It is the sunscreen brand singled out by CHOICE as the single WORST failure in Australian SPF 50+ tests. Now the skincare giant furiously hits back
One of the most popular sunscreen brands singled out by a consumer group for failing to meet Australia's strict SPF 50+ regulations has furiously hit back at the controversial experiment.
But consumer group CHOICE has revealed it was 'so perturbed' by the results of its extraordinary first experiment - which found Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen returned an SPF of just 4 - that it conducted a second test at an independent lab in Germany.
CHOICE found that 16 of 20 sunscreens tested in Australia failed to meet the SPF protection claims on its labels, including big brands such as Cancer Council, Neutrogena, Bondi Sands, Coles and Woolworths.
Ultra Violette's 'skinscreen', which retails for $52, was called out by CHOICE for having the 'most significant failure' in the entire experiment during the watchdog's first round of rigorous testing.
'We were so perturbed by the results that we decided to delay publishing and test a different batch of the Ultra Violette sunscreen at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results,' CHOICE experts said.
'Those results came back with a reported SPF of 5.'
Just weeks before the bombshell report dropped, Ultra Violette released a slick social media video showcasing the costly process the business says it undertakes to ensure its products meet SPF requirements - singling out how it spent $150,000 on testing.
'Do you know how SPF is actually tested? Making our SKINSCREENS can cost up to $150,000 in testing alone,' the brand said at the time.
'We take the integrity of our products pretty damn seriously - no cutting corners here. We ensure you have the best protection (from both UVA and UVB), and the added skincare benefits to match, no matter where in the world you are.'
The video, narrated by Ultra Violette's co-founder Ava Chandler-Matthews, took viewers behind the scenes of how the company tests its sunscreen products - dwelling on how it cost $150,000 to test them.
'Because we formulate our own products at Ultra Violette, we have to pay for all the testing upfront... It's expensive because you do it on real human skin,' Ava said.
She explained that the brand undertake the costly process of SPF testing 'multiple times throughout the product development journey'.
'How it works is they apply a test patch of the sunscreen, then they burn you with a UV lamp, with and without the sunscreen,' Ava said.
'The amount of time it takes for your skin to burn is what determines the SPF, but that's the UVB test. The UVA test is done in a lab. We test to Australian standards first because that's always the hardest. After that, we test to FDA standards.
'All of our sunscreens globally are broad spectrum.'
Ultra Violette responds to CHOICE
At Ultra Violette we take misleading claims made about our products very seriously.
Ultra Violette is deeply committed to the health and safety of our customers and only work with reputable, TGA licensed manufacturers who perform substantial quality release testing in accordance with the strictest SPF standards in the world. Given our commitment to producing the highest quality sunscreens for consumers, we do not accept these results as even remotely accurate.
Ultra Violette first completed testing for Lean Screen in 2021 (with results of SPF of 64.32 to allow for an SPF 50+ rating), and again in 2024.
However, to ensure complete transparency and peace of mind for our customers, we proactively initiated another urgent SPF test of the batch in question in April this year (2025). We retested our product in a full 10-person panel and the results have come back at 61.7, which is above the threshold required by the TGA to make a 50+ claim. Choice's recent retest only included 5 participants, where 2 results were considered non validated, resulting in a sample size of only 3.
We rigorously retest our entire SPF range every two years. Lean Screen has been on the market for 5 years in 29 countries and we have not received a single substantiated claim of sunburn during use – reinforcing our confidence in the testing we have. If the Choice results represented the actual level of protection offered, we would have had hundreds of cases of reported sunburn and skin damage while using this product in real life situations.
Read the full Ultra Violette statement and the April 2025 test result here.
Ava claimed the brand went the extra mile by doing 'additional' testing on all of their sunscreens because, as she said, 'UVA protection is obviously very important to us'.
'The SPF testing is really just the start. When you own all your own formulations, you have to do stability testing which is to make sure the product is stable and contains the UV actives over time as well as clinical and panel testing,' she said.
'Developing all your own formulations, owning your own sunscreen brand and making that sunscreen brand global is really expensive,' she concluded.
Following CHOICE's bombshell report, Ultra Violette disputed the claims, saying: 'Given our commitment to producing the highest quality sunscreens for consumers, we do not accept these results as even remotely accurate.
'Lean Screen contains 22.75 per cent zinc oxide, a level at which, when applied sufficiently, would render a testing result of SPF 4 scientifically impossible.'
