Exercise boosts survival rates in colon cancer patients, study shows
A three-year exercise program improved survival in colon cancer patients and kept disease at bay, a first-of-its-kind international experiment showed.
With the benefits rivaling some drugs, experts said cancer centers and insurance plans should consider making exercise coaching a new standard of care for colon cancer survivors. Until then, patients can increase their physical activity after treatment, knowing they are doing their part to prevent cancer from coming back.
'It's an extremely exciting study,' said Dr. Jeffrey Meyerhardt of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, who wasn't involved in the research. It's the first randomized controlled trial to show how exercise can help cancer survivors, Meyerhardt said.
Prior evidence was based on comparing active people with sedentary people, a type of study that can't prove cause and effect. The new study — conducted in Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, Israel and the United States — compared people who were randomly selected for an exercise program with those who instead received an educational booklet.
'This is about as high a quality of evidence as you can get,' said Dr. Julie Gralow, chief medical officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 'I love this study because it's something I've been promoting but with less strong evidence for a long time.'
The findings were featured Sunday at ASCO's annual meeting in Chicago and published by the New England Journal of Medicine. Academic research groups in Canada, Australia and the U.K. funded the work.
Researchers followed 889 patients with treatable colon cancer who had completed chemotherapy. Half were given information promoting fitness and nutrition. The others worked with a coach, meeting every two weeks for a year, then monthly for the next two years.
Coaches helped participants find ways to increase their physical activity. Many people, including Terri Swain-Collins, chose to walk for about 45 minutes several times a week.
'This is something I could do for myself to make me feel better,' said Swain-Collins, 62, of Kingston, Ontario. Regular contact with a friendly coach kept her motivated and accountable, she said. 'I wouldn't want to go there and say, 'I didn't do anything,' so I was always doing stuff and making sure I got it done.'
After eight years, the people in the structured exercise program not only became more active than those in the control group but also had 28% fewer cancers and 37% fewer deaths from any cause. There were more muscle strains and other similar problems in the exercise group.
'When we saw the results, we were just astounded,' said study co-author Dr. Christopher Booth, a cancer doctor at Kingston Health Sciences Centre in Kingston, Ontario.
Exercise programs can be offered for several thousand dollars per patient, Booth said, 'a remarkably affordable intervention that will make people feel better, have fewer cancer recurrences and help them live longer.'
Researchers collected blood from participants and will look for clues tying exercise to cancer prevention, whether through insulin processing or building up the immune system or something else.
Swain-Collins' coaching program ended, but she is still exercising. She listens to music while she walks in the countryside near her home.
That kind of behavior change can be achieved when people believe in the benefits, when they find ways to make it fun and when there's a social component, said paper co-author Kerry Courneya, who studies exercise and cancer at the University of Alberta. The new evidence will give cancer patients a reason to stay motivated.
'Now we can say definitively exercise causes improvements in survival,' Courneya said.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Experts reveal what's driving explosion in under 50s cancer cases - as landmark study shows 23 per cent surge since the 90s
Cancer deaths have fallen by more than a fifth over the past 50 years—but diagnoses have soared with cases in younger adults driving the trend, a landmark study reveals. Experts say the spike in diagnoses is being fuelled in part by lifestyle factors—including smoking, obesity and poor diet—which remain among the leading causes. The analysis, from Cancer Research UK, is the first to examine 50 years of NHS cancer data, revealing striking progress—but also alarming new trends. The data reveals that although survival rates have improved dramatically since the 1970s, the risk of developing cancer has risen just as sharply. In 1973, around 328 in every 100,000 people died from the disease. By 2023, that figure had fallen to 252—a 22 per cent drop—thanks to earlier diagnosis and better treatments. But over the same period, the number of people developing cancer has soared by almost 50 per cent. Incidence rates have climbed from 413 to 607 per 100,000 people, with some of the sharpest rises seen in under 50s. Among those aged 20 to 49, rates are up by 23 per cent since the early 1990s. Scientists are still trying to explore the factors behind the rise in early onset cancers, with some suggesting modern diets and exposure to substances like microplastics, or a combination of several triggers, could be to blame. Speaking this week at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference in Chicago —the world's biggest cancer conference—experts also cautioned that poor lifestyle was likely the driving factor. Presenting research on the key factors influencing the surge in colon cancer cases among people in their 20s, 30s and 40s, Dr Jessica Paulus a senior director of research at Ontada, said obesity was far higher among early-onset patients than 'average age'. Of the 14,611 young patients tracked in the study, more than a third were obese at time of diagnosis. 'Interestingly, distress thermometer data also showed early-onset patients were more likely to report high or moderate distress' at time of diagnosis compared to older patients, she added. This thermometer is a tool health professionals ask patients to use to self-report feelings or issues, such as financial concerns, pain, fatigue and worry. But drinking, physical inactivity and poor diet too plays a 'huge' role too, Professor Neil Iyengar, an expert in breast oncology and the impact of lifestyle factors on cancer at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre in New York, said. He told MailOnline: 'The link between obesity and several forms of cancer is already well-established, but this data is mostly from older people. 