Queen of the Nigerian Warri Kingdom visits Atlanta to lay groundwork for partnership
The Queen of the Warri Kingdom in Nigeria is paying a visit to Atlanta and meeting with city and state leaders in an effort to open the lines of communication.
Queen Olori Atuwatse III came to the WSB-TV studio in midtown Atlanta to speak with Channel 2′s Karyn Greer.
On Monday, the queen consort spoke to legislators under the Gold Dome of the Capitol to discuss opportunities to connect the crown jewel of the Civil Rights Movement with the most populous Black nation of Nigeria.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
'I'm really honored to be here because I know that Atlanta has very deep roots, cultural roots with the Civil Rights Movement and a huge African diaspora community,' she told Greer. 'And so I'm really excited to be here to explore those cultural and economic opportunities.'
The 38-year-old is the youngest-serving queen in the country.
Her visit to Atlanta is just the beginning of her mini world tour.
So far, her favorite part of the Peach State's capital has been The King Center.
'Wow. That is all I can say. I was absolutely taken away. Like the tour of his life and just experiencing...Just getting a chance to experience everything that he did and he represented. I mean, his legacy still lives on,' she said.
TRENDING STORIES:
Severe weather threat increasing for late Saturday, Sunday morning across north Georgia
GA church daycare employee accused of giving Benadryl to toddlers to make them go to sleep
Atlanta police confirm arrest of man accused of slashing homeless tents
Her Majesty Atuwatse III is fully aware of the current state of affairs in the United States and hopes city and state leaders will see what her country has to offer.
'We're actually looking to form bridges as opposed to burn bridges. We're looking to build alliances,' she said.
Nigeria's Nollywood is actually the second largest producer of movies in the world. And the U.S. is one of their main export destinations for things like crude petroleum, gas, gold and cocoa beans.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From celebrating Juneteenth to the erasure of Black history: Charles M. Blow on America today
The political analyst and former New York Times columnist Charles M. Blow shares his thoughts about our nation's newest federal holiday, Juneteenth: Last month I visited Emancipation Park in Houston, a park established in 1872 by the formerly enslaved as a space to celebrate Juneteenth, the day in 1865 that the news of emancipation was proclaimed in Galveston, Texas. Ramon Manning, the board chair of the park's conservancy, told me that his corporate sponsors had grown skittish about supporting Juneteenth-related activities and anything with words like "culture," "heritage" or "Black History" – words nearly impossible to omit in this park. This, for Manning, is a bit of a whiplash. Four years ago, in the wake of the massive protests following the killing of George Floyd, and in a Senate riven by partisanship, the bill to make Juneteenth a national holiday passed unanimously. Biden signs bill making Juneteenth a federal holidayWhat is Juneteenth? Learn the history behind the federal holiday's origin and name A year before that, in the closing months of his reelection bid, Donald Trump himself had proposed making it a national holiday in his so-called Platinum Plan for Black America. In fact, in 2019, Trump's statement commemorating Juneteenth ended by saying that on Juneteenth, "... we pay tribute to the indomitable spirit of African Americans." Now, the mood of the country has shifted. Pluralism and racial justice have been demoted in the zeitgeist, as Trump has returned to office on a mission to purge the government, and much of society, of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts. Trump administration threatens public schools' federal funding over DEI initiativesTrump's DEI undoing undermines hard-won accommodations for disabled peopleCompanies could face Trump repercussions over DEI This has spurred an erasure of Black history and Black symbols in some quarters, a phenomenon that I call "The Great Blackout" – from an executive order condemning the direction of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, to the National Park Service removing - but being forced to restore - Harriet Tubman's image and quote to a page about the Underground Railroad. There are, unfortunately, countless examples. That chill is having a dampening effect on the upcoming observation of Juneteenth, far beyond Emancipation Park, as multiple cities have cancelled Juneteenth celebrations altogether. 2025 Indianapolis Juneteenth parade canceled San Luis Obispo Juneteenth event canceled In this sad new reality, America's youngest national holiday is now caught in the crossfire of America's raging culture wars. For more info: Charles M. Blow on Instagram Story produced by Robbyn McFadden. Editor: Chad Cardin. See also: Passage: The story of Juneteenth ("Sunday Morning")Decades after a mob destroyed her house, Opal Lee is returning home ("Sunday Morning") Dad says son "may never be the same" after alleged hazing Nature: Mating grebes From celebrating Juneteenth to the erasure of Black history: Charles M. Blow on America today
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Recent graduate Kaitlyn Lubega brings New Mexico national acclaim in poetry
