'No more excuses': Newsom calls for cities to adopt plan banning homeless encampments
Gov. Gavin Newsom is urging cities and counties in California to adopt a model ordinance he released on Monday that makes encampments unlawful as part of efforts to address 'decades of inaction on homelessness.'
The announcement comes as $3.3 billion in funding will be made available Monday for communities to address homelessness, according to a news release.
The model ordinance, which is described as a 'starting point' and something local officials can adjust in creating their own policies, builds on Newsom's executive order last year that called for state agencies and departments to address encampments on state property.
Newsom is now calling on 'every local government to adopt and implement local policies without delay.'
'There's nothing compassionate about letting people die on the streets,' Newsom said in a statement. 'Local leaders asked for resources — we delivered the largest state investment in history. They asked for legal clarity — the courts delivered.
'Now, we're giving them a model they can put to work immediately, with urgency and with humanity, to resolve encampments and connect people to shelter, housing, and care. The time for inaction is over. There are no more excuses.'
Newsom's model ordinance laid out what is unlawful when it pertains to encampments, such as constructing or maintaining any semi-permanent structure on public property that's used for shelter.
Also unlawful is for people to camp on public property for more than three consecutive days or nights in the same location as well as to camp within 200 feet of any posted notice to vacate or other official signage related to clearing out an encampment or prohibiting camping in that location.
People also cannot sit, sleep, lay or camp on any public street, road, bike path or sidewalk that prevents passage 'within the meaning of the American Disabilities Act.'
Acknowledging that specific policies may vary for communities, all local approaches should reflect three principles that the model ordinance embodies, the ordinance read. Those principles are that people should not face criminal punishment for sleeping outside when they have nowhere else to go; encampment policies 'must prioritize shelter and services' while ensuring people, and their belongings, are treated with respect; and that policies must not 'unduly limit' local authority to clear encampments.
'Officials must be able to enforce common-sense policies to protect the health and safety of their residents and maintain their public spaces,' the ordinance read. 'When officials lack appropriate tools, encampments persist, endangering the health and safety of those living in and alongside them.'
The model ordinance also provided an approach for what communities must do before enforcement, including posting a notice to vacate at least 48 hours prior to enforcement. Another stipulation is that city officials should make 'every reasonable effort' to provide the people living at the encampment with emergency shelter or other appropriate housing and supportive services.
The model ordinance also describes what to do in more emergency circumstances and how to handle personal belongings at an encampment site.
It's estimated that 187,084 people in California experienced homelessness last year, according to the Public Policy Institute of California, citing data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Paris Barraza is a trending reporter covering California news at The Desert Sun. Reach her at pbarraza@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Newsom urges cities to adopt ordinance banning homeless encampments

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests
As President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard and the United States Marines to Los Angeles in the wake of violent protests over federal immigration raids, Americans have soured on the president's response as Angelenos continue to take to the streets. Forty-five percent of adults disapprove of Trump deploying the California National Guard, while 38% approve, according to a YouGov poll released on Tuesday. The poll also shows that 17% of Americans are not sure about the deployment. Another YouGov poll released Tuesday showed that more Americans disapprove than approve of the Pentagon sending the Marines to Los Angeles, with 47% disapproving and 34% approving. There are 19% — about 1 in 5 — who are unsure. Conducted on June 10, the YouGov poll surveyed 4,309 U.S. adults. Since protests began on Friday, June 6, Trump has repeatedly defended his actions. On Monday, he took to Truth Social to suggest that Los Angeles would be 'completely obliterated' if he did not send in the National Guard. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. Gov. Gavin Newsom did not approve or consent to Trump's deployment of the National Guard and has attacked the president's actions since last week. When Trump and White House border czar Tom Homan floated the idea that Newsom should be arrested for not approving, Newsom dared them to arrest him. Among several elected Republican lawmakers who have criticized Newsom and the developments out of Los Angeles, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the governor should not be arrested. But he offered an outdated alternative. 'I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested but he ought to be tarred and feathered, I'll say that,' Johnson told reporters. Newsom saw this and replied in an X post. 'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700s style forms of punishment,' the governor wrote Tuesday. As of Wednesday morning, Trump ordered the deployment of over 4,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times reported. The Pentagon also deployed 700 U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton, with a military convoy heading from Twentynine Palms toward the City of Angels. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass ordered an 8 p.m. to 6 p.m. curfew on Tuesday, but 25 people were arrested in connection with violating the curfew, the Times reported. Colombian fugitive living 30 years in Mass. deported after deadly secret uncovered Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, 'secret police tactics' Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Photos show National Guard with rifles on ICE enforcement missions
There are currently 4,100 California National Guardsmen and 700 Marines in the greater Los Angeles area after President Donald Trump ordered them to protect federal buildings and federal law enforcement as protests opposed to ICE raids increased over the weekend. MORE: Hegseth asserts Trump can send troops anywhere to protect ICE agents conducting raids Most of the attention has been focused on the crowd control assistance that these troops could provide around federal buildings, but Trump's memo calling up National Guardsmen also said they would "temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law." MORE: LA protests live updates: Trump's actions put democracy 'under assault,' Newsom says On Tuesday, the X page for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) posted photos of California National Guardsmen on the scene of a detention being carried out by an ICE agent with the caption "Photos from today's ICE Los Angeles immigration enforcement operation." One of the photos was later reposted by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's personal X account with the caption "This We'll Defend." A U.S. official told ABC News that the photos showed National Guardsmen providing force protection