Women soldiers will have to pass ‘sex-neutral' physical test, US Army Says
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The new fitness test is very similar to the previous one. It consists of five events: dead lifts, push-ups, planks, a 2-mile run and a workout where soldiers sprint, then drag a weighted sled and carry kettlebells.
Advertisement
The new Army Fitness Test eliminates the standing power throw, an event sometimes called the ball yeet, which is widely disliked by service members; it requires soldiers to throw a 10-pound medicine ball backward over their heads. The biggest overall change will be in how the test is scored for 21 close combat occupations that are likely to be involved in heavy fighting in wartime: Women in those categories will be graded on the 'male' scale, which is likely to significantly reduce the number of them who meet the requirements.
Advertisement
For example, to pass the dead lift event, women ages 17 to 21 will need to lift at least 140 pounds, instead of the 120 required under the old standards. They will also have to run 2 miles in 22 minutes, instead of 23 minutes and 22 seconds.
After their introduction in June, active duty soldiers in the 21 combat specialties will be held to the new standards in January 2026, and National Guard and Reserve troops will need to meet them by June. The test for noncombat units, also called combat-enabling roles, will continue to be assessed based on sex and age, the Army said. If a currently enlisted close combat unit member cannot pass the new test, they would be required to change their military occupation, said Sgt. Maj. Christopher Mullinax.
The new test comes three weeks after Hegseth ordered the elimination of lower physical fitness standards for women in combat positions. In 2022, the Army had eased the standards for women and older members.
Hegseth, a former National Guard infantryman and Fox News host, has previously opposed the inclusion of women in some combat roles. In a recent book, he wrote that 'women cannot physically meet the same standards as men.'
'Dads push us to take risks,' he wrote. 'Moms put the training wheels on our bikes. We need moms. But not in the military, especially in combat units.'
He later backtracked, saying in December that 'if we have the right standard and women meet that standard, Roger, let's go.'
This article originally appeared in
Advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Cancer Risk at Air Force Missiles Sites Low 'But Not Zero,' Latest Service Data Shows
Airmen who watched over America's nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles in Cold War-era facilities faced marginally higher risk of cancer due to contaminants found there and more workplace oversight is needed, according to the latest findings of an Air Force health study. Air Force Global Strike Command, during a town hall event Wednesday, released the latest data showing the slightly elevated cancer risk as part of its ongoing probe into health concerns for America's missileers, maintainers and other support roles at several bases in the Midwest and Western U.S. The lifetime cancer risk for all Americans is around 39%, and the Air Force's Health Risk Assessment found rates of 39.9% to 40.13% for men and women if they would have served anywhere from eight to 70 years in those jobs. Service officials said consistent workplace inspections and monitoring would likely be necessary to address the risks, which are caused by the presence of chemicals and toxins. Read Next: Army Faces Backlash over Plan to Divert Barracks Funds to Border Mission Contaminants linked to cancer were found during a series of environmental studies at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, and Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. "In summary, this health risk assessment characterizes the health risk as low but not zero," Col. Ric Speakman, the commander of the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, said during the town hall presentation. "Therefore, the appropriate action is to include missile alert facility workers in an occupational surveillance." Air Force Global Strike Command is still in the process of an ongoing epidemiological study and is gathering more data from states as well as national cancer registries before more definitive cancer and health conclusions can be made. Last year, reported in an investigative series that past probes by the Air Force into cancer concerns roughly two decades ago went ignored, and past and current missileers and nuclear missile maintainers raised alarms about the environmental conditions, toxins and chemical dangers they faced while in uniform. They believe the conditions made them sick. In the wake of reporting, the service announced changes that included new workplace inspections and health record tracking, and the spouse of a missileer who died from non-Hodgkin lymphoma was able to secure Department of Veterans Affairs benefits related to his death. While polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, were one of the known outlawed carcinogenes that the Air Force's remediation efforts focused on, research shown during Wednesday's town hall showed there were other toxins detected as well that were factored into the service's health risk assessment. "Although only PCBs were detected at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency's standards for cleanup and remediation, the environmental sampling was sensitive enough to detect chemicals such as benzene and chloroform at levels well below standards for remediation," a Thursday news release from Air Force Global Strike Command following the town hall said. The Torchlight Initiative, a grassroots organization that began shortly after a Space Force officer and former Air Force missileer raised concerns about non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates at Malmstrom, released its own independent study in April examining the rates of blood cancer reported in its online health registry. That study found that service members were diagnosed at younger ages compared to the wider population. Air Force Global Strike Command officials briefly mentioned that study at the town hall, stating that, "while this study is separate from the missile community cancer study, it does add to the work advocacy and the well-being of the missile community." Representatives from the Torchlight Initiative were on Capitol Hill in early April alongside other advocacy groups, and made a plea to lawmakers in hopes of expanding the PACT Act -- a 2022 law that mostly covered veterans sickened by toxic exposure in war zones -- to cover those who experienced health issues stateside as well. "The Torchlight Initiative is happy to hear that Global Strike and U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine are still working on their long-term study and research," the organization said in a statement to on Thursday. "However, our focus and energy remains with the families who are disproportionately affected by these cancers and illnesses." The remaining data in the ongoing health study is slated to be released in late 2025. Gen. Thomas Bussiere, the head of Air Force Global Strike Command, said during the town hall he would advocate for a registry, if the VA also supported such a move, based on the study's findings. "The level of interest and oversight with the Department of the Air Force and Congress has not waned, and I'm very thankful and happy with the interest and actions on the part of the VA," Bussiere said in a news release after the town hall. "They've been great partners, and I anticipate they will continue to be great partners." Related: Independent Study Raises Alarm About Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma at Malmstrom Air Force Base
