logo
What does President Trump's travel ban mean for global sporting events?

What does President Trump's travel ban mean for global sporting events?

New York Times18 hours ago

The Concacaf Gold Cup begins next week. The Little League World Series kicks off in August, and then there's the New York Marathon in November. Then, of course, come the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics, with dozens of international sporting events big and small in between. All are taking place in the United States, which just instituted a travel ban on 12 countries and visa restrictions on another seven, following President Donald Trump's order issued Wednesday.
Advertisement
The banned countries include Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The restricted countries include Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The order bars all travelers from banned countries and suspends certain visas for travelers from restricted countries.
Trump's order does include specific exemptions for the World Cup and Olympics, along with any 'other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State.' The exemption allows athletes, coaches, 'immediate relatives,' and anyone 'performing a necessary support role' from banned or restricted countries to travel to the U.S.
The exemptions have some sports leaders hopeful that the effects of the ban on international events will be minimal. But this week's order adds uncertainty to massive competitions planned years in advance, to the athletes and their families planning on traveling and to local economies hosting them.
'I would say that this turned out, from a sports perspective, about as well as it could,' said Travis Murphy, who has worked as a U.S. diplomat and with the NBA in international governmental affairs.
Questions remain, however, around what constitutes a 'major sporting event,' and who is included in 'immediate relatives.'
A spokesperson for the New York Road Runners, which hosts the New York Marathon, a large event not explicitly named in the order, said the group isn't seeing any impact currently. But cities across the country host a variety of international events for sports, large and small, from the youth and amateur level up to the Olympics. Those organizers will have to work with the State Department to make sure there are no issues.
'I think there's going to be some confusion, exactly what is included and what isn't included, because of the way this was rolled out,' Murphy said. 'The answers are kind of, they're, they're coming together in real time. What is the threshold in which an event is a major sporting event versus not?'
Some of those questions have come up immediately, with the U.S. and Canada hosting the Concacaf Gold Cup beginning next week. The tournament features Haiti, a banned country. A White House spokesperson told The Athletic that the Gold Cup and Club World Cup are considered 'major events.'
'Every national governing body of Olympic sports, for example, has an international federation that governs that sport. And all those sports have world championships somewhere, age group championships, under-18 championships,' said Jason Gewirtz, the publisher of SportsTravel Magazine, an industry publication for the sports event and travel industry. 'You name a sport, they're going somewhere. A lot of those events are coming or planning to come to the United States.'
Advertisement
Trump similarly instituted four versions of a travel ban during his first term, which were challenged in the courts throughout his administration. Trump has cited security concerns as his reasoning behind the bans, while some critics have called it discrimination based on ethnicity.
The new ban exempts people with visas already in the U.S. and those on visas for professional athletes. That's a positive sign for sports like Major League Baseball, which has athletes from several countries outside the U.S., including those subject to the visa restrictions like Cuba and Venezuela.
'The good news is that our efforts to publicize the impact on MLB of the rumored prior travel ban appear to have been heard by the Administration,' wrote immigration lawyer Amy Maldonado on LinkedIn.
To what extent families will be able to travel with affected athletes remains an open question. As for fans, concerns remain about how Trump's travel restrictions might affect tourism for major sporting events, not just from banned countries but from other fans reconsidering travel to the U.S. As of April 30, flight bookings from Canada have dropped sharply compared to last year, while flight bookings from other countries have held up. But tourism groups, hotel companies and airlines are warning about potential declines in international travel in the future.
State Department principal deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott addressed concerns about the effects of the ban on the World Cup at a news conference on Thursday.
'We're in constant communication with countries about ways that we can see the vetting process we need to see, to have that collaboration and make sure that we're having those security concerns addressed,' Pigott said. 'This is part of what it means to host an event.'
Murphy said he thinks the ban will not affect the sports industry as much as other parts of the economy. Gewirtz said host cities and event organizers, particularly for smaller competitions, are likely concerned about the potential effects of the ban, but also that the sports travel industry has proved resilient.
Advertisement
'No industry is completely immune from these things,' he said. 'But sports is a very big driver of travel and, in the past, it has tended to transcend politics.'
Meanwhile, exemptions for professional athletes and events under the travel ban do not include international student-athletes coming to the U.S. to compete at the college level. Those athletes are currently left in limbo, while the Trump administration has paused student visa interviews in order to expand scrutiny of social media accounts belonging to applicants. That order came down from Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week and has not yet been lifted.
The Trump administration is also trying to block all international students from attending Harvard, a move that is currently being litigated in the courts.
'Right now it's June, kids are getting ready to come to the States,' Murphy said. 'That's a far larger challenge, I think, for the sports-specific space… Many of them went home for the summer, thought that they were going to go home and then get their visa and come back. And now they're kind of stuck in a bit of limbo waiting to see how this unfolds, and that remains to be seen.'
Murphy sees that uncertainty as part of a larger moment, where sports are becoming increasingly globalized at a time when countries are restricting their borders. Just look at the NFL, which recently announced a whole slate of international games this year, including one in São Paulo. Just last month, Brazil reintroduced visa requirements for U.S. citizens.
'It forces leagues and entities to look at these things differently,' Murphy said. 'There's just a certain amount that I think was taken for granted about people moving around the world back and forth. I think these issues are only going to become more complicated.'
Then there's the U.S.'s efforts to bid for future international events; after the 2026 World Cup, the U.S. will co-host the 2031 FIFA Women's World Cup with Mexico.
'There's two trains kind of coming toward each other here,' Murphy said. 'One is the reality is a modern immigration policy, and in particular this administration, and the other is this desire, or the realities of these events coming to our shores,' Murphy said.
(Photo)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sovereignty vs. Journalism in the Belmont gives horse racing a Kentucky Derby rematch
Sovereignty vs. Journalism in the Belmont gives horse racing a Kentucky Derby rematch

