
Police officers who pepper-sprayed and Tasered amputee, 92, cleared of assault
Pc Stephen Smith, 51, and Pc Rachel Comotto, 36, were accused of using excessive force on Donald Burgess during a confrontation at Park Beck care home in St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, in June 2022.
Jurors returned their unanimous verdicts on both Sussex Police officers at Southwark Crown Court after around two hours of deliberations on Wednesday.
Sussex Police officers Pc Stephen Smith (left) and Pc Rachel Comotto (right) leave Westminster Magistrates' Court, London (Yui Mok/PA)
They found Smith not guilty of two counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for his use of Pava spray and for using a baton, whilst Comotto was found not guilty of one count for deploying her Taser.
The care home had called 999 after Mr Burgess, a single-leg amputee and wheelchair user, reportedly grabbed a knife he was given to cut his food and threatened to stab staff.
The court previously heard this was 'out of character' for Mr Burgess, whose movements with the knife were described by deputy care home manager Donna Gardner as 'extremely quick'.
'The reason for his behaviour that day, we now know, is that he was delirious as a result of a urinary tract infection,' judge Christopher Hehir told jurors.
Smith sprayed synthetic Pava pepper spray into Mr Burgess's face and used his baton to try and knock the knife out of Mr Burgess's hand, with Comotto deploying her Taser, all within a minute and 23 seconds of entering the wheelchair-bound pensioner's room.
Mr Burgess was taken to hospital after the incident and later contracted Covid.
He died 22 days later aged 93.
Care home manager Steve Cooper previously told jurors Burgess had been threatening staff for more than 30 minutes with a serrated knife before they decided to call 999.
'He was very aggressive and threatening to hurt my members of staff,' he told the court.
'We tried to use different de-escalation techniques. He wasn't responding to anything we said.
Sussex Police officer Pc Rachel Comotto at Southwark Crown Court in London (Lucy North/PA)
'He had a look in his eyes I've never seen before – he wasn't the Donald I knew.'
He said Mr Burgess jabbed the knife towards him and told him: 'I'm going to murder you, and I'll enjoy it.'
The court heard both Smith and Comotto repeatedly asked Mr Burgess to drop the knife, with Smith warning him: 'Put the knife down mate, or you will be sprayed or tasered. That's up to you.'
Footage from body-worn cameras played to the jury during the trial showed Smith then discharging the spray directly into Mr Burgess's face.
Mr Burgess then raised the knife a couple of times as Smith uses his baton to try and get the knife out of his hand.
When this failed, Comotto deployed her Taser.
Pc Smith previously told jurors he did not see that Mr Burgess was disabled and using a wheelchair until after the incident as he was focused on the knife the pensioner was holding in his hand.
He added he believed Mr Burgess 'could clearly understand what we were saying to him' as Mr Burgess reportedly asked 'Are there many more of them coming?' – suggesting he was aware Smith and Comotto were police officers.
During his evidence, Pc Smith also denied hitting Mr Burgess with a baton, claiming he instead flicked the baton towards the pensioner's wrist to 'knock the knife out' of his hand.
Smith said: 'The way he had been threatening staff members – the threat was the knife, to the staff there and also to himself.
'I just wanted the knife out of the gent's hand.'
During her evidence, Pc Comotto said she believed using the Taser was the safest way to 'protect' Mr Burgess as she feared her colleague using the baton again would cause more harm.
She added she knew from her training the risk of injury to Mr Burgess was higher with a baton than with a Taser.
She said: 'It was proportionate because other tactics had failed. If I didn't act, something worse could happen.'
