logo
A Family Matters Season 4 Review {3.5/5}: Critic Review of Criminal Justice

A Family Matters Season 4 Review {3.5/5}: Critic Review of Criminal Justice

Time of India29-05-2025

Story: Season 4 sees Madhav Mishra (Pankaj Tripathi) take on a challenging case involving a passionate love affair that ends in murder. As courtroom drama unfolds, Madhav faces two fierce legal opponents. With his trademark wit and empathy, he unravels buried secrets to uncover the truth in an intense battle for justice.
Review: The fourth season of Criminal Justice, titled A Family Matter, reaffirms the franchise's formula—anchored by Pankaj Tripathi's unshakable presence—while taking some new thematic detours into familial trauma, mental health, and the complexity of truth. Directed by Rohan Sippy and penned by a writing team that includes Harman Wadala, Sandeep Jain, and Sameer Mishra, this eight-episode series delivers an engaging courtroom drama that, while flawed in places, remains compelling throughout.
The story opens with the tragic death of Roshini Saluja (Asha Negi), found blood-soaked in the arms of Dr. Raj Nagpal (Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub), who quickly becomes the prime suspect. Roshini—caretaker to Raj's daughter Ira (Khushi Bhardwaj), a child with Asperger's syndrome—was also his lover. With Raj's estranged wife Anju (Surveen Chawla) convinced of his innocence, she turns to Madhav Mishra (Tripathi), the everyman lawyer with a sharp mind and empathetic core, to defend him.
From this setup unfolds a dual narrative: one that examines Raj's complex personal relationships, and another that delves into the realities of raising a neurodivergent child. These intertwined threads provide a rich emotional backdrop to the legal mystery, even as the narrative occasionally loses momentum.
Pankaj Tripathi remains the franchise's biggest asset. His portrayal of Madhav Mishra is sharp, empathetic, and laced with subtle humour—once again breathing life into courtroom procedures that might otherwise feel dry. As he puts it, 'Hum wahi karenge jo humara kaam hai — defence,' a line that aptly sums up his unwavering commitment to his role. His chemistry with his assistants—Barkha Singh and Aatm Prakash Mishra—adds warmth and levity to the otherwise grim proceedings. Khushboo Atre, playing Madhav's wife, delivers well-timed comic relief while also emerging as an unexpected pillar of support in his legal battle.
Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub delivers a grounded performance as a man caught between guilt, grief, and injustice. Surveen Chawla stands out in emotionally heavy scenes, portraying Anju's inner turmoil with restraint and poise. Khushi Bhardwaj, in her limited role as Ira, is convincing and brings authenticity to her portrayal of a child on the autism spectrum. Asha Negi, while sincere in her portrayal of Roshini, is let down by a thinly written character arc—her romantic progression with Raj feels rushed and lacks emotional payoff.
Among the legal players, Shweta Basu Prasad and Mita Vashisht bring strength and credibility to their opposing roles, creating a compelling courtroom dynamic that feels less like theatrical drama and more like a tense chess game. As the investigating officer, Gauri Karmakar is convincingly portrayed by Kalyanee Mulay, who leaves no stone unturned in proving she's a sharp, no-nonsense cop with a keen sense of justice.
Rohan Sippy maintains a steady hand throughout the eight-part series, choosing a restrained, character-centric approach, avoiding sensationalism in favour of emotional depth and realism. The writing team deserves credit for attempting to weave complex issues—infidelity, parenting a special-needs child, and the grey areas of marriage and morality—into a legal thriller format. However, the pacing is occasionally uneven, especially in the middle episodes, where emotional subplots stall the narrative momentum.
Still, the slow-burn approach allows viewers to absorb the emotional undercurrents behind each character's choices. The final episodes effectively build courtroom tension, with well-argued confrontations that challenge assumptions and shift perspectives.
Criminal Justice: A Family Matter may not be the most suspenseful or fast-paced installment in the franchise, but it builds steadily—valuing insight over spectacle—and offers a mature reflection on justice amid fractured relationships and unspoken wounds. While it lacks the relentless thrills of earlier seasons, it surpasses Adhura Sach in both narrative cohesion and emotional depth.
If you've followed previous seasons of Criminal Justice, you're already familiar with its signature style: layered characters, grounded storytelling, and the enduring charm of Pankaj Tripathi—all of which make this season well worth your time.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Shweta Basu Prasad says she is scared of repeating herself as an actor
Exclusive: Shweta Basu Prasad says she is scared of repeating herself as an actor

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Exclusive: Shweta Basu Prasad says she is scared of repeating herself as an actor

