logo
Reproductive rights advocates sue Arizona over laws regulating abortion

Reproductive rights advocates sue Arizona over laws regulating abortion

Independent23-05-2025

Reproductive rights advocates sued Arizona on Thursday to unravel several laws regulating abortion in the state.
The lawsuit was filed by two providers in the state and the Arizona Medical Association. It comes more than six months after voters enshrined in the state constitution access to abortions up to fetal viability, which is the point at which a fetus can survive outside of the uterus.
The advocates are seeking to undo laws including those that bar abortions sought based on genetic abnormalities, require informed consent in-person at least 24 hours before the procedure and offer an opportunity to view the ultrasound, and prohibit abortion medication delivered by mail and the use of tele-health for abortion care.
'These stigmatizing and medically unnecessary abortion restrictions violate the right to reproductive freedom established by Arizona voters last November, and it's time for them to go,' Rebecca Chan, staff attorney for the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement. 'Arizonans are perfectly capable of making decisions about their own reproductive futures."
The state attorney general's office is reviewing the complaint, and an agency spokesperson noted that state law should be in line with the amendment approved by voters last November. Arizona was one of a handful of states that passed ballot measures in the 2024 general election enshrining the right to abortion to their state constitutions.
Earlier this year, an Arizona judge blocked the state's 15-week abortion ban.
Peter Gentala, president of Center for Arizona Policy, a socially conservative nonprofit, said it is too early to determine if the organization will intervene in the lawsuit.
'Women's health is important and this lawsuit reflects an agenda to maximize abortion in Arizona and that comes at a cost to women's health,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Glendale terminates ‘divisive' Ice detainee holding contract amid California protests
Glendale terminates ‘divisive' Ice detainee holding contract amid California protests

The Guardian

time15 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Glendale terminates ‘divisive' Ice detainee holding contract amid California protests

The California city of Glendale has terminated a contract to house federal immigration detainees, with local officials saying the arrangement had become increasingly 'divisive' within the community. The decision by the Los Angeles county municipality to sever ties with US immigration and customs enforcement (Ice) comes after three days of protests in other parts of the LA area. That included Sunday near the Metropolitan Detention Center, about nine miles from Glendale, where cars were set alight as anti-Ice protesters clashed with law enforcement, including the National Guard. Glendale city officials described the move to cancel the contract, which has been in place since 2007, as a local decision that 'is not politically driven' but is 'rooted in what this city stands for – public safety, local accountability, and trust'. 'The city recognizes that public perception of the Ice contract – no matter how limited or carefully managed, no matter the good – has become divisive,' it said. But the decision also reflects political tension among city and state leadership as well as federal government actions to enforce US immigration laws at the heart of the unrest. Glendale's city leadership said its police department does not and will not enforce federal immigration law, in accordance with a California state statute which prohibits the use of local law enforcement resources for immigration enforcement. 'We remain in full compliance' with California state law, the city said in a statement. 'The Glendale police department has not engaged in immigration enforcement nor will it do so moving forward.' But they acknowledged that ending the agreement with Ice could make it more difficult for families to visit detained relatives and for people held under immigration laws to access legal counsel in other jurisdictions. Glendale is the third largest city within LA county, with a population of about 210,000. It regards itself as 'a progressive community that offers the best in urban-suburban living and is an optimal location for successful businesses large and small'. Glendale's chamber of commerce calls it the 'Jewel City'. In Glendale's statement on Sunday, it said it 'is consistently ranked as one of the safest cities in the nation'. 'That is no accident,' the statement said. 'We cannot allow that trust to be undermined.' According to NBC, 82 people were detained by Ice and housed in the Glendale city jail since January. A city spokesperson told the outlet those detainees spent between six and 12 hours in the jail facility, but they were not fingerprinted or booked. Glendale says the jail only provided a bed, food, water, and medical care to Ice detainees and did not house minors. But under California law, state and local law enforcement are prohibited from allowing federal immigration authorities to use space in their facility. Civil liberties groups have opposed the arrangement. 'Ultimately and effectively, this Glendale contract with Ice is helping the Trump administration carry out its mass deportation agenda that is racist and has abused countless people's constitutional, civil and human rights,' said Andres Kwon, with the American Civil Liberties Union, to NBC. The decision came as protests intensified after the Trump administration deployed national guard troops in Los Angeles on Sunday against the wishes of Gavin Newsom, who has requested that they be removed. 'We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' the California governor said in a social media post. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed.' Trump said he had directed his administration to 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles'. LA police later declared an unlawful assembly, and police chief Jim McDonnell said officers were 'overwhelmed' by the remaining protesters that included regular agitators who show up at demonstrations to cause trouble. The anti-Ice protests also spread to northern California. In San Francisco, 60 people were arrested Sunday night as protesters shattered windows and vandalized buildings, according to the city's mayor, Daniel Lurie, and police. In a statement late Sunday night, Lurie said local officials supported peaceful protest but would not tolerate 'violent and destructive behavior'.

