a sudden convert, declaring the book 'neither pornographic nor immoral.' 'On the contrary,' he said, 'it is a work of art of high level, following other works of art produced by the same authors.'
Maria Teresa de Mascarenhas Horta Barros was born in Lisbon on May 20, 1937, the daughter of Jorge Augusto da Silva Horta, a prominent doctor and a conservative who supported the dictatorship, and Carlota Maria Mascarenhas. Her paternal grandmother had been prominent in the Portuguese suffragist movement.
Maria attended Filipa de Lencastre High School, graduated from the Faculty of Arts at the University of Lisbon, and published her first book of poetry at 23. She would go on to write nearly 30 more, as well as 10 novels.
She was also a critic and reporter for several newspapers and the literary editor of A Capital.
In the 1980s, she edited the feminist magazine Mulheres, which was linked to the Portuguese Communist Party. (She was a member of the party from 1975 to 1989.)
No matter the genre — poetry, fiction or journalism — she considered writing a public duty.
'The obligation of a poet is not to be in an ivory tower; it is not to be isolated but to be among people,' she told the online magazine Guernica in 2014. 'As a journalist, I never isolated myself. I was a journalist at a daily newspaper and every day I went out on the street. Every day I had contact with people.'
She won most of her country's top literary prizes, but she caused a stir in 2012 when she refused to accept the D. Dinis Award because she objected to the government's right-leaning politics.
She is survived by her son, Luis Jorge Horta de Barros, and two grandsons. Her husband, the journalist Luis de Barros, a former editor of the newspaper O Diário, died in 2019.
'People ask me why I am a feminist,' Ms. Horta told Guernica in 2014. 'Because I am a woman of freedom and equality and it is not possible to have freedom in the world when half of humanity has no rights.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Iberian Blackout Put EU Energy Security in the Spotlight
The Iberian Blackout Put EU Energy Security in the Spotlight

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Iberian Blackout Put EU Energy Security in the Spotlight

