Kayse Shrum's resignation letter says she wants to return to OSU medical school after sabbatical
Former Oklahoma State University President Kayse Shrum's resignation letter to the OSU/A&M Board of Regents indicates she wants to return to OSU's faculty after a sabbatical.
The Oklahoman obtained the letter, dated Feb. 3, and a copy of her contract via an open-records request. The newspaper still has a large open-records request for information connected with Shrum's resignation pending with the university and the board of regents, which governs the school. Both entities are funded by taxpayers.
OSU officials, including regents' Chair Jimmy Harrel, have refused to discuss the circumstances surrounding Shrum's departure from the university presidency after less than four years or why they waited until Feb. 5 to announce her resignation. OSU officials kept secret Shrum's situation from some of the state's top education officials, who learned of what had happened via media reports.
Shrum's departure was especially curious, given her popularity with students, faculty and state lawmakers, who all have been vocal in support of her since news of her resignation became public.
Shrum has not returned multiple messages seeking comment. In her letter, she told regents she requested that she begin an official sabbatical on Feb. 3, which would run through June 30, the end of the academic year.
'Following this academic year, I will return to the tenured faculty at the OSU Center for Health Sciences per my contract, effective July 1, 2025,' she wrote. 'It has been an honor and a privilege to serve as the President of Oklahoma State University. I believe during my tenure I have set the university on a course to a bright future.'
The only hint given by OSU officials about why Shrum resigned came on Feb. 7, when they released a list of motions approved by regents during a Jan. 31 meeting. The motions concerned a review of the OSU Innovation Foundation, a favored project of Shrum that was rebranded in 2023 from its former name, the Oklahoma State University Research Foundation.
Shrum said then the foundation was 'a crucial pillar of our We Are Land-Grant strategy' she forged during her tenure. One of the motions approved Jan. 31 indicate regents were reviewing transfers of funds appropriated by the Legislature involving the Innovation Foundation. Along with Shrum, one of the Innovation Foundation's executives, Elizabeth Pollard, also resigned.
Shrum, 52, became the first woman to lead one of Oklahoma's two research universities when OSU/A&M regents chose her to succeed Burns Hargis, effective July 1, 2021. Shrum, a doctor of osteopathic medicine, previously had been president of OSU's Center for Health Sciences.
She graduated from OSU's medical school in Tulsa in 1998 and returned there in 2002 to teach and practice pediatric medicine. She became the youngest, and first female, dean and president of an Oklahoma medical school when she was promoted at the Center for Health Sciences in 2011 and 2013, respectively.
Her current OSU contract, dated July 1, 2024, includes a clause noting that Shrum 'shall retain her faculty appointment in the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Department of Pediatrics (the 'Department') with tenure. Should this Contract be terminated prior to its expiration date and Dr. Shrum elects to return to and actively assume such academic service, such service shall be governed by the policies and rules applicable to the Department and her total compensation shall be equal to the highest-paid faculty member in the Department.'
As president, Shrum received an annual base salary of $650,000, along with a $20,000 annual automobile allowance, use of the president's on-campus home, usual OSU employee benefits and memberships at both the Stillwater Country Club and Karsten Creek Golf Club. OSU also paid $75,000 annually into a retirement plan for Shrum.
On Feb. 7, the regents announced the selection of James Hess as OSU's interim president. Hess most recently has served as vice president for graduate programs at the OSU Center for Health Sciences, where he has worked since 2003. The Oklahoma Higher Education Hall of Fame inducted Hess in 2023. He is from Henryetta and has spent 43 years in Oklahoma higher education.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Kayse Shrum wants to return to OSU medical school after sabbatical
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma's primary election locks out too many voters. It's time for a change.