NIH scientists go public to denounce Trump's deep cuts in health research
NIH scientists go public to denounce Trump's deep cuts in health research

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

NIH scientists go public to denounce Trump's deep cuts in health research

In his confirmation hearings to lead the National Institutes of Health, Jay Bhattacharya pledged his openness to views that might conflict with his own. 'Dissent,' he said, 'is the very essence of science.' That commitment is being put to the test. On Monday, scores of scientists at the agency sent their Trump-appointed leader a letter titled the Bethesda Declaration, a frontal challenge to 'policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe'. It says: 'We dissent.' In a capital where insiders often insist on anonymity to say such things publicly, more than 90 NIH researchers, program directors, branch chiefs and scientific review officers put their signatures on the letter – and their careers on the line. They went public in the face of a 'culture of fear and suppression' they say Donald Trump's administration has spread through the federal civil service. 'We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources,' the declaration says. Named for the agency's headquarters location in Maryland, the Bethesda Declaration details upheaval in the world's premier public health research institution over the course of mere months. It addresses the abrupt termination of 2,100 research grants valued at more than $12bn and some of the human costs that have resulted, such as cutting off medication regimens to participants in clinical trials or leaving them with unmonitored device implants. In one case, an NIH-supported study of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Haiti had to be stopped, ceasing antibiotic treatment mid-course for patients. In a number of cases, trials that were mostly completed were rendered useless without the money to finish and analyze the work, the letter says. 'Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million,' it says, 'it wastes $4 million.' The four-page letter, addressed to Bhattacharya but also sent to the health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr and members of Congress who oversee the NIH, was endorsed by 250 anonymous employees of the agency besides the 92 who signed. Jenna Norton, who oversees health disparity research at the agency's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, recently appeared at a forum by Senator Angela Alsobrooks to talk about what is happening at the NIH. At the event, she masked to conceal her identity. Now the mask is off. She was a lead organizer of the declaration. 'I want people to know how bad things are at NIH,' Norton told the Associated Press. The signers said they modeled their indictment after Bhattacharya's own Great Barrington Declaration of October 2020, when he was a professor at Stanford University Medical School. His declaration drew together like-minded infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists who dissented from what they saw as excessive Covid-19 lockdown policies and felt ostracized by the larger public health community that pushed those policies, including the NIH. 'He is proud of his statement, and we are proud of ours,' said Sarah Kobrin, a branch chief at the NIH's National Cancer Institute who signed the Bethesda Declaration. As chief of the health systems and interventions research branch, Kobrin provides scientific oversight of researchers across the country who have been funded by the cancer institute or want to be. But sudden cuts in personnel and money have shifted her work from improving cancer care research to what she sees as minimizing its destruction. 'So much of it is gone – my work,' she said. The 21-year NIH veteran said she signed because 'I don't want to be a collaborator' in the political manipulation of biomedical science. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow with the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, also signed the declaration. 'We have a saying in basic science,' he said. 'You go and become a physician if you want to treat thousands of patients. You go and become a researcher if you want to save billions of patients. 'We are doing the research that is going to go and create the cures of the future,' he added. But that will not happen, he said, if Trump's Republican administration prevails with its searing cuts to grants. The NIH employees interviewed by the AP emphasized they were speaking for themselves and not for their institutes or the NIH. Employees from all 27 NIH institutes and centers gave their support to the declaration. Most who signed are intimately involved with evaluating and overseeing extramural research grants. The letter asserts that 'NIH trials are being halted without regard to participant safety' and that the agency is shirking commitments to trial participants who 'braved personal risk to give the incredible gift of biological samples, understanding that their generosity would fuel scientific discovery and improve health'. The Trump administration has gone at public health research on several fronts, both directly, as part of its broad effort to root out diversity, equity and inclusion values throughout the bureaucracy, and as part of its drive to starve some universities of federal money. This has forced 'indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science', the declaration says. Some NIH employees have previously come forward in televised protests to air grievances, and many walked out of Bhattacharya's town hall with staff. The declaration is the first cohesive effort to register agency-wide dismay with the NIH's direction. A Signal group became the place for participants to sort through NIH chatter on Reddit, discern rumor from reality and offer mutual support. The declaration took shape in that group and as word spread neighbor to neighbor in NIH offices. The dissenters remind Bhattacharya in their letter of his oft-stated ethic that academic freedom must be a linchpin in science. With that in place, he said in a statement in April, 'NIH scientists can be certain they are afforded the ability to engage in open, academic discourse as part of their official duties and in their personal capacities without risk of official interference, professional disadvantage or workplace retaliation.' Now it will be seen whether that is enough to protect those NIH employees challenging the Trump administration and him. 'There's a book I read to my kids, and it talks about how you can't be brave if you're not scared,' said Norton, who has three young children. 'I am so scared about doing this, but I am trying to be brave for my kids because it's only going to get harder to speak up. 'Maybe I'm putting my kids at risk by doing this,' she added. 'And I'm doing it anyway because I couldn't live with myself otherwise.'

