logo
'Unit 234' Review - Cat And Mouse With Nuance And Edge

'Unit 234' Review - Cat And Mouse With Nuance And Edge

Unit 234 begins a straightforward cat-and-mouse movie. When the owner of a storage unit facility finds herself in the wrong place/at the wrong time, the bad guys put her on the run. This is a familiar concept, and the movie explores its premise but does something clever. The story takes a subversion and becomes more poetic about personal justice and revenge. Complete with a gripping performance, this is a tightly paced thriller that delivers a heartwrenching tale of loss and gain.
When a group of criminals comes to collect the contents of a storage unit, the owner finds herself in a cat-and-mouse game. Laurie (Isabelle Fuhrman) runs her family business. She works the graveyard shift as a gang of criminals led by Jules (Don Johnson) arrives. She discovers a man, Clayton (Jack Huston), tied to a gurney and missing a kidney. Laurie sets him free, believing they are attempting to harvest his organs. Escaping, they are pursued throughout the night by Jules and his crew. While Clayton initially seems innocent, Laurie soon discovers he is hiding a secret.
As the chase with Jules and the crew intensifies, Laurie discovers Jules's more complex motivations, driven by a personal need for revenge. While the film offers little reinvention, the pacing is gripping. The story may be a tad over the top, but the performance grounds it. Here, Fuhrman and Johnson excel by bringing an air of complexity and grit to the characters of Laurie and Jules, respectively. Jack Huston and Isabelle Fuhrman in 'Unit 234'. Photo Courtesy of Brainstorm Media.
We meet Johnson, a stereotypical high-class criminal with an entourage and a Mercedes. By the film's end, Jules is much less a one-dimensional character but instead a complex one. His character is much less a black-and-white construct but instead lies on a spectrum of gray. Here, Johnson creates a character who can be equally terrifying and sympathetic.
The same is true of Fuhrman. Her character is given agency to react in ways that feel relevant to the story. She is far from a damsel-in-distress, but instead a character like Jules, who, while more morally centered, is put on a journey of self-discovery as the mystery unfolds. Jack Huston in Unit 234. Photo Courtesy of Brainstorm Media.
The film works in tandem, first by weaving an element of mystery that unfolds through the character's eyes instead of a simple information dump. The situation unveils itself in clever ploys that never feel contrived. Second, a psychological underpinning guides this story out of the realm of a straightforward cat-and-mouse thriller. The tale deftly puts the audience in the shoes of the characters of Jules and Laurie. This is done in part to examine the justification of actions, but moreover allows for the audience to question in their own way: what would we do in this situation?
Unit 234 does not bog down in providing the audience with a definitive answer, which is the film's strength. The movie cares less for a perfect conclusion or firmly establishing who the 'bad guy' and 'good guy' are. The film speaks to the complexities of humanity and the decisions people make for good or ill. Don Johnson in 'Unit 234'. Photo courtesy of Brainstorm Media.
At its core, this film is less about a high-stakes game of cat and mouse and more about a story of revenge. Unit 234 weaves a narrative about the cycle of ongoing violence that never distracts from the intensity. Part of the film's strength is its simplicity. The story takes place over a single night. It offers a snapshot into their character's motivations without the need to provide an abundance of exposition or neatly tie up the loose ends by the end.
Unit 234 is a surprise from the start; there is an expectation that the film will be a fun but empty thrill ride. The story begins with the former approach and successfully hooks the audience for the ride. Still, by the second act, the film deliberately switches from a thrill ride into a complex morality play. The story is better for it, an d so is the audience.
Unit 234 will debut in select theaters and On Demand on May 9, 2025, courtesy of Brainstorm Media.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jay Leno Unveils Ultra-Rare 1956 Mercedes Alloy Gullwing Forgotten Even by Mercedes
Jay Leno Unveils Ultra-Rare 1956 Mercedes Alloy Gullwing Forgotten Even by Mercedes

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jay Leno Unveils Ultra-Rare 1956 Mercedes Alloy Gullwing Forgotten Even by Mercedes

⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious In his latest video, automotive icon and comedian Jay Leno unveiled one of the rarest Mercedes-Benz vehicles ever produced—a 1956 Mercedes-Benz Alloy Gullwing, so exclusive that even Mercedes-Benz doesn't know where all of them are today. Leno's discovery highlights a version of the classic 300 SL Gullwing that is rarely seen outside of elite collections. Only 29 examples of the alloy-bodied variant were produced, and this one—once owned by noted collector Rudi Klein in Los Angeles—is among the few known to remain intact. Unlike its more commonly seen steel-bodied sibling, the Alloy Gullwing was a lightweight, high-performance version built entirely out of aluminum. Its 3.0-liter inline-six engine, producing 215 horsepower, was designed for competitive driving and reduced weight. While the standard Gullwing is already a legend, the Alloy version emphasizes performance over refinement, making it highly prized among purists. Despite its value—estimated at $10 million—this Alloy Gullwing is not the most expensive Mercedes ever sold. That distinction belongs to the record-breaking 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupe, which fetched over $140 million in 2022. Still, the Alloy Gullwing remains one of the most valuable privately owned road cars in the world. 'This is the first true supercar,' Leno declared in the episode, challenging the often-cited claim that the Lamborghini Miura holds that title. He emphasized the Alloy Gullwing's blend of performance, rarity, and motorsport heritage, qualities that make it unlike anything else from its era. Now retired from late-night television, Leno continues to spotlight automotive rarities through his YouTube channel, Jay Leno's Garage, where he shares cars from his 300+ vehicle collection, valued north of $50 million. With each new video, Leno not only entertains but also helps preserve the legacies of cars even their manufacturers forgot existed.

Broward businessman sentenced to 23 years after swindling Haitian investors
Broward businessman sentenced to 23 years after swindling Haitian investors

Miami Herald

time14 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Broward businessman sentenced to 23 years after swindling Haitian investors

