logo
A Utah mom is charged in her husband's death. Did she poison him with a cocktail?

A Utah mom is charged in her husband's death. Did she poison him with a cocktail?

Wakala News02-03-2025

On March 4, 2022, Kouri Richins says she found her husband, Eric Richins, unresponsive in their bed. First responders tried to save him, but it was too late for the father of three. Weeks later, police said Richins' death was caused by an overdose of fentanyl. The grieving widow from Utah was arrested and charged with murder shortly after she wrote a children's book to help their kids cope with grief.
In her first primetime interview, Kouri Richins' mother, Lisa Darden, tells '48 Hours' contributor and 'The Talk' co-host Natalie Morales that hours before Eric Richins was found unresponsive, the couple was celebrating a new house-flipping deal Kouri was working on. Kouri Richins told investigators she had made her husband a Moscow mule that night. But something didn't sit right when the medical examiner ruled Eric Richins died from a lethal dose of fentanyl,according to his family's spokesman, Greg Skordas.
'He wasn't an opioid user … This doesn't smell right,' says Skordas.
Kouri Richins was later arrested and charged with murder. Prosecutors allege she gave Eric Richins a lethal dose of fentanyl on the night of his death. Eric's family suspects she placed the fentanyl in that Moscow mule.
'He told his family, 'If I die, you need to take a look at her because I think she's trying to kill me,'' Skordas tells Morales.
Kouri Richins maintains she's innocent. Her attorney, Skye Lazaro, says prosecutors, 'have to prove that she obtained drugs and gave them to her husband … And unless they can connect those dots, they're gonna have a hard time proving murder in this case.'
A UTAH COUPLE'S CELEBRATION ENDS IN TRAGEDY
In the early morning hours of March 4, 2022, Lisa Darden was attempting to console her daughter, 31-year-old Kouri Richins.
Lisa Darden: She was spread out on the floor … just sobbing.
Kouri had just learned from emergency personnel that her husband Eric was dead.
Lisa Darden: She was tore up.
Her brothers Ronney and DJ were also there.
Ronney Darden: She is a complete wreck.
DJ: I just started crying.
According to Lisa, that night Kouri had poured Eric a drink to celebrate a new opportunity at her real estate business — the purchase of a mansion.
Lisa Darden: She told me she made him a Moscow mule.
That's a drink made with vodka and ginger beer.
Lisa Darden: She said they went to bed about 9, 9:15, she went and laid with Ash. … Ashton, the 9-year-old has always had major nightmares. … And when she went back to get in her bed, he was cold. … she went to push on him, and he didn't respond.
It was after 3 a.m., and Lisa says Kouri immediately called 911 and at the dispatcher's instructions, performed CPR. When first responders arrived they started working on Eric – but it was too late.
Ronney Darden: It's just unbelievable. You're — you're in shock that something like that, you know, could happen.
It was those first responders who initially suspected Eric had died of an aneurism. The father of three young sons was just 39.
Natalie Morales: How were the boys? Did the boys know what was happening?
Lisa Darden: They knew something was happening and … they could see the ambulances and cops coming in, very distraught.
Ronney Darden: They all just sat there … on the couch and just cried together.
The sad scene was a far cry from the happy family they once were.
Kouri and Eric met in 2009 at a local Home Depot. Back then Kouri was a cashier. Eric worked in construction and was a frequent customer.
Ronney Darden: I heard that he wanted her number for a long time, is kind of afraid to go get it. So, he had to — have a friend run in and go get it from her.
Eric asked her out, and they hit it off.
Natalie Morales: When Kouri said I'm dating this guy, what did you think?
DJ: Uh, Kouri was terrified of me meeting him.
Natalie Morales: Oh, really?
DJ: Yeah.
Natalie Morales: Why?
DJ: Because I'm the big brother and —
Natalie Morales: Tough.
DJ: Yeah. Yeah.
But DJ and Ronney say Eric fit right in.
Ronney Darden: I thought he was a great guy.
In 2013, Kouri and Eric got married and had the boys – first Carter, then Ashton, and finally, Weston. Lisa says fatherhood came easily to Eric.
Lisa Darden: (He) taught those boys so much … They idolized their father, and he idolized the boys as well.
Kouri's family got to know the Richins, including Eric's two sisters Katie and Amy.
Ronney Darden: They'd come up, uh, for birthdays here and there. … We're all very friendly.
Eventually Eric started a stone masonry business and Kouri started her own real estate company – buying houses, fixing them up, and selling them for profit. Greg Hall was her marketing director and good friend.
Greg Hall: Kouri had something that a lot of people don't. A lot of times you find an individual that is intelligent, but no common sense or common sense and no intelligence. She had both. … She was a brilliant young lady.
Natalie Morales: How many houses would she have on average that she was working on or trying to flip
Lisa Darden: At one time?
Natalie Morales: Yeah.
Lisa Darden: I would say on average three.
Lisa Darden: Yes.
Natalie Morales: — of buying a home, fixing it up, selling it?
Lisa Darden: Yes.
And Eric's business continued to flourish.
Lisa Darden: They both lived very well, and they both bought and spent what they wanted.
In their spare time, Eric loved to hunt, and together they traveled the world.
Natalie Morales: It sounds like on the surface, Eric and Kouri seem to have it all. Would you say that was so Lisa?
Lisa Darden: I would say that, yes.
Greg Skordas: I don't know that I can even begin to overstate how close this family was … this was a huge loss
Greg Skordas is the spokesman for Eric's family.
Greg Skordas: He was this beautiful son and — and brother … And to have that taken away from you, I — I can't imagine much worse than that.
Not long after Eric's funeral, an autopsy revealed the cause of his death. It wasn't an aneurism — it was a lethal dose of fentanyl.
Greg Skordas: Fentanyl is many, many times more potent than oxys, and the other pain medications that we typically use. It's a very dangerous drug.
But how did fentanyl get into Eric's system? Kouri's family believes his recreational drug use could be to blame. Nearly every day, they say, Eric would take a gummy with THC – the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana.
Ronney Darden: It was always just — just to relax at the end of the day.
And according to Ronney, Eric did not always get the gummies from reputable sources.
Ronney Darden: Just about every trip that I had been on with him, he'd buy just from someone off the street.
Lisa says Eric also sometimes took pain pills.
Lisa Darden: Hey, do you have any pain pills? Hey, can you call and get — or hook me up?
Greg Skordas: He certainly wasn't an opioid or an illegal drug user.
Kouri's family thinks Eric had taken something he didn't know was laced with fentanyl, and that his death was a tragic accident. Eric's family strongly disputes this claim.
Greg Skordas: He didn't die of a self-inflicted drug overdose.
Eric's family wondered if Kouri may have been involved.
Greg Skordas: They said … This doesn't smell right. … No question the family thought that right from the beginning.
KOURI RICHINS CHARGED IN HER HUSBAND'S DEATH
In the months following her husband's tragic passing, Kouri Richins struggled to find her footing on her own and to navigate life as a single mom.
Ronney Darden: Kouri was still completely distraught. … even now, she's never had time to … grieve. … she's doing her best to move on, she didn't know of a way of doing that.
Kouri's brother Ronney says it was also hard for the couples' three young sons.
Ronney Darden: The boys, it's so hard for them they lashed out a little bit because they couldn't quite understand what was going on. … they needed some help and Kouri needed some help.
Eventually Kouri found a way to turn her grief into action.
In March 2023, one year after Eric's death, Kouri came up with the idea to write that children's book about coping with loss, ' Are You With Me?' She promoted it on a local TV show, 'Good Things Utah.'
KOURI RICHINS | 'Good Things Utah': I just wanted some story to read to my kids at night … And so, you know, I was like, let's just write one.
The self-published book follows the story of a child who lost his father but is reminded his presence still exists all around.
In the book, Eric is portrayed as an angel who is always close by. 'Yes, I am with you on Christmas,' Kouri writes, 'You can't see my smile but it's there. I'm here, and we're together.'
Kouri's mother, Lisa, says writing the book was therapeutic.
Lisa Darden: I think the book was a great thing.
Natalie Morales: It helped them.
Lisa Darden: It helped them all.
Her family says it finally seemed as though Kouri and the boys would be able to move forward.
Ronney Darden: It seemed to make … the boys really happy.
While the family was working to get back on track, police had been investigating Eric's death. And just weeks after Kouri's appearance on TV to promote her book —
KUTV NEWS REPORT: New at 10. This has been a talker all day today … a Summit County woman who wrote a children's book about coping with grief following her husband's death … now accused of being the one that actually killed him.
On May 8, 2023, Kouri, the grieving wife, was now the prime suspect in her husband's death.
Natalie Morales: You must have been in a panic
Lisa Darden: I was shocked. … She can't be arrested.
Kouri was charged with aggravated murder and taken into custody. Court documents allege she 'committed homicide' by the 'administration of a poison.'
Greg Skordas, the spokesman for Eric's family, suspects Kouri put a lethal dose of fentanyl in the drink she made Eric that night: the Moscow mule.
Greg Skordas: The dosage that he was given that night was of such a high level that no person could have survived it.
Skye Lazaro was her attorney at the time.
Skye Lazaro: They seized a number of items from the home, uh, and there was no fentanyl that was found on any glassware.
Kouri's family says they struggled to make sense of the charges. Kouri denies any involvement in her husband's death.
Lisa Darden: For anybody who knows Kouri just knows … She could not have done this. … She'd never do this.
Lisa says her daughter and son-in-law had a great relationship.
Lisa Darden: Nobody's perfect, but they're pretty close.
And like many couples that have disagreements, they were able to overcome their differences.
Lisa Darden: He didn't want Kouri to work. He wanted her to be a stay-at-home mom and she's very independent and that wasn't going to happen.
Another issue, says Kouri's brother Ronney, was the amount of time Eric spent away on hunting trips — sometimes four or five months a year.
Ronney Darden: It just kind of irked her. … because that … his biggest passion in life is hunting, and she might want him home a little bit more. And so, you know, they might get in a fight about that.
And then, according to Kouri's mother Lisa, there was alleged infidelity on Eric's part. She says she heard about it first from Kouri, and then from Eric.
Lisa Darden: It was a text about trust, how I trusted him as a son-in-law, as a father, as a husband. And how could he do this?
Kouri's family says the couple went to counseling, determined to work through their issues. Skordas, who denies Eric ever cheated on Kouri, says Eric had a different reason for wanting to make his marriage work.
Greg Skordas: He was going to do whatever he could to make it work because he — he lived for those boys. He would have done anything for those boys. … let's – let's go to counseling. Let's try to keep the family together.
Skordas says at one point Eric had considered divorce, but ultimately decided against it. He says to protect the boys in case the relationship didn't work out, Eric put his estate into a secret trust — without telling Kouri — and named his sister Katie in charge. But in the months leading up to Eric's death, Ronney says the couple seemed better than ever.
Natalie Morales: How were they doing as a couple, as a family?
Ronney Darden: Yeah, fantastic. They were, um, probably one of the best spots I've ever, seen them in in quite some time. … everyone is having fun, laughing, joking. You know, it's — it seemed really great to me.
So why would Kouri want Eric dead? Court documents allege Kouri was having an affair and 'planned a future with her paramour.' Along with that, a life insurance payout might have been a motive. Skordas says Eric's family agrees.
Greg Skordas: This is cold-hearted greed.
At the time of Eric's death there were 'at least six life insurance policies' on him, totaling nearly $3 million. Court documents allege that in January 2022, two months before Eric died, Kouri 'forged Eric signature' to get yet another policy, worth an additional $100,000. Kouri is also accused in court documents of stealing from Eric's personal accounts and 'misappropriating monies distributed from Eric Richins' business' dating back years.
According to Skordas, Kouri didn't just want the money, she desperately needed it. Court documents allege her house flipping business was 'drowning in nearly two million dollars of debt.'
Greg Skordas: She was in way over her head. … She needed some money in a hurry. … a significant amount of money.
Skordas says a premarital agreement stipulated Kouri had given up claim to Eric's business assets 'except that if Husband should die prior to Wife while the two are lawfully married.'
Greg Skordas: He was worth much more to her dead than divorced. … She felt … that there was easy money and fast money to be made by not having her husband around anymore.
Kouri's attorney Skye Lazaro strongly disputes any allegations her client forged Eric's signature, mishandled finances or stole from Eric. As for the claim Kouri was in debt and needed the money, she says that's simply not true.
Skye Lazaro: She was in the business of flipping houses … this is what they did.
Lazaro says taking on debt from lines of credit was part of how the business of flipping houses worked, and the money would be paid back when a home sold.
Skye Lazaro: It's not as if she had all these conventional loans that she owed people money on it. … sure, it looks like a large number. But … We're talking about business transactions with people who she … did business with.
Lisa Darden: Eric and Kouri sat down every month and did the bills together. At all times, Eric knew what was going in and what was coming out.
Lisa says Eric not only knew about the finances – but he was also very supportive of Kouri's new business opportunities – like the purchase of the mansion they were celebrating the night he died.
Lisa Darden: Eric saying, 'Let's have a shot. Come on, let's celebrate Kouri.'
It was that night, Skordas says, Eric's family believes Kouri gave him the Moscow mule laced with fentanyl. And, he says, Eric's family believes it wasn't the first time Kouri had tried to poison her husband.
Greg Skordas: The time he died wasn't the first time we believed that she tried to kill him.
ERIC RICHINS' FAMILY CLAIMS KOURI TRIED TO POISON ERIC BEFORE
Just outside Salt Lake City, in the shadow of Utah's Wasatch Mountains — home to famed ski resorts including Park City — is the property that Kouri Richins was planning on flipping. The deal she and Eric were celebrating the night he died, says her attorney, Skye Lazaro.
Skye Lazaro: It's a decently good size home.
Lazaro showed '48 Hours' the nearly 10-acre estate.
Natalie Morales: Where are we? Give us a sense of why this is significant real estate.
Skye Lazaro: So this is the Heber Valley. Uh, right over the hill is Park City … all the major ski areas. Uh, and then to the right is Deer Creek reservoir. … So this really sits … between major recreational areas.
Natalie Morales: It looks ginormous.
Skye Lazaro: It's massive.
The 20,000-square-foot mansion and its 4,000-square-foot guesthouse were originally built in 2017 but never finished. The project was abandoned for two years until Kouri discovered it.
Skye Lazaro: I think this … was kind of her dream when she got into this idea of flipping houses was to be able to do properties like this.
Lazaro says Kouri used financing from a group of investors to make an offer on the house for $3.9 million.
Skye Lazaro: The plan was to develop this, turn it into a recreational hotspot, given this is probably one of the most beautiful places in the world and … hopefully sell it at a profit.
Natalie Morales: How much did she think she could make off of this house?
Lisa Darden: Her and Eric sat down with an accountant one time, and he said, if you can get it done and stay under budget, you could walk away with $12 million.
Natalie Morales: Wow. … That's a — that's a big turn.
Lisa Darden: Yes.
Natalie Morales: From $3.9 to $12 million.
Lisa Darden: Yes.
Greg Hall worked with Kouri. He says it was a solid investment.
Greg Hall: There was a lot of excitement. I remember how excited she was. … it would've been a real easy flip. They wouldn't have had to — to sit on that for long.
Natalie Morales: As far as you know, Eric was on board with this plan?
Lisa Darden: Oh, a hundred percent.
But that's not what Eric's family remembers, says their spokesman Greg Skordas.
