
Concern over youth mental health services
Young people with mental health issues have to wait longer for services, and go through the adult system due to a lack of resources, a Dunedin counsellor says.
Mirror Counselling and Treatment director Deb Fraser's concerns are backed up by the Mental Health Commission's System Performance Monitoring Report, which was released yesterday and paints a fairly grim picture of the country's mental health system.
The report also said: "Young people have often been expected to fit into adult services, including inpatient care in adult facilities.
"Young people, whānau and families have told us that this practice can be harmful, can cause a loss of hope and does not uphold the rights of young people."
Young people were also more likely to wait longer for specialist services, the report said.
Ms Fraser said the report served a useful summary, particularly when it came to assessing youth services.
"We still have young people being treated in an adult ward here and although those numbers are small, the evidence says that young people shouldn't be being admitted to an adult facility.
"So that's an ongoing challenge for us in this particular area that we need to be doing something different for that population."
Young people in adult wards could become more distressed when exposed to adults with more complex mental health needs, she said.
"That's why we need more fit-for-purpose youth mental health services.
The mental health system was "congested", which made it difficult for on-the-ground staff.
"I think we need to acknowledge that the workforce is very committed and highly skilled that responds on a daily basis ... ensuring that we are providing as seamless a service as we can so that people don't fall through the gaps."
The report called for staff with more "lived experience"; Ms Fraser pointed towards the increased role of peer support services.
"It's about having a model that is able to assist them in being able to do their best work when they're integrated, so there's good shared responsibility around the care of those young people and their whānau coming into our service."
Mental Health Commission chief executive Karen Osburn said the report pulled together resources from the past two years.
"What this report does is it brings together multiple parts of the mental health and addiction system.
"So we start first with people, so how are people doing? What are the mental health, addiction and wellbeing outcomes for people?"
Ms Osburn said while programmes such as Access and Choice had proved successful in getting people access to interim mental healthcare, there were still significant gaps in the system.
"We also need to address the real workforce challenges that are in specialist services. So how can we streamline some of the pathways and look at the combination of services that give people choice and options but also ensure that the people with the greatest need are receiving that sort of higher level of care and support?"
Other issues flagged in the report were the fact more than 700,000 people in New Zealand had hazardous drinking patterns, and fatal drug overdoses had almost doubled in the past nine years, while suicide rates had shown no significant decrease since 2018, Māori and rangatahi continuing to experience elevated risk.
Ms Osburn said it was important to stay on top of the issues and data, and the sector was waiting for better direction from the government.
"We certainly want to see our progress ... but we're also wanting the collective ownership across the system. "
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Sunscreens fail to meet SPF claims
business health 27 minutes ago Research out of Australia has revealed that 16 out of 20 sunscreens, many of them sold in New Zealand, do not meet their SPF claims. One product, which sells in New Zealad for around 50 dollars, claimed to provide SPF 50 protection, but was found to have an SPF of just four. Aussie consumer group Choice tested 20 sunscreen products from household brands, including Banana Boat, Nivea and Neutrogena. Their research tallies with previous testing carried out by Consumer NZ. Consumer NZ research writer Belinda Castles spoke to Lisa Owen.


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Study reveals which sunscreens don't meet SPF claims
A new study has found more than half of sunscreens tested didn't reach their SPF claims, including one marked SPF50+ that only clocks an SPF of 4. Australian consumer group Choice took a close look at household sunscreens, including many available in New Zealand, and found that 16 out of the 20 tested didn't meet the mark. While most still provided moderate or high SPF protection, one product – Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Sunscreen – only returned an SPF of 4. Choice tested the sunscreen again at a second lab to confirm this result and got a similar low SPF of 5. This sunscreen is sold in New Zealand for $58. After testing, Choice contacted manufacturers of the sunscreens with their results. Ultra Violette suggested that "human error" or a "mix-up of samples" was a "highly probable scenario", Choice reported on their website. The manufacturer also said that, given the levels of zinc oxide in its Lean Screen sunscreen, an SPF of 4 was scientifically impossible. "We are deeply committed to the health and safety of our customers, rigorously retesting our entire SPF range every two years," Ultra Violette said in a statement to Choice. "Lean Screen has been on the market for five years in 29 countries and we have not received a single substantiated claim of sunburn during use – reinforcing our confidence in the testing we have. If the Choice results were at all feasible, we would have had hundreds of cases of reported sunburn and skin damage while using this product in real life situations." Consumer NZ research and test writer Belinda Castles says the results are worrying given these companies' lack of transparency about when and where their products are tested. 'Sunscreens sold in New Zealand are now regulated under the Sunscreen (Product Safety Standard) Act 2022 and must meet the Australian and New Zealand sunscreen standard, which has requirements for independent testing," Castles said in a statement releasing the new data on Thursday. "However, when we updated our sunscreens database last year, the companies that market Banana Boat, Bondi Sands, Neutrogena, Nivea and Sun Bum refused to provide this information.' Consumer NZ ran a sunscreen testing programme until 2022. Castles says they had been campaigning for companies to regularly test products to ensure they continue to meet their label claims. 'Our sunscreen research found some companies were relying on test results that are several years old. The latest Choice tests back our call.' Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF50+ tested at 38 in the Australian test. The company told Consumer NZ this product was last tested in 2017. Woolworths Sunscreen SPF50+ Everyday Lotion tested at 27 in the Australian test. The company told Consumer this product was last tested in 2018. The latest Choice test found Nivea Sun Protect & Moisture Lock SPF50+ and Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion SPF50+ both tested at SPF40. Consumer's 2021 tests of both these sunscreens also got SPF results in the 40s. SPF is a measure of how effective sunscreen is at protecting your skin from UVB rays. If it takes five minutes of sun exposure for your skin to start burning, applying an SPF 50 sunscreen protects you for 50 times that amount of time – in this case 250 minutes. Sunscreen with an SPF of 30 would protect you – ideally – for 180 minutes. Products tested available in New Zealand SPF results in 50+ La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen SPF 50+ – tested at 72 Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 56 Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen – tested at 51 SPF results in the 40s Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 41 Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen – tested at 40 Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ – tested at 40 SPF results in the 30s Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 35 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen – tested at 32 Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 – tested at 38 SPF results in the 20s Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 28 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion – tested at 26 Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 24 Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ – tested at 27 SPF results <10 Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen – tested at 4


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
11 sunscreens sold in New Zealand don't meet SPF claims
RNZ A new study has found more than half of sunscreens tested didn't reach their SPF claims, including one marked SPF50+ that only clocks an SPF of 4. Australian consumer group Choice took a close look at household sunscreens, including many available