A South Florida moving company owner convicted of swindling millions of dollars from thousands of investors — including nurses, school teachers and military veterans — was sentenced to 23 years in prison on Friday in Fort Lauderdale federal court. Sanjay Singh, 45, borrowed hundreds of millions from the mostly working-class investors with promises of paying them double-digit returns and ownership of the trucks in his company, Royal Bengal Logistics Inc. In the end, about 2,000 investors — many of Haitian descent — fell for Singh's sales pitch and lost $54 million in what federal prosecutors described as a 'Ponzi scheme' that warranted 25 years in prison. In November, a 12-person jury unanimously found Royal Bengal's former president guilty of conspiring with other employees, wire fraud and money laundering. On Friday, U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz condemned Singh as a 'huckster' who lied to victims while raising $158 million between 2020 and 2023 for his Coral Springs company. After sentencing him, the judge scheduled a restitution hearing for June 26. A 66-year-old victim wrote a letter filed in court describing how he had to come out of retirement after losing his life savings. 'Mr. Singh, if you are not aware, and just like you, my wife and many others you duped are immigrants who came to the US to further our education and/or seek a better life,' wrote the victim, whose name was redacted. 'You stole our happiness, our retirement, our financial freedom, and our money that we entrusted you with.' 'Lying, lying, lying' At trial, prosecutors Roger Cruz and Robert Moore said Singh stole tens of millions from investors and lied to them about how he spent their money; instead, they said, he used the proceeds to buy a Mercedes, renovate his Coral Springs home and play the stock market as a day trader, squandering millions of the victims' investments. 'He was just lying, lying, lying — gambling in the stock market,' Moore told jurors during closing arguments at trial. 'He knew his company wasn't making any money, and he knew he was lying. ... This was a Titanic. This was a sinking ship.' After Singh was found guilty by the Fort Lauderdale jury in November, the judge allowed him to remain free on a $1 million bond. But the prosecutors urged Leibowitz to cancel his bond based on allegations that he could flee to his native India, especially as he faced potentially decades in prison. They wrote that Singh 'has the means and incentive to flee pending sentencing, and a history of deceiving this Court.' Judge Leibowitz sided with the prosecutors and revoked Singh's bond. Since mid-November, he's been held at a Broward County jail that doubles as a federal-lockup. Singh's assistant federal public defenders, Abigail Becker and Victor Van Dyke, sought a lower sentence at Friday's hearing, to no avail. They portrayed him at trial as a hard-working family man who made mistakes in building his business, but he didn't intentionally mislead anyone, lie to his company's investors or commit fraud. 'It's a story of a man who grew his business from zero trucks to 200 trucks with revenue of $18 million in three years,' Van Dyke told jurors, arguing Singh didn't live lavishly. 'This case is about trucks, not Ferraris.' In a separate Securities and Exchange Commission civil complaint, Singh and his company were accused of fraudulently raising money from investors through unregistered securities and related anti-fraud violations. As a result of the enforcement action, Singh lost control of his company in June 2023. A federal judge froze Singh's and the firm's assets, including bank accounts and real estate, and appointed the Fort Lauderdale law firm Tripp Scott as Royal Bengal's receiver to work on recovering money for investors. Many of them invested between $25,000 and $250,000 in Singh's company. In South Florida, such cases are increasingly common. For decades, the region has been known as the nation's con capital for its healthcare, income-tax and credit-card scams — not to mention high-end Ponzi schemes orchestrated by such notorious figures as the late Wall Street financier Bernard Madoff and disbarred Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein. Preying on Haitian Americans But South Florida has also become home to 'affinity fraud,' authorities say, where investment schemers prey on unsuspecting immigrants and other minorities who tend to trust the perpetrators because they either know them or someone else who vouches for them. The Haitian-American community has been hit particularly hard, but so have immigrants from Cuba, Colombia and Venezuela. In the Singh case, the former head of Royal Bengal was accused of conspiring with other employees, including Haitian Americans, to offer high-yield investments, promising mostly working-class people in the Haitian diaspora to use their money to expand operations and increase the company's fleet to 200 semi-trucks and trailers, as well as build a maintenance facility in Lubbock, Texas. Singh assured investors that his company was generating $650,000 to $1 million a month in revenue between 2019 and 2023 — and that their investments were safe and growing in value, according to court records and the FBI. During a November 2022 investor Zoom video conference, Singh boasted that Royal Bengal was a better company than Apple and Tesla. 'Better than Tesla' 'The fundamentals of this business can be trusted,' Singh said during the presentation. 'So let's move on from the point of view that [Royal] Bengal may last one day, two days — this is not Bitcoin. Our product is better than Apple. Our product is better than Tesla. You buy Apple, you buy Tesla, you start spending money. You buy [a] Royal Bengal [investment] contract, you start making money.' SEC investigators said Singh and Royal Bengal used tens of millions of dollars of new investors' funds to make Ponzi-like payments to old investors — until the purported business model collapsed due to operating losses of $18 million since 2019. The SEC complaint named Singh and his former company itself as defendants. Also, Singh's wife, Sheetal, and Constantina Celicourt, the spouse of the firm's former vice president of business development, were named as relief defendants. (Her husband, Ricardi Celicourt, who public records show was a Royal Bengal executive, was not named in the SEC lawsuit.) Singh's wife, Sheetal, and Constantina Celicourt were not charged with any wrongdoing, but the SEC sued them to collect proceeds that authorities say they received from Singh's alleged Ponzi scheme. If the SEC and federal prosecutors prevail in their parallel cases, it is likely that Singh, his company, his wife, and Celicourt will be required to pay back the money they're accused of stealing from the Haitian-American investors and other victims of the investment scam. After his conviction in November, Singh informed the SEC in Miami that he and his wife wanted to settle the agency's claims, SEC trial lawyer Russell O'Brien wrote in a court filing last month. Now that Singh has been sentenced, the next step is to meet with the couple to finalize the terms of any settlement, O'Brien said.

Rosberg says Verstappen antics 'extremely unacceptable' as ban looms
Rosberg says Verstappen antics 'extremely unacceptable' as ban looms

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rosberg says Verstappen antics 'extremely unacceptable' as ban looms

Former F1 world champion Nico Rosberg thinks Red Bull's Max Verstappen should have been disqualified from the Spanish Grand Prix after appearing to deliberately ram George Russell's Mercedes. The Dutch world champion was annoyed at having to let the Briton overtake him after a previous near collision, which Rosberg acknowledges was not Verstappen's fault. Advertisement But his decision to pretend to let Russell pass before speeding up and hitting the Mercedes caused a 10-second penalty and knocked him down from fifth to 10th. Rosberg believes he got off lightly with a "very lenient" punishment in Barcelona. "It looked like a very intentional retaliation," he told Sky Sports. "Wait for the opponent, go ramming into him, just like you felt the other guy rammed into you at Turn 1. "That's something which is extremely unacceptable and I think the rules would be a black flag, yes. If you wait for your opponent to bang into him, that's a black flag." Advertisement A black flag means disqualification from the race being run. Verstappen may have avoided being thrown out of the Spanish Grand Prix but F1 bosses are bound to look again at his conduct. He also risks a possible future race ban because of the number of penalty points he has picked up in a 12-month period. He now has 11 and reaching 12 can trigger a suspension.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store