Associated Press

time14 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Sovereignty vs. Journalism in the Belmont gives horse racing a Kentucky Derby rematch

Horse racing is getting a Kentucky Derby rematch in the Belmont Stakes at Saratoga Race Course on Saturday to close out the Triple Crown. Derby winner Sovereignty and runner-up Journalism, who won the Preakness two weeks later, headline the field of eight in the Belmont. Add in Baeza, and the top three finishers from the first Saturday in May are involved. 'We're delighted to have the first three horses out of the Derby challenging each other again,' said Michael Banahan of Godolphin, which owns Sovereignty. 'It's a quality race. ... It should set up well, and may the best horse win.' Journalism opened as the 8-5 morning line favorite with Sovereignty the second choice at 4-1. Journalism won the Preakness run without Sovereignty after owners and trainer Bill Mott opted to give their horse extra rest. The intent was to focus on the Belmont rather than chase the chance for Sovereignty to become the sport's 14th Triple Crown champion and first since Justify in 2018. 'We felt that the best thing for him and to have a career through the whole season, and maybe into next year as well, was spacing his races a little bit,' Banahan said. 'Bill Mott, who's trained horses for us for a long time, is very judicious about where he wants to place his horses. And we put a lot of faith in the recommendations that he would give us.' Michael McCarthy-trained Journalism is the only horse running in all three legs of the Triple Crown this year. And he is the favorite for a reason. 'Journalism is a very tough horse,' said John Shirreffs, who trains Baeza. 'One thing about Journalism, (if) he runs his race (like in) Kentucky, Pimlico, he's very tough. He's solid. So, it's going to be a very difficult horse to beat.' Shirrefs said Baeza is emerging and developing, hoping the half-brother of last year's Belmont winner, Dornoch, can stride along and get past Sovereignty and Journalism this time. 'Hopefully we get out of the gate well and get a nice pace,' Shirrefs said. 'It's just the how the race unfolds and him not getting into any trouble.' Long shot Heart of Honor is running again after finishing fifth in the Preakness three weeks ago. New to the Triple Crown trail are Hill Road, Uncaged, Crudo and Rodriguez, who was scratched from the Derby with a minor foot bruise that also caused him to miss the Preakness. Banahan expects Rodriguez to go to the lead, as so many of Hall of Fame and two-time Triple Crown-winning trainer Bob Baffert's top horses do, and provide the main speed. 'That horse is going to be ready,' Chad Brown, trainer of Hill Road, said of Rodriguez. 'You can be assured of that. And it sure looks like he's by far the fastest horse in the race.' Brown has won the Preakness twice but never the Belmont. After going to Saratoga with his parents while growing up and getting into horse racing as a result, he's hoping to end his drought at his home track. 'We have a very unique time in history where there'll be three Belmont Stakes run total at Saratoga before you'll never see another one again,' Brown said. 'So, to be part of history with that, that would be extra special.' ___ AP horse racing:

GOP lawmakers stick with Trump in messy Musk breakup
GOP lawmakers stick with Trump in messy Musk breakup