'Obesity rates are accelerating in young people. 'But having too much fat—even if you have a normal body weight or body mass index—also increases the risk of developing cancer. 'It's never too early to start good eating and exercise patterns. 'We need to start thinking of some foods and high-sugar beverages in a similar way that we think about smoking: unnecessary, addictive, and harmful.' Other experts, however, cautioned that tobacco was likely not behind the rise in younger cancer cases. Professor Paul Pharoah, an expert in cancer epidemiology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre in Los Angeles told MailOnline: 'Incidence of the one major smoking related cancer, lung cancer, has come down in all age groups in men. 'In women, lung cancer incidence has fallen in younger women since 1990, but continues to increase in older women.' He added: 'Screening is also unlikely to be a cause of the difference between younger and older people, as the screening programmes implemented by the NHS since 1990 would be more likely to increase incidence in older individuals.' While cancer survival in England and Wales has doubled since the 1970s, progress has slowed sharply over the past decade. The report found that survival improved three to five times faster in earlier decades than it has since 2010. And despite the gains, the UK continues to lag behind comparable countries on key cancer outcomes. Late diagnosis remains a major issue. Only 54 per cent of cancers in England are diagnosed at stage one or two—the earliest phases, when tumours are usually small, haven't spread far, and are most treatable. That figure has barely improved in the last ten years. Cancer Research UK's chief executive, Michelle Mitchell, said: 'It's fantastic to see that thanks to research, cancer death rates have drastically reduced and survival has doubled. 'But more than 460 people are still dying from cancer every day in the UK. Too many cases are still being diagnosed too late.' The report also highlights the leading preventable causes of cancer. Smoking remains the biggest risk factor, but obesity—now linked to 13 different types of the disease—is rising rapidly. Other contributors include drinking, poor diet, sunbeds, lack of exercise and failure to protect skin from the sun. Cancer Research UK is urging the Government to act swiftly and decisively in its upcoming National Cancer Plan for England. It is calling for earlier diagnosis, faster access to tests, better GP referrals and a national lung cancer screening programme—arguing that these steps could save thousands of lives. Mitchell added: 'If this plan is done right, it could transform cancer care in this country and ensure people affected by cancer live longer, better lives.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Two thirds of motorists have made mistakes because they're distracted - but the main cause ISN'T their phone
Almost two thirds of motorists admit they've made mistakes while driving because they've been distracted... but the culprit isn't their phone or car's flashy dashboard screens. While road safety groups have raised major concerns about drivers refusing to put down their smartphones despite the threat of £200 fines and six penalty points, and many diverting their eyes to large, convoluted touchscreens, the biggest distraction is not technology but human. A recent poll of 2,691 UK drivers found that talking to passengers (43 per cent) and daydreaming (37 per cent) are the biggest triggers of distraction. The RAC, which commissioned the survey, has warned this could have 'catastrophic consequences' as it is causing unnecessary errors that puts other road users at risk. Some 63 per cent of the panel admitted making mistakes due having their attention diverted away from the task of driving for one reason or another. And while not the biggest cause, tech is having a part to play in driver errors; interacting with modern touchscreen systems to control functions such as heating, radio and navigation has resulted in a quarter of motorists driving poorly. Mistakes triggered by distraction included missing a junction, exceeding the speed limit, ending up in the wrong lane and nearly crashing into another road user. When all respondents to the survey were asked what they consider distracting, the most common response is talking on a phone (46 per cent). The second most common distraction drivers listed is either applying make-up or shaving (42 per cent). However, among those who admitted to making distracted mistakes, just 8 per cent and 2 per cent of drivers respectively said those were the causes. Separate Department for Transport (DfT) figures show 940 people were killed or seriously injured in crashes on Britain's roads in 2023 where a driver was found to be distracted by something within their vehicle. Rod Dennis, RAC road safety spokeman, said: 'Talking to passengers or daydreaming are so common that they aren't perceived by drivers to be big distractions, but our research has revealed they are in fact responsible for most of the errors drivers admit to. 'Although your eyes are on the road, it's easy for your mind to wander behind the wheel, especially on long journeys. 'Distractions can have catastrophic consequences for both drivers themselves and other road users, especially in extreme instances like failing to stop at a junction or at a red light or crossing. 'Driving is still a very mentally demanding task, especially as we need to be able to react to what's in front in a split-second, so it's important we do everything we can to stay alert and minimise distractions.' IAM RoadSmart director of policy and standards Nicholas Lyes believes it is paramount for ministers to updated road safety strategy recognises the importance of improving driving standards overall. 'In vehicle distractions play a huge part in taking minds away from the driving task ahead,' he said. 