China opposes Philippines, US, Australia joint patrol in South China Sea; but Philippines criticise a "high-risk" manoeuvre by Chinese vessel near disputed area
In this photo provided by the Armed Forces of the Philippines Public Affairs Office (PAO), Philippine Marines participate in amphibious landing exercise as part of a joint US-Philippines military exercises called Balikatan or "shoulder to shoulder", Sunday May 4, 2025 in Balabac, Palawan province, Philippines. -- Armed Forces of the Philippines PAO via AP
BEIJING, May 8 (Reuters): China's foreign ministry on Thursday expressed opposition against a recent joint sea and air patrol by the Philippines, the United States and Australia in the South China Sea.
China is committed to safeguarding its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told a regular press conference while urging relevant countries to stop forming groups and stirring up trouble in the region.
The Philippines, meanwhile, criticised on Thursday a "high-risk" manoeuvre by a Chinese vessel near the disputed Scarborough Shoal in a rare incident involving warships from the two navies.
The Scarborough Shoal -- a triangular chain of reefs and rocks in the contested South China Sea -- has been a flashpoint between the countries since China seized it from the Philippines in 2012.
Monday's encounter took place "approximately 11.8 nautical miles southeast" of the Scarborough Shoal, the military said, during ongoing US-Philippine military exercises that Beijing has slammed as destabilising.
"The Chinese frigate BN 554 was documented tailing PS35 (BRP Emilio Jacinto) at close range, while BN 573 dangerously crossed its bow in a high-risk maneuver that created the danger of collision," the military said in a statement, labelling the incident "threatening and provocative".
China in response accused Manila of sending a ship to "intrude" into its territorial waters.
Its military said it had sent "naval and air forces to track, monitor, warn and drive away the Philippine boat in accordance with laws and regulations".
"The relevant remarks of the Philippines side disregarded the facts, confused the public, and attempted to mislead international cognition," said Colonel Tian Junli, spokesperson of the Chinese military's Southern Theater Command.
Philippines Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad told AFP the last such encounter between warships from the two navies he could remember was on a resupply mission in the South China Sea two years ago.
Alexander Lopez of Manila's National Maritime Council said the Chinese vessel had been "dangerously close" to its Philippine counterpart.
The ship crossing the bow of the BRP Emilio Jacinto had come within about 180 metres (590 feet), he told AFP, leaving "no room for any manoeuvre, for any emergency cases".
The Chinese vessel following alongside had been less than 100 metres away, he said.
China and the Philippines have engaged in months of confrontations in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims in nearly its entirety despite an international ruling its assertion has no merit.
A Filipino sailor lost a thumb last June when Chinese coast guard members wielding knives, sticks and an axe foiled a Philippine Navy attempt to resupply its troops stationed on the Second Thomas Shoal.