In late April, Spain, Portugal and parts of southern France experienced the most widespread blackout in European history. As their governments and the European Union scramble to identify the root cause of the grid failure, the incident raises serious questions about the efficacy of the EU's pooled energy policy and the security of its electricity network. Shortly after noon on April 28, electricity production across the power grids of Spain and Portugal dropped by more than half in a matter of seconds, provoking a power outage that brought industries, businesses and communities to a standstill across the Iberian peninsula. The blackout persisted throughout the day, as authorities scrambled to reboot the power grid. In some parts of the peninsula it was almost 24 hours before life returned to normal. Multiple inquiries have since been set up to investigate the incident, most notably by an expert panel from ENTSO-E, the European umbrella group for Transmission System Operators, or TSOs, across the bloc. While physical sabotage and cyberattacks have been ruled out, it may be many months before the ENTSO-E panel as well as Spanish and Portuguese experts arrive at a definitive explanation for the incident. In the meantime, the political fallout is becoming increasingly clear, with potentially far-reaching implications for EU energy market integration, power-grid resilience, the role of renewable energies and culture war politics across the bloc. Russia's all-out invasion of Ukraine in 2022 effectively ended the EU's energy dependency on Russia and sent energy prices soaring across the bloc. But in doing so, it also intensified policy conflict around the EU's push for further integrating member states' energy markets. Many policy analysts and politicians have underlined the resilience that integrated European electricity markets can provide in the wake of losing cheap Russian gas supplies, while decrying price caps and subsidies at the member-state level, which they argue undermine a unified EU-wide approach. Others, however, argue that national governments must retain the legislative freedom to reduce energy prices to hard-pressed consumers and businesses to protect living standards and domestic economies. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. The Iberian blackout has now added another complex dimension to this ongoing debate. Some experts tout enhanced integration as the solution to future outages, with interconnected grids facilitating backup power to affected regions, while others argue that increased integration could actually exacerbate rather than ameliorate blackouts. As Jianzhong Wu, a professor at the University of Cardiff, points out, increased interconnectedness means that 'serious faults, like a large loss of synchronisation, can spread across multiple regions or even countries if not rapidly contained.' The one thing that most energy experts can agree on, however, is the extent to which the blackout has exposed the shortcomings of a power grid designed for the age of fossil fuels, but which must now incorporate ever larger and more diverse energy sources. Even staunch advocates of renewable energy accept that the inherent variability in weather-based renewable energy sources complicates grid operators' ability to 'efficiently manage power flows and avoid grid imbalances.' As a result, the commendable and necessary drive to complete the energy transition has to be matched by equally urgent investment in the upgrading of European power grids as fossil fuels give way to renewable energy. And the scale of the necessary investment is truly staggering. According to a 2023 International Energy Agency report, the world must add or replace 50 million miles of power grids by 2040 in order to meet climate targets and facilitate the integration of renewables into the system. That's the equivalent of all the grids currently in existence globally. While Europe has invested more in upgrading its electricity grid than the U.S., for example, the bloc's current focus on security has already seen national governments cut public spending in order to hit the target of devoting 2 percent of GDP to defense, with capital spending on infrastructure among the casualties. Another obstacle, according to David Brayshaw, a professor at the University of Reading, is the serious knowledge gap that exists regarding the future of integrated power systems in a world increasingly affected by climate change. Brayshaw argues that while Europe's power system is evolving rapidly, driven by renewables and electrification, inadequate research has been conducted into 'how climate change will affect future power systems, or how to design grids that are truly robust.' In the realm of cynical retail politics, and amid Europe's increasingly polarized political landscape, the blackout has been deftly weaponized by populist politicians and vested energy interests. Indeed, for the European far right and nuclear power lobby, the blackout could hardly have come at a better time. For years, far-right skeptics of climate change have viewed the energy transition as a Trojan horse for the 'overreaching ambition of the EU.' But renewables remain very popular with voters, particularly the promise they hold of ushering in high-quality, well-paid jobs and energy self-sufficiency, which has made opposing them a hard sell for populists. However, with the governments of Spain and Portugal reluctant to jump the gun on the ongoing investigations into the April blackout, the resulting information vacuum has given the far right in Spain and beyond the opportunity to tie renewable energy—and by extension climate change policy—to the April incident and blackouts in general, thus sowing doubts among the public about the energy transition. The nuclear power lobby has also been quick to politicize the blackout for commercial advantage. In recent years the industry has watched with dismay as the plummeting costs of renewables has caused production and profits in the sector to fall. In Spain, for example, the country's five nuclear power plants spend increasing amounts of time offline because of the EU electricity system's 'merit order' protocol, which prioritizes the cheapest form of electricity generation at any given time. In Spain and elsewhere, that increasingly means renewables. Indeed, France has long stalled on increasing its meager interconnectivity with Spain's power grid to protect its massive nuclear power industry, which produces around 75 percent of the country's electricity, from Spain's cheaper green power. The highly disputed claim by the Spanish and EU nuclear lobbies that more nuclear power would have ameliorated the effects of the April blackout has now energized the campaign against the Spanish government plans for a complete phaseout of the nuclear industry by 2035. It is also adding momentum to the mini-revival of the industry's fortunes across the bloc, already kickstarted by the scramble to find alternatives to Russian gas. Since the April blackout, even more explosive claims have emerged that implicate renewables in the failure. In May, for example, several news outlets cited anonymous sources in Brussels to support the now comprehensively debunked claim that a botched clandestine stress test of renewable energies was responsible for the outage. Against this backdrop, Europe increasingly risks learning all the wrong lessons from the Iberian blackout. Most notable among them is the wrongheaded notion that renewable energy production must be tailored to fit the capabilities of the existing power network, rather than the other way around. John Boyce is an Irish freelance journalist with a background in international relations and Hispanic affairs. He writes for a variety of publications on Anglo-Irish, Spanish and European politics. The post The Iberian Blackout Put EU Energy Security in the Spotlight appeared first on World Politics Review.