to federal personnel and were not conducting law enforcement duties. MORE: Amid LA protests, what officials say about the rules of force for National Guard, Marines The Posse Comitatus Act prevents active-duty U.S. military personnel from carrying out domestic law enforcement duties though that restriction can be lifted when a president invokes the Insurrection Act, which President Trump has not done. MORE: What is the Insurrection Act, and what happens if Trump uses it to quell LA protests? In the photos, the National Guardsmen were armed with rifles but it was unclear if they were loaded with ammunition. ABC News has previously reported that while the federalized troops are carrying weapons, their guns will not have ammunition loaded in the chamber, according to U.S. officials. But they will carry ammunition as part of their regular uniforms that can be used in the rare case of needed self-defense. California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state of California have asked a federal court to stop the Trump administration from using federalized National Guardsmen and Marines to accompany ICE agents on immigration raids saying it will "escalate tensions" and raises questions if the force protection they are providing constitutes law enforcement duties which they are not allowed to do by federal law. "Defendants intend to use unlawfully federalized National Guard troops and Marines to accompany federal immigration enforcement officers on raids throughout Los Angeles," said the lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta on behalf of Newsom. "They will work in active concert with law enforcement, in support of a law enforcement mission, and will physically interact with or detain civilians." "To preserve the peace, Plaintiffs respectfully urge the Court to grant the circumscribed emergency relief requested through this motion for a temporary restraining order, which will prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines for law enforcement purposes on the streets of a civilian city," the motion requested. MORE: Gov. Greg Abbott to deploy Texas National Guard in anticipation of protests A hearing on the state's motion will be held on Thursday. On Tuesday, Hegseth told a congressional committee that he and President Trump have the power to send National Guard and active-duty troops anywhere in the country to ensure that ICE agents can enforce the law. "We believe that ICE, which is a federal law enforcement agency, has the right to safely conduct operations in any state, in any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth told a House Appropriations Defense subcommittee. "ICE ought to be able to do its job, whether it's Minneapolis or Los Angeles," he added. On Wednesday, testifying before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, Hegseth again defended using troops with ICE agents on immigration raids, saying it was needed to keep them from being attacked. Democratic Sen. Jack Reed shot back, calling it "illegal." "Law and order is a civil function under the Constitution of the United States -- civil enforcement, law enforcement authorities -- not the U.S. military," Reed said. "This is not only, I think, illegal, but also a diminution of the readiness and focus of the military," he added. Photos show National Guard with rifles on ICE enforcement missions originally appeared on


Fox News
31 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump sends clear message federalizing National Guard for LA riots: This is not 2020
As riots and immigration protests grip Los Angeles, President Donald Trump is determined not to repeat the violence of 2020. In recent days, Trump administration officials have pointed to the riots that broke out in Minneapolis in 2020 after the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer, singling out Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, for slow-walking the activation of the National Guard. Now, Trump is at odds with another Democratic governor — this time California's Gavin Newsom — as the president moves to deploy and federalize thousands of National Guard troops along with hundreds of Marines in an effort to prevent Los Angeles from suffering the same fate as Minneapolis. While Trump has said he is dispatching troops to prevent the destruction of Los Angeles, Newsom has accused Trump of "turning the U.S. military against American citizens." But Trump and his allies have persisted with a clear message for Democrats: This is not 2020. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who previously served as governor of South Dakota, defended the Trump administration's decision to deploy and federalize troops and override state authority, claiming Minnesota is an example of what happens when a "bad governor" is in charge. "I was a governor of a neighboring state to Tim Walz and watched him let his city burn," Noem told reporters Tuesday. "And the president and I have talked about this in the past, and he was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community where a bad governor made a bad decision." Other administration officials expressed similar sentiments. "This isn't the Summer of 2020 2.0," DHS Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar said in a statement Monday. "I thank the brave men and women of the National Guard defending federal buildings so that immigration officials can keep us safe." Walz was first elected governor of Minnesota in 2019, leading the state as protests broke out after the death of Floyd. While Walz has said he takes the blame for a delayed response activating the National Guard in his state, he has also said he is proud of how Minnesota reacted. "I'm proud of Minnesota's response; I'm proud of Minnesota's first responders who were out there, from firefighters to police to the National Guard, to citizens that were out there," Walz said in a 2022 gubernatorial debate. Walz's office did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. The political climate is also different for Trump this time around. Whereas in 2020 Trump faced an upcoming election, he no longer has a second term on his mind, influencing his actions, according to political columnist Kristin Tate. "Trump has learned a lot in the last five years. … Trump no longer cares about political consequences. He cannot run again. So, he's just doing what's right," Tate told Fox News Digital. "He's instilling law and order, regardless of the consequences. And that's what should've been done all along. But the rioters in the Golden State are shocked to see that law and order is being implemented, and the good old days of burning down the city with impunity are over." Trump has also moved to exert greater authority over the National Guard than he did in 2020, bypassing Newsom's authority. While Republicans like Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas pushed Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act in 2020 to pave the way for Trump to federalize the National Guard, Trump ultimately chose not to. Although separate from the Insurrection Act, Trump has invoked another law to place National Guard troops under federal command this time around, prompting ire from Newsom and other Democrats. Additionally, Newsom has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for federalizing the National Guard, labeling the move an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." "Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority," Newsom said in a statement Monday. "This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic. Every governor, red or blue, should reject this outrageous overreach."