logo
Guatemala's president denies new asylum deal with US

Guatemala's president denies new asylum deal with US

Washington Post8 hours ago

GUATEMALA CITY — Guatemala President Bernardo Arévalo said Friday he has not signed an agreement with the United States to take asylum seekers from other countries, pushing back against comments from U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem .
Noem and Arévalo met Thursday in Guatemala and the two governments publicly signed a joint security agreement that would allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers to work in the capital's airport, training local agents how to screen for terrorism suspects.
But Noem said she had also been given a signed document she called a safe third country agreement. She said she reached a similar deal in Honduras and said they were important outcomes of her trip.
Asked about Noem's comments Friday during a news conference, Arévalo said that nothing new was signed related to immigration and that Guatemala was still operating under an agreement reached with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in February. That agreement stipulated that Guatemala would continue accepting the deportation of its own citizens, but also citizens of other Central American nations as a transit point on their way home.
Arévalo said that when Rubio visited, safe third country was discussed because Guatemala had signed such an agreement during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term in office. But 'we made it clear that our path was different,' Arévalo said.
He did add that Guatemala was willing to provide asylum to Nicaraguans who have been unable to return to their country because of the political situation there out of 'solidarity.'
The president's communications office said Noem had been given the ratification of the agreement reached through diplomatic notes weeks earlier.
During Trump's first term, the U.S. signed such safe third-country agreements with Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala . They effectively allowed the U.S. to declare some asylum seekers ineligible to apply for U.S. protection and permitted the U.S. government to send them to those countries deemed 'safe.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Haitians fear overcrowding, limited resources as DHS announces end of TPS
Haitians fear overcrowding, limited resources as DHS announces end of TPS

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Haitians fear overcrowding, limited resources as DHS announces end of TPS

South Floridians react to U.S. plans to revoke immigration status of Haitian migrants in September South Floridians react to U.S. plans to revoke immigration status of Haitian migrants in September South Floridians react to U.S. plans to revoke immigration status of Haitian migrants in September Hours after the Department of Homeland Security announced it will officially end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians living in the United States, residents in northern Haiti expressed deep concern about the impact of returning migrants. In Cap-Haitien, the news spread quickly, dominating conversations across the city. The streets of downtown were crowded Friday afternoon as people continued their daily routines amid a tense and uncertain atmosphere. Concerns over infrastructure, healthcare, and housing The city, already straining from a growing population of people fleeing gang violence in the capital city of Port-au-Prince, may now face a fresh influx. One Haitian man voiced alarm at the possibility. "We gotta deal with the gang situation and the humanitarian [situation]," said Virme Wilmond. "All those people need food. We don't have health care. How are we going to receive all those people? That's going to be a real problem, I can tell you." Visitors also note lack of progress Robin Nash, a visitor from Los Angeles, noted worsening conditions in the city. "There's already a housing problem here right now and if you saw downtown Cap, there's nothing but trash," she said. "I'm thinking of the deepest darkest ghetto." According to CBS News Miami, Nash said this was her second trip to Haiti and that she had not seen improvement since her last visit. TPS termination set for September 2 DHS Secretary Kristy Noem said in a statement that the decision to terminate TPS aligns with the original intent of the program, noting that conditions in Haiti had improved. She added that allowing Haitians to remain in the U.S. would be "contrary to the national interest." Two flights departing from Miami were reported full, with some passengers permanently relocating to Haiti. The TPS designation ends August 3, with termination effective September 2. Without legal intervention, hundreds of thousands of Haitians currently living in the United States could lose their protected status that day.

Jasmine Crockett fumes over Melania's ‘Einstein visa' and shreds the first lady's modeling career
Jasmine Crockett fumes over Melania's ‘Einstein visa' and shreds the first lady's modeling career

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jasmine Crockett fumes over Melania's ‘Einstein visa' and shreds the first lady's modeling career