Greta Thunberg's a vapid leftist — and a useful idiot for terror
Greta Thunberg's a vapid leftist — and a useful idiot for terror

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Greta Thunberg's a vapid leftist — and a useful idiot for terror

Professional leftist Greta Thunberg was brought to Israel this week after the 'selfie yacht' she was traveling on attempted to break through the naval blockade of Gaza. Her boat, the 'Madleen,' was part of a flotilla pretending to deliver aid to alleviate an imaginary famine. The 22-year-old was given food and shelter and sent home by the Israeli government, which she accused of 'kidnapping' her. All the usual suspects went along with this predictable framing. Advertisement If Thunberg really wanted to better understand the concept of an abduction, she might have asked Hamas to visit the Israelis still being tortured in a dank basement somewhere in Rafa. But the 'human rights activist,' which is how the legacy media unironically describes her, has never once called for the release of the hostages taken by Islamists. Advertisement Indeed, the flotilla effort was reportedly organized by a 'Hamas operative.' '[The Israelis] tried to make us watch all kinds of propaganda videos,' Thunberg told reporters after landing in Paris, 'but I didn't watch. This is nothing compared to what is happening in Gaza, which is in desperate need of humanitarian aid.' Referring to GoPro videos made by Palestinians that document the gleeful slaughter of women, children and the elderly as 'propaganda' is a bold accusation coming from a cosplay revolutionary whose biggest problem was getting a vegetarian meal from her hosts. Advertisement As this was all going on, incidentally, Israel has been sending hundreds of aid trucks into the Gaza Strip. Hamas opposes this effort, as it uses food and aid to control the Palestinian population. On the day Thunberg was whining to reporters in Europe, at least five aid workers were murdered by Hamas trying to bring food to the population. The real question is: Why is she in the news at all? Advertisement Thunberg was named Time's Person of the Year in 2019 after dropping out of high school and 'raising awareness for climate change.' It was quite a historic accomplishment: No one was talking about global warming before Greta came around, apparently. Me? I tend to think the kid who stays in school and learns a thing or two about biology before lecturing me about science is the real hero. But we live in a time where emotionalism and vapidity are often confused with decency and wisdom. Thunberg is the embodiment of this trend. Thunberg's most infamous moment was a frivolous emotional outburst at the United Nations, where she screamed at those who had bequeathed her with unprecedented wealth, safety, and freedom. 'You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words,' she claimed. Advertisement But really, her dream was to be famous. Or, maybe, it was first the dream of exploitative parents who persuaded their child that the world was on the precipice of Armageddon. Since her Time magazine cover, Thunberg has achieved nothing. Her native Sweden has turned back to fossil fuels. Europe, as well. The Earth, however, is still here. Advertisement Subsequently, Thunberg has moved on to champion other trendy leftist causes, such as Black Lives Matter and now 'Free Palestine.' The only thing she understands less about than climate science seems to be the Middle East. As far as I can tell, Thunberg has never once said anything remotely compelling or witty or smart. There are millions of young people far more worthy of attention. For years, youth shielded Thunberg from criticism. Even now, journalists fail to ask her any serious, in-depth questions about the issues she champions. Advertisement The chances she could answer one are incredibly slim. Well, Thunberg is now a young woman, and so we can freely point out that she's always been an extraordinary imbecile. But now, she's also a useful idiot for terrorists. For that, there is no excuse. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner.