The joint US-Philippine exercises known as Balikatan, which this year were to simulate a "full-scale battle scenario", are set to end Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Kabul's growing water crisis
EVERY week, Bibi Jan scrapes together some of her husband's meagre daily wage to buy precious water from rickshaw-drawn tankers that supply residents of Afghanistan's increasingly parched capital. Kabul faces a looming water crisis, driven by unruly and rapid urbanisation, mismanagement over years of conflict, and climate change, meaning people like Bibi Jan are sometimes forced to choose between food and water. 'When my children have only tea for a few days, they say, 'You bought water and nothing for us',' said the 45-year-old housewife, describing reusing her supplies for bathing, dishes and laundry. Experts have long sounded the alarm over Kabul's water problems, which are worsening even as many international players have backed off big infrastructure projects and slashed funding to Afghanistan since the Taliban government took power in 2021. 'There could be no ground water in Kabul by 2030' without urgent action, the UN children's agency Unicef warned last year. Other experts are more cautious, citing limited consistent and reliable data, but say the situation is clearly deteriorating. A 2030 cliff is a 'worst-case scenario', said water resources management expert Assem Mayar. A boy sitting atop a potable water tanker on a hillside in Kabul. — AFP But even if slated development projects are completed in a few years, it 'doesn't mean the situation would become better than now', Mayar said. 'As time goes on, the problems are only increasing,' he added, as population growth outstrips urban planning and climate change drives below-average precipitation. The Taliban authorities have launched projects ranging from recycling water to building hundreds of small dams across the country, but larger interventions remain hampered by financing and technical capacity. They remain unrecognised by any country since they ousted the Western-backed government and imposed their interpretation of religious law, with restrictions on women a major sticking point. They have repeatedly called for non-governmental groups to reboot stalled projects on water and climate change, as Afghanistan faces 'some of the harshest effects' in the region, according to the United Nations. The water and energy ministry wants to divert water from the Panjshir river to the capital, but needs US$300mil to US$400mil (RM1.2bil to RM1.7bil). A dam project near Kabul would ease pressures but was delayed after the Taliban takeover. For now, Kabul's primary drinking water source is groundwater, as much as 80% of which is contaminated, according to a May report by Mercy Corps. It is tapped by more than 100,000 unregulated wells across the city that are regularly deepened or run dry, the NGO said. Groundwater can be recharged, but more is drawn each year than is replenished in Kabul, with an estimated annual 76 million cubic metre deficit, experts say. 'It's a very serious problem... Water is decreasing day by day in the city,' said Shafiullah Zahidi, who heads central Kabul operations for the state-owned water company UWASS. Water systems designed decades ago serve just 20% of the city's population, which has exploded to around six million over the past 20 years, said Zahidi. At one of Kabul's 15 pumping stations, maintenance manager Mohammad Ehsan said the seven-year-old well is already producing less water. Two others nearby sit dry. 'The places with shallower water levels are dried out now,' said 53-year-old Ehsan, who has worked in water management for two decades, as he stood over an old well. It once produced water from a depth of 70m, but a newer well had to be bored more than twice as deep to reach groundwater. At one of the two large stations in the city, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) recently procured four new pumps where only one had been functioning. 'If that pump collapsed for any reason, that means stopping the service for 25,000 beneficiary households' which now have uninterrupted water, said Baraa Afeh, ICRC's deputy water and habitat coordinator. Everyone in Kabul 'should have 24-hour service', said Zahidi, from the state water company. But in reality, Bibi Jan and many other Kabulis are forced to lug water in heavy jugs from wells or buy it from tankers. These suppliers charge at least twice as much as the state-owned utility, with potable water even more pricey in a country where 85% of the population lives on less than a dollar a day. Bibi Jan said she has to police her family's water use carefully. 'I tell them, 'I'm not a miser but use less water.' Because if the water runs out then what would we do?' — AFP
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Born in exile, cast out again