These top-rated $9.99 eye patches banish puffiness, dark circles, and crow's feet: 'I'm honestly obsessed'
These top-rated $9.99 eye patches banish puffiness, dark circles, and crow's feet: 'I'm honestly obsessed'

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

These top-rated $9.99 eye patches banish puffiness, dark circles, and crow's feet: 'I'm honestly obsessed'

There is something so refreshing and calming about starting my day with a pair of under-eye patches, and if you're the same way, it really doesn't get any better than the Plantifique Superfood Under Eye Patches, now under $10 — for a limited time only. At a massive 37 percent off at Amazon, you only have till June 22 to snag this deal. The set includes 12 pairs of eye patches in total, each packed with collagen and hyaluronic acid. PLANTIFIQUE Superfood Under Eye Patches (12 Pairs) For just $9.99, you'll get 12 pairs of eye patches packed with collagen and hyaluronic acid — that's 83 cents per pair. They depuff, hydrate, and nourish your under-eye region, all while making you look more awake and ready to take on the day. Pop them in the fridge for an extra boost. $9.99 (37% off) Shop It's specifically designed for dark circles and puffiness, giving you that dewy, bright-eyed look in the morning — even when you've gotten little to no sleep the night before. They pack a ton of other benefits, too — each eye mask should moisturize and nourish your under-eye area, improve skin elasticity, enhance your natural glow, and refresh tired eyes. Its superfood-packed formula makes this possible. The six ingredients include green tea, peach, flaxseeds, coconut, aloe vera, and blueberries — and even have anti-aging properties like reducing the appearance of crow's feet. Whether you're destressing in the bathtub, jetting off in a plane, or just waking up from a bad night's sleep, these under-eye patches from Plantifique are your best friend. Plus, at just 83 cents for a pair of eye patches, it's one of the cheapest and most effective skincare treatments on the market. The product is also vegan, and the brand does not test on animals — so you know you're buying from a brand that puts the voiceless first. Amazon customers seem to love it too, rating it a 4.5-star from more than 10,000 shoppers. 'Amazing product, skin under eye moisturizes and is very effective. No irritation at all. Even for sensitive skin,' says one reviewer. Another says putting them in her fridge enhances their depuffing abilities: 'These eye patches feel so good right out of the fridge. They reduce puffiness and leave my under-eyes smooth and hydrated.' 'These actually work!' adds a third. 'I've been using these eye patches for a few days now and I'm honestly obsessed. They feel super cool and refreshing, and they really help with puffiness when I haven't slept well (which is often as a mum).' She also says it's an easy way to look put together in the morning — especially when you don't have time for your entire skincare routine. At just $9.99 for a limited time, these top-rated Plantifique eye patches are a must-have for those always on the go. Stock up on a few packs because we're telling you, you'll be wanting to use them daily.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store