logo
Mailbag: Beware of the ‘wolves in sheep's clothing'

Mailbag: Beware of the ‘wolves in sheep's clothing'

If you are a Huntington Beach resident who believes in unrestricted access to knowledge and protecting your freedom to make decisions for your own family, then vote 'yes' on Measure A to repeal the ordinance creating a children's book review board, and 'yes' on Measure B to ensure that any future efforts to outsource library operations to for-profit companies will require voter approval and a majority vote from City Council. This is a critical safeguard to maintain public oversight and the integrity of community libraries.
The City Council believes that a 21-person politically appointed, children's book review board is more qualified than you to choose appropriate reading materials for your children. They are not.
Accusations that there are 'pornographic' materials in the children's library section have served to divide the community and undermine public opinion about libraries, librarians and their supporters. The mayor handed out images from what they believe to be inappropriate library materials from a booth at this year's Easter celebration.
Every accusation is a confession. These people are wolves in sheep's clothing. Do not let them deceive you.
The review board, whose decisions are unappealable, has the authority to decide which materials belong in the library based on 'community standards' that have not yet been defined. Materials that enter or remain in the children's book section could eventually align with the review boards' political and religious beliefs. Will no votes ultimately enable indoctrination of young minds under the guise of 'protecting children?' Whatever happened with that MAGA commemorative library plaque? Is this nuclear 'attack on porn' simply helping City Council complete a MAGA agenda item designed to stifle 1st Amendment rights at taxpayer expense?
A 'no' vote for either measure is a slippery slope toward government control of thought and information. Vote 'yes' on Measure A to protect parents' rights to maintain control of what their OWN children read, and 'yes' on Measure B to help ensure public libraries stay free and open to everyone.
Judy MorrisHuntington Beach
Monday I attended my first Huntington Beach City Council meeting, appropriately at the city library. It was quite an eye-opener, as more than 90 people signed up to address the council at the podium regarding Measures A and B. In a nutshell, a 'no' vote advocates for increasing the council's authority in deciding what books to have reviewed by the peer review board within the children's section, and to privatize the library altogether.
Once upon a time such notions would only appear in dystopian novels or movies such as Ray Bradbury's 'Fahrenheit 451' or George Orwell's '1984.' Yes, interesting ideas to conjecture and be entertained by, but surely not something that could really happen here. Do we not live within a democracy with constitutional rights guaranteeing freedom for the people to make their own choices regarding what to write, speak and read? The irony is that not that long ago, these values were most adamantly defended by American conservatives, the same people who bore a flag with a coiled snake emblazoned on the cloth, and the warning, 'Don't tread on me.' Do the advocates against Measures A and B, most of whom identify as conservatives, simply not know what they are doing?
Ron TerranovaHuntington Beach
As a former Orange County 'Teacher of the Year,' I taught for 40 years, addressing my school board many times. I advocated for school nurses, librarians and lower class sizes. I hoped my school board understood the reality of transmitting a crowded curriculum to more than 30 students every day, all day.
In January 2025, Newport-Mesa School Board had the luxury of picking a qualified new board member and they looked forward to working with her. On merit, they selected Kirstin Walsh who has children in NMUSD, has volunteered in the schools for 13 years, is PTA President at Newport Harbor High, has held offices at the elementary and intermediate school PTAs. After carefully vetting four candidates, board members added Walsh to their ranks. DONE! Now, let's get to work, solving school problems.
I'm sorry to say that members of our community collected signatures, forcing an election for NMUSD School Board, thus taking about $500,000 from Newport-Mesa's school budget. Their candidate was on the original list of those considered for the school board position, but was not selected.
Walsh is the kind of board member I want on the dais when I speak. Parent volunteers, like Walsh, who spend years in our school halls and classrooms, understand the challenges and strengths of school life.
I am saddened by the loss of half-a-million dollars from our slim school budget, used to fund an unnecessary election. I hope voters will make it right, and ensure that Kirstin Walsh continues in the position for which she was chosen, on merit.
Carrie Luger SlaybackNewport Beach
As the June 10 NMUSD Area 5 Special Election approaches, the saying, 'You are the company you keep,' rings true. Claims that Kirstin Walsh, Andrea McElroy's opponent, is a conservative or a non-partisan, don't align with her affiliations.
In 2023, NMUSD's progressive majority voted to block schools from notifying parents about their child's gender dysphoria, risking student well-being.
Conservative trustees, prioritizing safety, supported notification, but the majority prevailed. School board votes-on academics, safety and fiscal management reflect trustees' values, and the 2023 decision clearly revealed the progressive majority's values. Andrea McElroy champions parental rights and transparency. Walsh claims non-partisanship, yet her Instagram shows her campaigning with Democrats Carol Crane, Ashley Anderson (NMUSD Trustee) and Katrina Foley, vice chair of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Her campaign is heavily funded by the teacher's union, which endorsed Kamala Harris and the Women in Leadership PAC who advocate for 'leading the fight against conservatives.' This does not reflect conservative values.
This election demands leadership for quality education and parental involvement.
Walsh's 'non-partisan' label masks her affiliations.
Voters deserve transparency. I'm voting for Andrea McElroy, whose values I trust.
Lisa Ruggieri HinesNewport Beach
As 17-year Newport-Mesa Unified School District (NMUSD) Area 5 residents and parents, we've raised our children in Newport Beach, where they've thrived in our public schools. Area 5 has long elected conservative trustees who prioritize fiscal responsibility, parental rights and transparency. Taxpayers deserve a voice in this special election and we're voting for Andrea McElroy.
Andrea, a business owner and mother, brings proven fiscal accountability and champions parental rights, demanding transparency between families and schools. She and her husband actively serve our community, earning trust from neighbors, educators and leaders like Newport Beach Mayor Joe Stapleton. Her platform supports every child's unique path — arts, CTE, college — ensuring success in a safe, high-quality environment.
Andrea, endorsed by the Orange County Republican Party and local police and fire associations, aligns with Area 5's conservative values.
On June 10, vote Andrea McElroy — the only conservative in this election. She's a principled leader who will stand for our children and represent our community's values.
Kate and Logan MaloufNewport Beach