'We all lead busy lives but being in charge of more than a tonne of metal travelling at speed comes with massive responsibility and it only takes seconds for things to go tragically wrong.' Distraction impact on road traffic collisions According to the most recently available Department for Transport figures, in 2023 there were 1,624 deaths on Britain's roads. Of these, 23 fatalities listed mobile phone use as a contributory factor. In fact, distraction and impairment were cited in 34.9% of all fatal collisions. Only speed (57.7%) and behaviour or inexperience (46.8%) were more common contributory factors in deadly road traffic accidents. Last month, we revealed that nine in ten motorists admit they cannot complete a car journey without being distracted by their phone. This is despite the threat of fines and points on a licence and the increased likelihood of being caught by new roadside camera technology. Just 10 per cent are able to go from start to finish on a trip without using their device in some way or another, analysis of driving data collated from a sample of half a million motorists over the last 12 months and shared exclusively with This is Money revealed. With more than 42million licence holders, it suggests 37.8million are being distracted by their phones behind the wheel. The analysis, carried out by telematics firm IMS, raises yet more alarm bells about technology's impact on road safety. Some 23 deaths on the road in 2023 were either entirely or partly caused by a driver being on the phone. And the development of more advanced and larger touchscreen in new cars is only increasing the risk of driver's taking their eyes off the road. Infotainment in the latest models, which has seen models fitted with enormous TV-like displays on the dashboard, are now a major distraction concern. With growing fears drivers are preoccupied by fiddly touchscreen systems, a study recently named and shamed the brands with the most difficult and convoluted to operate. It found that it can take up to 22 seconds to complete simple tasks on the move - time where a driver isn't entirely concentrated on the road ahead. It comes as manufacturers from next year are threatened with having safety ratings for their vehicles downgraded if simple functions in the cabin are not operated using buttons and instead require motorists to prod through various screen menus.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Eating this kind of bread can raise colon cancer patients' risk of death
Eating white bread and other foods considered to be proinflammatory can raise colon cancer patients' risk of death from the disease, researchers said this week. Of a study of more than 1,600 patients with stage III colon cancer, people who consumed the most of those foods — also including french fries, hot dogs, and soda — during a phase 3 clinical trial showed longer overall survival post-treatment compared to those on a proinflammatory diet. The patients who ate a proinflammatory diet had an 87 percent higher risk of death than those who consumed the least proinflammatory food. Inflammation is the body's immune response to stimulus, such as falling down or burning your finger. Both too little and too much inflammation can cause problems, and most chronic diseases are believed to be rooted in inflammation that lasts over time. Some of the foods that can contribute to inflammation have been linked to cancer risk. 'One of the most common questions that patients ask is what they should do after treatment to maximally reduce their risk of cancer recurrence and improve survival,' Dr. Sara Char, a clinical fellow in hematology and oncology at Boston's Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, said in a statement. 'These findings add to the published literature about the importance of dietary patterns and physical activity in outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.' Char was the first author of the research which was presented on Sunday at this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. 'This study provides additional evidence that diet may be important for improving outcomes and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer,' co-author Dr. Kimmie Ng, also of Dana-Farber, said. 'Further studies are needed to tailor specific dietary recommendations for patients with colon cancer, and to understand the biological mechanisms underlying the relationship between proinflammatory diets and survival.' The use of the anti-inflammatory drug in the participants' trial, which is known as celecoxib, did not have a significant influence on the relationship between diet and survival, but the authors also noted that those who engaged in higher levels of physical activity had the best overall survival outcomes. Their findings come following previous research that showed systemic inflammation can increase the risk of colon cancer development and progression. Using anti-inflammatory drugs can reduce the risk of recurrence in selected patients with stage III colon cancer, the Dana-Farber researchers said. It remains unclear how much diet could affect cancer outcomes after treatment, but these findings add to a growing body of knowledge that could affect tens of thousands of Americans with colorectal cancer. Some 150,000 people are diagnosed with colorectal cancer each year in the U.S. It is the second-most common cause of cancer deaths for men and women in the U.S., and is expected to cause about 52,900 deaths this year. The average five-year survival for patients with stage III colon cancer is around 80 percent, although between 25 and 35 percent of patients experience a recurrence of cancer during that time. The researchers say that they plan to conduct more detailed investigations of the biological effects of diet and lifestyle on colon cancer outcomes, including those with metastatic colon cancer and those diagnosed at younger ages, under age 50. The majority of Americans — as many as 57 percent — may be eating a diet that promotes inflammation, researchers at the Ohio State University found last year. In 2018, a Harvard study found that people who ate foods that promoted inflammation had a higher rate of colorectal cancer compared with people who ate the least foods, with a 22 percent higher risk for men than women. Eating white bread and drinking alcohol are linked to an increased risk for developing colorectal cancer. Whole grains have anti-cancer properties and eating fiber helps to reduce colorectal cancer risk, researchers told Fox News Digital in 2023. The next year, a study found potential risk for white bread intake. Alternatively, consuming more dark leafy greens, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, and protein sources that are high in omega-3 fatty acids can help fight inflammation, according to UCLA Health. The Mediterranean diet may be the most beneficial, Johns Hopkins Medicine notes. 'I want to emphasize that people really need to focus on their pattern of eating — as opposed to eating a few particular foods — to reduce inflammation,' Dr. Edwin McDonald, a gastroenterologist at UChicago Medicine, wrote. ' There's no miracle food out there that's going to cure people with chronic inflammation. You need to have an anti-inflammatory lifestyle and diet.'