Greg Skordas: I don't think he was ever in favor of that … He was on board with supporting his wife. That doesn't mean he agreed with it.
In fact, the house is mentioned in a legal filing, containing notes from an investigator who interviewed Eric's family after his death. They said 'Eric and his wife were arguing' about buying the property.
And that wasn't all Eric's family told investigators. According to that same filing, they made numerous allegations against Kouri, including that they suspected 'his wife had something to do with his death. They advised he warned them that if anything happened to him… she was to blame.'
They also told investigators they believed Kouri had tried to poison Eric before, on two separate occasions.
According to the filing, Eric's family said the first attempted poisoning was in 2019 when Eric and Kouri and six friends were on vacation in Greece. They said Eric became 'violently ill' after Kouri 'gave him a drink.' Ronney says he heard it was all a misunderstanding.
Ronney Darden: Eric was on medication and … that medication, you're not allowed to drink on … he asked the waitress, uh, to bring a, a virgin drink, a drink without alcohol. … She didn't do it and made him very, very sick. … Kouri called his doctor. Um, figured out what to do and … later that night he was back and — and fine. … everyone that was there will tell you the exact same thing.
According to that same filing, the second time Eric's family said Kouri tried to poison Eric was the month before Eric died, on Valentine's Day 2022. They said, 'his wife brought him a sandwich, which after one bite Eric broke into hives and couldn't breathe.' Kouri's family denies she ever tried to poison him.
Ronney Darden: They ordered a sandwich, and the sandwich was bad.
Skye Lazaro: He went and took a nap and then went and coached one of his child's games.
Skye Lazaro: Aside from an assertion … by the family, uh, there doesn't seem to be anything else out there that supports that.
Eric's family also called into question Kouri's behavior following her husband's death.
According to court documents, Eric's family told investigators two days after Eric died, Kouri punched Eric's sister Amy 'in the neck and face' when Amy tried to stop her from opening a safe they said contained 'between $125,000 and $165,000 cash.'
Ronney Darden: There was an argument that broke out. … and … Eric's sister said that she owns the house. … everything is put into a trust, and she owns the house.
Remember, Eric had created that trust — and kept it secret from Kouri — when they were going through those marital problems. Until Eric's death, Kouri knew nothing about the trust, according to court documents.
Ronney Darden: If Eric had any sort of documents, he'd have them in the safe … So, she went in to go, see what was in there. … Amy came after Kouri, and then, you know, Kouri defended herself.
DJ: The two of them started pushing and … I was standing in the middle of them. … All they did was push. Both of them were trying to swing over the top of me. … So the narrative that's been pushed that it was — poor Amy got assaulted was nonsense.
The brothers say Amy stormed off and called the police. A month later Kouri was charged with assault and later pleaded no contest.
Natalie Morales: Mm-hmm.
Skye Lazaro: — highly emotional. … things got a little heated between them.
Two families. Two very different stories about what they believe happened to Eric. But with accusations flying back and forth, what did the evidence show?
Skye Lazaro: The state has to prove … that she did this, that she got the drugs and that she somehow gave them to him.
Greg Skordas: She had apparently … contacted a drug dealer, a known drug dealer in that area, and purchased fentanyl and had, uh — done it on more than one occasion.
KOURI RICHINS IN COURT: BAIL HEARING BRINGS FIRST LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE
In June 2023, Kouri Richins appeared in court before Judge Richard Mrazik for a bond hearing.
JUDGE RICHARD MRAZIK: The issue before the court is whether defendant Kouri Richins should continue to be held without bail during the pre-trial period.
It was the first time since Richins had been charged in her husband's death that the public got to see her. And for the entire four-hour hearing, she sat in handcuffs next to her attorney, Skye Lazaro.
Skye Lazaro: I cannot imagine how difficult it was for Kouri to sit there and listen to everything that was talked about at that hearing.
To convince the judge why Richins should not be released, prosecutors Patricia Cassell, Brad Bloodworth, and Joseph Hill presented evidence and called witnesses to make their case Richins had poisoned her husband. It had all the elements of a mini trial.
Skye Lazaro: In order for the judge to make a determination to detain someone at a bail hearing, the state has to prove substantial evidence.
Prosecutor Joseph Hill called to the stand cellphone expert Chris Kotodrimos.
He asked him about Google searches he says Richins made on her phone.
JOSEPH HILL (in court): Were you able to observe, uh, Internet searches on that phone?
CHRIS KOTODRIMOS: Yes.
Those searches – which were detailed in court documents – included:
Can deleted text messages be retrieved from an iPhone?
Can FBI find deleted messages?
What is a lethal dose of fentanyl?
Skye Lazaro: I don't know that these searches mean as much when you look at the timing of when they're done.
Lazaro says there's an innocent explanation: those searches were conducted after Eric's death.
Skye Lazaro: I think it's more to answer questions relating to what she was being accused of.
The state also called to the stand the lead the investigator on the case Detective Jeff O'Driscoll.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): I was assigned to be the lead — the lead detective in this case in April of this year.
Prosecutor Bloodworth questioned Detective O'Driscoll about where Richins may have gotten fentanyl. He specifically asked about an interview the detective conducted with Carmen Lauber, who said she worked for Richins. She's referred to as C.L.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): C.L. is an associate of the defendant. Uh, she cleaned houses for the defendant's business, as well as her personal home at times.
Detective O'Driscoll said C.L had a criminal history with drugs. At the time of their interview she was on probation for multiple drug distribution charges, according to court records. She has not been charged in connection with Eric's death.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): in our interview C.L. told us that in early 2022, the defendant reached out to her either by phone call or text message requesting that she procure fentanyl for what the defendant reported was a investor who had a back injury.
Detective O'Driscoll testified that C.L. told him she purchased 15-30 fentanyl pills and then sold them to Richins.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): C.L. told us that after purchasing the pills she returned home … she said that either later that night or the next day, the defendant met her … and did a hand-to-hand exchange of pills for cash.
That transaction, says Detective O'Driscoll, took place on Feb. 11, 2022 – three days before Valentine's Day – when, according to court documents, Eric's family said Richins had tried and failed to poison Eric with that sandwich. But there was more.
BRAD BLOODWORTH: (in court) We're gonna now shift … to a second drug buy
Detective O'Driscoll said C.L. told him Richins contacted her again approximately a week later.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): The defendant reached out to her again by text or, or call and said that she wanted some more fentanyl that was stronger than the previous batch.
This time, Detective O'Driscoll said, C.L. told him Richins paid by check.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): The defendant came to the door and wrote her a check from her business, from the defendant's business for $1,300 for the purchase of the fentanyl.
Just a week later, Eric was dead.
Skye Lazaro: We dispute all of those allegations.
In her cross-examination, Lazaro asked Detective O'Driscoll if there could have been another reason for that $1,300 check.
SKYE LAZARO (in court): It could very well be that Kouri was paying her for cleaning houses, correct?
DET. O'DRISCOLL: I don't wanna speculate, but —
SKYE LAZARO: It could be.
DET. O'DRISCOLL: It's possible.
SKYE LAZARO: Despite what C.L. said? Correct? OK.
Lazaro says because Carmen Lauber is a convicted felon she's not credible.
Skye Lazaro: She … was on probation at the time. I think anytime you have an informant-type situation … it can call into question the veracity of their statements or the motive for what they're saying.
In her cross-examination of Detective O'Driscoll, Lazaro attempted to show how C.L. might have felt pressure to tell investigators what they wanted to hear.
SKYE LAZARO (in court): You begin the interview by explaining to C.L. essentially how dire of a situation she's in, correct?
DET. O'DRISCOLL: I don't have the interview memorized, but I know we talked about that. Yes.
SKYE LAZARO: OK. Well, you told her that she was on probation to drug court for four first-degree felonies, correct?
DET. O'DRISCOLL: Correct.
SKYE LAZARO: You essentially tell her that she has the potential of doing a considerable amount of state and federal prison time, potentially.
DET. O'DRISCOLL: Yes. This is a common tactic in law enforcement to be able to leverage charges for information.
Lazaro also asked the detective what evidence there was to back up C.L.'s claims that she had sold fentanyl to Richins.
SKYE LAZARO (in court): Because C.L.'s working for the defendant there's communication, correct?
DET. O'DRISCOLL: Correct.
But Detective O'Driscoll said he saw no text messages where Richins allegedly asks C.L. for drugs.
DET. O'DRISCOLL (in court): We didn't find any.
SKYE LAZARO: Was anyone with her that could corroborate that she saw C.L. hand Kouri drugs?
DET. O'DRISCOLL: Not that I know of.
'48 Hours' attempted to contact C.L. for comment; we received no response.
Skye Lazaro: They have to prove that she obtained drugs and gave them to her husband.
Skye Lazaro: And unless they can connect those dots, they're gonna have a hard time proving murder in this case.
BOMBSHELL LETTER FOUND IN KOURI RICHINS' CELL
As Kouri Richins' bond hearing came to a close, her attorney Skye Lazaro was hopeful her client would be granted bail.
Skye Lazaro: This is a case in which there doesn't appear to be any smoking gun. These cases are generally more favorable to the defense.
The prosecution closed its case to deny Richins bail with a victim impact statement from Eric's sister, Amy.
AMY RICHINS (in court): I'm here today to represent my brother, Eric Eugene Richins. … Eric is gone and I am brokenhearted. … None of our lives will ever be the same. Eric died under horrendous circumstances. I am tormented at the thought of what he endured … Please do not allow Kouri to hurt Eric's memory, our family, friends, and community anymore. We have been through enough.
Judge Richard Mrazik spent very little time making his decision: Richins would remain in custody.
JUDGE RICHARD MRAZIK: The circumstances of this case weigh soundly against granting pre-trial release of any kind.
Richins' family was disappointed. They say her time in jail while waiting for her trial has taken its toll.
Lisa Darden: I hear her on the phone. I hear her sobbing.
In September 2023, Richins' family says, she had a medical emergency in custody while taking prescription medication and needed to be rushed to the hospital.
Natalie Morales: What did she say happened to her?
Lisa Darden: That they gave her the wrong medicine… and it caused a seizure.
Richins made a full recovery. But while she was away, jail officials say they found a handwritten letter in her cell that was never sent. The document, later filed in the court record, has become known for the words scrawled at the top of the page: 'Walk the Dog.' Prosecutors say it's from Richins to her mother.
Lisa Darden: I take care of her 16-year-old dog.
Natalie Morales: Mm-hmm.
Lisa Darden: And her thing is, be sure you walk Har. … She's so worried about this dog.
In November 2023, prosecutors filed this motion asking the court for a no contact order to deny Richins access to her mother and brother. In the motion, they say the letter 'is evidence of witness tampering.' They say Richins gives her mother instructions on what her brother, Ronney, should say in court.
'The letter instructs Lisa Darden to induce the Defendant's brother, Ronald Darden … to testify falsely,' the motion states.
Greg Skordas: To me, this letter is an attempt to get a witness to testify to something that isn't true by spoon feeding… the witness the testimony that he's supposed to give.
In the letter, Richins writes that her defense will need to establish that Eric bought drugs while traveling abroad:
'We need some kind of connection … Here is what I'm thinking but you have to talk to Ronney. He would probably have to testify to this.'
Natalie Morales: In the letter, it appears that she's laying out a little bit of her defense … for example … your name is brought up. Eric told Ronney he gets pain pills and fentanyl from Mexico.
Ronney Darden: Mm-hmm.
Natalie Morales: — saying tell Ronney.
Richins goes on to write:
'Ronney should have texts from Eric talking about getting high as well … reword this however he needs to, to make the point, just include it all. The connection has to be made with Mexico and drugs.'
Natalie Morales: Is she giving you instruction in this letter
Lisa Darden: I don't know. I don't know one way or another.
Ronney Darden: Um, most of that, unfortunately, I can't speak about.
Lisa Darden: The things that are in the letter are true things and everybody who's — who's in her circle already knew this.
But Kouri has a different explanation. She says the letter is fiction. In separate phone calls from jail – that were recorded and later entered into the court record – she told her mother and Ronney that the letter was part of a book she's been writing and that it's private.
The judge denied the motion for no contact, saying the state had failed to prove witness tampering.
Skye Lazaro: It isn't witness tampering, 'cause it didn't go anywhere and it was never communicated to anyone.
As the families wait for the trial, they say their focus is on Eric and Kouri's three sons.
Greg Skordas: The family is concerned about the boys.
Lisa Darden: That's the main focus. The boys. That's who's important here right now.
Both families say they hope to gain custody. The boys are currently living with a member of Eric's family. Lisa says they're only allowed to speak to their mother twice a week on a video call.
Lisa Darden: It's just heart-wrenching as to what they're going through.
Lisa, Ronney and DJ have been denied private visits with the kids, but Lisa says she does what she can to support them, and attends all their sports practices.
Lisa Darden: And the reason I can do that, it's a public place. … I can't be stopped from going there. I still get to see them. I still get a hug and kiss, and that keeps me going.
Besides the murder case, which could carry a sentence of 25 years to life, Kouri faces another criminal case for fraud and forgery charges, and there are multiple ongoing civil cases regarding the fate of Eric's estate. Both sides believe the other is after the money.
Natalie Morales: Both families are concerned about the boys.
Greg Skordas: You could say that. You could say that. I wouldn't. … we believe that the defendant's family's concerned about the money that they can get.
Lisa Darden: Whoever ends up with the boys ends up with the money. … That's all they want. It's not right.
Until that's resolved, both families are waiting for the trial to start, and are hoping for a verdict that delivers their version of justice.
Natalie Morales: What is the family doing to stay strong now?
Greg Skordas: You know, the family has the family, they have each other … they feel like the state has put together a good case and … they're going to stay united and — and support each other no matter what happens in this case.
Ronney Darden: She's innocent. She's been thrown in jail over something that she hasn't committed.
Natalie Morales: Are you both confident that Kouri will be found not guilty, Lisa?
Lisa Darden: I am, a hundred percent.
DJ: A hundred percent, she'll be out.
Skye Lazaro withdrew from the case in May 2024.
Kouri Richins is scheduled to go on trial for the murder of her husband in 2025.
'48 HOURS' POST MORTEM PODCAST
Natalie Morales and producer Betsy Shuller discuss the six life insurance policies, the 20,000-square-foot mansion Kouri purchased just after his death, and the potentially incriminating handwritten letter found in her jail cell.
Produced by Betsy Shuller. Ryan Smith and Elena DiFiore are the development producers. Emma Steele is the field producer. Marcus Balsam Michael Vele and Phil Tangel are the editors. Anthony Batson is the senior producer. Nancy Kramer is the executive editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What did Dana Chandler do? Inside the case of the Kansas woman convicted of double murder after three trials
What did Dana Chandler do? Inside the case of the Kansas woman convicted of double murder after three trials