Seeing life inside a Ugandan refugee camp. Facing discrimination as a Black woman. Building the strength to hold one's head high. Kaitlyn Lubega says she channels hardships like these into her poetry performances, transforming the pain of humanity into rhyme and cadence. The effort paid off in early May when Lubega, a recent graduate of United World College-USA in Montezuma, earned third place in the Poetry Out Loud National Finals in Washington. She competed against 54 others from across the United States. It was her second time representing New Mexico in the national competition, after winning both the 2024 and 2025 state championships. But for her second and higher-placing national performance, she enjoyed herself more and felt a deeper connection to the experiences that inform her performance, she said. Channeling pain into poetry Lubega, 18, was born in the United Kingdom and raised in New Jersey. A daughter of Ugandan immigrants, she faced both racism and sexism in a small community of people who didn't look like her. 'I viewed myself as lesser growing up, and I never liked the fact that I was Ugandan for the longest time in my life,' she said by phone from her New Jersey home. The lessons of her parents, Mohammed and Florence, and the guidance of her Auntie Tina, kept her afloat through tough times as a kid, she said. ' I think especially those strong women,' she said. 'Being the strong women that they were unapologetically, not destructively, but very peacefully and gracefully themselves.' They dressed, spoke and wore their hair the way they wanted, Lubega said, which 'at a young age made me feel less ashamed,' and gave her confidence to exist in a space where she 'didn't really feel appreciated.' There was a positive side to her difficult upbringing. She won best-in-grade year after year in her school's poetry competition, sparking a love of both writing and performing poetry. Her move to New Mexico to attend United World College gave her the space to look back and contextualize her life experiences instead of seeing them 'as a passerby,' she said. New Mexico's serenity helped her become reflective, and the school's method of instruction encouraged her to find herself through 'the complexity of our everyday lived experiences,' she said. Back in Uganda Lubega visits Uganda every other summer, and before her return last year, she got a class assignment as part of her International Baccalaureate in global politics: She would visit a refugee camp, engage with the community and write a report on the experience. At Palabek Refugee Settlement in northern Uganda and its companion school, Lugeba interviewed people. It affected her more deeply than most assignments, in part because she was treated better than locals just because she was from the United States. That treatment reminded her of the 'privilege' she said those from the United States are afforded. 'I love the country,' she said. 'But it was so difficult to see some of the problems and the recurring cycles that seem to never leave Uganda in some way.' Uganda has more refugees than any other African country, according to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants nonprofit. And those refugees are dealing with overpopulation and food insecurity driven by surging conflicts in neighboring countries like South Sudan. Those conditions became worse after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January that froze nearly $2 billion for international humanitarian programs run by the U.S. Agency for International Development. The agency has since been further dismantled through efforts led by the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The refugee camp Lubega visited and surrounding host communities abruptly lost $15 million in funds to provide food aid and services for more than 50,000 people. A federal district court has since ordered the Trump administration to resume disbursing those funds, but the money has been slow to return. Poetry Out Loud Contestants Contestants in the 2025 Poetry Out Loud National Championship, held May 5-7 in Washington. Standing tall The refugee camp experience informed Lubega's choice of poems to perform for the Poetry Out Loud competition. It also impacted her performance, especially when she recited 'I'm the People, the Mob,' by Carl Sandburg, a piece from the perspective of the battered and unseen movers of history. 'In that poem,' she said, 'I sort of channeled that pain and that hurt that I see certain people face.' Transforming profound suffering into a performance that wows isn't easy. But it wasn't overbearing for Lubega, who said she felt confident and had fun this time around. 'I had a lot more poise in just everything,' she said. 'I'm very happy that I was able to find that and channel that energy into a positive way and do better in the competition this year.' She left Washington with national recognition, a $5,000 third-place purse and an outpouring of support from her elders and siblings. Now, after New Mexico, she's returning to the Northeast to attend Connecticut College, a small liberal arts college in New London, Conn. There, she's set to study political science with a minor in African studies and a pathway in communications, rhetoric and media. But she won't soon forget New Mexico, she said. Nor will she forget the lessons and rituals that have guided her since childhood, including her mother's advice to stand tall. 'So I get up before I go on stage. I stand as tall and as great-postured as I can — and obviously everything in me is jittering — but I usually, right before they call my name, I take a breath, I pray, and I say, 'OK, let's lock in and let's go kill this.' '
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's war against DEI isn't going so well in Virginia