Fiery Air India crash kills 241 people aboard, leaving 1 survivor, airline says
Fiery Air India crash kills 241 people aboard, leaving 1 survivor, airline says

Boston Globe

timea day ago

  • Boston Globe

Fiery Air India crash kills 241 people aboard, leaving 1 survivor, airline says

Indian Home Minister Amit Shah confirmed that he met the sole survivor at the hospital. A doctor said he had examined the survivor, whom he identified as Vishwashkumar Ramesh. 'He was disoriented with multiple injuries all over his body,' Dr. Dhaval Gameti told The Associated Press. 'But he seems to be out of danger.' Advertisement Another medic said Ramesh told him that immediately after the plane took off, it began descending and suddenly split in two, throwing him out before a loud explosion. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Black smoke billowed from the site where the plane crashed near the airport in Ahmedabad, a city of more than 5 million and the capital of Gujarat, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's home state. Firefighters doused the smoking wreckage of the plane, which would have been fully loaded with fuel shortly after takeoff, and adjacent multistory buildings with water. Charred bodies lay on the ground and parts of the fuselage were scattered around the site. Indian army teams were assisting civil authorities to clear debris and help treat the injured. Advertisement A video on social media showed the jet slowly descending as if it were landing. As soon as it disappeared from view behind rows of houses, a giant fireball filled the sky. The Associated Press was able to verify the video by matching up the flight path of the plane from the runway with the crash site and the nearby residential area. At the crash site, the tail cone of the aircraft, with its damaged stabilizer fins still attached, was lodged near the top of one of the buildings. Modi called the crash 'heartbreaking beyond words' and said 'my thoughts are with everyone affected.' Sambit Patra, a lawmaker from Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, said Gujarat's former chief minister, Vijay Rupani, was among the dead. Divyansh Singh, vice president of the Federation of All India Medical Association, said at least five students from the medical college were killed on the ground and 50 others were injured. Singh said some of them were in critical condition and many people are 'feared buried in the debris.' Air India confirmed in a statement posted on X that 229 passengers and 12 crew members were killed in the crash. The only survivor was a British national of Indian origin. The flight bound for London Gatwick Airport had 169 Indians, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese, and one Canadian aboard. 'Our efforts now are focused entirely on the needs of all those affected, their families and loved ones,' the airline said. This is the first crash of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, according to the Aviation Safety Network database. Boeing said it was 'working to gather more information.' India's aviation regulatory body said the aircraft gave a mayday call, signaling an emergency, but then did not respond to the calls made by the airport traffic control. Advertisement Aviation consultant John M. Cox, the CEO of Safety Operating Systems, told the AP from Los Angeles that while the first images of the crash were poor, it appeared the aircraft had its nose up and was not climbing, which is one of the things that investigators would look at. 'The 787 has very extensive flight data monitoring — the parameters on the flight data recorder are in the thousands — so once we get that recorder, they'll be able to know pretty quickly what happened,' he said. The wide-body, twin-engine aircraft was introduced in 2009, and more than 1,000 have been delivered to dozens of airlines, according to the flightradar24 website. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his government was in constant contact with Indian authorities and encouraged loved ones of passengers on the Air India flight to contact the foreign office. 'Our hearts and our thoughts are absolutely with the friends and families of all those affected who are going to be absolutely devastated by this awful news,' Starmer said. British Cabinet minister Lucy Powell said the government will provide 'all the support that it can' to those affected by the crash. Britain has very close ties with India. There were nearly 1.9 million people in the country of Indian descent, according to the 2021 UK census. Condolences also poured in from King Charles III, who said he and his wife, Queen Camilla, were 'desperately shocked' by the crash. 'Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected by this appallingly tragic incident across so many nations,' he said in a statement. Advertisement The last major passenger plane crash in India was in 2020, when an Air India Express Boeing-737 skidded off a hilltop runway in southern India, killing 21 people. The worst air disaster in India was on Nov. 12, 1996, when a Saudi Arabian Airlines flight collided midair with a Kazakhstan Airlines Flight near Charki Dadri in Haryana state, killing all 349 people on board the two planes. Boeing has been in recovery mode for more than six years after Lion Air Flight 610, a Boeing 737 Max 8, plunged into the Java Sea off the coast of Indonesia minutes after takeoff from Jakarta, killing all 189 people on board. Five months later, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, a Boeing 737 Max 8, crashed after takeoff from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, killing 157 passengers and crew members.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store