Wakala News

time01-06-2025

  • Wakala News

What did Dana Chandler do? Inside the case of the Kansas woman convicted of double murder after three trials

Dana Chandler has spent decades maintaining her innocence against allegations she was responsible for the 2002 murders of her ex-husband, Mike Sisco, and his girlfriend, Karen Harkness. In 2025, Chandler took on her own defense, representing herself in the third trial the state brought against her for the murders. DANA CHANDLER (in court, closing): My liberty, my freedom is hanging in the balance. Hailey Seel is Dana Chandler and Mike Sisco's daughter. She and other Sisco and Harkness family members have spent decades grieving, searching for answers and for justice. ' I want to understand what happened and why. And — and — and actually know the truth of what happened,' she tells '48 Hours' contributor Jim Axelrod. '48 Hours' first started covering the murders in 2008 and spoke with individuals involved several times over the years. THE MURDERS OF MIKE SISCO AND KAREN HARKNESS Hailey Seel: It's hard to swallow and it's hard to believe. It's insane. (crying) For Hailey, it all started on July 7, 2002. She learned her father and Harkness had been killed in Harkness' Topeka, Kansas, home. Hailey Seel: I immediately just saw a bunch of tape around the house and police. … And my grandma's sitting in there and she just told me that they had been shot. The night before the murders, Sisco and Harkness enjoyed an evening at a casino about an hour outside of Topeka. Surveillance footage shows them leaving about 1:30 a.m. They then stopped to get coffee – the last time video captured Harkness alive. Harold Worswick (2008): They were extremely happy, you could just see that. Harkness' father, Harold Worswick. Harold Worswick: Everything they did was for each other. The day after Sisco and Harkness' night out, a family get-together had been planned at Harkness' house. Relatives thought the couple might be announcing they were engaged. Harold Worswick: And I rang the doorbell and knocked on the glass and couldn't raise anybody. I thought, 'This is strange.' Worswick, who has since died, recalled that he entered Harkness' home that afternoon through an open sliding door, didn't see any sign of Karen or Mike Sisco, so he headed downstairs to the bedroom. Harold Worswick: Just as I got to the foot of the stairs, I could see Karen. … And I said, 'Oh, Christ.' I knew she was dead. And then I found Mike on the outside of the bed. Worswick would then call 911. HAROLD WORSWICK (to 911): I just located my daughter and she's downstairs and she's dead … Det. Richard Volle: I got a radio call just after two o'clock on July 7th, 2002. Richard Volle, now retired, was the Topeka Police Department's lead detective on the case. Det. Richard Volle: It was a report of two dead bodies in a basement. Five bullets had struck Harkness, 53, including in her back and buttocks. Sisco, 47, suffered between five and seven gunshot wounds. The couple had been in bed. The rest of the house appeared undisturbed. Investigators found more than $1,000 in cash, a Rolex watch and other jewelry left behind. Robbery was quickly ruled out. To understand who might want Harkness and Sisco dead, police turned to their families for information. Det. Richard Volle: What we're left with is an emotional killing. It's an emotional execution. Sisco, a salesperson for a welding company, and Harkness, who worked in the hospitality industry, were both previously married and now divorced. The well-liked couple had been dating about four years. Harkness' children, Chad and Erin, were in their 20s at the time of the murders. Chad Harkness: It was a surprise to everybody that this would happen to somebody like her. Erin Sutton: My mom was an amazing woman. … She, she didn't have enemies. … And I remember telling her on several occasions that if I could be half the mom that she was to me, then I would be the best mom in the world. Sisco had custody of his two children, Hailey, then, 17, and Dustin, 15. Dustin Sisco: My dad was really my life growing up … He was really my hero. Hailey's relationship with her dad was more complicated. Hailey Seel: I wasn't happy with my dad. I wasn't happy with my mom. I wasn't happy at my school. By Hailey's own admission, she was a difficult teen. Hailey Seel: My dad gave me an ultimatum: 'Either you follow my rules or you move out.' She chose to live with her then-boyfriend, Chris. Hailey Seel: And I moved in with Chris and then my dad was killed. That defiance made Hailey and Chris of interest to police. They were polygraphed and questioned. DET. VOLLE: I'm just curious, is everything all right with your dad and everything? HAILEY SEEL: Uh, yeah. … We weren't really getting along for a little while. Authorities said their alibis checked out. As did the alibis of Harkness' daughter, Erin, and her husband, Jeff Sutton. Harkness' son Chad was also questioned. Chad Harkness: I was hooked up to a polygraph machine and asked if I had murdered my mother or in any way participated in the murder of my mother. Police concluded none of them were involved. But family members thought they knew who was responsible: Mike Sisco's ex-wife, Dana Chandler. Cathy Boots: She just — she never fit in. Cathy Boots, Mike Sisco's sister, watched Chandler and Sisco's relationship deteriorate. After 15 years of marriage, the couple went through a bitter divorce, finalized in 1998. Sisco's relatives say Chandler had a drinking problem and she sporadically stalked Sisco during and after the divorce, with frequent calls and bizarre visits. Cathy Boots: The kids were upstairs in their room. … And we heard a noise and there she was … in the middle of the night … jumping on a trampoline in the backyard of Mike's home. Mark Boots is Mike Sisco's brother-in-law. Mark Boots: I think she became obsessed with the fact that Mike was moving on with his life. … And then when Karen entered the picture, that's when things really started, I think, escalating. Mike Sisco kept track of some of the incidents from 1998 in a day planner, writing: JULY 28: … Dana stalking neighborhood at 8:30, caught her she left. … NOVEMBER 12: Dana came in house while I was at Karens from 7:00 to 11:00 went thrus stuff … Mark Boots: She was willing to travel great distances to show up back in his life. According to the Boots, the last time Chandler showed up at Mike Sisco's home was in the spring of 2002, several months before the murders. Cathy Boots said Mike told her Chandler went there to talk about moving back in. Cathy Boots: She said, 'The kids are getting older. … They're having different issues with themselves now. They need both parents. I think I should move back in and we should parent together.' Mark Boots: All this harassment and stalking had come to the point that Mike told me that he and Karen now feared for their lives. Mark Boots says Mike Sisco made that clear to him on a fishing trip, nine days before the murders. Mark Boots: He turned to me and said, 'Mark, you're gonna wake up and find me dead. And I want you to know who did it, Dana Chandler.' But Chandler lived eight hours away in Denver and there was no sign that she had been in Harkness' house in Topeka the night of the murders. WHO WANTED THE COUPLE DEAD? Det. Richard Volle: The victims were doing absolutely nothing and may not have seen it coming at all. Investigators were trying to determine who would gun down Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness as they lay in bed. Detective Richard Volle called Sisco's ex-wife, Dana Chandler, to inform her of Mike's murder. DET. RICHARD VOLLE (phone call to Chandler): Your husband was found shot to death today, this afternoon. Your ex-husband, I'm sorry … Can you tell me when the last time was that you talked to him? Chandler, Volle says, did not ask many questions and did not seem concerned. Chandler would later say she was very upset on that call. But only Volle's side of their conversation was recorded, due to a technical error, he said, on his part. The next evening, Chandler called the Topeka Police Department, leaving a message on a different officer's voicemail: DANA CHANDLER (phone call to police): Hi, my name is Dana Chandler and I got a very disturbing phone call last night. Someone had said that my ex-husband had been killed, and I'm just calling to — to see if that's true or not … Chandler would later explain her call was simply seeking confirmation. Given the personal nature of the murders, no signs of a burglary, and those stories about a messy divorce and stalking, Chandler became the main suspect. Volle decided to talk with Chandler in person, recording this audio, four days after the murders: DET. RICHARD VOLLE ( interview audio 2002): Tell me about what happened on the 6th. DANA CHANDLER: I got up, I had my morning coffee. But again, there was an issue with the recording. In most of the rest of the conversation, Chandler is difficult to hear. Volle recounted what he said she told him. Det. Richard Volle: She said she'd been at home, Saturday morning, that's July 6th … and then made a couple of errand stops. Chandler said she bought cigarettes, snacks, and a car cigarette lighter at several stores around Denver and then got gas. But Volle says she failed to mention one purchase he saw on a credit card receipt. Det. Richard Volle: She'd bought two five-gallon gas cans, as well. Volle wondered why she didn't tell him and why she would even need gas cans, unless she had been planning a trip, perhaps to Kansas, and didn't want to stop for gas along the way. According to Volle, Chandler had also said, after running those errands, she went home to her Denver apartment. Det. Richard Volle: Didn't have any visitors. No contact with anybody. And the next day got up and went for a drive in the mountains at ten o'clock in the morning. But Volle couldn't verify that Chandler was in her apartment the night of the murders, nor that she took a drive in the mountains the next day. Volle said the area Chandler described driving through would have meant she'd have to pass Rocky Mountain National Park surveillance cameras. Those cameras were checked. Volle said there was no sign of her car. Det. Richard Volle: The particular person that I had view that tape looked at every frame slowly. … She was never there. Investigators also reviewed Chandler's cellphone records. They said that while she tended to use her cellphone frequently, she, oddly, had no activity around the time of the murders. Det. Richard Volle: What we found was there was a 27-hour window where her phone wasn't used. Still, there was no DNA, no fingerprints, or other forensic evidence to tie Chandler to the killings. The gun used in the murders hadn't been found, though investigators learned the bullets were from an Israeli weapons manufacturer. And Chandler would go on to say she didn't even own a gun. But family members remained convinced that Chandler was responsible for the murders. They say they pushed to have a meeting with then-DA Robert Hecht. Tim Sisco is Mike Sisco's brother. Tim Sisco: I specifically went into this meeting wanting to know if he would pursue a circumstantial case. … And the answer was, 'Without that murder weapon, we don't have enough hard evidence to move this forward.' The Sisco and Harkness families grew increasingly frustrated and decided to take action — looking for more information about Chandler's possible involvement in the murders. Cathy Boots: I put her picture up everywhere. 'Have you seen this person?' Several months after the murders, having more questions than answers, Mike Sisco's sister Cathy Boots said she and their mom Carol Sisco went searching for clues, even lifting up manhole covers and looking in rest stop bathrooms for the gun used in the murders. Cathy Boots: We thought, you know, maybe she threw the gun somewhere. … So I would stand on a toilet and try and push a tile up. They found nothing, but Hailey Seel, Chandler, and Mike Sisco's daughter, was also working the case. Hailey Seel: I felt the need to do something. I didn't wanna just sit back with my hands tied and helpless. In 2005, three years after the murders, Hailey began secretly recording conversations with her mother, trying to learn what happened to her dad and Harkness. HAILEY SEEL (recorded phone call): … I think that the only way I can really move on with a relationship with you is if we can get it, you know, if you can just tell me yourself that you did it. … DANA CHANDLER: Well, number one, I didn't do it and number one I, number two, I don't know what happened Hailey. … One thing Hailey asked about was why her mother had no cellphone activity for 27 hours around the time of the murders. HAILEY SEEL (recorded phone call): Why did it have no calls and was at home the whole time? You knew it could be traced. DANA CHANDLER: I was in the mountains; I didn't have a signal. Chandler insisted she had nothing to do with the murders, but did say she had violent thoughts about Mike Sisco. DANA CHANDLER (recorded conversation): I said I could kill him. You ever think about killing him? HAILEY SEEL No, but — DANA CHANDLER: I did. HAILEY SEEL: But — DANA CHANDLER: Honestly, I can say I did. The official investigation, though, seemed stalled, so authorities asked Vernon Geberth, a homicide and forensic consultant and former New York City Police Department detective, to review case files. In 2007, nearly five years after the murders, he issued a report concluding '… Dana Chandler is the one and only person who had the motive, means and opportunity to commit these murders.' It was Geberth who brought the case to the attention of '48 Hours.' In 2009, '48 Hours' aired its first report on the murders —and tried to talk with Chandler. HAROLD DOW | '48 Hours' correspondent: Did you know anything about the death of Michael and Karen? DANA CHANDLER: I have no idea what happened to Mike and Karen. '48 Hours' ended the episode asking viewers to contact police if they had any information. Again, the case seemed to be going nowhere. But two years later, a new DA, Chad Taylor, decided he was willing to take a chance with the evidence they had. He chose to move the case forward and arrest Chandler. With '48 Hours' cameras rolling, law enforcement, zeroed in on Chandler in Oklahoma, where she was staying at the time. Taylor didn't just help plan the arrest, but went on it, with a gun at the ready. And on July 24, 2011, Chandler was in custody, charged with the murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness. WHERE WAS DANA CHANDLER THE NIGHT OF THE MURDERS? Hailey Seel I'd hit a point where I didn't know … if justice would ever … be served. For Hailey Seel who was convinced her mother killed her father, Dana Chandler's arrest was nearly a decade in the making. Hailey Seel It was such a feeling that I – I — it was unbelievable. She was determined to get justice as she prepared to face Dana Chandler in court. Hailey Seel: I've made it this far. … I can do anything. In March 2012, Chandler went on trial. Jacqie Spradling, then-chief deputy DA, began by referring to those conversations Hailey Seel had taped years earlier with her mother. JACQIE SPRADLING (in court): 'I could kill him. I thought about killing him.' These are the words of this defendant about her ex-husband Mike Sisco. In her opening statement, Spradling suggested a possible motive for murder. JACQIE SPRADLING (in court) Two days before the homicides, the defendant called Mike. Mike at this time told the defendant, in that five-minute phone call, that he and Karen were going to be married. But there is no recording of that call. MARK BENNETT (in court) It's easy to make allegations. It's difficult to prove those allegations. And in his opening, defense attorney Mark Bennett argued the case against Chandler was all speculation. MARK BENNETT (in court): There is no evidence that places Dana Chandler in or near the Harkness residence on July 6th or 7th, 2002. But to authorities, there was the question about exactly where Chandler was during that time. Volle says she told him she was home Saturday, the night of the murders and then drove through the mountains the next day. But Chandler's business acquaintance Jeff Bailey, testified Chandler told him something different — that she slept in her car in the mountains the Saturday night of the murders. JEFF BAILEY (in court): She told me that the story she was giving me was the truth. And the story that she'd given to the law enforcements was not the truth. And prosecutors told the jury Chandler did not use her cellphone for 27 hours the weekend of the murders. Remember, Hailey Seel accused her mother of trying to avoid being tracked. Volle found another instance when Chandler didn't use her phone a month before the murders. DET. RICHARD VOLLE (in court): There were no calls registered. There were some calls came to the phone, but none were picked up. And prosecutors say that's important, because during that time — a month before the murders — was Chandler's dry run for the killings. They called her friend Ann Carrender to the stand. Carrender says Dana told her she had driven to Topeka. ANN CARRENDER (in court): She had— gone to Mike's house— through the window. Um, nobody was home. … JACQIE SPRADLING: What else did she tell you? ANN CARRENDER: That she had gone — and sat outside Karen's house. Spradling says Chandler was obsessed with Mike Sisco and presented evidence that in the six months leading up to the murders, she called Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness more than 600 times. The defense argued Chandler was calling to talk to her kids, but Hailey Seel remembered her mother's calls differently. JACQIE SPRADLING (in court): What was the thing that she talked to you the most about? HAILEY SEEL: She talked about my dad a lot. And – I — I re — I really feel like she was — was really just obsessed — with him. An FBI analyst testified Chandler often called late at night, and frequently made repeated calls in a short time period, including a month before the murders. ALICE CASEY (in court): On June 3rd, she made 17 calls in 18 minutes. Both of Chandler's children testified for the prosecution, saying that their mother also had a history of stalking their father. DUSTIN SISCO (in court): She took me and my sister with her to go spy on my dad. … And so we were in the car and she told us, you know, we're just going to be her little helpers. HAILEY SEEL (in court): She asked if I would go — go up to the house with her. And we did. And she was looking in all the windows. And she told me to look in the windows. And – JACQIE SPRADLING: Did you? HAILEY SISCO: I did. … JACQIE SPRADLING: What was it that she was looking at in there? HAILEY SEEL: I think that she — was — was thinking there was — a lady in there with my dad. Hailey also testified about those recordings she made talking with her mother. During one of them, Chandler, who attended Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, gave an explanation as to why she bought those gas cans. DANA CHANDLER (audio recording): I ran into a girl that had run out of gas at an AA meeting and so I went and got gas for her. She asked me for money and we don't give people money at AA … Prosecutor Spradling told the jury that she believed Chandler used those two five-gallon gas cans to have enough gas so she would not have to stop and potentially be seen near the crime scene. But Chandler's attorney argued there was no proof she was ever in Topeka during the time of the murders. MARK BENNETT (in court): Did you or … any other members of the Topeka Police Department … ever find an eyewitness that put — the defendant, Dana Chandler, in Topeka, Kansas on either July 6 or July 7, 2002? DET. RICHARD VOLLE: No. The closest law enforcement was able to come was at a gas station in WaKeeney, Kansas, nearly halfway between Denver and Topeka. Clerk Patty Williams wasn't sure, but she thought she might have seen Chandler the night of the murders. Jacqie Spradling: Patty was shown a picture of the defendant … Patty indicated that she was 70 percent sure that that was the woman who had been there. But by the time Chandler went on trial, Patty Williams had died. A different worker from the gas station testified about seeing a black car that looked similar to the one Chandler drove that day. But she said it might have had license plates from Virginia. When it was the defense's turn, Bennett pointed out there was no proof Chandler was ever there. MARK BENNETT (in court): Wasn't any receipt from WaKeeney, was there? DET. RICHARD VOLLE: No. And Bennett questioned whether Volle investigated other suspects, like two men with criminal records who had stolen checks from Mike Sisco and cashed one after the murders. MARK BENNETT (in court): That didn't make 'em a suspect? DET. RICHARD VOLLE: No, because the check wasn't taken from Karen Harkness' house where the murders occurred. The check was actually taken from Mike Sisco's house where the murders did not occur. And one of the men was in jail when the murders occurred. In closing arguments, Bennett