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bannon Promises ‘Punk' Musk: ‘I'm Going to Rip Your F***ing Face Off'
Bannon Promises ‘Punk' Musk: ‘I'm Going to Rip Your F***ing Face Off'

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bannon Promises ‘Punk' Musk: ‘I'm Going to Rip Your F***ing Face Off'

Steve Bannon is milking the raging feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk for all that it's worth, warning the Tesla boss: 'I will rip your f---ing face off.' After positioning himself squarely on Team Trump and calling for investigations into Musk and his businesses, now the MAGA loyalist has turned to physical threats to demonstrate his loyalty to the president. Musk began trying to tank Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill earlier this week, leading the two MAGA heavyweights to eventually exchange increasingly personal insults. On his show, War Room, on Thursday, Bannon called for Musk to be deported, demanded his alleged drug use and ties to China to be investigated, and said Musk's company, SpaceX, should be 'seized' by the government. Musk responded by calling Bannon a 'r----d.' Now, Bannon has threatened to 'rip his f---ing face off.' 'You're going to tell me we should allow some f---ing punk to sit there and say he should be impeached, and [Vice President] JD [Vance] should step in?' Bannon told Politico's Playbook. The comment was in response to a post on X saying that Musk was likely to win his fight against Trump and that Vance should replace the president. Musk shared the post and wrote simply: 'Yes.' 'F--- you, dude. We're going to go to f---ing war, and I'm going to rip your f---ing face off,' Bannon told Politico. Bannon was once a top strategist for Trump but has since been relegated to trying to influence the president through his punditry. Ever since Musk was brought in to lead the so-called 'department' of government efficiency, Bannon has railed against him on War Room. Now he seems keen to exploit the rift between Musk and Trump, who famously rewards loyalty—and venom. According to Trump biographer Michael Wolff, the president likes it when his aides make biting comments on his behalf. He's been known to say, 'That's a good one' after particularly scathing insults, according to Wolff. Speaking to Playbook, Bannon said Trump had treated Musk 'almost like a son,' only for the Tesla chief to then turn on him. 'He invited his family to Christmas dinner. He let him sleep over. He let him walk in and out of meetings. The president went to the max informality to welcome this guy,' Bannon said. Playbook described his remarks as an ''I told you so' victory lap.'

Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time
Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time

SALT LAKE CITY () — Parking in downtown Salt Lake City may start making a bigger dent in your wallet. As part of the city budget for the 2026 fiscal year, the Salt Lake City Council is considering changing the hourly rates for metered parking throughout the city, as well as the collection days and hours. Currently, metered parking is available at just $2.25 an hour. The city collects this fee between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday. On Saturday, the parking is free for two hours, while on Sunday, parking is free for the whole day. Carp chaos at Utah Lake as carp overpopulation becomes serious problem Under the proposed changes, the hourly rate for metered parking would rise to $3.50 an hour. The proposal would also take away the two free hours on Saturday and extend the collection hours from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Sunday would keep its free parking. The Salt Lake City Council will next meet on Tuesday, June 10, at 1 p.m. for a work session, where the calendar includes considering unresolved issues. A formal City Council meeting will be held at 7 p.m., where council members will consider adopting the proposed budget. Escape today to OUTRIGGER Ka'anapali Beach Resort Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump Salt Lake City Mission hosting pickleball event to help kids, change lives Elevate your outdoor adventure with the 2025 Forest River Rockwood Roo 17E Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

To cope with Trump and Musk's feud, MAGA world turns to weird man talk
To cope with Trump and Musk's feud, MAGA world turns to weird man talk

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

To cope with Trump and Musk's feud, MAGA world turns to weird man talk

As the conservative media ecosystem tries to cope with the fallout from an apparent feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk — over the GOP's budget bill — some right-wing influencers are trying to spin the spat as nothing more than two macho men in a benign sparring match. You may not think that two grown men — arguably, the most powerful in the world — hurling meme-ified insults, threats and accusations at each another is an acceptable or respectable portrayal of masculine vigor — akin to Ali-Frazier or two ferocious bulls locking horns. But many in MAGA world, an ecosystem known for trafficking in toxic masculinity, are trying to convince their followers otherwise. 'Sometimes guys fight. Guys sometimes will punch you in the face, and the next night you're having a beer. Sleep with your girlfriend, and you patch things up,' Fox News host Jesse Watters argued Thursday night. Fellow Fox host Sean Hannity compared the barrage of insults to his bygone athletic days growing up, saying 'there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball, football or baseball — whatever we were playing — where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again.' He also described Musk and Trump as two 'very strong-willed heavyweights' — as if what we're talking about here is prize fighters, not petulant and unstable men. Fellow MAGA influencers, including conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec and right-wing troll Joey Mannarino, chimed in with their own bizarrely anatomical rationales, with Posobiec saying the spat was a model demonstration of direct — or 'phallocentric'— communication and Mannarino saying this is simply 'how men with testicles spar.' Right-wingers love to accuse liberals of teaching what they portray as toxic or extreme 'gender ideology,' which is basically their summation for the idea that trans people exist and deserve rights. Meanwhile, many of the loudest voices in MAGA world are out here telling the world that mercurial outbursts, including threats and juvenile insults, are a staple of manhood. Americans ought to keep this contradiction in mind as conservatives try to impose their warped view of gender on the nation. Thus far, the responses out of MAGA world to the apparent divide between two of their most beloved political figures have ranged from the hypermasculine denial laid out here to abject sadness. And while it's unclear what, if anything, this spat will mean for Americans, or the passage of a Republican bill seeking deep cuts to federal programs, it is clear that conservative influencers aren't enjoying watching all this drama play out in public. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store