As a lifelong Oklahoman, I grew up admiring leaders like Henry Bellmon — public servants who put principle over partisanship and worked to move our state forward. For those readers who may be too young to remember Gov. Bellmon, he was a war hero and Oklahoma's first Republican governor. He was widely admired and still celebrated today as a pragmatic leader who put education, infrastructure, and economic growth above party loyalty. He spent considerable political capital to pass an education reform package that reduced class sizes, increased teacher salaries, and made significant investments in early childhood education, despite fierce opposition from his own party. In short, he was a statesman who consistently acted in the best interests of the people of Oklahoma, rather than for his own political gain. Today, leaders like him would not stand a chance in a primary election, not because they lack vision, integrity or experience, but because Oklahoma's closed primary system forces candidates to pander to the most extreme voices in their party rather than appeal to the broader electorate. Instead of rewarding problem solvers, our system today encourages political survivalists — candidates who appeal to the loudest voices rather than the broadest coalition. It is no surprise that many of our most capable leaders choose not to run for office at all. The system has made governing secondary to partisan battles, and the result is a political landscape that prioritizes loyalty tests over meaningful leadership. This is why we need State Question 836, a constitutional amendment proposing an open primary system that ensures every voter — not just registered Republicans or Democrats — has a say in who represents them. Instead of separate party primaries where a small percentage of voters effectively decide the outcome, SQ 836 would put all candidates on a single ballot, and the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, would move on to the general election. This simple change would force candidates to appeal to a broader audience, rather than just the most vocal partisan factions. More: Open primaries are no threat to conservatism — they're a return to it | Opinion The consequences of our broken primary system are evident. Oklahoma's voter turnout is among the lowest in the country because people feel disenfranchised — locked out of elections that are often decided long before November. When most races are effectively determined in low-turnout primaries, the general election becomes an afterthought, leaving independent voters and moderate voices unheard. This disillusionment has led to a growing disconnect between elected officials and the people they are supposed to serve. SQ 836 is not a partisan issue — it's a pro-voter issue. It ensures that every Oklahoman has a voice in every stage of the electoral process. It encourages candidates to build coalitions rather than simply appease party insiders. Most importantly, it restores accountability by ensuring that those who govern us must appeal to all the people they serve, not just a fraction of their party's base. If we want to make Oklahoma's democracy great again, we must fix the rigged system that has created division and dysfunction. SQ 836 is a step toward bringing back the Oklahoma we once knew — a state where statesmen like Bellmon could thrive, where cooperation is rewarded, and where every voter has a say. The strength of a democracy depends on the ability of its people to participate fully, and Oklahoma deserves a system that works for all of us — not just a select few. It's time to put the people back in charge of our elections. The best way to do that is to support SQ 836. David High is a lifelong resident of Oklahoma City and an attorney with the law firm of Tomerlin, High & High. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Constitutional change needed to give all Oklahomans a voice | Opinion
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Nazarene denomination sues breakaway congregation
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – A court battle broke out this week after a Nazarene congregation voted to 'spiritually disaffiliate' from the Nazarene denomination. The Oklahoman first reported that the congregation of what was Oklahoma City First Church of the Nazarene is now called OKC First. The church is located near 4400 NW Expressway. The report detailed that 98% of the congregation that was there during an April special meeting voted to spiritually disaffiliate. The reason for that disaffiliation, according to members, was that the denomination was pressuring them to be less welcoming to members of the LGBTQ+ community. Cleveland County Sheriff says no layoffs needed despite lower budget approval The OKC First Reverand Jon Middendorf posted a letter after the vote that read in part: 'As you may know, OKC First has been spiritually aligned with the Church of the Nazarene for many years. We have enjoyed a shared fellowship and collaborated in ministry, and each of us has benefited from the other's wisdom and friendship. Recently, however, things have changed. In particular, our insistence that God's love is inclusive and welcomes all who seek His grace, and the Church of the Nazarene's opposition to our position, has made it abundantly clear that we must part ways.' 'We were not willing to sacrifice any part of our community to retain a relationship with the denomination,' said Eric Jergensen, Secretary of the Board. Jergensen said that it wasn't an easy decision, but they discussed with just about everyone within the church and outside the church and felt it was the right thing to do. 'People just have a sense of home in that building, and we would not like to lose that,' said Jergensen. The last week of May, the Oklahoma District, Church of the Nazarene, filed a lawsuit against OKC First that claimed the district should get possession of the church's building and property. It's a 196-page suit that includes the Nazarene manual/guidelines in which the district explains it gets ownership of all church properties in the event of disaffiliation. However, OKC First filed an objection this week, including the deed to the actual property. In court documents, they argued, '..the deed makes no mention of or reference to any entity other than OKC First.' Jergensen said that they don't necessarily need the physical building in order to conduct worship, but that it's needed for them to stay in the community. 