
‘The government is destroying independent fashion boutiques like mine. I won't vote Labour again'
Opening the door to Dragana Perisic's eponymous boutique on Redchurch Street in Shoreditch feels like stepping into a former – and many would say better – version of London.
The space is small and dimly lit, with just six rails of beautifully tailored, handmade clothes. Perisic herself sits at the till, immaculately stylish with one streak of blue in her brown bob, having hand-sewn all the skirts, dresses and jackets in the studio space at the back of her store.
Compare this to the faceless corporations that crowd much of central London, filled with clothes made in China, Vietnam or Turkey that have been designed by people in Los Angeles or Hong Kong (or sometimes even by AI) and pumped out to identikit shops in major cities around the world.
And yet it is Perisic's store that is closing down after 19 years, crippled by business rates – the relief for which drops from 75 per cent to 40 per cent on April 1. For Perisic, this translates to an increase in charges from £9,000 a year to £18,000, and along with astronomical rents and rising national insurance for employers, it spells the end of her much-loved boutique.
She is not alone. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has predicted that store closures will rise to around 17,350 in 2025, from 13,479 in 2024, as business rates strangle smaller retailers. The CRR warns that the majority of the shops shutting down this year will be independents or those with fewer than five stores, and that on average business rates will increase from £3,589 to £8,613.
For people in the fashion community – many of whom voted Labour in the last election – this feels like a betrayal.
'I first opened here in 2006,' says Perisic, 'back when there were so many independent designers like me in this area. And I weathered so much: the financial crisis, Covid, Brexit. But what I was not expecting was for this government to destroy independent businesses like mine. I have never voted Conservative in my life, but what they have done is worse than the Tories, and I won't vote Labour again.'
Another Soho-based store owner – who sells contemporary clothing and jewellery for men and women – is also on the brink of closing down because of the damaging cocktail of higher business rates and national insurance contributions starting this week. He believes it is now almost impossible to be successful in the capital as an independent brand.
'If you're anywhere in central London you need to make a million quid a year just to break even,' he says. 'To rent a halfway decent space in Soho and pay the business rates alone will cost you nearly half a million pounds, which means you need to sell a hell of a lot of clothes just to keep your head above water.'
In homogenised Britain, where chain restaurants, identical coffee shops and fast-fashion brands dominate every high street, this should be a problem the government wants to solve.
Not only do small stores boost the value of properties nearby (according to a study by Strutt and Parker, independent shops and restaurants are rated, alongside parks, as one of the most desirable local attractions), they also bring in tourists.
'About 60 percent of my customers are here on holiday,' says Perisic, who tells me that clients from expensive American cities like New York and San Francisco regularly complain to her about the lack of designer-owned stores in their cities. Now, London is going the same way.
'Britain makes it almost impossible for small fashion businesses to exist,' says Patrick Grant, an author and journalist and former owner of Savile Row store Norton & Sons, who was forced to shut down his ready-to-wear business E. Tautz & Sons in 2021 because running costs were simply too high.
'These days, only huge companies can afford the astronomical rents and business rates, and as a result London has the exact same clothes on offer as every other city. It's so dull, which is sad because we have an enormous amount of creativity here.'
Grant talks about spending a weekend in Bordeaux recently (in France, independent businesses have a reduced corporation rate). 'I couldn't believe how interesting the shops were,' he says. 'There were almost no global brands and thousands of small places selling charming clothes tailored to the local market – it was really fantastic.'
For Grant, these impending closures will lead to a dearth of tourists picking London as a fashion destination. 'Choices like [increasing business rates] stifle creativity and economic activity,' he says. 'We're already struggling to encourage people to come here and shop but if there's nothing interesting to buy then why would they bother?'
'The government has to revise its entire business model,' he continues. 'In an era where online shopping already dominates, a business rate tax is not fit for purpose as it punishes brick and mortar instead of encouraging it.' And, yes, from next April the government intends to drop business rates for companies valued at less than £500,000 and increase them for everyone else – but given the price of renting a space in central London even independent designers with very low margins are likely to fall into the second category.
Debra McCann is one of them. She is the founder and owner of The Mercantile, an independent store selling quirky, stylish clothes sourced from brands in Britain and around Europe. It is on the edge of Spitalfields Market and on a sunny weekday morning, this treasure trove of affordable, interesting fashion attracts groups of tourists as well as local office workers popping in to browse the rails with a coffee. It feels like a breath of fresh air compared to the foreign-owned chain stores that take up so much local real estate.