'I'm not a trigger-happy officer,' she added. 'It's the first time I've fired my Taser.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Costly inquiries are all very well if we learn lessons from them
Lord Hardie's inquiry into the long and costly tram project cost £13 million Lord Hardie, the retired judge who chaired the nine-year long inquiry into Edinburgh's trams, admitted to MSPs last week that he was upset when he found out that the public were told about his £1 million pay cheque for his work on the investigation. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... He thought the revelation might lead to journalists 'pestering' him at home. As it turned out no-one, not even the most enthusiastic tabloid hack, knocked on his front door, so he was free to enjoy his post-retirement bonus with his family, unmolested by the press. As for the general public, well they had more things on their plate to worry about than Lord Hardie's bank balance – the cost of living crisis for a start. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Even more staggering than Lord Hardie's daily rate – set by the Scottish Government, which apparently has a fee schedule for retired judges – was the total cost of the inquiry itself. It cost tax payers £13 million, which works out about £1.5 million a year to produce a report that told us what we all knew any way. The 961-page report can be summed up in three points: the city council's original budget was way off track; the management of Tie – the arms-length company set up to deliver the tram system – was chaotic; and the Scottish Government ducked its responsibility for oversight of the project, despite giving it a £500 million grant. None of which came as surprise to any of us who had been subjected on a daily basis to the 'living hell' that was Edinburgh city centre during the construction of the (shortened) tram route. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So why did it take nine years and £13 million to come to the same conclusion the average Edinburgh citizen had reached only months after the work started? Lord Hardie's evidence was to Holyrood's finance and public administration committee, which recently established its own inquiry into the cost of public inquiries. Kenneth Gibson, the committee's convenor, hit the nail on the head when he said his inquiry had 'the potential to be a really interesting piece of work given the significant sums of money that public inquiries often involve.' There are four public inquiries ongoing in Scotland right now, looking at the Covid crisis, hospital safety, child abuse and the death of Sheku Bayoh. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So far the costs of these are estimated at a staggering £200 million. This is money the country can ill-afford to spend. How many social care staff would one public inquiry buy? Of course, public inquiries are important for finding out why bureaucrats bungled major capital projects such as the parliament building and Edinburgh's tram network, or what mistakes politicians made during a health crisis such as Covid. But they are not worth the reams of paper they are written on if no-one learns any lessons from them. Nor should any public inquiry take nine years. What on earth did Lord Hardie and his team find to ask questions about over a seven-year period? And why did it take two years to write the report? That works out at just over a page a day – which deserves a separate inquiry of its own.


Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Full cost of failed pandemic- PPE finally revealed after major fraud probe
The Covid counter-fraud commissioner uncovered the £1.4billion figure in the first phase of his investigation into wasteful Tory spending during the Covid-19 pandemic Failed pandemic-era PPE contracts cost the British taxpayer £1.4billion. The Covid counter-fraud commissioner uncovered the figure in the first phase of his probe into wasteful Tory spending during the pandemic. Some £762million is unlikely to ever be recovered, as the Sunday Mirror revealed. These failures saw substandard PPE, including gowns, masks and visors, not inspected for two years, meaning public money could no longer be recouped. Most of the wasted money went on surgical gowns, with more than half (52%) of them being non-compliant. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is now urgently trying to claw back £468million that could still be recovered, which she wants to reinvest in public services and local communities. The next phase of Tom Hayhoe's investigation will look into fraud and error in other pandemic spending programmes such as furlough, bounce-back loans, Business Support Grants and Rishi Sunak 's Eat Out to Help Out scheme. Mr Hayhoe's final report is due to conclude in December. Recovery action has so far resulted in £182million being returned to the public purse, with some PPE suppliers having been referred to the National Crime Agency for suspected fraud. Ms Reeves said: 'The country is still paying the price for the reckless handling of Covid contracts which saw taxpayer pounds wasted and criminals profit from the pandemic. This investigation and plan to recover public money underlines our commitment to ensure that every penny spent during the pandemic is fully accounted for.' The Chancellor confirmed her Covid fraud crackdown at Labour 's annual conference last September. At the time, she said: 'I won't turn a blind eye to rip-off artists and fraudsters. 'I won't turn a blind eye to those who used a national emergency to line their own pockets. I won't let them get away with it. That money belongs in our police, it belongs in our health service, and it belongs in our schools.' In December, she tasked Mr Hayhoe with the job of trying to claw back lost money. The Tory Government has always insisted that it was operating in a crisis, with global PPE shortages driving up prices for kit that was essential for frontline workers. Former Health Secretary Matt Hancock told the Covid Inquiry in March: "I have been subject to enormous amounts of conspiracy theories about what went on here, when in fact what happened was so many people working as hard as they could to save lives, and they bought more PPE as a result. And therefore people are alive who would otherwise be dead."


BBC News
13 hours ago
- BBC News
Sussex Police in identity appeal after Burgess Hill assault
Police have released an image of two people they would like to speak to after a man was assaulted outside a West Sussex Police said a 47-year-old man suffered significant injuries in the attack at about 16:30 BST on 17 April, outside the Block and Gasket pub in Church Road, Burgess force released a CCTV image of two males officers would like to speak to as part of their who recognises them or can help with the investigation is asked to contact police.