reiterated there was no forensic evidence linking Chandler to the crime. MARK BENNETT (in court): All this time, they've been trying to put her in Kansas when this happened. And for nine-and-a-half years, they've come up dry. Spradling reminded the jury of Chandler's stalking behavior— and tried to make sure they knew just how scared Mike Sisco was of Chandler. She said Mike Sisco had gotten a protection from abuse order against Chandler. JACQIE SPRADLING (in court): So, he got a court order saying she has to stay away. The protection from abuse order did not stop the defendant, though. After two weeks of testimony, it took the jury 83 minutes to reach a verdict: guilty of first-degree murder. Hailey Seel: I feel better in the sense that my dad's killer is paying for their actions … I don't feel better that my mom is capable of killing my dad. When it was time for sentencing, Hailey Seel asked that her mom receive the maximum sentence. HAILEY SEEL (in court:) We each have a deep scar on our souls from what this monster has done. But Chandler would also get a chance to speak. DANA CHANDLER (in court): But most importantly, I deny that I murdered Mike or Karen. I am innocent. I did not murder Mike or Karen. Chandler was sentenced to life in prison. But soon that verdict would be called into question. DANA CHANDLER'S CONVICTION REVERSED Hailey Seel: A lot of my mind has been focused on her getting away with killing my Dad, and … just drags me down. For years, Hailey Seel's thoughts were consumed with proving her mother killed her father, Mike Sisco, and Karen Harkness. With Dana Chandler in prison, Hailey was relieved she could concentrate on other things. But her relief was tinged with pain. Hailey Seel: I wanna focus on my future and what I want to do with my life. … I wanna be everything my mom wasn't. (cries) But Hailey's focus would turn again to the case. Chandler almost immediately began filing motions as she worked to appeal her conviction. She and her attorneys cited, among other things, the actions of prosecutor Jacqie Spradling. In particular, statements Spradling made at trial about that protection from abuse order. JACQIE SPRADLING (in court): Mike got a protection from abuse, a court order. He applied and said, 'Hey, judge, please order this woman to stay away from me.' And the judge agreed. Stacey Schlimmer: And that is just a blatant misstatement. Stacey Schlimmer, one of Chandler's appeal attorneys, was never able to find a protection from abuse order. Stacey Schlimmer: I went through the whole case. I went and looked for every possible order I could find. And there wasn't one that she was referring to. In 2018, Schlimmer argued that Spradling's actions constituted prosecutorial misconduct. STACEY SCHLIMMER (arguing before Kansas Supreme Court): I — I think that Ms. Chandler never had an opportunity at a fair trial from the get-go. Schlimmer contended the case against Chandler should be thrown out. The court agreed. Stacey Schlimmer: The Kansas Supreme Court held that … it's so bad that we're going to go ahead and overturn her conviction. Other issues about statements Spradling made at trial also came up, including describing a route Chandler took between Kansas and Denver when there was no evidence that she drove that way. JACQIE SPRADLING (in court): She drove directly up to Nebraska. And after she gets on Nebraska she turns around and goes home. Stacey Schlimmer: They just kinda hypothesized, 'Well, she must have went up and went over from Nebraska.' There was no evidence of that at all. Schlimmer also contended the state did not have enough evidence to prove Dana Chandler's guilt. Stacey Schlimmer: We argued insufficiency of evidence as an issue for appeal … Jim Axelrod: Meaning you don't think prosecutors had enough to make a legitimate case? Stacey Schlimmer: Jurors didn't have enough evidence before them if you took out all the evidence that should've never been presented or told to them incorrectly. The Kansas Supreme Court described Spradling's actions as, 'intolerable acts of deception.' And she was disbarred. '48 Hours' reached out to Spradling, but did not receive a response. Stacey Schlimmer: When a case gets reversed, like a case like this, we essentially have an innocent woman who's been convicted of crime because of the prosecutor. Or we have a family that has now a reversed conviction that has to go through the system again. Jim Axelrod: Either way, there's an injustice. Stacey Schlimmer: Right. So … that conduct is gonna affect someone. The Kansas Supreme Court did decide, though, there was sufficient evidence to retry Chandler if the district attorney chose to. Hailey Seel: When I found out that the Kansas Supreme Court overturned the verdict … it was very shocking. … What does this mean? Will the DA's office retry her? … Jim Axelrod: Were you angry with the prosecutor who was cited for misconduct? Hailey Seel: I've never been angry with her. … I think it was an innocent mistake. Chad Harkness, Karen Harkness' son, takes a different view of Spradling's actions. Chad Harkness: Had Jacqie not made those comments, we wouldn't be sitting here today. This — this would be over. … Now … all these years later, we're still having to, you know, live through this again. And it — it's just — it's not right. It's not fair. The decision whether to retry Chandler was now in the hands of Shawnee County's new DA, Mike Kagay. Mike Kagay: We analyzed every aspect of the case. And ultimately, we came to the conclusion that we believed justice demanded that we move forward, and we pursue another trial. Pursuing that would take years. Chandler remained incarcerated. She, and her defense lawyers, argued she should be set free, and fought against having another trial. : Unbelievable. For Hailey, the delays seemed endless. Chandler and her lawyers filed nearly 400 motions, including ones requesting a change of judge, to retain an investigator, for her bond to be reduced, and to disqualify the Shawnee County District Attorney's Office. And through it all, she fired several of her lawyers. Hailey Seel: She went through seven lawyers in that time, uh, between representing herself. There were also dozens of hearings, including one where Hailey was called to testify – and Chandler did the questioning. Hailey Seel: She took me on the stand for at least 45 minutes … and she directly questioned me. Jim Axelrod: What was that like? Hailey Seel: It was the most awful thing I've ever … I mean, the — the suspect in the killing of my dad is now having the power to question me on the stand and talk to me. … Jim Axelrod: Not just the suspect in the killing of your dad, your own mother. Hailey Seel: Yeah, yeah. I mean, It – it — it was awful. But Hailey was willing to take whatever steps necessary to ensure her mother would stand trial again for the murders. Hailey Seel: If she could bring out something to prove where she was, to say she didn't do it, prove she didn't do it — that's not just for me, that's for her and her own freedom. But she can't, and she hasn't. WOULD DANA CHANDLER BE RETRIED? Mike Kagay: Two innocent people were murdered in our community. That demands justice. Although Dana Chandler's conviction had been overturned, prosecutors were determined to retry her for the murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness. By 2021, the organization, Miracle of Innocence, got involved, advocating for Chandler. Darryl Burton: Dana Chandler was someone who, we believed in her innocence. … When we looked at the case, the facts was just … nothing connected this lady to the crime. Darryl Burton is the co-founder of Miracle of Innocence. He's someone who was wrongfully imprisoned and had his murder conviction reversed. He says, before sending someone to prison, the case needs to be more convincing than the one made against Chandler. Darryl Burton: There's no evidence … no fingerprints, no DNA, no confession, no weapon, no witnesses, nothing. … When it comes to, you know, these kinds of crimes of murder, you just got to have more than that. Chandler and her attorneys also raised other issues as they tried to get the case dismissed. Some allegations related to the 2009 '48 Hours' broadcast. Chandler falsely accused law enforcement of forming 'a partnership with '48 Hours' to film an episode aimed at convincing the public that Ms. Chandler murdered Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness.' Jim Axelrod: What do you make of the idea that, if '48 Hours' had not reported, starting in 2009, on this case, that Dana Chandler would never have been arrested or tried? Stacey Schlimmer: I don't think it was '48 Hours' (laughs). 2009 is a lot different than when they arrested her. They arrested her three or four years — three years later. I think the family was what kept it going. They believe that Ms. Chandler did this. … It was the new prosecutor, and it was the family probably saying, 'Hey, we need justice done in this.' But Stacey Schlimmer, Chandler's former appeal attorney, does take issue with the handling of the 2011 arrest and the show of force. Jim Axelrod: You've seen Dana Chandler's arrest many times. Stacey Schlimmer: Right. Jim Axelrod: And it bothers you. Stacey Schlimmer: It bothers me a lot. '48 Hours,' as well as The Topeka Capital-Journal, were given advance notice of the arrest by the office of then-DA Chad Taylor. Jim Axelrod: Are you bothered by law enforcement … or are you bothered by the fact that there were cameras there? Stacey Schlimmer: I'm bothered by the prosecutor. I'm bothered by the district attorney showing up at an arrest and having that arrest filmed. … Jim Axelrod: So they wanted video of law enforcement with their guns out? Stacey Schlimmer: I think they wanted then the public to see that. … That to me was it seemed like such a production for a case. … that prosecutor should never have done that. Ultimately, the various arguments Dana Chandler's team made to dismiss the case were unsuccessful. Chandler's new trial was scheduled for the summer of 2022. Before the trial began, '48 Hours' again tried to speak with Chandler. She said she would only agree to an interview if CBS paid her million-dollar bond. We declined. Chad Harkness: Never thought we'd be sitting here again and getting ready to start a — a retrial on this … it's just mind blowing. Chad Harkness, Karen Harkness' son, was relieved the DA's office decided to retry Chandler, but was concerned about going through this yet another time. Chad Harkness: Just — us kids having to relive this again and … It just it makes me sick. Hailey, too, was not looking forward to another trial. But said testifying again could give her some control of the situation. Hailey Seel: If I can … realize my power. … And it gives me courage to go forward because I know the truth … The truth is that … she murdered them. The passage of time has left Hailey with so much loss — loss she holds her mother responsible for. And, as a mom herself, having married her high school boyfriend Chris Seel, Hailey's feelings are even more complicated. Jim Axelrod: When you think of your mom, do you think mother, or do you think Dana? Hailey Seel: I think Dana, yeah. She's Dana to me. Actually, mom is — is a — an ucky word to me, to the point where I don't even like my kids to call me mom. I don't like mom. Mom is a — a very hurtful person (cries). No matter the name, Dana Chandler is someone her daughter will have to face again in court — and someone who will eventually tell her side of the story. DANA CHANDLER (in court): Let's start by stating my name. My name is Dana Chandler. I as everyone know, have been accused of double homicide and I am innocent. DANA CHANDLER RETRIED FOR DOUBLE MURDER In the summer of 2022, Dana Chandler was on trial for the second time for the murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness. As in her first trial, the defense focused on all that was lacking in the case against Chandler. TOM BATH (in court): There is no evidence that she was in the Harkness residence, no evidence she was in Topeka. There's no evidence she was in the state of Kansas. Defense attorney Tom Bath insisted Chandler was in Colorado at the time of the murders, more than 500 miles away, and faulted investigators for zeroing in on her. TOM BATH (in court): Everything they looked at, everything they examined … excluded Dana. The lack of physical evidence was acknowledged by Shawnee County Deputy District Attorney Charles Kitt. CHARLES KITT (in court): Science is not going to solve this case. This case is not based on DNA. Instead, the state focused on evidence such as Chandler's hatred of her ex-husband and his girlfriend. CHARLES KITT (in court): This case is based on jealousy, rage and obsession. Prosecutors presented evidence they say showed that obsession—including records of more than 600 phone calls Chandler made to Harkness and Sisco in the six months before the murders. And they introduced witnesses who said Harkness and Sisco told them some of those calls were menacing. Kim Warrender was Harkness' coworker. KIM WARRENDER (in court): She said she had been up all-night receiving phone calls from Dana. … CHARLES KITT: She told you she was afraid? KIM WARRENDER: Very afraid. Erin Sutton also testified that her mother, Karen Harkness, was scared of Chandler. She spoke about messages she said she heard that Chandler left on her mother's phone. ERIN SUTTON (in court): She would call my mom horrible names. CHARLES KITT: And, like, what kind of names would she call her? ERIN SUTTON: She would call her a whore. In addition to testimony about calls Chandler made, there was also attention paid to when there was no call activity on her phone– specifically during 27 hours the weekend of the murders. Authorities believed Chandler's phone was turned off so it could not be traced as she traveled to Kansas. But the defense suggested it could have just been spotty cellphone service in Colorado. Prosecutors told the jury about a purchase Chandler made the day before the murders but failed to mention to investigators. Kitt asked Richard Volle, the lead detective on the case, about the purchase. CHARLES KITT (in court): Can you tell us what that is? DET. RICHARD VOLLE (holding the receipt): This is an Auto Zone receipt … It shows the purch — first two purchases were five dollar or five-gallon gas cans. Authorities wondered why Chandler didn't tell them about the gas cans, and why she would need gas cans unless she was planning a trip — perhaps to Kansas — and did not want to stop for gas along the way. And there was the issue of Chandler's alibi — according to Detective Volle, a changing, unconfirmable one. One witness testified that Chandler said she was in the mountains in Colorado at the time of the murders, but Volle testified Chandler told him she was at home in her Denver apartment. DET. RICHARD VOLLE (in court): She said she'd stayed at her house, had no guests or phone calls and then she turned in about 9'o clock. A friend of Chandler's testified about something authorities thought might have been a dry run for the murders. She said about a month before the killings, Chandler called and told her about a trip she made to Sisco's and Harkness's homes . ANN HAMMER (in court): She told me that she knew nobody was in the house and that she went into Mike's home through the window. After that, she did go to, um, his girlfriend's house and sat outside her house, waiting for them to come home. But they didn't show up … CHARLES KITT: Did she tell you what she did when she — got into Mike's house? ANN HAMMER: She wanted to see what it looked like on the inside. But Chandler's attorney questioned the reliability of her testimony, pointing out she may have gotten some dates wrong regarding calls with Chandler. ANN HAMMER (in court): It must not have been a Monday. TOM BATH: But 20 years ago, you said it was a Monday. Right? ANN HAMMER: Sure. Testimony about Chandler's behavior also came from Cathy Boots, Mike Sisco's sister. She described an incident several years before the murders, that she said she witnessed while staying at Mike's house. CATHY BOOTS (in court): We went to bed that night and I woke up in the early morning hours … to a noise out in the backyard. And we had left the back porch lights on. And I looked out through the blinds and Dana was jumping on the trampoline out back. And Mike Sisco's brother-in-law, Mark Boots, recounted a disturbing conversation he said he had with Mike nine days before the murders. MARK BOOTS (in court): Mike told me that the patterns of harassment had increased and that he feared for he and Karen's lives. Mike Sisco and Dana Chandler's daughter, Hailey Seel, was going to be in the uncomfortable position of testifying against her mother. A DAUGHTER'S SECRET RECORDINGS PLAYED IN COURT Hailey Seel: I was absolutely still nervous — and scared. … Being up there, it causes conflict. As Hailey Seel reflected back on testifying against her mother, Dana Chandler, she recalled the stress she was under. As a prosecution witness, Seel was asked to describe some of her mother's behavior—behavior Seel said she found obsessive. CHARLES KITT (in court): Was there a time where you were asked to spy on your dad? HAILEY SEEL: Yeah. Seel recounted an incident, after her parents split up, when she said, Chandler drove her and her brother to Sisco's home, and they all sat in the car to watch the house. HAILEY SEEL (in court): She said, 'Come on. We need to watch your dad. And you can be my little helpers.' … She had me go with her to the house after so long. And — um, and she wanted to look in the windows. CHARLES KITT: Did she look in the windows? HAILEY SEEL: Yeah. We both looked in the windows. And she said, 'Did you see that? Did you see that?' And I said, 'No. I didn't see anything.' It was episodes like that which led Seel, early on, to think her mother could be responsible for the murders. Hailey Seel: I always suspected she had something to do with it because of the history of her harassment, stalking, hatred, talking bad about them to us all the time. Seel testified about some of the ways her mother expressed that dislike of her father — like the demeaning ways Chandler referred to him in emails and online chats — including ones where Chandler referred to Sisco as 'it' — sent when Seel was 14 years old. CHARLES KITT (in court, pointing at email): And does she call him manipulative and deceiving? HAILEY SEEL: Yes. CHARLES KITT: And then calls him a rapist. HAILEY SEEL: Yeah. … CHARLES KITT And just a couple of lines down, 'I hate his guts.' HAILEY SEEL: Yeah. CHARLES KITT: Are those things your mother typed to you? HAILEY SEEL: Yes. HAILEY SEEL (recording to Dana Chandler): Nobody can say that they — that you were in Colorado that weekend? Also played in court, were those conservations Hailey secretly recorded with her mom as she tried to learn more about Chandler's possible involvement in the murders. Jim Axelrod: In all the conversations you had with her over the days, weeks, months, even years after this happened, she never told you something … that made you think, well, at least my mom didn't do it? Hailey Seel: No. Every time I talked to her, I felt more and more confident that she definitely had something to do with it. And perhaps most telling to Hailey was a conversation, played in court, where Chandler said she had thought about killing Mike Sisco. DANA CHANDLER (recording): …. you ever think about killing him? HAILEY SEEL: No, but — DANA CHANDLER: I did. In one of those discussions, Hailey asked her mother about why she bought those two gas cans — which authorities thought could have been used to help drive roundtrip from Denver to Topeka without stopping in Kansas for fuel. Chandler, who'd been a problem drinker, explained she bought them for someone else—a woman she met at AA. DANA CHANDLER (recording, played in court): … She asked me for money and we don't give people money at AA. I said, 'I'll go buy you some gas …' The prosecutor asked Hailey if she was able to learn anything more about that woman from Chandler. CHARLES KITT (in court): She wouldn't tell you who that person was? HAILEY SEEL: No. She didn't. But Chandler's defense team argued those recorded conversations proved nothing about the murders. And regarding the two gas cans, it maintained that the 10 extra gallons the cans could hold would not have been enough for Chandler to drive roundtrip from Denver to Topeka without still needing to stop for fuel. The defense accused authorities of tunnel vision — including not looking more thoroughly at other suspects. And her lawyers said Chandler never owned a .9mm gun — the type of weapon used in the murders, which was never found. What was found, were unusual bullets made in Israel. AMY COODY (in court): Israel Military Industries, that's the manufacturer. Chandler's attorney questioned a firearms examiner who had worked for the Kansas Bureau of Investigation about those bullets. TOM BATH (in court): Is that a bullet, ammunition you typically see? AMY COODY: Actually, we had not seen that before. And so it was a little bit unusual to