Politico

time15 minutes ago

  • Politico

GOP lawmakers stick with Trump in messy Musk breakup

Amid the messy ongoing divorce between the president and the world's richest man, this much is already clear: Donald Trump has sole custody of the House GOP. Republican lawmakers are making clear that, if forced to choose, it's Trump — not Elon Musk — they're sticking by as leaders race to contain the fallout for their 'one big, beautiful bill.' Even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who helms a House panel inspired by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative, blasted Musk's public attacks on Trump as 'unwarranted' and criticized his 'lashing out on the internet.' 'America voted for Donald Trump on Nov. 4, 2024 — every single vote mattered just as much as the other,' Greene said in a brief interview. 'And whether it was $1 that was donated or hundreds of millions of dollars, the way I see it, everybody's the same.' Like many Americans, GOP members watched Thursday's online exchange with a sense of car-crash-like fascination. Many shared that they hoped Musk and Trump could somehow patch things up. But many — including some of the former DOGE chief's biggest backers on Capitol Hill — were wholly unsurprised to see the billionaire suddenly cut down to size after months of chatter about who was really calling the shots at the White House. 'It's President Trump, not President Musk,' said one lawmaker granted anonymity to speak frankly about prevailing opinions inside the House GOP. Speaker Mike Johnson made no secret of where he stands on the public breakup. He told reporters Friday that he hoped the two men 'reconcile' and that it would be 'good for the party and the country if all this worked out.' But in the nearly same breath, Johnson quickly reaffirmed his allegiance to the president and issued a warning to Musk. 'Do not doubt, do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. 'He is the leader of the party. He is the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era. And he's doing an excellent job for the people.' Other House Republicans concurred with the speaker's assessment Friday, even as they faced the looming threat of Musk targeting them in the upcoming midterms or at least pulling back on his political giving after pouring more than $250 million into the 2024 election on behalf of Trump and the GOP ticket. 'I think it's unfortunate,' said Rep. Tim Moore (R-N.C.) of the breakup. 'But Donald Trump was elected by a majority of the American people.' Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio, who was one of only two Republicans to oppose Trump's megabill in the House last month, also made clear he stood with the president over Musk. 'He does not have a flight mode — he's fight, fight, fight … and he's been pretty measured,' Davidson said of Trump. 'I think Elon Musk looked a little out of control. And hopefully he gets back and grounded.' GOP leaders who have spent weeks cajoling their members to vote for the sprawling domestic-policy bill hardly hid their feelings as Musk continued to bash the legislation online, even calling on Americans to call their representatives in an effort to tank it. 'Frankly, it's united Republicans even more to go and defend the great things that are in this bill — and once it's passed and signed into law by August, September, you're going to see this economy turning around like nothing we've ever seen,' Majority Leader Steve Scalise said in a brief interview Friday. 'I'll be waiting for all those people who said the opposite to admit that they were wrong,' Scalise added. 'But I'm not expecting that to happen.' A few Republicans are still trying to walk a fine line by embracing both Trump and Musk — especially some fiscal hawks who believe Musk is right about the megabill adding trillions to the national debt. 'I think Elon has some valid points about the bill, concerns that myself and a handful of others were working to address up until the passage of it,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said in an interview. 'I think that'll make the bill stronger. I think it'll help our standing with the American people.' Both Trump and Musk 'have paid a tremendous price personally for this country,' Cloud added. 'And them working together is certainly far better for the country.' Notably, House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, a key Musk ally on the Hill, declined to engage Thursday when asked about the burgeoning feud. Instead, the Ohio Republican responded by praising the megabill Musk had moved to tank. Democrats, for their part, watched the unfolding and public breakup with surprise and a heavy dose of schadenfreude. 'There are no good guys in a fight like this,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.). 'You just eat some popcorn and watch the show.'

Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits
Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits

The conservative House Freedom Caucus said on Friday that it would 'not accept' changes that 'water down' its cuts to green energy tax credits as the Senate weighs whether to alter the legislation. The House version of the 'big, beautiful bill' would make drastic changes to tax cuts for low-carbon energy sources passed in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Climate-friendly energy projects, including wind and solar, would only be able to qualify for the credits under the House bill if they begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment. This brief window would likely make many projects ineligible for the credits, and is expected to significantly hamstring the development of new renewable power. In a post on social media on Friday, the Freedom Caucus warned the Senate against loosening that restriction or others included in the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: if the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' said the post, which was attributed to the Freedom Caucus's board. 'The House Freedom Caucus Board will stand united holding the line. The American people didn't send us here to cave to the swamp — they sent us here to change it,' they added. The Senate has been widely expected to consider changes that could slow the rapid elimination of the tax credit passed under the House version of Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and John Curtis (Utah) released a letter warning against a 'full scale' repeal of the tax credits. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections and pass their bill. On Friday, a group of 13 House GOP moderates released a letter calling on Senate leadership 'to substantively and strategically improve clean energy tax credit provisions' in the legislation. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,' said the letter, which was led by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). Altogether, the letters illustrate what could be a tough task ahead of the Republican leadership as they look to find a measure that will keep at least 50 senators on board and appease the House. Emily Brooks contributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store