'The high street is already very homogenous in most towns and cities,' she says. 'And these new government policies are only going to increase its blandness.'
The Mercantile has been in the same spot for more than 15 years and while footfall is at a record high, the sheer rate of taxation means she has never been more worried. 'This last national insurance rise was a real disappointment coming from a Labour government,' she says, 'I voted for them and I feel like Rachel Reeves has just shot us one last blow.'
McCann sources clothes from around Europe and has seen first hand the power that good government policies can have. She cites both Denmark and Spain as countries where independent designers have been given tax reliefs – and as a result creativity has flourished.
'We get no help at all in this country, just higher and higher taxes,' she says. 'My biggest costs are rent and staffing. I can't do anything about the rent and I also can't let go of staff because theft rates have skyrocketed in the last two years, so I need people with eyes on the customers all the time.' Hence also needing to stay near Spitalfields, which has a security team on hand.
Like everyone I speak to for this piece, McCann is in despair about these new policies. 'At this point, I feel like I'm firefighting all the time,' she says.
Perisic, at least, can take some time off when her store closes its doors for the last time at the end of the month. She simply doesn't have the capital to invest in the marketing needed to launch an online-only store, so instead she is going travelling. As for the space she has made her own for nearly two decades: a cupcake chain is reportedly taking it over.
And in the future, life abroad sounds increasingly appealing.
'For now, Athens sounds like a good place to start looking,' she says, 'I don't think this government cares about creativity – it's too busy trying to make Amazon happy.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist
The First Minister was asked on the BBC Scotland's Sunday Show if those who backed Reform were 'gullible' or 'racist' – a term the SNP leader has previously used to describe the party. Mr Swinney said the 7,088 people who backed Reform – more than a quarter of the vote – in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse ballot were 'neither', but were instead 'angry at the cost-of-living crisis'. He added: 'I think that's what motivates the Reform vote. People have got poorer because of one central thing – Brexit, and the author of that is (Reform UK leader Nigel) Farage. 'I'm standing up to Farage. I'm going to make no apology for it.' He said the SNP is 'in the process of recovery' and he had come into office as First Minister a year ago 'inheriting some significant difficulties' within the party, and that it needs to get stronger before the Holyrood election in 2026. He said voters are 'having to work hard for less' and are concerned about public services, particularly the NHS. Mr Swinney was asked about comments he made prior to the vote saying 'Labour were not at the races' and claiming it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie. The First Minister said that since the general election campaign last year, people he has met have pledged never to vote Labour due to the winter fuel allowance being cut, while Reform's support increased. Mr Swinney said: 'People were telling us on the doorsteps, they were giving us reasons why they weren't supporting Labour. We could also see that Farage's support was rising dramatically and that's happening across the United Kingdom, it's not unique to Hamilton. 'I positioned the SNP to be strong enough to stop Farage, and that's what we were determined to do.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has branded the SNP's campaign 'dishonest and disgraceful' and said it had put the spotlight on Reform. Those comments were put to the First Minister, who said he had previously been allies with Mr Sarwar in a campaign to 'stand up to far-right thinking'. Mr Swinney said: 'That was months ago and then we found ourselves in the aftermath of the UK local authority elections, the English local authority elections where Farage surged to a leading position and won a by-election south of the border. 'So the dynamic of our politics change in front of us. 'I've been standing up to Farage for months, I've been warning about the dangers of Farage for months, and they crystallised in the rise of Farage during the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election.'