Apparently when President Trump says 'illegal DEI,' he means lawful and common-sense efforts to integrate public schools. At least, that's the takeaway from the Department of Education's new investigation against Fairfax County Public Schools. Trump officials claim Fairfax County violated federal law when it adopted an admissions policy designed to 'change the demographic make up' of its most competitive high school. This theory, which equates integration with segregation, dates back to Barry Goldwater, who remarked in 1964 that 'the Constitution is color-blind … and so it is just as wrong to compel children to attend certain schools for the sake of so-called integration as for the sake of segregation.' It seems Trump agrees. Unfortunately for him, the Supreme Court does not. Just last year, the court declined to overturn a ruling for Fairfax County. As I explained at the time, that decision made sense. Even as the Supreme Court has shifted hard right, decades of conservative case law — including from Chief Justice John Roberts — condone racial goals such as diversity, equality and inclusion. The new investigation tracks Trump's disregard for courts and his tendency toward bluster over substance. But in important respects, it also exposes that Trump's war on DEI lacks any moral and legal basis. Some context is helpful. For decades, Black advocates sought to desegregate Thomas Jefferson High School, one of the nation's top-ranked public schools. As recently as 2012, the NAACP filed a civil rights complaint alleging that the school's admissions policies discriminated against African American and Hispanic students and students with disabilities. Things shifted in 2020. As racial justice protests erupted across the globe, local leaders grappled with the fact that in a county with roughly 100,000 Black residents, Thomas Jefferson High School admitted so few Black students that the number was too small to report. The state convened a task force to examine the causes of this ongoing exclusion at Thomas Jefferson and other Virginia schools. Following a series of hearings, the board revised the school's admissions process, eliminating a $100 application fee and a standardized testing requirement. Contrary to ongoing claims that the new policy compromised 'merit,' the board raised the minimum GPA for admission from 3.0 to 3.5 and added an honors course requirement. The new policy also implemented a holistic evaluation that included new 'experience factors,' such as whether the applicant qualified for reduced meals or is an English language learner. The updated process also ensured that each middle school receive a number of seats equal to 1.5 percent of its eighth-grade class. The school board resolved that '[t]he admission process must use only race-neutral methods that do not seek to achieve any specific racial or ethnic mix, balance or targets.' This means that admissions officials are not told the race, ethnicity, sex or name of any applicant. In Supreme Court parlance, the entire admissions process was 'colorblind.' The new process produced promising results. In its inaugural year, Thomas Jefferson High School received 1,000 more applicants than the prior cycle. This larger applicant pool also 'included markedly more low-income students, English-language learners, and girls than had prior classes at TJ.' Consistent with the heightened GPA requirement, the admitted class's mean GPA was higher than in the five preceding years. The new process also yielded greater racial diversity. Black students comprised 10 percent of the applicant pool and received nearly 8 percent of offers and Hispanic students comprised 11 percent of the applicant pool and received over 11 percent of offers. The overall percentage of Asian American students decreased from the preceding year, but Asian Americans continued to enjoy the highest percentage yield of all racial groups. And as the Fourth Circuit detailed, Asian American students from historically underrepresented middle schools 'saw a sixfold increase in offers, and the number of low-income Asian American admittees to TJ increased to 51 — from a mere one in 2020.' In short, Thomas Jefferson High School adopted a 'race-neutral' process to pursue a set of goals that included increasing Black and Hispanic representation. This is the precise type of practice the Trump administration denigrates as 'illegal DEI.' Efforts to promote racial diversity do constitute DEI. But they are far from illegal. In fact, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard — the 2023 decision striking down Harvard University's formal consideration of applicant race — supports most of the DEI policies Trump now targets. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts deemed Harvard's underlying goals as 'worthy' and 'commendable.' Justice Brett Kavanaugh made the point more directly; writing for himself, Kavanaugh noted that 'racial discrimination still occurs and the effects of past racial discrimination still persist' and that 'universities still can, of course, act to undo the effects of past discrimination in many permissible ways that do not involve classification by race.' The actions of the high school square with Kavanaugh's call for policies that attend to race but do not differentiate between individual students on this basis. This should short-circuit the Department of Education's investigation against Fairfax County. But it is unlikely to stall Trump's desire to outlaw integration. The Pacific Legal Foundation, which initiated the lawsuit against Fairfax County and remains a force on the right, wants to revive Goldwater's hostile approach to integration. Consider the following FAQ on Pacific Legal's website: 'schools may use or not use standardized tests, essays, interviews, or auditions, as long as their reasons for using or not using them are not racial.' By this logic, a high school could lawfully eliminate an admissions fee if motivated by public relations concerns, but it would be unlawful to take that same action if done to decrease racial barriers that exclude low-income Black and Hispanic students. Now consider higher education. Per Pacific Legal, Harvard University could eliminate admissions preferences for the children of alumni and wealthy donors if done to appease alumni pressure. But it would be unlawful for Harvard to take the same action if the goal is increasing the number of Asian American students or mitigate unearned racial preferences that flow to wealthy white applicants. The upshot is that affirmative efforts to reduce racial inequality — everything Trump dubs 'illegal DEI' — remain legal and morally just. So, at least for now, integration does not equate to segregation. Jonathan Feingold is an associate professor at Boston University School of Law. He is an expert in affirmative action, antidiscrimination law, education law, and critical race theory.