PUSHED out of Pakistan where she was born, Nazmine Khan's first experience of her country, Afghanistan, was in a sweltering tent at a border camp. 'We never thought we would return to Afghanistan,' said the 15-year-old girl, who has little idea of what will become of herself or her family, only that she is likely to have fewer freedoms. 'When our parents told us we had to leave, we cried.' Having nowhere to go in Afghanistan, she and six other family members shared a stifling tent in the Omari camp near the Torkham border point. Islamabad, accusing Afghans of links to narcotics and 'supporting terrorism', announced a new campaign in March to expel hundreds of thousands of Afghans, with or without documents. Many Afghans had lived in Pakistan for decades after fleeing successive wars and crises. But seeing their removal as inevitable, many did not wait to be arrested by Pakistani forces before leaving. Since April 1, more than 100,000 Afghans have been sent back to their country of origin, according to Islamabad, out of the around three million the United Nations says are living in Pakistan. Nazmine's family fled Afghanistan in the 1960s. Her four brothers and sister were also born in Pakistan. An Afghan refugee woman holding her child at a makeshift camp near the Afghanistan-Pakistan Torkham border, Nangarhar province. — AFP 'In a few days, we'll look for a place to rent' in the border province of Nangarhar where the family has roots, she said, speaking in Pakistan's commonly spoken tongue of Urdu, not knowing any Afghan languages. In the family's tent there is little more than a cloth to lie on and a few cushions, but no mattress or blanket. Flies buzz under the tarpaulin as countless children in ragged clothes come and go. Already suffering When it comes to her own future, Nazmine feels 'completely lost'. Having dropped out of school in Pakistan, the Taliban's policies towards women will hardly change the course of her life. But from what little she has heard about her country while living in eastern Pakistan's Punjab, she knows that 'here there are not the same freedoms'. Since returning to power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have imposed restrictions characterised by the UN as 'gender apartheid'. 'It is now a new life ... for them, and they are starting this with very few utilities, belongings, cash, support,' said Ibrahim Humadi, programme lead for non-governmental group Islamic Relief, which has set up about 200 tents for returnees in the Omari camp. Some stay longer than the three days offered on arrival, not knowing where to go with their meagre savings, he said. A Talibanmember(centre) from theMinistry for thePropagation ofVirtue and thePrevention ofVice checking arefugee'sdocuments nearthe afghanistan-PakistanTorkham border.— AFP 'They also know that even in their area of return, the community will be welcoming them, will be supporting them ... but they also know the community is already suffering from the situation in Afghanistan,' he added. Around 85% of the Afghan population lives on less than US$1 (RM4) a day, according to the UN Development Programme. 'We had never seen (Afghanistan) in our lives. We do not know if we can find work, so we are worried,' said Jalil Khan Mohamedin, 28, as he piled belongings – quilts, bed frames and fans – into a truck that will take the 16 members of his family to the capital Kabul, though nothing awaits them there. 'We still don't understand' The Taliban authorities have said they are preparing towns specifically for returnees. But at one site near Torkham, there is nothing more than cleared roads on a rocky plain. The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) says 'greater clarity' is needed to ensure that the sites intended Young afghan refugees sitting on a truck with their belongings after arriving from Pakistan at a makeshift camp near the afghanistan-Pakistan Torkham border. — AFP for returnees are 'viable' in terms of basic infrastructure and services such as health and education. It's important that 'returnees are making informed decisions and that their relocation to the townships is voluntary', said IOM communications officer Avand Azeez Agha. Looking dazed, Nazmine's brother Dilawar still struggles to accept leaving Pakistan, where he was born 25 years ago. His Pakistani wife did not want to follow him and asked for a divorce. 'When we crossed the border, we felt like going back, then after a day it felt fine,' said the former truck driver. 'We still don't understand. We were only working.' — AFP
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
A RM1.7bil ‘holy hole'
THE walls surrounding Ghana's national cathedral are ageing plywood. Its spires are yellow construction cranes, which have not moved in years. It frequently reverberates with singing – the singing of a choir of frogs that moves in whenever the cathedral's half-finished foundations fill with rainwater. Ghana's former president, Nana Akufo-Addo, spent around US$58mil (RM248mil) in public money on the US$400mil (RM1.7bil) cathedral project – a huge sum in this debt-saddled West African country. The new finance minister said in March that Ghana's economy was in 'severe distress'. The cathedral was designed by celebrity architect David Adjaye. But beyond the blueprints, there is very little to show for the money. 'They have only dug a hole – a big hole,' said Praise Chinedu, a student and a Pentecostal Christian. A well-thumbed Bible tucked under his arm, he was emerging from a morning service at Pure Fire Miracles Ministries onto a street humming with churchgoers, ice cream vendors and clamouring children. His brother John, who had been buying anointing oil, sidled up. 