The brand said Lean Screen, like all UV formulas, are made by reputable, TGA-licensed manufacturers and tested to meet the strictest global SPF standards.
'To ensure complete transparency and peace of mind for our customers, when we were first alerted to CHOICE's testing, we immediately initiated another 10 person test on the batch in question at an independent lab,' an Ultra Violette spokesperson said.
'We proactively initiated another urgent SPF test of the batch in question in April this year (2025). We retested our product and the results have come back at 61.7, which is above the threshold required by the TGA to make a 50+ claim.
'CHOICE's recent retest only included five participants, where two results were considered non validated, resulting in a sample size of only three.
'Over the past four years, we have conducted three different tests at independent labs vs. Choice's 1.3 tests.'
The surprising results of the 20 popular sunscreens tested
Australian consumer watchdog CHOICE has tested 20 popular sunscreens, with 16 failing to meet the SPF50 protection claims on their labels.
Of the 20 sunscreens tested, only four passed the SPF test:
Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 52
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 72
Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen passed with a reported SPF of 51
Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 passed with a reported SPF of 56
Sunscreens that failed the SPF test:
SPF results in the 10s
Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen - tested at 4
SPF results in the 20s
Aldi Ombra 50+ – tested at 26
Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 28
Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion – tested at 26
Cancer Council Everyday Value Sunscreen 50 – tested at 27
Cancer Council Ultra Sunscreen 50+ – tested at 24
Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 24
Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ – tested at 27
SPF results in the 30s
Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 35
Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen – tested at 32
Cancer Council Kids Clear Zinc 50+ – tested at 33
Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 – tested at 38
SPF results in the 40s
Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube – tested at 43
Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 41
Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen – tested at 40
Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ – tested at 40
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Erin McNaught shares health update after her seven-month-old baby undergoes surgery to remove tumour
Erin McNaught has shared a health update with her fans, after her seven-month-old son Obi underwent surgery to remove a brain tumour. The 43-year-old Australian model shared a photo to social media on Saturday which captured her kissing her young son on the chest while he lay on a hospital bed and captioned it with some heartwarming words. 'Today Obi had the surgery to remove the tumour. The amazing team here are very happy with the way it went,' Erin began. 'While it's too early to tell much more, we are hoping this will have been his biggest hurdle. She went on to thank her followers for their support during this difficult time. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. 'Taking each day as it comes but oh so thankful for today. Thank you everyone for all your beautiful messages of support.' Earlier this week, Erin and her partner Stace Cadet shared devastating news about their son Obi Brooks Kotaras, revealing he was diagnosed with a brain tumour. The couple, who welcomed their first child together in October last year, issued an emotional joint statement on Thursday morning, expressing their anguish over Obi's recent health battle. 'For the last few weeks we have noticed a rapid decline in Obi's behaviour and happiness,' the statement began. 'He was having problems eating, sleeping and most recently, keeping his head straight.' They explained that after noticing the worrying changes they took Obi in for an MRI scan under the advice of their doctor. The scan, conducted earlier this week, revealed the shocking diagnosis - a large tumour located on the right side of his brain. 'At about 6:00pm Tuesday night we met with a neurosurgeon who broke the heartbreaking news,' they said. Earlier this week, Erin and her partner Stace Cadet shared devastating news about their son Obi Brooks Kotaras, revealing he was diagnosed with a brain tumour 'We are absolutely shattered and the last few days have been our hardest days.' The former Miss Universe Australia and her partner went on to praise the team at Queensland Children's Hospital, who are now working with them to determine a treatment plan. 'Our team at the Queensland Children Hospital have been incredible and remain hopeful that we can remove the mass and get Obi healthy and happy pending the results,' they added. The post was flooded with messages of support from family, friends and fans, including Erin's ex-husband, who she shares two children with - sons Evander, seven, and Ennio, five. The harrowing update follows what was initially a joyful start to parenthood for Erin and Stace, who confirmed the birth of their son exclusively to Daily Mail Australia back in December following his birth in October. The couple shared at the time that they had named him Obi and were over the moon to bring him home. 'We are so in love with him, we can't believe he's finally here,' Stace said in December. The former MTV host also previously opened up about her difficult pregnancy, revealing the journey had been 'a little touch and go at times,' with health complications in the final trimester.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Disgusting Aussies troll woman after her dad died celebrating his 40th wedding anniversary