us. The prosecution, though, explained there were places one could buy those bullets. CHARLES KITT (in court): Could that ammo have been brought into Kansas and sold at a gun show? AMY COODY: Yes, sir. CHARLES KITT: Could have been exchanged by individuals? AMY COODY: Yes, sir. There were other parts of the investigation that the defense argued supported its case. There was forensic work it said eliminated Chandler. Unidentified fingerprints found at the house did not match Chandler. None of Chandler's DNA was found at the murder scene, nor were any fibers found from her clothing, or any of her hair. KAREN THIESSEN (in court): I did not find any … hairs that were consistent with the sample coming from Ms. Chandler. TOM BATH (in court): In 20 years, the state had no evidence, no evidence whatsoever that placed Dana Chandler in Karen Harkness' home, in the city of Topeka, or in the state of Kansas. After three weeks of testimony, that lack of physical evidence would be the defense's theme in its closing argument. TOM BATH (in court): Each and every time they tested something, it excluded Dana. CHARLES KITT (in court): From the beginning, I told you this case is about obsession, jealousy, rage. The state focused on Chandler's behavior — her calls, emails, and her own family's testimony against her. CHARLES KITT (in court): The defendant clearly hated Karen and Mike, words from her own mouth and her own fingers typing those messages. TOM BATH (in court): A lot of evidence about Dana's bad behavior. That's true. … That's not evidence. … They have not proven this case beyond a reasonable doubt. On Aug. 25, 2022, the case went to the jury, and Hailey was waiting for a verdict. Hailey Seel: I've really tried to trust the process … cause I knew I didn't have any control over it. So it was gonna be what it was gonna be. But the wait to find out what that verdict would be was a long one. JURORS DEADLOCK IN DANA CHANDLER'S SECOND MURDER TRIAL The case in the second trial of Dana Chandler for the murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness went to the jury on Aug. 25, 2022. That day came and went, as did several more. Hailey Seel: After about four days … I started to get nervous and think, wow, this actually could not come back in a guilty verdict and I started to think of that possibility. … And so … I prayed and I just trusted that, if she did get away with this that … life would have to go on, right? After six days of deliberating, Chandler would learn her fate. JUDGE CHERYL RIOS (in court): I understand that the jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict at this time, is that correct? FOREPERSON: That's correct. The jury informed the judge they were deadlocked. There were seven votes to convict and five to acquit. Ben Alford: We did what we could with what we had. Ben Alford and Carrie Kimes were two members of the jury who voted to find Chandler not guilty. Carrie Kimes: I never saw actual evidence that — Dana Chandler was ever in the Harkness home. … I can't send somebody to spend the rest of their life in prison if you can't even prove she left Colorado that weekend. Ben Alford: Everything that was tested for DNA proved inconclusive. … And that's pretty remarkable. But for juror Randy Edwards, the state's depiction of Chandler's behavior was persuasive evidence. Randy Edwards: She was beyond upset. She was obsessed. He also found those conversations Seel recorded with her mother to be convincing and voted to convict. Randy Edwards: When I was able to comprehend that Dana said that she had thought of killing Mike, that was probably the — the piece that pushed me beyond any question of reasonable doubt anymore. Mike Kagay: There was a split verdict, but the majority of the jury was in favor of a conviction and that was meaningful. DA Mike Kagay decided to retry Dana Chandler. Her lawyers convinced the court to reduce her bond, which allowed her to be released with supervision as she awaited the next trial. JUDGE CHERYL RIOS (in court): The court is going to direct that … she have GPS monitoring. After spending more than a decade incarcerated, Chandler celebrated her freedom with Darryl Burton and Miracle of Innocence. Darryl Burton: Anybody who's getting outta prison after you've been in prison for any length of time, it is, it's a joyous occasion. … You're happy that someone's been released and, you know, also feel like, well, maybe it's a good chance that, you know, we can, you know, mount a defense, and get her totally acquitted. As a condition of her release, Chandler was not allowed to contact her children. Still, Hailey worried about her safety. She is married to Chris Seel, her high school boyfriend, and is a mother of three. Hailey Seel: I'm scared to death that she's going to hurt me, or she's going to affect my kids in some way. Hailey's fear only grew when Chandler made a post to her Facebook page. Chandler complained about her treatment at trial, calling it a kangaroo court. And in the background, she showed images of Hailey's children. Hailey says Chandler somehow learned which church she attended and downloaded a livestream of a service to create the photos. Hailey Seel: It was chilling and it was disturbing. … I feel like it was a direct message to me. Jim Axelrod: And what was the message? Hailey Seel: Intimidation. … I don't care about your boundaries. Her belief that her mother committed the murders remains unwavering, and she says, disturbing. Hailey Seel: She's my mom but … if you're my mom, why would you do that to my dad? … For your kids' sake, maybe that would be a reason not to do it. … Being a mother now, I have a new perspective. … It becomes even more unreal now. Also unreal to Hailey — thoughts of a third trial. Jim Axelrod: What are your expectations for yet again another trial Hailey Seel: This time, I am not as confident. For trial number three, jurors would be from Pottawatomie County, Kansas. The defense requested a change of venue, and the judge agreed, citing excessive media coverage. It would take place in Westmoreland, a smaller, more rural area, 60 miles away from the last setting in Topeka. CHARLES KITT (in court): July 7th, 2002 was going to be a good day. Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness had been in a relationship for a few years. The trial got underway with opening statements on Feb. 7, 2025. CHARLES KITT (in court): One name just kept coming up, Dana Chandler. Charles Kitt was back retrying the case, joined by prosecutor Dan Dunbar. Judge Cheryl Rios again presided. And in a last-minute change, on the morning of opening statements, Chandler dismissed her defense attorneys. And Chandler decided the best person to represent her was herself. DANA CHANDLER (In court): I am innocent. I did not kill Mike and Karen. DANA CHANDLER REPRESENTS HERSELF AT THIRD MURDER TRIAL DANA CHANDLER (in court): I think this case is a character assassination. In February 2025, Dana Chandler was on trial for the third time for the murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness. But this time, she was representing herself. Mike Kagay: She was exercising her constitutional right. … It was an unknown. It was certainly unexpected. One thing that was the same as in the previous trials: Hailey Seel testifying. Hailey was asked again by the prosecution about her mother's inappropriate behavior. DAN DUNBAR (in court): What sort of things would she say about Karen? HAILEY SEEL: She called her a homewrecker. Um, a slut, very bad names. Prosecutors were also interested in an incident when Chandler drove Hailey and her brother to drop them off at Harkness' house. HAILEY SEEL (in court): We waited there for a really long time in the car… And then my dad and Karen got there, and my mom got out and yelled at them and just was very angry with my dad. … DAN DUNBAR: Hailey, I don't have any further questions, thank you. When it was time to be cross-examined, Hailey knew it would now be her mother doing the questioning. Nt sd Dana ' Hello Ms. Seel.' Hailey Seel: I really went up there — with like my game face on, you know. I — I knew it was war. I knew it wasn't going to be a — a nice, a cordial, a thoughtful — you're the victim, this was your dad and I'm so sorry place that she'd be coming from. Chandler challenged Hailey about her description of that drop-off at Harkness' home. Chandler said it was Hailey's father, Mike Sisco, who was behaving badly, not her. DANA CHANDLER (in court): When your dad and Karen drove up, your dad stormed over to the car. HAILEY SEEL: Oh, no. No, he did not. DANA CHANDLER: And he started banging on the window. HAILEY SEEL: Wha? No. No, he did not. I was inside that car and my dad absolutely did not bang on the windows. DANA CHANDLER: And I didn't get out — I never got out of the car. HAILEY SEEL: You were the first one out of the car. Hailey Seel: I was just in disbelief because I knew she just made that up because it never happened, and he never did that. … But … I didn't get concerned. I just said 'no, you know. I'm glad you asked so I can straighten this out. That never happened.' And then it comes down to who's believable. And I wasn't worried about that. As another way to seemingly explain some of her past behaviors, Chandler brought up that she used to have a drinking problem. DANA CHANDLER (in court): And I did tell you that I was — I realized that I had a problem with alcohol. HAILEY SEEL: You did tell me you had a problem with alcohol. Something Chandler said she stopped by 1999, three years before the murders. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I told you I was going to three AA meetings a day, trying to get well. True? HAILEY SEEL: I knew you were trying to get well, yes. The state questioned though, if becoming sober changed Chandler's behavior. DAN DUNBAR (in court): When she came back clean and sober, did that change how she treated you? HAILEY SEEL: No. DAN DUNBAR: Did it — did it change how she talked about your dad? HAILEY SEEL: No. DAN DUNBAR: Did it change how she talked about Karen? HAILEY SEEL: No. Chandler not only thought she was the best person to represent herself, but when it was time to put on her defense, she decided she would be her own main witness. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I feel like that I need to kind of tell my story to kind of put things in perspective. She testified over seven days, speaking for about 20 hours. DANA CHANDLER (in court): You have not seen evidence that I was in Topeka, Kansas, on July 7th, 2002. Darryl Burton: There was times when she would take so long to try to get her point across. Dana Chandler's supporter, Darryl Burton, was concerned when she put herself on the stand. Darry Burton: Sometimes it seemed as though she was just rambling, you know, and that was just unfortunate. … She may have known — probably knew where she was trying to go, but she'd get lost. She again addressed issues such as her drinking and inappropriate conversations with Hailey. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I was writing emails, drinking to blackout. I'd get up the next morning and not even aware of those emails. I had a serious problem. … And horrible things I said about Karen spreading her legs. I mean, seriously, Hailey was 14 years old. (cries) I'm just so ashamed and embarrassed about that and I hated that Hailey — that I put Hailey through that. And Chandler, in her own testimony, addressed again that incident when she waited outside Karen Harkness' house to drop off Hailey and Dustin with the couple. She said it was done out of necessity. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I yelled through the window, I could not afford to feed Hailey and Dustin. And that I needed to leave them with him. Chandler contrasted those times to when she stopped drinking, showing videos of her spending time outdoors with Hailey and Dustin. DANA CHANDLER (in court): This video was taken about 9 months into my recovery. Chandler also disputed making frequent harassing calls to Harkness and Sisco, saying when she called, there was a reason. DANA CHANDLER: I was … calling to speak with my children, Hailey, and Dustin. As to her having disagreements with Karen Harkness, she testified there were none. DANA CHANDLER: I never, ever, had any confrontations with Karen Harkness, at all. Chandler also pointed out what she said was sloppiness in the police investigation. When Chandler questioned lead detective Richard Volle, she asked about whether police were too focused on her and should have been looking more thoroughly at other possible suspects. DANA CHANDLER (In court, questioning Volle): Did you or did you not receive any leads for other suspects besides me? DET. RICHARD VOLLE: Uh, early on in the investigation, there were several other people that were looked at as possible leads. … So it's a matter of checking people off, to dismissing people that couldn't have done it. … Uh, when we can't dismiss them, we keep focusing on them, like we did with you. Chandler, though, said there was an area she felt law enforcement thoroughly investigated — whether she bought a .9 mm gun, like the one used in the murders and they came up empty handed. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I've never owned, purchased, or possessed a .9mm firearm. And throughout her defense, Chandler was adamant that at the time of the murders, she was in Colorado, and no one could place her in Harkness' house, or even in Kansas. It seemed like a simple question Chandler was asking Detective Volle. DANA CHANDLER (in court, questioning Volle): Did you ever develop any information that I was in Topeka, Kansas, on July 6th or 7th of 2002? In answering that question, Volle said there was a woman named Patty Williams who may have spotted Chandler in the state of Kansas around the time of the murders. DANA CHANDLER (in court, questioning Volle): What do you know about Patty? DET. RICHARD VOLLE: She was a clerk at a convenience store in WaKeeney, Kansas. The gas station/convenience store in WaKeeney, where Williams worked, was nearly halfway between Denver and Topeka. It had been visited by an investigator, searching for locations where someone may have spotted Chandler around the time of the murders. There, the investigator showed Williams the photo of Chandler seen below. DET. RICHARD VOLLE (in court): She was seven out of 10 that it was you. According to Volle, the clerk was 70 percent sure she had seen Dana Chandler and described some distinguishing features. DET. RICHARD VOLLE (in court): She had, or said that she had gray near the hairline … Chandler though, told the jury, she did not have gray hair back then. By the time of the trials, Williams had died and could not be questioned again. Chandler also expressed concern that the investigator only showed a single photo of her initially, instead of an array of photos, including different people—something Volle did do when he went to the gas station about two weeks later. DET. RICHARD VOLLE (in court): We later — later went out with a — what we call a six-pack photo, it's uh six photographs of people that looked very similar and amongst those photos was Ms. Chandler. Volle said Williams immediately picked out Chandler, and again was 70 percent sure she saw her there. But Volle acknowledged using an array initially would have been better. There was still, for law enforcement, the issue regarding Dana Chandler's alibi. Remember, Volle said Chandler told him she was home in her Denver apartment the night of the murders. But she told others, including an acquaintance, Jeff Bailey, she slept in her car in the Colorado mountains that night. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I was confused … Chandler told the jury she had been confused when she spoke with Volle, but Prosecutor Kitt was not accepting that explanation. CHARLES KITT (in court): So what you told Detective Volle is not consistent with what you told Jeff Bailey, is it? DANA CHANDLER: Uh, as far as my trip to – CHARLES KITT: Ms. Chandler, it's not consistent – DANA CHANDLER: Oh, that part. OK. Yeah. I would agree with that. Um, I would — that's true … Once again, those secret recordings Hailey made with her mother were played in court: DANA CHANDLER: … you ever think about killin' him? HAILEY SEEL: No, but — DANA CHANDLER: I did. This time, Kitt questioned Chandler herself about its authenticity. CHARLES KITT (in court): Was that your voice saying, 'Did you ever think about killing him?' 'I did'? DANA CHANDLER: It sounds like it yes. When it was time for the final witness, Chandler decided it should be Dana Chandler. She knew the jury heard witnesses testify about her parenting and past behavior. Chandler explained if she was a less than an attentive mother, it was because of her drinking and a lack of money, not a lack of love. DANA CHANDLER (in court): I absolutely did want to have a relationship with my children. You know I think the financial, substance abuse combination, um it just wasn't feasible. So, that's all I have, thank you. Oh, cross. CHARLES KITT (in court): Ms. Chandler, during this time that you couldn't afford to feed your children, you were buying booze, correct? DANA CHANDLER: I was. CHARLES KITT: Buying enough alcohol to get blackout drunk? DANA CHANDLER: I was. CHARLES KITT: OK, thank you. I have no further questions. And with that, after 18 days of testimony, Kitt and Chandler presented their closing arguments. CHARLES KITT (in court): Why are Mike and Karen dead? And the evidence shows one simple answer, control. Hailey Seel: I think Kitt nailed it when he said it was about control. The state described Chandler losing control of Mike Sisco, as he planned his future with Karen Harkness, and the rage that followed. CHARLES KITT (in court): And that's what led to the defendant traveling to Topeka, Kansas, on July 6th and murdering them on July 7th. Kitt spoke about Chandler's depiction of events not lining up with the testimony of others. CHARLES KITT (in court): It's the defendant versus everyone. … You can believe the defendant's testimony, or you can believe everybody else that you heard from in this case. In Chandler's closing, she used a scale to make her point that prosecutors, whom she called her accusers, did not have enough evidence to tip it in their favor. DANA CHANDLER (in court): The, uh, accusers must, uh, tip the scale. Here. I'm innocent. (pointing to scale) DANA CHANDLER (in court): I had my infirmities, and I have my shortcomings, but I do stand here before you all today and proclaim that I am an innocent woman. She acknowledged the life she led was not perfect but said that doesn't make her a murderer. DANA CHANDLER (in court): The state has woefully failed to meet its burden, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I killed Mike Sisco or Karen Harkness. THE VERDICT About four hours later, the jury delivered its verdict: guilty of the murders of Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness. After hearing the verdict, Chandler turned away. And while it was the verdict Seel hoped for, the end result is nothing she ever wanted. Hailey Seel: It is so much worse that my mom is the one behind these murders because we lost my dad and Karen, but then through all this, now we've lost our mom. … I really wish it was someone else. Darryl Burton: I don't believe that they have proved this case beyond a reasonable doubt. Chandler's supporter, Darryl Burton, remains undeterred. He still believes she is innocent. Darryl Burton: The evidence just doesn't, you know, prove that she's guilty of anything Chandler is filing motions for an appeal. '48 Hours' reached out to Chandler again for this episode, but did not receive a response. Mike Kagay: I am very confident in this verdict. District Attorney Mike Kagay is certain the jury convicted the right person. Mike Kagay: I have every confidence in my prosecutors and how they handled this case. Hailey Seel: The focus of this case has gone almost completely to Dana Chandler and that the victims … has really been lost … which is really sad. More than 20 years have passed since Mike Sisco and Karen Harkness were murdered —-and Hailey wants to make sure the lives lost are not forgotten. Hailey Seel: I was trying to tell my daughter about who my dad is. (cries) … and I said … he was a really fun, supportive, encouraging guy who believed in me and my brother. …And Karen … was so kind, so accepting. … I miss them a lot. Dana Chandler is scheduled to be sentenced on June 3, 2025. Produced by Ruth Chenetz and Dena Goldstein. Chelsea Narvaez and Hannah Vair are the field producers. Mead Stone is the producer editor. Atticus Brady, Marcus Balsam, George Baluzy, Wini Dini, Gary Winter and Grayce Arlotta-Berner are the editors. Patti Aronofsky is the senior producer, Nancy Kramer is the executive story editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer. Jim Axelrod Jim Axelrod is the chief correspondent and executive editor for CBS News' 'Eye on America' franchise, part of the 'CBS Evening News.' He also reports for 'CBS Mornings,' 'CBS News Sunday Morning,' and CBS News 24/7.

