Macron's speech was ‘clumsy' imitation of Churchill
French President Emmanuel Macron's recent address in which he accused Russia of posing a threat to Europe was a poor imitation of Winston Churchill's iconic 1946 'Iron Curtain' speech, senior Russian diplomat Mikhail Ulyanov has said.
On Wednesday, Macron called for a substantial increase in EU defense spending and other initiatives to counter what he described as a persistent threat from Russia.
Ulyanov, Moscow's representative at international organizations based in Vienna, likened Macron's rhetoric to a 'clumsy replica' of Churchill's seminal speech delivered in Fulton, Missouri, widely regarded as a turning point in the Cold War.
'The European support group for Ukraine is making a somewhat sad impression right now, isn't it?' Ulyanov wrote in a post on X on Friday.
The EU this week announced plans to spend some $840 billion on rearmament of member states, which Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has touted as a way to beat Russia in an arms race. Additionally, Brussels has vowed to sustain military support for Ukraine, even as US President Donald Trump's administration seeks a swift resolution to Kiev's conflict with Russia.
Moscow interprets Macron's address as a commitment to prolonged animosity towards Russia, according to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who described the remarks as 'extremely confrontational' and misrepresenting the causes of the ongoing tensions between Russia and the West. Moscow has called the expansion of NATO in Europe since the 1990s a serious national security risk.
While Russian President Vladimir Putin did not directly respond to Macron's speech, he alluded to Napoleon's failed invasion of Russia on Thursday, remarking that 'some people still can't get over it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ex-Navalny aide gets 18-year prison sentence
A Russian court has sentenced a close associate of the late opposition figure Alexey Navalny to 18 years behind bars in absentia. Leonid Volkov was charged with creating an extremist group, rehabilitating Nazism, and funding extremist activities. Volkov joined Navalny in 2013 and fled to the EU in 2019. Two years later, Russia put him on the international wanted list on charges of illegally enticing minors to participate in unauthorized protests. In a statement announcing the sentence, the court also fined Volkov 2 million rubles ($25,000) and banned him from administering any websites for six years. The list of charges includes two counts of 'politically-motivated vandalism' and spreading disinformation about the Russian Armed Forces. Volkov mocked the court's decision in a post on X. He wrote that although the sentence itself was 'harsh,' the fine was miniscule, adding that he was 'not even barred from using the internet' and vowed to make good use of it. He became the head of Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) in July 2021, a month after it was designated an extremist group in Russia. In 2022, Volkov was designated a 'foreign agent' and added to Russia's terrorism and extremism watchlist together with Ivan Zhdanov, another Navalny associate, who also resides outside the country. The foreign agent status is reserved for those found to be assisting foreign organizations deemed hostile to Russia's interests, as well as for financing such activity. Navalny died at a penal colony in February 2024 while serving his sentence. He was initially imprisoned in 2021 for violating the terms of an earlier suspended sentence. In 2023, he was given an additional 19 years on multiple extremism-related charges. The Russian authorities have since issued arrest warrants against his close associates, including his widow, on various extremism-related charges. All of them reside outside Russia.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine membership out of NATO summit statement
The prospect of Ukraine joining NATO will not be mentioned in the declaration at the bloc's summit later this month, Bloomberg has reported. Kiev has long sought to become a member of the US-led organization, an aim that Russia views as a threat to its national security. The one-page draft statement, which was seen by the outlet, focuses solely on NATO's spending goals, Bloomberg reported on Monday. The document could still be subject to change. The summit in The Hague will reportedly include only a dinner with the king of the Netherlands and a single working session. The 'brevity' of both the declaration and the gathering is reportedly designed to minimize potential public disagreements between US President Donald Trump and other NATO leaders. 'Notably absent from the statement is the prospect of Ukraine joining the military alliance,' Bloomberg wrote. Last year's military assistance pledge worth $45 billion will not be renewed either, the report added. In July 2024, then-Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg urged the bloc's members to make a multi-year commitment to keep providing military aid for Kiev. Annual spending across the bloc should have amounted to €40 billion ($45 billion) each year under that scheme. This year, NATO members are only expected to commit to allocating at least 3.5% of their GDP to defense by 2032 and to spend an additional 1.5% on protecting infrastructure and ensuring civil preparedness. The bloc is considering allowing its members to count military assistance to Kiev toward the spending goals, according to Bloomberg. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte wants the summit to become a 'win' for Trump, who has repeatedly called on the bloc's members to spend at least 5% of their GDP on defense, Bloomberg reported, citing its sources. Earlier this month, AFP reported that NATO leaders would avoid discussing Ukraine's membership at the upcoming summit in a bid to alleviate tensions between the US and EU. The US president, who is seeking to facilitate a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, has ruled out the possibility of Kiev joining NATO. Russia views the military bloc's eastward expansion as a threat, and has cited it as one of the root causes of the Ukraine conflict. Russian officials have on numerous occasions stated that admitting Ukraine into the bloc would be crossing a red line and has insisted that the country remain neutral.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU push to target Russian oil exports will have consequences
The European Commission's push to lower the price cap on Russian oil exports risks fueling instability in the global energy markets, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has warned. His remarks came in response to reports that Brussels is reviewing the current price cap established under EU sanctions. 'Such actions undoubtedly do not contribute to the stabilization of international energy and oil markets,' Peskov said on Wednesday. The European Commission proposed its 18th round of sanctions on Russia on Tuesday, targeting energy exports, infrastructure, and financial networks. The measures include cutting the oil price cap from $60 to $45 per barrel, banning the future use of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, restricting imports of refined fuels made from Russian crude, and blacklisting 77 vessels that the EU claims are used to evade existing sanctions. The new package, which aims to pressure Moscow over the Ukraine conflict, requires the support of all 27 EU member states to take effect. Peskov said the Kremlin is closely monitoring the EU's actions, adding that Russia will respond in a way that best protects its interests if the bloc changes the price cap. He added that Russia has long operated under the 'illegal' sanctions and has gained 'very useful experience' in how to minimize any 'negative consequences.' In December 2022, the EU, along with the G7 and Australia, introduced a $60 per barrel price cap on Russian seaborne crude oil, barring Western shipping and insurance companies from handling cargoes sold above the cap. The measure was part of broader efforts aimed at reducing Russian export revenues amid the Ukraine conflict. Russia has rejected the Western oil price cap, saying the measure distorts market mechanisms and threatens investment in the global energy sector, while warning that it will halt supplies to any country that backs the cap. The global oil market remains sensitive to developments regarding the enforcement of the oil price cap. According to market players, previous attempts to enforce it have faced resistance from shipping and insurance companies. Analysts have pointed out that since its introduction, the cap has been almost completely ignored, as almost no seaborne crude cargoes have been traded below the $60-per-barrel limit.