A daughter who launched a fundraiser to try and save her father was ruthlessly mocked by trolls online. Chloe Moloney was trying to get her sick father Peter Jackson home after health complications on a cruise paused his 40th anniversary celebrations in April. He had fallen backwards and hit his head while re-embarking the ship in Darwin and suffered a bleed on the brain. The 63-year-old was rushed to the ship hospital before being transported to Royal Darwin Hospital where he underwent two emergency surgeries. Mr Jackson's family was told his only way of returning to Sydney, where he departed, was to fly there with a dedicated nurse which they could not afford. Ms Moloney appealed for help from strangers online to save up the $15,000 it would have cost to get her father home but instead she faced ridicule. Trolls grilled her parents for not purchasing travel insurance and said the fault for what had happened laid squarely in their hands. After clinging on for more than a month in Darwin Mr Jackson suffered another bleed which caused a cardiac arrest and he died on Friday. Ms Moloney said she was shocked by how inhumane people could be. 'Why are people so horrible? I've lost faith in all of humanity,' she said. 'I'll fight tooth and nail to get his story out there and how the system failed him.' Ms Moloney and her mother flew to Darwin to turn off Mr Jackson's life support after his latest episode. Now all that remains are the nasty comments on her fundraiser left by those who told her the situation could have been avoided. 'Stop your whining, it's their own fault for travelling without travel insurance' one person wrote. 'People with cancer have to pay for transfers so why wouldn't you,' a second said. 'Why should taxpayers have to pay to get your dad home,' a third added. Before his passing Mr Jackson spent two days unconscious following his initial accident before he woke up and was moved to a ward. During that time he was unable to be airlifted due to his delicate state but after he showed signs of improvement there was a window where he could have gone home. Ms Moloney said her father's speech had been impacted due to his injury and he needed to be transferred to a neuro rehab facility if he was released. The Royal Flying Doctor Service quoted $80,000 to fly him home and although Ms Moloney's parents had premium Ambulance cover, which included Air Ambulance, it did not extended to the type of transport her father needed. Additionally, the price to have a nurse accompany him on a commercial flight in a business class seat would have costed $15,000. 'Where is [my mother] supposed to get all this money from when she has already spent thousands on accommodation so far to stay with dad,' Ms Moloney told Ms Moloney said the whole experience had been a 'nightmare' and that her father was the 'most beautiful man'.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Renowned professor completes his 250th run months after being told he didn't have long to live
Terminal brain cancer sufferer Richard Scolyer has hit a fitness milestone that he feared he wouldn't live to acheive. Professor Scolyer, who co-directs the Melanoma Institute, was diagnosed with brain cancer in 2023 but experimental treatment initially kept the disease at bay. In March however, doctors told him an aggressive glioblastoma had returned meaning he had just months to live. Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive types of brain cancer and causes fast-growing tumors to develop in the brain or spinal cord. After hearing the news, Professor Scolyer vowed to make the most of what little time he had left and pledged to complete 250 park runs. He was surrounded by friends and family when he crossed his latest finish line in Haberfield in Sydney on Saturday. Professor Scolyer donned a special t-shirt to commemorate the occasion and was met with three balloons spelling out '250' at the finish line. Despite the rain Professor Scolyer told those who were out waiting for him that he was glad to make the most of the time he had left. Professor Scolyer became emotional when he began thanking everyone for their support. 'My heart's touched … one of the challenges of having cancer is the worry for the future but there is more to life,' he said. 'We are all going to end up at some period where we're going to finish our lives, I want to make the most of my time.' The former Australian of the Year said 'it was a beautiful day' after finishing the park run alongside his wife Katie Nicoll. Professor Scolyer's daughter Emily, 21, son Matt, 19, older brother Mark and his partner Anna waited at the finish line with cupcakes to celebrate. Ms Nicoll only started joining her husband on runs after he became sick but managed to run her personal best time for his 250th park run. A park run is a 5km timed run, open to walkers, joggers, and runners of all ages and abilities which is often hosted by local communities on weekends. The run was Haberfield's biggest as 590 runners showed up to support Professor Scolyer. Emily said 'time is not promised' which made her father's goal so much more special. His family said they were prioritising spending whatever time remained since doctors told them it might only be a matter of months before he dies. In March, the family were able to organise a trip to Tasmania to celebrate Professor Scolyer's father's 90th birthday. Looking towards the future, Professor Scolyer said he had signed up for the City2Surf on August 10. The family are optimistic that he will be able to run the event and Ms Nicoll said she had seen her husband sneaking out for occasional run in preparation.