Survivor's testimony key to helping convict violent ex-boyfriend charged with murder
Survivor's testimony key to helping convict violent ex-boyfriend charged with murder

Wakala News

time11-05-2025

  • Wakala News

Survivor's testimony key to helping convict violent ex-boyfriend charged with murder

C.C. Opanowski was just 18 years old when she was brutally attacked by someone she once loved — her ex-boyfriend Shawn Doyle. C.C. tried to put the traumatic incident behind her until she learned years later that Doyle murdered a mother of two young boys. For the first time, C.C. is speaking out publicly to' 48 Hours' and correspondent Anne-Marie Green about her story and how she was able to find the strength to testify against her attacker in court. It was Jan. 27, 1996 and C.C. Opanowski has just finished her first semester of college in upstate New York. She and her ex-boyfriend, Shawn Doyle had been broken up for about four months. C.C. Opanowski: My mother was going away for the weekend. … so I had this whole big house to myself. …And my friend Shannon and I … we were very close … I said, 'well, let's stay at my house 'cause there's no one around.' Shannon McCauliffe: it was just a girls' night. We just wanted to chill out. C.C. and McCauliffe were roommates at Sage Junior College of Albany. Shannon McCauliffe: I'm really introverted (laughs) and she was very bubbly and happy and chipper … And she just — she brought me outta my shell. Anne-Marie Green: When you were first meeting her, was Shawn Doyle around at the time? Shannon McCauliffe: Yes. He was obnoxious. … she would argue with him a lot on the phone. Anne-Marie Green: And then … in January is when this incident happens at her house? Shannon McCauliffe: Mm-hmm. … we were having a good time. It was just the two of us. Anne-Marie Green: But he keeps calling. Shannon McCauliffe: Mm-hmm. … Wanting to know what we're doing, wanting to know if he can come over. … She had a cellphone and I was like,' just turn it off.' Like she's like, no, 'cause if I turn it off, he's gonna come here. Shannon McCauliffe: We finally wake up and all we wanted was coffee. … I had the — of the mindset of I'm like, 'oh, I can't go out in public looking like I'm a mess. Let me go home and get dressed.' After McCauliffe left to go home, C.C. says there was a knock at her door. C.C. Opanowski: And I open it. And it's him. C.C. Opanowski: And he said … I just wanna talk to you. … And once he was inside, things got much different. … He pushed me onto the couch … started, you know, holding me down and restraining me. You know, yelling at me … And he picked me up and pushed me against the French doors and kept banging me against the French doors. McCauliffe called C.C., but there was no answer C.C. Opanowski: My hair was in a ponytail … And … he picked me up, held me up and cut my hair off … it was gone, just all of it. … he had already been choking me and … I thought he was gonna stab me. Shannon McCauliffe: I called her back a half an hour later, she still didn't answer. … and that's when my eyebrows kind of went up. C.C. Opanowski: I'm in complete shock. I can't believe it's happening and I have to figure out how to get out of it. …But during this time, the phone continues to ring. Shannon McCauliffe: I waited a couple minutes and I called her back. C.C. Opanowski: I explained to him … if I don't answer this phone, my mother will call the police. … So I do pick up the phone and it's Shannon. Shannon McCauliffe: I said, 'hey, are you OK?' C.C. Opanowski: And I don't know why I did this, but I started unloading the dishwasher. …And I'm saying to her, no, no, yeah, everything's fine. No, no. And no kept coming out of my mouth. And he didn't pick up on it, but she sure did. And that's when she said,' is he there?' And I said, 'yes.' A SURVIVOR SHARES HER STORY It has taken almost 30 years for C.C. to talk publicly about the day her former high school boyfriend, Shawn Doyle, attacked her in her family's home in Hudson Falls, New York, and then used scissors to cut off her ponytail. Anne-Marie Green: What was it like to have your hair cut off in this way? C.C. Opanowski: Demeaning. Anne-Marie Green: Demeaning. You think that's why he did it? C.C. Opanowski: Probably. Just to make sure he could knock me down somewhere. On that day, as Doyle went in and out of violent rages — at one point holding the scissors to her throat — C.C. says she wasn't sure she would make it out alive. Until, she says, McCauliffe called. Anne-Marie Green: When she finally picks up the phone … what did you hear in her voice? Shannon McCauliffe: Fear. McCauliffe says she knew that Doyle had been harassing C.C., so when C.C. told her Doyle was there, Shannon notified police and then rushed over to C.C.'s house. Shannon McCauliffe: I pulled onto her street and I parked and then I saw the – the — the police officers and everything. … so I kinda went in after the fact. … She looked terrified and angry and sad. C.C. says she thought when police arrived, they would make her feel safe. But that's not exactly what happened. C.C. Opanowski: They do not put him in handcuffs. … And they put us in the back of the same police car. C.C. Opanowski: Mind you, all of this time … I clearly look like I've been assaulted. My hair is completely cut off. And when they arrived at the police station — C.C. Opanowski: I was like, why — why are we here? Why is he not — why are we in the same room? C.C. says instead of separating them, police questioned them together. C.C. Opanowski: And they made it seem like it was some fight between two young kids, that turned, you know, slightly dark. When '48 Hours' reached out to the Hudson Falls Police Department, they acknowledged that law enforcement's response to domestic violence has evolved over the past several decades to better work with and support victims. Police arrested Doyle and charged him with menacing, harassment and trespassing. C.C. Opanowski: Looking at it … And you're saying, 'did this really happen to me?' You know, 'how could this happen to me?' JEALOUSY, A TATTOO AND OTHER RED FLAGS C.C. Opanowski and Shawn Doyle grew up in the small town of Hudson Falls located in upstate New York. C.C. Opanowski: He was nice to me. He was really nice. When C.C. started dating Shawn Doyle, she was just 15 years old — a sophomore in high school. Doyle was one year older. C.C. Opanowski: You know, we would go out and do lots of things together. We just hung out all the time. C.C. says Doyle had troubles at home. During his junior year, Doyle told her his parents kicked him out. So, C.C. begged her parents to let him move in with them. Anne Marie Green: Did you feel sorry for him? C.C. Opanowski: Def — oh definitely. Soon after he moved into C.C.'s family home, she says she saw a change in Doyle's behavior. C.C. says he became jealous and would secretly follow her around — something she says she didn't think at the time was a big deal. C.C. Opanowski: When you're a 16-, 17-year-old girl and you know you're looking at, oh, jealousy, you know, he must love me so much and that's why he's doing this. Or he followed me home, he's so worried about me, but is that really what the case is? When you look back as an adult, someone with experience, you know, you think. That's probably not — not OK. And Doyle showed even more possessive behavior that C.C. found troubling. C.C. Opanowski: He at one point did get a tattoo. … It was a heart on his arm. … And it had my name in the middle. Anne-Marie Green: What did you say? C.C. Opanowski: Why would you do that? Anne-Marie Green: And his response? C.C. Opanowski: I love you. Anne-Marie Green: Was it a red flag? C.C. Opanowski: Definitely. During his senior year, C.C. says Doyle dropped out of high school and was working odd jobs that he couldn't keep. C.C. Opanowski: And this is where things start to get … darker. You know, he — he doesn't have any prospects. He knows that I'm getting ready to go away to school. And to him, his whole life is — is about to completely change. But C.C. says she stuck by him, writing in her senior yearbook, 'I love you Shawn!' And in the summer of 1995, when she left to attend what is now Russell Sage College in Albany, they agreed to stay together and see each other on weekends. But at the end of September, things took a scary turn when C.C. told Doyle she would not be coming home every weekend to see him. Doyle showed up at her dorm. C.C. Opanowski: He stood outside, basically threatening that he was going to kill me. Anne-Marie Green: And now he's threatening not just you, but anyone around you. C.C. Opanowski: Basically anyone around me … so he was arrested. Doyle was charged with harassment and trespassing. It was the final straw for C.C., who says she broke it off with Doyle for good and he moved out of her parent's house. Later that winter, that's when Doyle showed up and viciously attacked her at her home. Anne Marie Green: I know he threatened a lot, but did you ever believe that Shawn Doyle would have physically hurt you? C.C. Opanowski: Not until that day, not in that way. After the attack, C.C. returned to college and finished up her freshman year. But McCauliffe says her friend had changed. Shannon McCauliffe: I think it had a profound impact on her life. C.C. Opanowski: You know, I was always looking over my shoulder … I bought myself a Swiss Army knife. … I'm having night terrors. … You know, waking up crying, waking up screaming, not being able to sleep. … awful, awful. So eight months after the attack, when it was time to take the case to trial, C.C. — who was still just a teenager at 19 years old — told prosecutors she couldn't go through with it. She says she was too traumatized and scared. C.C. Opanowski: I didn't wanna have to face him in court. I didn't wanna be going over this over and over and over again. I really wanted it to go away. Doyle was offered a deal. He pleaded guilty to menacing in the second degree and was sentenced to just three years' probation. C.C. transferred colleges and moved hours away from Hudson Falls. C.C. Opanowski: I needed peace and I didn't know how to get it. C.C. tried to forget her past, but she says she was haunted by a conversation she had with the prosecutor. C.C. Opanowski: She said, you know … based on what I see here, he is going to do this again to another person. And that has for the past 28 years stuck in my head. LORI LEONARD DISAPPEARS Nine years after C.C. Opanowski left upstate New York for a new life far away from Shawn Doyle, 33-year-old Lori Leonard disappeared. Lori was a single mom who lived with her two sons, Austin, who was 9 at the time, and Zackary 5, in Chittenango, a small town outside Syracuse, New York. Austin Feltrinelli: She was a — a very caring mother. The memories of her — just us always being happy together, spending time … kind of always … the three of us. Zackary Wicklund: It was just a lot of love and affection. Jennifer Leonard: Her dream was to have a home, a father figure for her kids, and for them to be happy. … She wanted the white picket fence. Jennifer Leonard was Lori's older sister. Jennifer Leonard: We were good friends. But I was a little bit of a bossy mother to her. … I had been through a lot of things already in my life and my relationships, and I was very, I would say, overprotective. In 2003, Lori met a man on the dating website His name? Shawn Doyle. Online dating was new back then, so Jennifer was skeptical about him. Jennifer Leonard: He was not charismatic. He was not social. … He was like a piece of furniture that you just walked around. But she says Lori didn't agree; she only saw the good in people. Jennifer Leonard: She would say, you know, he's misunderstood or he's shy. Jennifer says Lori told her very little about Doyle, except that he lived three hours away in Hudson Falls and worked at an ice cream factory. She also mentioned that Doyle was on probation. Jennifer Leonard: She told me that he was a boxer, that he was protecting a woman at a bar and was arrested because he used some of his professional boxing moves. Jennifer Leonard: No. Anne-Marie Green: I mean, did he — do you think he was even a boxer, ever? Jennifer Leonard: No. … I didn't buy the stories that he was selling her. … It sounded like he was trying to be something that he was not. Jennifer says after her sister met Doyle, Lori became distant. Jennifer Leonard: I would talk to Lori three times a day. Anne-Marie Green: And then when Shawn came into the picture? Jennifer Leonard: It was — it was a little quiet. And things only got worse. Jennifer Leonard: I had called her one night and he was over there and all I could hear in the background was him yelling at her. And that — that was like, 'what is this?' And she's like, you know I'll call you back. It's not a big deal. Jennifer Leonard: But I think what scared me more than anything was when he was caught yelling at her … it stopped. Like the kind of guys that you know don't want anyone else to see what happens behind closed doors. … He was sneaky. Soon after this incident, Lori ended her romantic relationship with Doyle. Lori told Jennifer they agreed to be just friends and that he was fine with it. Jennifer Leonard: And I was like, no, he's not. Nope. People like that aren't just OK with being friends. Despite the breakup, Doyle would still drive three hours from Hudson Falls to visit Lori. Oftentimes hanging out at the bar where she waitressed late at night. Dorothy Tucker: Shawn, always called me and he — he'd call me to get advice. Dorothy Tucker lived down the street from Doyle in Hudson Falls and considered him a close friend. Dorothy Tucker: I saw a sweet guy who would bend over backwards if I asked him to. However, after the relationship with Lori ended, she says Doyle told her he had followed Lori and watched her as she went out on a date. Dorothy Tucker: I was like, 'Shawn, you can't do that. … She does not wanna be with you.' Anne-Marie Green: Were you starting to get concerned about him and his behavior at that point? Dorothy Tucker: No. No. Because he agreed with me. … I didn't see the monster that he really was … He hid it quite well. On Friday, April 29, 2005, Lori, who was living with Jennifer, moved to a new rental apartment. Dustin Delatore: Usually people are miserable when they're moving. She was just happy. Lori's nephew Dustin Delatore, who was 15 at the time, helped with the move. Dustin Delatore: She wanted her own place. … She saw her future in that day. Also helping with the move was Shawn Doyle, who offered up use of his truck. Jennifer Leonard: She had asked a couple people before that. So he was a last resort. … He was still playing the 'I'm your friend.' Anne Marie Green: What was Shawn like that day? Dustin Delatore: Standoffish. Just, I mean, quiet. Jennifer says the move went smoothly until Doyle decided to hang around— and stayed with Lori in her new place for days. Jennifer Leonard: It was starting to get on her nerves now. Five days after the move, Jennifer says Lori told her Doyle was finally leaving because Lori had plans to go to Albany for the afternoon. Jennifer Leonard: She was supposed to go pick up the tickets. Tickets to a Yankees game — a gift from someone she had met at work. Anne-Marie Green: Were you concerned at all about her going to pick up tickets from a stranger? Jennifer Leonard: Yes, yes. But that was how she was. … She was very trusting. On Wednesday, May 4, Jennifer called Lori in the afternoon, hoping to catch her while she was heading to Albany. Jennifer Leonard: And it kept going straight to voicemail. Anne-Marie Green: Was that weird? Jennifer Leonard: Oh … Her phone never went straight to voicemail. It was never off. At first Jennifer thought she may have gotten lost on the drive or that her phone battery had died. Jennifer Leonard: It wasn't a thought at the time, that, that something bad happened, just that, you know, where is she? Twenty-four hours later, when Lori never called or returned home, Jennifer notified Chittenango police. Wade Irwin: Patrol started looking into her whereabouts at that time. Lead investigator Wade Irwin searched Lori's rental apartment. Wade Irwin: She had just moved into the home. … There were still lots of boxes, items being unpacked. Didn't appear that there were any signs of a break-in, or a crime that occurred at the home. … But her car was there. And he said there was something else unsettling about the scene. Wade Irwin: There was one shoe in the center of the bed. It was odd. Investigator Irwin says he was determined to speak to one person. Wade Irwin: The last person that — that we were able to determine that saw her, was Shawn Doyle. But before investigators could reach out to Doyle, Jennifer says she tracked down Doyle's number and called him herself. Jennifer Leonard: 'Shawn, have you talked to Lori?' And, uh, he goes, 'no I haven't talked to her in a couple of days. Um, wasn't she supposed to get tickets the other night?' And I'm like, 'yeah, she was, we haven't heard from her since. I'm like, you know, if she calls you let us know because the phone's off' … and he's like, 'oh yeah, definitely let you know …' …When I hung up, I was like I had chills and I'm like, he's full of it. He knows something. A KEY CLUE IN THE CASE As days went by, Chittenango investigators reached out to everyone who had contact with Lori Leonard prior her to her disappearance— including the man she was supposed to get Yankees tickets from in Albany. Wade Irwin: He was an executive for a company. … We were able to track him down. He was interviewed. Detective Wade Irwin says the executive waited for Lori in Albany and when she never showed up, he called her and even left a message. Wade Irwin: He was … calling with concern of … where she was. 