Actor Shweta Basu Prasad, who reprised her role as Lekha in 'Criminal Justice' Season 4, opens up about her evolving choices as an actor, her experience working alongside Pankaj Tripathi, and her constant quest to keep things fresh on screen. In an exclusive chat with India Today, the actress shares why reinvention matters to her and how collaboration shapes her started her journey in the industry at a young age, Shweta says her selection of roles has always come from a very personal space, 'I've been pretty lucky that good work has consistently come my way,' she says.'My choice of projects has always come from the lens of an audience. I'm a movie buff—I love watching films and series. So, when a new project is offered to me, beyond just looking at the team or the scale, it's really the story and character that matter most," she added. The actor believes in taking responsibility for the content she's a part of. 'My decision-making always starts with the question: Would I want to watch this? Because if I wouldn't, how can I expect others to? I'm asking people to subscribe, to spend their time and money—there's a certain responsibility in that. I have to genuinely believe in what I'm promoting.'advertisementWhen asked about working with Pankaj Tripathi and whether it has changed her approach, Shweta shares, 'I wouldn't say my performance has changed, but working with Pankaj ji has definitely added to my experience. There was a kind of nervous excitement, especially in Season 3 when my character was introduced. It wasn't just another scene—I was literally going head-to-head with him in court.'She adds, 'It was argument-heavy, dialogue-heavy, and technically demanding. But once I step into Lekha's costume and onto the set, that nervousness fades. Shweta takes a back seat, and Lekha steps in. The same happens with him—Pankaj ji disappears and Madhav Mishra takes over.'For Shweta, acting is deeply rooted in reaction and chemistry with co-actors. 'If I say something and I don't get the right reaction in return, my motivation for the next line falters. So, working with good actors really elevates your performance. I owe that to everyone I've worked with—Pankaj ji, Surveen, and the whole team.'The actress admits that her biggest fear is stagnation. 'Repeating myself is something I'm very conscious of—and scared of—as an actor,' she says. 'Cinema is a reflection of life, and life is full of surprises. Every day is different, and our art should reflect that.'advertisementShe emphasises the importance of reinvention in storytelling. 'There are many legal and courtroom dramas out there, but the key is in reinvention. It's not just about repackaging; it's about breathing new life into something. We are documenting the times we live in. What we created two years ago can't be replicated today—2025 brings a whole new lens. Even if it's the same story, it evolves with time. And that process of reinvention is far more exciting than mere repetition.''Criminal Justice' Season 4 is currently streaming on JioHotstar. You May Also Like

Delhi Court Refuses to Take Cognisance of Chargesheet Against Udit Raj in Protest Case
Delhi Court Refuses to Take Cognisance of Chargesheet Against Udit Raj in Protest Case

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Delhi Court Refuses to Take Cognisance of Chargesheet Against Udit Raj in Protest Case

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Thursday refused to take cognisance of a chargesheet against Congress functionary Udit Raj in a case of allegedly disobeying a Delhi Police prohibitory order while holding a protest at the house of former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal earlier this year. The court of additional chief judicial magistrate Neha Mittal said there was nothing on record to show that the accused had knowledge of the order. "It is also pertinent to note that there is no evidence on record regarding the identity of the accused. Despite the fact that the incident in question was videographed by the police officials, the accused cannot be seen in the entire video," it added. Raj, along with a few others, staged a protest near Kejriwal's residence on Jan 20, demanding a monthly salary for Buddhist monks and priests of Guru Ravidas and Valmiki temples. According to police, Raj's protest caused traffic congestion and inconvenience to commuters. Police claimed that the protesters were informed about the prohibitory order and the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct through loudspeaker announcements. However, the court found these claims unsubstantiated. The court also said that no police officer was specifically named in the chargesheet as having made such an announcement, nor were their statements recorded under Section 180 BNS. "In view of the above discussion, this court is of the considered opinion that there does not exist sufficient ground for taking cognisance of the offence punishable under Section 223 BNS. No other offence appears to be made out from the chargesheet. Accordingly, cognisance in the present case is declined," the judge concluded. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !

Criminal Justice spotlights Asperger's; real patients still battle daily inequity
Criminal Justice spotlights Asperger's; real patients still battle daily inequity

India Today

time5 hours ago

  • India Today

Criminal Justice spotlights Asperger's; real patients still battle daily inequity

In India, 1 in 68 children is diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Asperger's though often folded into the broader ASD category, remains clinically distinct in many respects. It is marked by significant impairments in social interaction and communication, alongside restricted interests, despite otherwise intact language co-morbidities such as anxiety and depression are common, yet public understanding remains dismally Rohan Sippy, otherwise known for his comedy flicks, delivers a taut narrative in his latest season of 'Criminal Justice'. The ongoing series steers clear of the histrionics that often plague Indian OTT content. Importantly, it takes a bold step by putting Asperger's syndrome in the front and right in the centre. It's not just a passing mention; the name is spoken, the condition is respected, and the portrayal of the syndrome is responsibly rendered. The result: A rare moment of clarity in Indian entertainment's murky representation of mental REAL ASPERGER'S For better context, Asperger's doesn't go by its own name any more in official diagnostic reports. It's now subsumed under an overarching ASD. The grouping may be clinically convenient, but it also heavily risks erasing the nuanced experiences of those who live with the condition. As psychiatrists like Dr Neerja Mathur point out, Asperger's is often presented with distinct psychiatric co-morbidities and behavioural traits that merit focused clinical attention and targeted interventions, not is this lack of specificity in diagnosis for AS that can have devastating consequences. Mitali Das, a mother and a social worker, recounts being shown the door by over 30 schools in New Delhi for her son's admission. "They couldn't place him because no one understood the difference between autism, Asperger's syndrome, Tourettes and dyslexia. We had to homeschool him.'While the West has made strides with specialist schools and trained support systems, India is still playing catch-up. Children with Asperger's often prefer to be homeschooled rather than attend regular schools. Even their high cognitive abilities do not mask the daily toll of social exclusion, bullying, and misunderstood irony is quite sharp. A condition identified as far back as 1944, named by British psychiatrist Lorna Wing in 1981, and increasingly common today, still goes largely unrecognised in classrooms, clinics, and is why 'Criminal Justice' matters. Not just for its storytelling, but for showing the courage to say the name, to represent reality, and to start the conversation. Whether the show will shift public attitudes or policy remains to be seen. But at the very least, it places Asperger's — finally — into the public that's a good first step.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store