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength
How long can you hold a plank — and how does it stack up to others in your age group? That's the question that was posed on "Fox & Friends" Thursday morning, when co-hosts Brian Kilmeade and Lawrence Jones competed in a plank challenge. A plank is an isometric move where the person holds a push-up position for a set period of time. Army Unveils New Fitness Test With Tougher Standards — Could You Pass It? Both held a low plank for well over a minute, exceeding the thresholds for their ages, although Kilmeade held his for a few seconds longer. A fitness expert at Lifetime in New York City provided the below targets for how long you should be able to hold a plank by age. Read On The Fox News App 20s: 1 to 2 minutes 30s: 1 to 2 minutes 40s: 1 minute or longer 50s: 30 to 60 seconds 60s and above: 20 to 30 seconds Planks are often touted as an abdominal exercise, serving as an alternative to traditional sit-ups and crunches, which can strain the back and neck. However, the isometric move benefits the body in many other ways beyond just sculpting a six-pack. In addition to working the abdominals, planks also strengthen the muscles in the arms, legs, chest and back, according to Healthline. They can also help improve posture while sitting or standing and can boost flexibility by stretching the lower half of the body, the above source stated. While Kilmeade and Jones both held low planks, some may opt for a high plank, which is where the arms are straight and the person balances on the palms of the hands. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter For those who are still working up to holding a full plank, the move can be modified by dropping the knees to the floor. There are also variations of the plank that target different parts of the body. Those include side planks, knee touches (touching alternating knees to the ground), hip dips and leg/arm extensions. For more Health articles, visit If you've just started planking, experts recommend starting with 15 to 30 seconds and gradually increasing the duration, with two minutes generally regarded as a good article source: Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Navy offers early retirement to more sailors with gender dysphoria
The Navy is offering more sailors with gender dysphoria the opportunity to take early retirement, according to a notice from the service released this week. Under the new rule, sailors with as few as 15 years on active duty can now apply for early retirement. The cash and benefits of a formal military retirement package, which troops must usually serve 20 years to earn, are significantly more generous than those offered to those who separate earlier in their careers. Announced Wednesday in a NAVADMIN message, the 15-year rule matches similar policies in the Air Force and Army for troops facing separation under gender dysphoria rules. The offer is a change from the Navy's March guidance for separating sailors with gender dysphoria, in which the service said that active duty sailors with 18 to 20 years of service who volunteered for separation could be eligible for early retirement. The Wednesday message allows sailors with 15 to 18 years of service to request retirement under an exception to the early retirement policy. The Pentagon has said troops with gender dysphoria who voluntarily separate will be eligible for more separation pay than those who are eventually involuntarily separated. In mid-May, the Pentagon set a deadline of June 6 for service members on active duty and with gender dysphoria to self-identify for voluntary separation. The Navy's new early retirement guidance notes it would be in effect 'until superseded or canceled,' but it was unclear if it would extend past the Pentagon's June 6 deadline. Also unclear was if troops with 15 to 18 years who have already agreed to separate could now apply for the exemption. Virtually all service members are eligible to retire from the military after 20 years of active duty service or equivalent careers in the guard or reserve. However, the military has previously offered earlier retirements under a process called Temporary Early Retirement Authority, or TERA. For instance, from 1993 to 2001, troops with 15 to 20 years could apply for TERA. That temporary policy ended in September 2002. In previous versions of TERA, service members granted early retirement received full retirement packages, including healthcare benefits, but collected a lower monthly retirement pay. The new Navy guidance appears to match the approach taken by both the Army and Air Force. A May 23 Air Force memo lays out guidance on voluntary separation, which allows airmen with 18 to 20 years of service to request early retirement and also notes an exception process for those with 15 to 18 years of service. An Army spokesperson told Task & Purpose that Inquiries sent to the Marine Corps and Army about early retirement policies were not immediately returned. The Pentagon estimates that there are more than 4,200 service members with gender dysphoria. Around 1,000 have self-identified, a defense department official told reporters May 15. Troops who do not leave voluntarily, officials have said, could be involuntarily separated from their military branch through information on their annual health assessment that identifies a previous or current diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Officials have also said commanders will be able to use their 'discernment and judgment in how to interpret and apply the guidance.' The Pentagon has said that troops who agree to voluntary separation, and who are not eligible to retire, will be eligible for twice the amount of separation pay as those who are involuntarily separated. For example, an E-5 with 10 years of service who is forced to separate would get a payment of just under $51,000 compared to $101,000 for voluntarily separating. An O-3 with seven years of service would receive a one-time payment of close to $62,000 if involuntarily removed from the military, versus roughly $125,000 if they leave voluntarily. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has trumpeted the policy as a ban and removal of trans service members throughout the military services. 'Trans is out at the DOD,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said in a public message on X. The Pentagon's guidance centers around troops with gender dysphoria, a medical diagnosis developed by the American Psychiatric Association. Not all transgender people exhibit or have diagnoses of gender dysphoria, according to the APA. Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often