'We're supposed to meet up. I got the tickets. I'm here, are you OK? I hope an accident didn't happen.' His alibi checked out, but Lori's phone records would reveal a lot more about another person who hadn't called. Wade Irwin: What became concerning for myself is … the person that cared about her, supposedly. Anne-Marie Green: Shawn Doyle. Wade Irwin: Shawn Doyle. Never called, never left a message. When Chittenango police went to interview Lori's former boyfriend, he told them that on the day she disappeared, he left her apartment 'about 3 p.m.' and then drove three hours home to Hudson Falls. Wade Irwin: He just always, had said all along… that he left her and she was alive at the apartment. When they checked out his alibi, Irwin says they couldn't clear him. Yet, Doyle was cooperative and even allowed investigators to search his truck and take photos. When they searched Doyle's glove compartment, they found something curious. Wade Irwin: There was a key with a serial number on it. As investigators kept an eye out on Doyle and continued to search for Lori, Jennifer says her family struggled to explain Lori's disappearance to her two young sons. Austin Feltrinelli: After several days to several weeks you know something's up. Your mother's not home. … The question is, you know, where is she? What's — what's she doing? Jennifer Leonard: We would say things like she got lost … you know, we'll get her. We'll find her. To make matters worse, Austin and Zackary were now separated, staying with their fathers, and only seeing each other on weekends. Austin Feltrinelli: We'd lived together our whole lives. … That was obviously different, you know, waking up every day with one — your mom's not there, uh, but two — now your brother isn't. Jennifer Leonard: We were suffering and every day our family was doing something to find her. … We were looking for her. We were a well-oiled machine. Jennifer suspected Shawn Doyle had something to do with her sister's disappearance. So, weeks after Lori vanished, she headed to Hudson Falls and held a demonstration, hoping someone there would know something about Doyle that could help investigators. Jennifer Leonard: We had posters. We had signs, we had Shawn's name up on signs, if anybody will speak to us. Dorothy Tucker says when she heard Lori's family was in town, she immediately called Doyle. Dorothy Tucker: I was like, 'Shawn, what's going on?' You know, 'did you do something?' (mimics his voice) 'I didn't do anything to her. She's probably off on a beach somewhere with some guy.' Anne-Marie Green: But you believe Shawn at the time? Dorothy Tucker: Oh, definitely. Later that day when Dorothy passed Lori's family rallying on the streets, she says she did something she has come to deeply regret. Dorothy Tucker: Like an idiot, I yelled out the window. … telling them to go home. Shawn didn't do anything and they needed to leave. As months passed with no sign of Lori, the family's hopes began to dwindle. Wade Irwin: I made a promise … to find a resolution to this for them and give them the closure and answers that they needed. … It was disheartening because every night … I'd call them and give them an update regardless of whether there was positive or negative information. (tears in his eyes) And then, on July 24, 2005, three months after Lori went missing — Capt. Tony LeClaire: We had a report that a fisherman had been going by in this area here. Captain Tony LeClaire is with the Washington County Sheriff's Office. Capt. Tony LeClaire: He saw, uh, what he thought to be a toolbox that goes in the back of a pickup truck floating. Thought it may be useful for him. So he grabbed onto it … towed it with his boat about a mile-and-a-half (points) … And then they dragged it outta the water there. The box was locked and emitting a foul odor, So police were called, and when they broke open the lock, authorities discovered a body inside. Wade Irwin: And there was contents, pillows, bedding, purse, but right on top was Lori's ID. (emotional) Also in the box was a photo of Lori's two sons. Wade Irwin: She was handcuffed behind her back. … There was duct tape around the handcuffs. Her feet were bound together and duct taped. .. Her face, from chin to forehead, um, had duct tape. And then once that duct tape was removed there was a bandana tied in her mouth. The Medical Examiner would rule that Lori died of asphyxiation. Jennifer Leonard: I couldn't wrap my head around what they were saying. 'What do you mean she was found in the toolbox in the water?' I — I couldn't, I couldn't, I couldn't accept it. Irwin says that's when Shawn Doyle went from a person of interest to a suspect in the case. Wade Irwin: Everything started to come together real quickly. We got a search warrant within hours to go to his residence. During their search, police found sand tubes in his garage that matched the sand tubes inside the toolbox used to weigh it down. Wade Irwin: We were able to track down in the home, similar handcuffs, bandanas, duct tape other means that he used that matched what was used on Lori. Remember that key investigators had discovered in Doyle's truck? It matched the lock of the toolbox, tying Doyle directly to the crime. When investigators checked the bridge near the canal where the toolbox was found, they discovered scratches on the bridge railing that matched scratches found on the bottom of the toolbox. Anne Marie Green: Just tell me about what investigators think happened? What was the theory? Capt. Tony LeClaire: The theory is that he came here with his pickup truck, came to the bridge, um, somewhere in the center of the canal and took the toolbox and basically just pushed it over the edge … and as he did, it scraped across. Just one day after the discovery of Lori's body in the toolbox, investigators arrested Shawn Doyle. Anne Marie Green: What was that moment like for you? Det. Wade Irwin: Overwhelming. Jennifer says it was time to break the news to Lori's two young sons. Zackary remembers the moment even though he was only 5 years old. Zackary Wicklund: I felt it as soon as I walked into the room. And I think my dad was the one that said that she's not coming home and I just kind of fell into him and just didn't know how to react. Jennifer Leonard: I watched a little boy break. He said not a word. Then it was time to tell 9-year-old Austin. Austin Feltrinelli: You know I let out kind of like a shriek and, and kind of just collapsed, uh, in my dad. And I can still kind of feel it. Jennifer Leonard: And he wailed. It wasn't a cry. It was, it was a pained guttural wail. … I'll always have that sound in my head. Jennifer says she couldn't truly mourn her sister because she had to prepare for Doyle's upcoming trial. Jennifer Leonard: I was gonna make sure that he got what he deserved. A SURVIVOR'S BREAKING POINT In late summer of 2005, C.C. Opanowski received a phone call from her father: her ex-boyfriend Shawn Doyle had been arrested for murder. C.C. Opanowski: I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I couldn't believe it. … You don't want it to be true … and it's terrible. When C.C. learned that the victim was 33-year-old Lori Leonard, a single mom of two young boys, she says she was overwhelmed with extreme guilt. C.C. Opanowski: That was a breaking point for me. I felt for her whole entire family and her two young children. C.C. says she was haunted by the choice she made as a traumatized and scared teenager. C.C. Opanowski: And all I can think about is … If I could go back, I would have done it differently. … I would have pressed my charges much further. So just weeks later, when investigators reached out to C.C. and asked if she would testify at Doyle's trial, she was determined to help. C.C. Opanowski: I need to make sure that he is put away for — for murdering Lori. … At this point now, I'm angry. I'm not fearful. But C.C. was not Doyle's only ex-girlfriend who investigators hoped would testify against him. Five years after Doyle attacked C.C., he allegedly tried to kill 23-year-old Sarah Volmar. '48 Hours' reached out to Volmar and received no response, but she did speak with the CBS affiliate in Albany about the attack in 2005. SARAH VOLMAR/ CBS6 ALBANY NEWS REPORT: He had tied me up with shoelaces and, um, put the duct tape back over my mouth and then just began strangling me until I passed out. And then my mother walked in on it. Doyle was charged with unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and assault in the third degree. But again, a deal was made. Doyle pleaded guilty only to the charge of unlawful imprisonment. A judge sentenced him to three years' probation. On Jan. 23, 2006 Shawn Doyle's trial began. It was a day that Lori's sister Jennifer Leonard had waited for. Jennifer Leonard: I was gonna be her advocate. I was gonna speak for her. I was gonna speak for the boys. When Doyle entered the courtroom, Jennifer Leonard says she was caught off guard because his appearance had changed. Anne-Marie Green: What'd he look like? Jennifer Leonard: Choir boy. He'd grown his hair. He had a sweater on. Kevin Kortright, now retired, had only been district attorney for less than a month. He says key to his case was making sure Doyle's other victims – C.C. and Sarah — would be allowed to testify. Oftentimes, judges do not allow a defendant's prior bad acts to be brought into trial. Anne-Marie Green: Why were the women so crucial? Kevin Kortright: He'd done it almost exactly the same in the past. … It's his modus operandi. It's strong proof. Despite the defense's objections, the judge ruled that C.C. and Sarah could testify. But first, Kortright presented the jury with all the pieces of physical evidence that pointed to Shawn Doyle — like the items they found in Doyle's garage and home: the sandbags and handcuffs. Anne Marie Green: And what about that bandana? Kevin Kortright: He wore a bandana 24 hours a day … He had bandanas in his bedroom. He had bandanas in his truck. The bandana in Lori's mouth was the one that I believe he was wearing that day. And then there was that toolbox. Kortright called to the stand a clerk from a local AutoZone store who says she sold Doyle the toolbox just one week before Lori disappeared. Kevin Kortright: She identified him perfectly. … She even identified his shirt he was wearing. And the most important piece of evidence: that key found in his glove compartment that tied Doyle directly to the box. Don Lehman: That was as strong as evidence as you could get. Retired journalist Don Lehman covered the trial for the Post Star newspaper. Don Lehman: The key to the toolbox was … there was no way around that … Then Kortright called Dorothy Tucker, Shawn's once close friend, to the stand. He says she was a major witness because she provided information as to how they believe Doyle transported Lori's body from Chittenango — three hours over to Hudson Falls — after he murdered her. Dorothy Tucker: He just kept calling me. Tucker told the jury that the day that Lori disappeared, Doyle stopped by her house. In the back of his truck, she says, was a very large cardboard box. Dorothy Tucker: I said, 'Shawn, what do you got there?' … Oh just garbage. Junk I had at Lori's. … and take it to the dump. DA Kortright believes Lori's body was in the box and that at some point, Doyle transferred her body to the toolbox. Tucker testified that just days after his first visit, Doyle showed up at her house again and the cardboard box had been replaced by a large toolbox. Dorothy Tucker: I walk out and I said 'hey Shawn … what do you need a toolbox for? You don't have any tools to put in it.' And he laughed and yeah, yeah, you know. So then he started saying about a friend … was going to meet him. They were gonna go fishing. Tucker said Doyle told her he was going to fish by the Champlain Lock canal area – a place he knew well and frequented often. Doyle had even taken C.C. there many times when they dated. Kevin Kortright: Lori was in the box that day. And he was taking her to dump her in the canal where she was later found. District Attorney Kortright called C.C. Opanowski as his last witness. Kevin Kortright: You always put the best for the last. C.C. Opanowski: I was very, very nervous. C.C. told the jury about the attack and the long-lasting mental anguish Shawn Doyle caused her. Anne-Marie Green: What did you want Shawn Doyle to see? C.C. Opanowski: That I wasn't afraid. That you're not my scary anything anymore. When it was the defense's turn, Lehman says they tried to poke holes in the prosecution's case. Don Lehman: There just was not – not a lot of holes to poke. '48 Hours' reached out to Shawn Doyle and members of Doyle's family, but they declined to be interviewed. After three long days of testimony, the case went to the jury. Lori Leonard's family members held their breath. Jennifer Leonard: I felt like I hadn't exhaled in months and that's what I needed. I needed to exhale. SHARING IMPORTANT LESSONS Despite the all the evidence against Shawn Doyle, retired journalist Don Lehman says no one knew which way the jury would rule. Don Lehman: There have been times that we've seen many cases where the jury does things that just kind of defy the evidence. On Jan. 26, 2006, after just two-and-a-half hours of deliberations, the jury came back with a verdict: guilty of second-degree murder. Anne-Marie Green: Guilty. Kevin Kortright: Um hmm. Anne-Marie Green: What went through your mind when you heard that word? Kevin Kortright: Thank God. Anne-Marie Green: Why does it still affect you? Kevin Kortright: Because bad things happen to good people. C.C. Opanowski: I was relieved and happy that he was going to be punished for what he did. For C.C., it was difficult to process the fact that a person she once loved was convicted of murder. C.C. Opanowski: To me, it almost felt like there wasn't a man left inside of him. But more like a monster. For your crimes to become worse as you go … to almost perfect them, to think about them in that serial fashion. One month later, before Doyle was sentenced, a judge listened to testimony and read over victim impact statements from Lori's friends and family. LORI LEONARD'S FAMILY MEMBER (in court) | CBS6 ALBANY: Prison isn't even the right place for someone like him. It's not punishment enough. Austin and Zackary, Lori's sons, were too young to attend trial, but both wrote letters to the judge. Zackary Wicklund (reading his statement): She let me sleep with her when I was scared. … And when I see something scary and hear something scary … we used to sing songs we liked the most together. Austin Feltrinelli (reading his statement): I think my mom was the greatest mom in the world. … My mom, my brother and I had really great times together. … I'm also sad because (pauses) I will never see my mom anymore now because of what happened … Shawn Doyle was sentenced to the maximum — 25 years to life, with the possibility of parole. Anne-Marie Green: Was that enough? Jennifer Leonard: I didn't think so. Anne-Marie Green: You don't want him getting out? Jennifer Leonard: No. There's no forgiveness. No way man. No. none. Dorothy Tucker: He's a danger to society. And I — I hope he never gets out. Dorothy Tucker, who initially stood by Doyle, says she feels betrayed by him. Dorothy Tucker: He lied straight to my face and here is someone that I trusted thought I knew, never saw that side of him. Tucker hopes Lori's family will forgive her for how she previously treated them when they came to rally against Doyle in Hudson Falls. Dorothy Tucker: I wanted to tell them how sorry I was and I still am. … that was totally uncalled for and it was unacceptable behavior on my part. Lehman, who has covered many domestic violence cases in his almost 30 years as a reporter, says there are important lessons that can be learned from C.C. and Sarah's attacks and Lori's murder. Don Lehman: Every case of domestic violence is a potential homicide. … They all have to be taken seriously. They all have to be handled in a way to protect these victims. Don Lehman: You know, as a young woman with two young kids … that's just mind-boggling that these kids lost their mom … to a guy like this … C.C., who bravely came forward to tell her story, hopes that others can learn from her. C.C. Opanowski: Be vigilant. Look at what's happening in front of you and make sure someone knows. Don't keep it quiet. … Pay attention and … when you have that feeling, that one that doesn't go way — you know, the one that you try to push down — that's the one you should listen to the most. She says she is ready to let go of the guilt she has felt for what happened to Lori. C.C. Opanowski: I've waited so long and I've had to live with it for all of these years. Jennifer Leonard: It's not her fault. It's the system that failed. … She did what she had to do. … I don't blame her. I feel sad that she's felt guilt all this time. Anne-Marie Green: How do you want your sister to be remembered? Jennifer Leonard: Lori Ann. She … so fun. So funny. So loving … For Jennifer Leonard, she longs for the life she always thought she would have with Lori. Jennifer Leonard: We were supposed to be … living in the same place and going out and raising our kids and having parties and that's what it was supposed to be. That's what we were supposed to have … And I'm it … just me and the kids trying to get along without her. Anne-Marie Green: What do you miss the most about Lori? Zackary Wicklund: In moments where I'm really sad, where I'm like I just need her to hold me and she hasn't been able to do that in 20 years. Shawn Doyle is eligible for parole in 2030. If you or someone you know needs help, the National Domestic Violence Hotline has counselors available around the clock at 1-800-799-7233 (SAFE). Produced by Chris Young Ritzen. Elena DiFiore and David Dow are the development producers. Michael Loftus and Chelsea Narvaez are the associate producers. Anthony Venditti is the content research manager. Michael McHugh is the producer/editor. Ken Blum is an editor. Lourdes Aguiar is the senior producer. Nancy Kramer is the executive story editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer. Anne-Marie Green Anne-Marie Green is an accomplished journalist and correspondent for '48 Hours,' where she reports on the most gripping crime and investigative stories on is also the host of the '48 Hours' 'Post Mortem' podcast. Green brings over two decades of experience in broadcast journalism to her work at CBS News.

