High energy costs threaten UK manufacturing's future, industry warns
MANCHESTER, England: Britain needs to cut industrial energy bills that are the highest among major advanced economies if its aspirations for a healthy manufacturing sector are to succeed, industry body Make UK said on Monday.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government is working on an industrial strategy to put British manufacturing — hit hard by Brexit, soaring energy costs and global trade wars — on a solid footing for the years ahead.
Manufacturing association Make UK said it should cancel climate levies imposed on industrial energy costs and adopt a fixed industrial energy price.
Britain had the highest industrial energy prices out of any International Energy Agency member country in 2023, reflecting its dependence on gas and its role in setting electricity prices.
'If we do not address the issue of high industrial energy costs in the UK as a priority, we risk the security of our country,' Make UK chief executive officer Stephen Phipson said.
'We will fail to attract investment in the manufacturing sector and will rapidly enter a phase of renewed de-industrialization.'
Britain has de-industrialized — defined as the share of manufacturing in overall economic output — faster than in any other major European country over the last 30 years, according to a Reuters analysis of national accounts data.
Manufacturing hit a record low 9 percent of economic output last year, crowded out by the dominant services sector which now drives the majority of the country's exports — a first among Group of Seven advanced economies.
Alan Johnson, a senior executive for manufacturing, supply chain and purchasing at Nissan Motor, said its Sunderland plant in the north east of England had the highest energy costs out of any of its facilities in the world.
'The proposals being put forward by Make UK ... would send a strong message to investors that the UK remains committed to creating a more competitive environment for electric vehicle manufacturing,' Johnson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Moscow poses no threat to Britain, says Russia's UK embassy
Russia's embassy in London said on Tuesday that Moscow had no intention of attacking Britain, rejecting accusations by the British government of growing aggression and daily cyberattacks. Britain said on Monday it would radically change its approach to defense to address new threats, including from Russia, after endorsing the findings of an independently-produced Strategic Defense Review. After unveiling the defense overhaul on Monday, Healey said Europe was facing war, growing Russian aggression, new nuclear risks and daily cyberattacks. Russia's embassy issued a statement on Tuesday criticizing what it described as 'a fresh salvo of anti-Russian rhetoric.' 'Russia poses no threat to the United Kingdom and its people,' the statement said. 'We harbor no aggressive intentions and have no plans to attack Britain. We are not interested in doing so, nor do we need to.' Relations between Russia and Britain are at their lowest level since the Cold War. They deteriorated further after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Britain and other NATO members have provided large amounts of military aid and other support to Kyiv. China's embassy in London also criticized Britain's defense review, saying in a statement on Tuesday that the document deliberately misrepresented Beijing's defense policy to justify British military expansion. The review had described China as 'a sophisticated and persistent challenge,' citing its rapid military modernization, including an expanded nuclear arsenal, and saying Beijing was likely using espionage and cyberattacks, and stealing intellectual property.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Support for Israel falling across Western Europe: YouGov
LONDON: Support for Israel in Western Europe has hit an all-time low amid the ongoing war in Gaza, according to YouGov. Data compiled by the polling firm shows that less than 20 percent of respondents in six countries — Germany, France, Denmark, Italy, Spain and the UK — have a favorable view of Israel, with unfavorable views accounting for 63-70 percent depending on the country. The range for those surveyed who believe Israel's actions in Gaza have been 'right' and 'proportionate' goes from 16 percent in France to as low as 6 percent in Italy. In the UK, 12 percent believe Israel's response has been proportionate. The question of whether Israel was right to invade Gaza following the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023, is slightly higher, with 29 percent of Italians and 40 percent of Germans agreeing. However, 24 percent of Italians and 12 percent of Germans feel that Israel should not have invaded Gaza at all. In the UK, 38 percent feel that the invasion was warranted, with 15 percent disagreeing. Just 24-25 percent of French, German and Danish respondents feel that Israel has any justification continuing operations in Gaza. The total is 18 percent in the UK and 9 percent in Italy. The highest number of people on Israel's 'side' in Western Europe is 18 percent in Denmark, while the lowest is Italy at 7 percent. The lowest polled nation for supporting the Palestinian cause is Germany at 18 percent, while the highest is Spain at 33 percent. The numbers of respondents believing that Hamas had any justification attacking Israel range from 9 percent to 5 percent. In the UK, the number is 6 percent. Respondents are pessimistic about the prospects for peace in the region. The French audience is the most optimistic, with 29 percent saying they believe peace is possible in the next decade. At the other end of the spectrum is Denmark with just 15 percent. The trends mirror polling from outside Europe. In April, Pew Research Center polling found that 53 percent of Americans held a negative view of Israel, up from 44 percent in March 2022. In addition, Data for Progress found that 51 percent of Americans disagreed with Israeli plans to take full control of Gaza and move Palestinian civilians. The same percentage said US President Donald Trump should 'demand that Israel agree to a ceasefire' in Gaza.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
EU and UK starting to put Brexit behind them