'We have connections to that neighborhood,' said Jergensen. They work alongside other non-profits in that area that feed the hungry, help find housing for the homeless, and perform many other services. 'We have relationships with those people. We have relationships with the children in that community who come to our after-school program. Those things would be really hard to keep if we weren't in that building,' said Jergensen. News 4 reached out to the district and asked for a response to why the lawsuit is needed. It is with a measure of sadness and deep reflection that we acknowledge the expressed desire of First Church of the Nazarene, Oklahoma City, to disaffiliate from the Church of the Nazarene denomination. For eighty-eight (88) years, First Church of the Nazarene, Oklahoma City, has been a valued part of our denominational family, sharing in our common mission, theological heritage, and commitment to serving God and neighbor. We honor the faithful ministry and dedicated members who have made significant contributions to both the local community and the broader denomination. As a denomination, our polity and trust clauses regarding church property are foundational to our collective work and mission. These provisions, established through a democratic and prayerful process over many years, ensure that church properties are held in trust for the furtherance of the denomination's mission objectives. This structure safeguards the long-term ministry of the church, extending beyond any single congregation or generation, ensuring that resources remain dedicated to the kingdom of God as understood by our shared covenant. We understand that discussions around disaffiliation can be complex and emotionally challenging. Our primary concern remains the spiritual well-being of all members, both within First Church of the Nazarene, Oklahoma City and across our entire denominational family. We are committed to an orderly and transparent process, guided by our established denominational policies and procedures, which are designed to address such matters with fairness and integrity for all parties involved. We extend an invitation for continued dialogue with the leadership of First Church of the Nazarene, Oklahoma City as we seek to navigate this period. Our hope is always for reconciliation and for the flourishing of Christ's church in all its expressions. We pray for wisdom, grace, and discernment for everyone involved during this time of transition. We remain steadfast in our commitment to our calling: to make Christlike disciples in the nation and around the world. We will continue to support and nurture our congregations across Oklahoma as they faithfully live out our shared Christian witness. Oklahoma District Church of the Nazarene Assistant District Superintendent Rev. Dorothy Whipp Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Door ajar for Reece Walsh as Kalyn Ponga could be banned from entire Origin series
Kalyn Ponga has reportedly been spotted meeting with International Rugby League boss Troy Grant in a move that could spell the end of his State of Origin career. Ponga scored the match-winning try in golden-point against Manly on Thursday night, and probably did enough to retain his spot for the Maroons in Origin 2. The fullback had 19 runs for 191 metres, five tackle breaks and the winning try as Newcastle came back to beat the Sea Eagles 26-22. And while he may have done enough to retain his spot in Game 2, his future in State of Origin has been thrown into massive doubt. is reporting that Ponga has recently seen in a meeting with IRL boss Grant, in what was most likely a discussion about switching his international allegiances from Australia to New Zealand. Ponga has always been bound to play for Australia at international level because represented the Aussie team at the Rugby League World Cup 9s event in 2019. However he's never played a Test match for the Kangaroos, and has constantly avoided making a call that would rule him out of playing for NZ. It's believed Ponga hasn't wanted to turn his back on the possibility of playing for the Kiwis one day because of his Maori heritage. The IRL recently changed the rules and allowed AJ Brimson to switch allegiances from Australia to England. Brimson had been bound by the same situation that Ponga was in that he too played for Australia at the World Cup 9s event in 2019. But the IRL - headed by Grant - recently approved Brimson's application to represent England and declared the World Cup 9s event was no longer a relevant factor. The IRL said because the 9s event has effectively been discontinued, it doesn't hold any standing anymore and was "unfairly" blocking players from featuring at Test level. 'At the time, the 9s World Cup was part of IRL's calendar planning and it was intended to be held every four years,' a statement from the IRL read. 'However, the tournament has effectively been discontinued and is not part of IRL's medium term planning. 'Therefore, the tribunal felt that players who had played in the 2019 World Cup 9s were being unfairly restricted as they elected for their country based on a different set of circumstances to players who elect for a country through a 13-a-side match.' The rule change effectively opens the door for Ponga to play for New Zealand if he so wishes. And the fact he was recently spotted meeting with Grant has fuelled the rumour mill that he wants to play for the Kiwis. But a switch in international allegiances would bring an end to Ponga's Origin career. Because New Zealand are a Tier 1 nation, anyone who represents the Kiwis isn't allowed to play State of Origin. It's the same for Brimson, who has ultimately ended his Origin career with Queensland by defecting to England. RELATED: Cameron Smith's truth bomb for Billy Slater after 'weak' accusation Kevin Walters calls out Broncos amid sad Adam Reynolds situation Ponga is likely to see out this year's Origin series for the Maroons, but a switch to represent New Zealand next season would mean Billy Slater will have to find a new fullback for Queensland. It opens the door for Reece Walsh to reclaim the spot he lost this year, while Slater also has the option of using Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow in the No.1 jersey.