Melania Trump's 'Einstein visa' status, modeling career, and marriage became the focal point of a heated House hearing on restoring integrity in the visa process. Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett shredded the Trump administration's mass deportation policies during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, accusing the government of 'snatching' visas off legal citizens and imposing travel bans. The 44-year-old Democrat challenged her Republican colleagues on the Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement Subcommittee, questioning why they weren't concerned about a lack of integrity 'when it comes to the president's family.' Crockett placed the elusive first lady under the spotlight, who moved to the U.S. after having an EB-1 visa approved. Nicknamed the 'Einstein visa,' the document is typically reserved for individuals who have won a Pulitzer, Oscar, or Olympic award, as well as those highly acclaimed in their field, according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. 'Let me tell you how you receive an Einstein visa,' Crockett said. 'You're supposed to have some sort of significant achievement, like being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize or a Pulitzer, being an Olympic medalist, or having other sustained extraordinary abilities and success in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics,' she continued. 'Last time I checked the first lady had none of those accolades under her belt.' Three years after meeting the president at New York's Kit Kat Club, Melania moved to the U.S. on her EB-1 visa. She eventually became a U.S. citizen in July 2006. At a time when the president is railing against immigrants and directing ICE officials to enact raids across the country, questions have once again been raised about Melania's suitability for the extraordinary ability category. Crockett rattled off a list of iconic 1990s supermodels and argued that the Slovenian-born runway star didn't belong in the same league. 'Melania, the first lady, a model – and when I say model, I'm not talking about Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford or Naomi Campbell-level – applied for and was given an EB1 visa,' the congresswoman continued. 'It doesn't take an Einstein to see that the math ain't mathin' here.' Alex Nowrasteh, Vice President for Economic and Social Policy Studies, who bore witness to Wednesday's hearing, chimed in to 'defend' the first lady. 'I also want to defend Melania real quick,' he said. 'Not everybody could marry Donald Trump and I think that's quite an achievement. So I think she deserves credit for that. Nobody up here could have done it!' 'You sure are right,' Crockett sneered. 'I couldn't have done it.'

Trump helped these African countries sign a peace deal. Here's what we know
Trump helped these African countries sign a peace deal. Here's what we know

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump helped these African countries sign a peace deal. Here's what we know

DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — A deal signed in Washington on Friday has been touted as a major step toward peace in Congo following decades of conflict that has killed millions, including thousands this year. The U.S.-mediated agreement is between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, which has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is backed by neighboring Rwanda, and it is not clear if it will abide by the deal as the group wasn't part of the negotiations. President Donald Trump says the deal gives the United States 'a lot of the mineral rights' from Congo. His administration has pushed to gain access to minerals key to much of the world's technology and is seeking to counter China, a key player in the region where the U.S. presence and influence have eroded. Both the Congolese and Rwandan presidents are expected in Washington in a few weeks to 'finalize the complete protocol and agreement,' U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said. Here's a look at what we know about the agreement: The agreement details general expectations but is short on how it will be implemented, particularly in getting the key actors of the conflict — the Rwanda-backed M23 rebels — to lay down their arms, according to a copy seen by The Associated Press. The deal emphasizes the two neighboring countries' sovereignty, territorial integrity and peaceful coexistence, with a commitment to halt all hostilities and any support for armed groups. Although it denies supporting the M23 rebels, Rwanda has said it is protecting its border and going after the ethnic Hutus, whom it accuses of participating in the 1994 Rwandan genocide and now working with Congolese forces after fleeing to the neighboring country. Armed gangs involved in the conflict may be reintegrated into Congolese security forces only after individual vetting based on loyalty, fitness and human rights records, the deal says. In what the U.N. has called 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth,' the deal includes a commitment to protect and facilitate humanitarian access for displaced people in Congo, estimated to be more than 7 million. The two countries also commit to creating an economic framework 'to expand foreign trade and investment derived from regional critical mineral supply chains,' including ones that 'link both countries, in partnership, as appropriate, with the U.S. government and U.S. investors.' Analysts say it is going to be difficult for the M23 rebels to withdraw from the cities they seized during their major advance this year and that such withdrawal may either take a long time or another round of fighting. Rwanda is estimated to have thousands of troops supporting the M23 rebels in eastern Congo. Even if Rwanda ends its support for the rebels, the M23 has been consolidating its grip in the cities it has seized, setting up local administrative offices and enforcing a new governing structure. A team of U.N. experts said in a report in December that Rwanda was benefitting from minerals 'fraudulently' exported from areas in the region under the control of the M23. Rwanda has denied involvement. The rebels were not directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and have not spoken publicly about the deal. And Corneille Nangaa, leader of the Congo River Alliance, which includes the M23, told the AP in March that 'anything regarding us which are done without us, it's against us.' Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe pointed to separate talks happening in Qatar that are meant to get both Congo and the M23 rebels to agree among themselves how they will end the fighting. He also said Rwanda agreed to lift its 'defensive measures.' It was not clear if he meant withdrawing the troops that Rwanda has said are defending its territorial interests. Of five people that the AP spoke to in the conflict-battered region, none of them was convinced the deal would quickly end the fighting. They called for caution in granting the U.S. access to the region's minerals — resources that even late Pope Francis had reprimanded developed countries for exploiting to the detriment of the Congolese. 'We draw the attention of the Congolese government not to give in completely or to sell the Congo to the Americans just because the United States has supported us in restoring peace,' said Hangi Muhindo, a resident of Goma, the city at the center of the conflict. 'The commitments to the United States must not jeopardize the future of our people,' he added. Some also felt the agreement is only a part of the solution and called for more dialogue and justice. 'We want peace now, but we don't want the therapy to be worse than the disease,' said Prince Epenge, spokesperson for the local opposition political coalition. ___ Justin Kabumba and Saleh Mwanamilongo in Congo contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store