The process of delivering on the promise made by Britain's Labour Party during last year's election campaign to reset the UK's relations with the EU is now well and truly underway, but only slowly. Last month, almost a year after Labour decisively won the general election, negotiators from both sides unveiled a deal that signals they are adamant about putting the bad blood of Brexit behind them. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Prime Minister Keir Starmer were beaming when they announced they had reached a new agreement that rectifies some of the damage caused by Brexit. Nevertheless, the relatively small scope of the agreement suggests that, rather than a revolution in relations between these two closest of neighbors, this agreement represents a slow evolution and that this incremental approach is bound to continue. It is nine years since the British people decided in a referendum to implement Brexit, causing relations between London and Brussels to sour. The psychological scars caused by this unilateral decision have been at least as deep, if not deeper, than the practical implications of the separation. The very fact that, after decades of continuous expansion of this unique political project, one of its most powerful members was the first to leave, leading to years of acrimonious negotiations that were more about British domestic politics than what was in the interest of either, disappointed, or more precisely, angered Brussels. Rather than a revolution in relations between these two closest of neighbors, this agreement represents a slow evolution Yossi Mekelberg With the UK under relatively Europhile new management, the path to a positive resetting of relations was paved, but it is still bumpy, mainly because of the rise of populist, anti-globalization and anti-immigration sentiments in both the UK and the EU. Starmer, borrowing from the world of sports terminology, referred to the signing of a trade deal with the EU as one that completed a 'hat-trick of trade deals,' following similar agreements with the US and India in the preceding weeks. He also declared this was a 'clear message sent across the globe that Britain is back on the world stage,' departing from years of policies that reflected the island mentality, not to mention the incompetence, of his Tory predecessors, who were still quick to criticize the fresh agreement. To be sure, the deal is not even remotely a step toward the UK rejoining the EU, but it has kick-started what will be months of negotiations over many nitty-gritty details, some more controversial than others. A big draw for the UK entering a new phase in the relationship was the EU's consent to remove the need for health and veterinary certification, known as sanitary and phytosanitary checks, on exports of farm products, ranging from fresh vegetables and meat to dairy products and even timber and leather. In principle, this should never have been an issue, as the quality and standards in the UK did not change after Brexit. But in the poisonous atmosphere under which the divorce settlement was agreed in 2020, Brussels was in no mood to make it easier for a breakaway country. This measure alone is a lifeline. For instance, small-scale sausage and dairy product makers will once again be able to sell into the EU without health certification, avoiding the fate of those that have already gone out of business as a result of the need for such certifications. Moreover, farmers in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland will see reduced checks on fresh food moving between them and Great Britain. Previously, they were caught up in the impossible conflict between the terms of the Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland and Brexit. This is as much symbolic as it is helpful to struggling farmers. What gave those in the UK who oppose closer ties with Europe some tailwind was the agreement over fishing rights Yossi Mekelberg What gave those in the UK who oppose closer ties with Europe some tailwind among the Conservatives and Reform UK — to the extent that, in another outburst of anti-European hysteria, the leader of the opposition Kemi Badenoch called the deal a 'surrender' — was the agreement over fishing rights. It might have been the case that Starmer's inexperience in negotiating on the world stage, or even being too keen on a deal, led to him agreeing to roll over the existing fishing deal for another 12 years, until 2038, providing access to UK waters for EU fishers. However, surrender it was not, as in any agreement it is the overall picture that counts and those who might lose out should be compensated. This is not only because it is fair, but also because it is prudent to avoid evoking anti-European sentiments. It is no secret that what accelerated the new 'entente cordiale' between the UK and the EU is the recognition that ensuring the defense of the realm — and, as a first step, winning the war in Ukraine — requires them to work closely together. This is now enshrined in the new document, which states that the 'UK and the EU share a responsibility for the security of Europe.' For the Britons, the prize of beginning talks on allowing its arms industry to access Security Action for Europe — a €150 billion ($171 billion) EU fund providing loans for defense projects — awaits. This would consolidate the close partnership of the UK as part and parcel of the defense of Europe. On at least two aspects of the new deal — the return of youth exchanges and British travelers once again being able to use e-gates when traveling to the EU — the psychological boost of being a partner is significant. The latter might not be a deal-breaker in relations, but after decades of whisking through terminals with a minimum of fuss, this Brexit hindrance symbolized for many the acrimonious separation between the Brits and the Europeans. Restoring access to e-gates will return the sense of close relations with our neighbors, even if not still belonging to the same family. For young people, to be able to work and study in Europe with fewer restrictions will enhance their experience. And maybe this will be the generation that rediscovers Europe and being European, which will lead to a much-needed antidote to Brexit, as well as a remedy for a world that currently thrives on what separates us, not what brings us together.