'God is not going to be happy,' he said. Across Accra, Ghana's coastal capital, citizens joke that the hole is the biggest and most expensive in the world. Ghana's former president Akufo-Addo. — Francis Kokoroko/The New York Times A valuable stretch of land surrounded by museums, bank headquarters and some of Ghana's ritziest hotels was cleared of government buildings for the church. That land is now thick with vegetation and bird life, unvisited except by scrap metal thieves and, occasionally in the rainy season, swimmers staging stunts for social media. The unbuilt cathedral became a symbol of economic mismanagement and a political battleground after Akufo-Addo said its construction was to fulfil a personal pledge he had made to God. Now that Akufo-Addo has left office, the project appears permanently doomed. The cathedral is now a major target of the new government's anti-corruption initiative, called Operation Recover All Loot. Last month, the government announced that it would no longer fund the project and dissolved the agency responsible for managing it. Africa is home to the world's largest Christian population. Ghana, where faith is especially important to young people, has seen a recent boom in church building. But the national cathedral project never attracted the support Akufo-Addo anticipated. Instead, construction stalled at its foundations as Ghana suffered its worst economic crisis in a generation. To many Ghanaians lately, a cathedral has seemed like the last thing the country needs, especially one with an estimated cost of US$400mil. The project began with much fanfare. In 2019, at a fundraising dinner in Washington, a smiling Akufo-Addo cut into a large grey, square confection – the planned cathedral rendered in cake. With a 5,000-seat auditorium and a concave roof referencing the curve of Asante royal stools, it was intended to be much more than just a cathedral. It was to be a national monument, similar to the Washington National Cathedral or London's Westminster Abbey, a place where solemn ceremonies of state – like presidents' funerals and royal weddings – would take place. Akufo-Addo, who was born into a Presbyterian family but became an Anglican as a young man, told the group gathered in Washington that the interdenominational cathedral would be a unifier for Ghanaian Christians, who represent more than 70% of the population. It would also be an offering of thanks to God for sparing the country from the epidemics, civil wars and famines that had plagued its neighbours, he said. But then he revealed a third reason for its construction. 'I made a pledge to God that if I become the president – after two unsuccessful attempts – in the 2016 presidential elections, I will build a cathedral to the glory of God,' he said, according to official readouts of the event. The statement turned out to be a gift to Akufo-Addo's opponents, who argued that the president should not be allowed to use public money as part of a personal bargain he made with God – let alone US$58mil of it. Paul Opoku-Mensah, the executive director of the agency overseeing the project, said demonising the cathedral quickly became 'a political strategy'. In March 2024, one member of parliament, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, led a march to the construction site, cutting a red ribbon at its gate to poke fun at the president for commissioning what was still a giant hole. 'We are demanding that the contracts must be immediately terminated to avoid further financial loss to the state,' he said. If using the cathedral to target the president was a political strategy, it worked. John Mahama, a former president who promised to create jobs and fix the economy, pulled off a dramatic comeback in December's election. He made Okudzeto Ablakwa his foreign minister. Corruption accusations often take centre stage in Ghanaian elections, and the large sums involved in the national cathedral project convinced many Ghanaians that officials had been skimming off the top. A public ombudsman said procurement rules had been breached and recommended a forensic audit. But in an interview by the big hole in early April, Opoku-Mensah said he had nothing to hide and had handed over all the accounts to the investigators. He explained that the cathedral was not really intended as a church, but as a major monument that had needed state money to get started but would eventually become a profit-making magnet for visitors. 'It's a fundamental misunderstanding of the vision,' he said. Akufo-Addo also seemed befuddled about the controversy. 'I find it difficult to see what is so problematic about it,' he said in an interview in April in his book-lined home office surrounded by a lush garden. He mused aloud about whether people believed it 'would be too big a tribute to my leadership'. Now that the country's leaders have changed, few Ghanaians admit to supporting the cathedral. Those who do say Akufo-Addo and others should foot the bill – but not taxpayers. 'It should be funded through donations,' said Esi Darko, an architect, as she left church one recent afternoon in an Accra neighbourhood known as Christian Village. 'It shouldn't be imposed upon everyone because not all are Christians.' There are also around five million Muslims in Ghana, a country of more than 35 million people, and, lately, a growing number of atheists. 'Don't believe in God?' reads a billboard in central Accra. 'You are not alone.' — ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