How a California family's battle for justice for slain teen has impacted victims' rights
How a California family's battle for justice for slain teen has impacted victims' rights

Wakala News

time04-05-2025

  • Wakala News

How a California family's battle for justice for slain teen has impacted victims' rights

It shook the entire campus at the University of the Pacific. A freshman on her first day of college in 1979 was found unconscious, bleeding from her head, in a remote area of the school. Her name was Catina Salarno. Harriet and Mike Salarno were getting ready for bed when the phone rang at their San Francisco home. Mike answered it. His tone signaled the news. Harriet Salarno: I said … 'what's wrong?' … he says, Catina has been shot and she's in the emergency room. The Salarnos' two younger daughters, Regina and Nina, rushed to their side. Then the phone rang again. Harriet Salarno: And they said, 'your daughter passed away.' Nina Salarno: I don't think it can be described in words, what it's like to watch your mom collapse, crying. My dad, very, very strong man, but you could tell he was shaken to the core. Regina Salarno-Novello: And life just stopped. … I literally … life stopped, completely stopped.' '48 Hours' first met the Salarno family in 1990. Harriet and Mike were making their weekly visit to Catina's resting place. MIKE SALARNO (1990): I think coming out here and being able to talk to Catina gives me a peace of mind. Also that I can still communicate with my daughter, that it isn't, um, the final end. At the time, Catina had been gone for 10 years, and her family was just embarking on a decades-long journey to keep her killer behind bars. MIKE SALARNO (to reporters outside 1990 parole hearing): It's the first skirmish in a long, long battle that this we started today. It was not a journey they had ever expected to make. Erin Moriarty: Harriet, did you and Michael really have kind of a — the perfect life as parents, three kids? Harriet Salarno: Yes. To answer you, yes. We were so blessed. Both Mike and Harriet were juvenile commissioners assigned by the city of San Francisco to mentor boys and girls. Their arms and home were always open, says Nina, the youngest daughter. Nina Salarno: I think the best way to describe it is it typified a middle-class American family that valued their faith, valued family, valued community as well. They spent blissful summer days at the cabin in the mountains. Three carefree sisters with Catina leading the pack, says Regina, younger by 18 months. Regina Salarno-Novello: She was the heart and soul of the family. … She had such a good heart. She loved being the older sister. Nina Salarno: (I) think the best way to describe Catina is she is that person every person should meet in their life. She just brought an air of kindness. CATINA SALARNO MEETS THE BOY ACROSS THE STREET When Catina was 14, a new family, the Burns, moved in across the street in San Francisco. There were four children: a girl and three boys – all about the same age as the Salarno sisters. Regina Salarno-Novello: And we were spying on them. So … we all made a big batch of cookies, giggled all the way across the street, knocked on the door, introduced ourselves, and gave 'em a batch of homemade cookies. Soon, the friendship between the oldest Salarno sister and the second oldest Burns brother blossomed into a young love. Catina and Steven Burns started dating in the tenth grade. Erin Moriarty: How would you describe Steven Burns? Regina Salarno-Novello: Well, he was the big brother I never had, you know. And for me it was like, God, I have a big brother. And I was — I just thought he was great because we got to go to the football games. Burns, who went to an all-boys Catholic school, was a star athlete and captain of the football team. He and Nina, a basketball and volleyball player, bonded over their shared love of sports. Nina Salarno: I loved Steve. I idolized him. … He was a great athlete. He coached my teams … He would help me with my shot, and he took the time to do that. Mike took Burns, who had a difficult relationship with his own dad, under his wing. He not only mentored him, but he also gave him a job at his TV store delivering TVs. Regina Salarno-Novello: And my dad …who embraces everybody, brought him in and treated him as a son. Mike trusted him completely says Regina. They all did. Erin Moriarty: Did you ever see anything that between Steve and Catina that worried you? Harriet Salarno: I have to tell you, I've given hours and hours of thought of that. Why didn't I see this? What was it? Nina Salarno: You sometimes are close to people, you don't always see little signs or you ignore them. But with hindsight, the sisters say, there were signs. In her senior year, Catina who'd been accepted to the University of the Pacific, wanted to break up with Steve. But he wasn't having it, says Regina. He started threatening her. Regina Salarno-Novello: She said that Steve said that if I broke up with him, he would kill me … But at the time, neither sister took him seriously. Erin Moriarty: Neither one of you told your parents. Regina Salarno-Novello: We just figured he was just saying it. And because of what our relationship was over the years, why would we believe that? … He enjoyed being part of the family. Why would he destroy a family that he loved? Mike and Harriet never heard about that incident; never imagined the life they knew would come to an end. Harriet Salarno: We thought we were doing good and everything would be fine and never thought the boy across the street would murder our daughter. ONE LAST ENCOUNTER When Catina Salarno arrived at the University of the Pacific in September 1979, she thought she had left Steven Burns behind for good. He said he was going to Santa Clara University and she was going to begin pursuing her longtime goal. Regina Salarno-Novello: She knew she was gonna become a dentist. … She knew exactly what she was gonna do. It was planned for her. That was her goal, her dream. But Catina's excitement was cut short soon after the Salarnos got to campus. Regina Salarno-Novello: We were staying overnight and we went to the hotel lobby, and then all of a sudden there's Steve and his sister and family. And we were like, 'what are you doing here?' And he says, well, I'm going to UOP. Nina Salarno: That's really, the first time I heard a lot of panic in her voice, uh, because that just caught her off guard. For the first time, Catina turned to her father for help. Regina Salarno-Novello: My dad walked up to him and said, OK, Steve. … Leave Catina alone. She has told you that. You guys move on to your own ways, be friends, and know that I will always be here for you. The Salarnos headed back to San Francisco and Catina and Burns each moved into their respective dorm rooms on opposite sides of the campus. Burns' new roommate, Les Serpa, remembers walking in the room and seeing Catina's picture everywhere. Les Serpa: He said his girlfriend, uh, was at Pacific as well … there were pictures of her and him together … more pictures than I'd ever seen before, but they were everywhere on his desk. Erin Moriarty: He didn't mention that she had wanted to break up? Les Serpa: Not at all. It was all very positive. Everything was great. Across campus, Catina was settling in with her new roommate, Joanne Marks. Then came a knock on the door. It was Steve Burns. Joanne Marks: After he left, uh, Catina told me that he wanted to meet with her later in the evening for the last time. Joanne Marks: She was not looking forward to meeting with him, but she was looking forward to it being the last time. She believed that he would stop bothering her. Marks says Burns came by to pick up Catina about 7:45 that evening. Joanne Marks: I said something like, you know, have a good evening, and he just grunted. Catina told Joanne she would see her later; but that later never came. A freshman out for a walk named Kevin Arlin would be the one to discover why. It was around 9:45 p.m. when he saw something on the sidewalk. Arlin, unnerved by what he saw, rushed back to his dorm and got a resident advisor. They both ran back to the scene. Kevin Arlin: And … we got up to — to her and it was … a young lady that, uh, was laying on the ground and she was still alive … she was unconscious, but there was a big pool of blood around her head. Arlin would later find out it was 18-year-old Catina Rose Salarno. She had been shot in the back of the head. Kevin Arlin: Her arms … were twisted in a way that I never thought the human body could twist. Kevin Arlin: I — I — I just remember the blood. Erin Moriarty: That had to be heartbreaking. Kevin Arlin: Yeah. I knew it was tragic or I knew it was, uh, it was very serious, a very serious injury. While the two men waited for the ambulance to arrive, Steven Burns returned to his dorm room, where his roommate Les was watching 'Monday Night Football.' Les Serpa: He went and laid on the bed, propped up a pillow and started watching the game. Les Serpa: He was not nervous at all. The ambulance arrived around 10 p.m. and rushed Catina to St. Joseph's Hospital. She was still alive, barely. Years later, her family would learn she was not alone. Randy Haight – at the time a young patrol officer who was at the crime scene — met his partner at the hospital. Randy Haight: I said, where's the family? And he says, she's a student at UOP from out of town. …They're not here. I said, Is anybody with her? He says, haven't seen anybody. It's just us. Catina Rose was pronounced dead at 9 minutes after midnight. Randy Haight: We made the decision to sit with Catina until the Coroners came. … even though she had passed, I just didn't feel right leaving her alone … I prayed. I said a prayer for her. By then, homicide detectives were at Catina's dorm talking to Marks. Joanne Marks: I told the police that, uh, Catina had been picked up by Steve Burns and I told them which dorm he was from. Serpa and Burns were in their room when there was a knock at the door. Les Serpa: I opened the door and, uh, I — you know, there's like five guys out there in suits. … And so I stepped out a little bit say hello, and I could see at the end of each hall was full of police officers. … And then they asked to search our room. … they went through everything, every bag, every drawer — everything. Les Serpa: I didn't know at the time … but later I learned they were looking … for a weapon, for a gun. Steven Burns was pulled from the room and taken to the Stockton police station, where he was fingerprinted and photographed. Officer Haight recalls seeing him there. Randy Haight: He did not appear to be upset in any way. … Burns told the police he didn't meet Catina on campus that night, and that he spent the evening in his dorm room watching 'Monday Night Football.' Without the gun – it was never found – the police didn't have enough evidence to hold him. Steven Burns was released. His father took him back to San Francisco. The police didn't publicly name a suspect. But Harriet Salarno didn't need a name. She already knew it. Harriet Salarno: I just said to Mike,' it's Steve, Mike, it's Steve.' I — I — I don't know why … I just had that feeling. After talking to the family, the police learned that Steven had threatened to kill Catina if she broke up with him. Two days after the murder of Catina Rose Salarno, Steven Burns was arrested at his home just across the street from where Catina grew up. Nina Salarno: I remember … sitting up in the window, watching them walk him out in handcuffs and putting him in the patrol car. My whole world got taken from me, and really, in the flash of a gun. I mean, everything was gone. A MURDER AND A BETRAYAL Learning to live without their daughter has been a lifelong journey for Catina's parents — one crippled by what ifs. Mike Salarno never stopped blaming himself. Harriet Salarno: He felt that as a father, he let her down. For decades, Catina's sisters have also grappled with regret, wishing they had told their parents about Steven Burns threatening to kill Catina. Regina Salarno-Novello: What if I had said something? What if we told them about the threat? Erin Moriarty: You're living with guilt, too. Regina Salarno-Novello: And it doesn't change after 40 years. … it's the hole in my heart from missing my sister and what we could have had together. In the wake of the murder, each member of the family retreated into their own private grief. Harriet Salarno: I didn't even care if I even lived. I wanted to join Catina. Regina Salarno Novello: I didn't know what to do anymore. My whole plan, my whole world, my whole bubble blew up. Nina Salarno: I mean I never felt that kind of hurt. … I lost my entire family because they fell apart … It was painful enough that my sister had been murdered, but the person that I viewed as a brother and loved, betrayed me by taking her life. The Salarnos would learn that the young man they had trusted had stolen a gun from Mike's store weeks before Catina's murder. Erin Moriarty: You believe he planned that murder? Harriet Salarno: Yes. Nina Salarno: Oh, absolutely. … the fact that he stole the gun prior. There was no reason for the stealing of the gun, otherwise. They came to believe Burns may have been planning to use that gun to kill Catina even before she left for college. Regina Salarno-Novello: The night before we took her to UOP, I heard this noise outside … and it was Steve Burns … pacing in front of the bedroom window. …he had a big, white towel wrapped around his left hand. Regina says Burns tried to climb up the side of their house and enter through the window of the bedroom the girls shared, but Catina told him to leave. Regina Salarno-Novello: She said, 'No, I'm not opening the window, go to bed, Steve. Go — you're — I'm going to school tomorrow.' You know, 'stop, just stop, just stop.' Nina Salarno: Then there was a sound like he fell, and it was a very distinct sound of metal hitting metal. Erin Moriarty: What do you think now, when you look back on that, that sound of metal against metal? Nina Salarno: I think if I had opened the window and he got in, there'd be three dead girls. Erin Moriarty: You think he had a gun with him then? Nina Salarno: Absolutely. Six months after Catina's death, 19-year-old Steven Burns went on trial for her murder. It was a bitter awakening for the Salarnos, who say there was more concern for the defendant and his rights than there was for his victim. Neither of Catina's parents were allowed in the courtroom — not even while Nina, who was only 14 years old at the time – took the stand. She had to testify at the trial on her own without a victim's advocate to support her. Erin Moriarty: What was that like on the stand? Nina Salarno: Ugh. … I think the best word was just awful. I was in a courtroom. The only person I knew in the courtroom was the guy that had murdered my sister. The prosecution argued that Burns met Catina that night carrying the stolen gun with the intention of killing her if she wouldn't continue their relationship. Still, the jury did not convict him of premeditated first-degree murder. He was found guilty of second-degree murder and was sentenced to 17 years to life with the possibility of parole. Nina Salarno: We all thought 17 years to life meant life – that they would never let him out. They would learn they were wrong. Just 10 years into his sentence, Steven Burns came up for parole. The Salarnos were outraged. In 1990, they talked to then-'48 Hours' correspondent Bernard Goldberg the night before the first parole hearing: HARRIET SALARNO: I had no idea the parole system was so rotten. BERNARD GOLDBERG: OK, Steven Burns was handed down a 17-to-life sentence. HARRIET SALARNO: That's right. HARRIET SALARNO: That's right. BERNARD GOLDBERG: But you — you don't want him out after 17 years, after 20 years, after 25, you — is that fair? HARRIET SALARNO: Oh, that's a very fair question. Absolutely, I don't want him out, but I don't even wanna go up there before 17 years because that's what I was told! Going into this hearing, they know there's a chance he could get out. On March 28, 1990, the Salarnos and a bus full of supporters headed to Steven Burns' parole hearing. MIKE SALARNO (to Goldberg): That bus ride was the longest ride in my life. The first hardest thing was when she died, this is the second. For the first time since Catina's murder, the Salarnos confronted the man they had once considered part of the family. MIKE SALARNO (parole hearing): Steve sentenced my daughter to death forever. I ask for a fair trade. I ask you to sentence Steve to life in prison. Then it was Burns' turn to speak. STEVEN BURNS (parole hearing): It's hard to say the words how difficult it is to live day to day about the feelings I have inside about what I did. Regardless of what I do, I can't bring Catina back. … But I know this that I am deeply sorry for what I did. And I will work each day of my life, whether it be in prison or out — outside to make up. He apologized, but the Salarnos noticed he never looked at them while he did it. NINA SALARNO: If you can't look at someone in the face and say you're sorry, then you know damn well you're not sorry. After an excruciating wait, the parole board came back with a decision. Steven Burns was found unsuitable for release, but he would get another chance at freedom in just two years. HARRIET SALARNO (1990): Two years, we got two years. And I feel very, very drained, and I know my family's so worn out. NINA SALARNO: We'll be here. HARRIET SALARNO: We'll be back. MIKE SALARNO: We'll be back. We'll be back. And back they would come over and over again for the next 35 years. FIGHTING FOR VICTIMS' RIGHTS There is one thing you can count on with the Salarnos. Every week for almost 46 years, they have gone to the cemetery where Catina now rests. These days there's another grave to tend. Mike Salarno died in 2013 of cancer. There's something else you can be sure of. Every time Steven Burns comes up for parole, they will be there. Nina Salarno: We all said we would be back and we've continued to be back 12 times, not just because he murdered Catina, but because he is a dangerous murderer that will kill or harm again. And that's just the bottom line. In January 2025, they were about to go to their 13th parole hearing. NINA SALARNO (praying at gravesite): Give this family the strength to continue to fight. That fight for victim's rights has shaped all their lives. Regina Salarno-Novello: Was I gonna be a nurse 40 years ago? No. And now I am … the reason why I did it is because I swore nobody would die alone. Nina says she was so traumatized by the trial, she vowed she would become a prosecutor. And so she did. She became a specialist in domestic violence cases. Nina Salarno: I believed like my sister, so many victims are either not heard, afraid to be heard, or just don't understand the magnitude of what's happening to them. She became the DA in Modoc County – cowboy country – about as far north in California as you can get. Nina Salarno: Being able to be out in the mountains and/or, um, work on a cattle ranch or ride my horses and have that time is just — it's who I am. Harriet went on to start Crime Victims United, an organization that has changed hundreds of laws. Before Harriet Salarno, victims in California weren't allowed to give impact statements at sentencing. Now they are. Parents – even if witnesses – can now attend the trial. And children, unlike Nina, must now be accompanied by a support person when testifying. Nina Salarno: She's my hero. … my absolute hero. … it's just so significant to see … how she supports people and just really fights for what's right. Harriet Salarno: I have a passion. For Harriet that has meant fighting to keep Steven Burns behind bars. Harriet Salarno: I've been doing it for 45 years and I will continue to do it. … As long as I'm alive and as long as he's in prison. Burns has been in prison for 45 years. But the Salarnos are convinced he hasn't changed. Nina Salarno: He still has yet to admit to … the facts of the crime. Burns' story, says Deputy District Attorney Robert Himelblau, has changed at least 12 times over the years. Robert Himelblau: He had said repeatedly that Catina pulled the gun, that Catina was the one who had the revolver, ignoring the fact that we knew that he had stolen Catina's father's revolver. … sometimes she shot him, sometimes they struggled over the gun and it accidentally went off. In 2016 – 37 years after the murder – Burns finally stopped lying about Catina's actions, says Nina. He told the commissioners, 'I became very, very angry … and I pulled out a gun and shot Catina.' But Burns continued to deny that he stalked her to UOP to kill her if she didn't get back together with him. Nina Salarno: The shooting of the gun murdered my sister, but the behaviors and the need for his power and control, and the obsessiveness is what makes him dangerous. And according to a complaint brought up at the last parole hearing, he has shown those same obsessive behaviors inside prison. A professor who taught incarcerated students reported that Burns' behavior towards her was quote disturbing and manipulating. Nina Salarno: He was relentless towards her because she would … not allow him into a class. He focused on her and was not going to stop till he got what he wanted. Erin Moriarty: Do you think that if Steven Burns is released, he could hurt someone? Robert Himelblau: Yes. The next woman he goes out with who says no. But there are some who believe that Burns deserves a second chance. Kevin Anderson, once a respected pediatrician, got to know Burns when he was incarcerated — also for murder. After 24 years in prison, Anderson was released on parole in 2023. He started working as a counselor. '48 Hours' first spoke to him the day before Burns' 2025 parole hearing. Erin Moriarty: Do you think that Steven Burns is a danger to society? Kevin Anderson: I can't say 100 percent … But I do think that Steven Burns has done a lot of the work … to get to that point where you're no longer a danger to society. Burns has earned a college degree and has worked with hospice patients. He has participated in numerous anger management and rehabilitation programs, some alongside Anderson. Kevin Anderson: I think that … he has the tools now that he didn't have before. Anderson worked with Burns in mock hearing sessions to help him prepare for the upcoming parole hearing. Kevin Anderson: We had to push him. And once we got him to get off of the denial on certain issues where the real honesty had to come out, now he's able to talk about it in the honest terms that maybe he wasn't able to do 10 years ago, 15 years ago. Anderson says Steven told him he snapped when Catina rejected him. Kevin Anderson: She said, I want you to stay away from me and my family. … and he said, at that point I just lost it. … And as he was describing this, he was crying. … 'cause now he realizes where he was going with this, and what this was leading to. And Catina saw it too, says Anderson. Kevin Anderson: He described to me her body language, what her eyes were doing, how they had just grown really big. I said, what else? And he said … her voice was shaking. … And I said, and what did that mean to you? And he would say, it meant she was scared to death. But it didn't stop him. Steven Burns shot the woman he claimed to love in the back of the head and walked away, leaving her to slowly bleed to death. Erin Moriarty: Did he say why he left and didn't get help for her? Kevin Anderson: He did say that what he did afterwards was a very cowardly act. Steven Burns is about to get another chance to convince commissioners that the same man who left Catina to die that night, is a changed man. And this time, the Salarnos fear the odds are in his favor. Regina Salarno-Novello: It scares the living daylights outta me, having him come out. STEVEN BURNS' 13th PAROLE HEARING As Harriet Salarno counts down the days to the 2025 hearing, she does what she has done for the past four decades; she goes to work. At 92, Harriet still goes to the office at Crime Victims United every day. Harriet and Nina are picking out photos to show the commissioners at the parole hearing. Nina Salarno: It's important that they understand that she was a beautiful human being … and her life was taken for no reason Nina has been preparing for this hearing for month.s. Nina Salarno (showing file cabinet): And in here, I keep everything from the trial, everything from the trial to all those subsequent parole hearings. Nina, the prosecutor, is leaving nothing to chance. Nina Salarno (holding binder): Here's transcripts from the 2010 hearing. But Nina, the protector, is calling on Catina and her dad to help the things she can't control. As a DA, Nina knows Burns' chances of getting out are better than ever. Keith Wattley is founder of UnCommon Law, an organization that helps incarcerated people navigate the parole process. Keith Wattley: From what I've seen so far on paper, in terms of the time he's done, the program … that he's put together for himself and how well he's performed there, he does seem like somebody who, under the law, should be granted parole. Wattley, who has never met Burns, but has reviewed his last two parole transcripts, says Steven has two other important things going for him: his age — he was only 18 — when he committed the crime. Keith Wattley: California … has passed laws to say that we have to consider someone's youth at the time of the crime … none of us are fully developed in the brain by — before we're age 25. And his age at the time of the hearing — 63. Wattley says Burns is eligible for special consideration under the elderly parole program. He says people simply age out of crime, especially violent crime. Erin Moriarty: But in Steven Burns' case, isn't there a possibility that … if he gets out, he gets involved with someone and they leave him, he'll do the same thing? Keith Wattley: It's a great question. It's an important question. The science and the statistics say no. … They say that people who come home from a life sentence are among the least likely to recidivate. That's just true. But sometimes statistics are no match for the human spirit. Erin Moriarty: When the family comes consistently to these parole hearings, especially a family like the Salarnos, doesn't that make it much more difficult for someone like Steven Burns to get a chance at parole? Keith Wattley: I would say yes. Yes, it does … have an impact on the process. The Salarnos are praying they'll make an impact again this time. Harriet, Nine, her daughter Lexy, and a group of loyal friends head to the DA's office in Stockton, California, where they will attend the parole hearing via video — the post-COVID new normal. Harriet Salarno: It does. It really does. I am shaky, very shaky. Erin Moriarty: You are right now? Harriet Salarno: Yeah. Sad thing. But I'm — I'm afraid of him being released, Erin. … I — just afraid that he'll come after us. Harriet braces herself as she heads into the conference room knowing she will have to again see the man who put her daughter in a grave. Harriet Salarno: Looking at Steve Burns when he walked in … he just looks dangerous. He acts dangerous. And what he says is dangerous. '48 Hours' was not allowed to record video or audio during the hearing, but I was able to sit with the family and friends to observe. Steven Burns — his affect flat, his voice monotone — once again denied he planned to kill Catina that night. Audio was recorded by the parole board: COMMISSIONER: You didn't plan to kill her? STEVEN BURNS: No. COMMISSIONER: And you deny that you've threatened to kill her at — previously, correct? STEVEN BURNS: Yes. COMMISSIONER: Do you understand why previous panels … have found that you minimize what you did and — and your intentions? STEVEN BURNS: Based on that, yes. After almost four hours, the commissioners retreated to make their decision. Erin Moriarty: Is this the hardest part? Just waiting — to see? Harriet Salarno: Waiting. This is the most difficult part. Twenty minutes later, the family was called back into the conference room. The decision was in. COMMISSIONER: Even after 45 years in prison … we see very little change on those issues that led you to murder Catina, that led you to do things in prison that offended others … We see very little change. Steven Burns was found unsuitable for parole. Harriet Salarno: We can go home and really sleep tonight! Erin Moriarty: This is the first real smile I've really seen on your face. Nina Salarno (to her mother): I'm very proud of you. When Kevin Anderson, Burns' friend from prison, read the transcript of the hearing, he was stunned. He sent '48 Hours' an email, some of which I read to him when we spoke again after the hearing. Erin Moriarty (reading email): 'Reading this transcript is hurting my head, heart and soul. This man is absolutely not ready to be released.' Kevin Anderson: No. The way he came across in that hearing, he was absolutely not ready … All the work he has done, I didn't see it showing up there at all. Four days after the hearing, Nina and Harriet went to the gravesite to deliver the news. Nina Salarno: We got a five-year-denial, dad. So I'm still holding strong to my promise to you. It was Catina's 64th birthday. Nina Salarno: Catina, I think that's the best birthday present we could give you was that denial. So thank you for watching over mom and watching over everyone Harriet Salarno: Happy birthday Catina … I love you both so much and miss you. Steven Burns is expected to go before the parole board again in 2030. Produced by Liza Finley and Gabriella Demirdjian. Cindy Cesare and Greg Fisher are the development producers. Lauren Turner Dunn is the associate producer. Doreen Schechter, Gregory F. McLaughlin, Chris Crater and Michael Vele are the editors. Patti Aronofsky is the senior producer. Nancy Kramer is the executive story editor. Judy Tygard is the executive producer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store