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
The winners and losers in Labour's first spending review
When Rachel Reeves publishes the government's spending review on Wednesday, the stories the Treasury will want to tell are the energy, transport and other infrastructure projects that will get a share of the big boost in capital funding – £113bn. They will argue that cash, freed up by the change to the fiscal rules in the budget, could only have happened under Labour and was opposed by the Tories and Reform. But the capital spending cannot stop expected cuts in day-to-day spending, meaning extremely tight settlements for departments, with savings expected from policing budgets, local government, civil service cuts, foreign aid, education and culture. Treasury sources said they would still spend £190bn more over the five-year parliament than the Conservatives' spending plans – meaning more than £300bn will be distributed among departments. Real-terms spending will grow at an average of 1.2% a year over the three years that the spending review period covers, a significant drop from the first two years when it will be 2.5%. Even that figure does not tell the full story because of the disproportionate boost being given to defence and the NHS – and has led the Institute for Fiscal Studies to warn that the spending commitments will require 'chunky tax rises' in the autumn, when coupled with other expected priorities such as restoring the winter fuel allowance to more pensioners and action on child poverty such as ending the two-child benefit limit. Here are some of the key offers from the spending review – and the rows over cuts. The biggest row of the spending review has been between Reeves and the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, over policing, which one source describes as being a 'huge headache'. Cooper has brought out the big guns to make her case, first with a letter from six police chiefs who warned that without more funding the government would not meet its manifesto promises on crime. Sir Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan police, and other senior police officers have also written to the prime minister to warn him that investment was need to prevent some crimes being routinely ignored. It is understand the policing budget will not face real terms cuts but the level of spending is still under discussion. The Home Office is under strain as a major spending department that is key to some of the most ambitious manifesto pledges – including halving knife crime, police recruitment, reducing violence against women and girls as well as dealing with monitoring offenders who will be released earlier due to sentencing changes. The other major spending review row is over deep dissatisfaction from Angela Rayner – the deputy prime minister and housing secretary – with the level of funding for social homes in the spending review, making her one of the last remaining holdouts in negotiations with the Treasury over departmental spending settlements. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been battling for more funding for the affordable homes programme as well as trying to preserve cash for local councils, homelessness and regional growth initiatives. The Treasury had previously put £2bn into affordable housing, described as a 'down payment' on further funding to be announced at the spending review, which Reeves said would mark a generational shift in the building of council homes. However, the next phase of funding has caused a major rift with Rayner – and more so because capital spending on infrastructure such as housing is meant to be a priority. The environment secretary, Steve Reed, is said to have been holding out for a big capital injection to fund flood defences. The autumn budget said the government was facing significant funding pressures on flood defences and farm schemes of almost £600m in 2024-25, and that those schemes would have to be reviewed for their affordability. Sources at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) confirmed a post-Brexit farming fund would be cut in the review. Labour promised a fund of £5bn over two years – from 2024 to 2026 – at the budget, which is being honoured, but in the years after that it will be slashed for all but a few farms. The energy secretary, Ed Miliband, had a long fight to keep cash for a major programme of insulation, which was a key part of the government's net zero strategy. However, there are reports suggesting other schemes could be scaled back to protect the insulation programme. At the October budget, Reeves announced £3.4bn over three years for household energy efficiency schemes, heat decarbonisation and fuel poverty schemes. The government responded to concerns expressed at the time calling the sum the 'bare minimum' and promising a spending uplift at the review. Miliband's department is expected to get significant capital investment in energy infrastructure including nuclear – with the government poised to give the go ahead to the Sizewell C nuclear plant. The chancellor has already announced £15bn in transport spending across the north of England, funds which she said fulfil promises made by the Conservatives to the country but which the party had no way to pay for them in its own plan. Wes Streeting's department is set to be one of the big winners of the spending review and it will lay the groundwork for the NHS 10-year plan, which will be published imminently after the spending review. The department will get one of the biggest boosts to funding as others face real-terms cuts. The funding for the plan prioritises three key areas, moving care from hospitals to communities, increasing the use of technology, and prioritising prevention. No 10 and Streeting hope that the 10-year plan will contain major commitments and a positive story that the government will finally be able to tell properly on improvements to the health service – though any good news could be scuppered by the ballot for strike action by resident doctors. Still, Streeting's department was one of the last to settle formally with the Treasury due to negotiations over drug prices, though departmental sources downplayed any specific row. Any child in England whose parents receive universal credit will be able to claim free school meals from September 2026, the government has said. Parents on the credit will be eligible regardless of their income. The government says the change will make 500,000 more pupils eligible. A Department for Education (DfE) source said it was the best measure outside welfare changes to address child poverty and that the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, had consistently fought to protect school food programmes through each round of spending negotiations. But schools budgets will be squeezed. Teachers will get a 4% pay rise next year, with additional funding of £615m. But schools will still have to fund about a quarter of the rise themselves – a total of £400m from their current budgets. Phillipson has tasked the DfE with finding savings in schools budgets, such as energy bills. Savings will also come as the government is removing public funding for level 7 apprenticeships, which has drawn criticism from skills experts. The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, was one of the first to reach her settlement to allow her to announce a £4.7bn plan to build three new prisons starting this year, part of a 'record expansion' as the government attempts to get to grips with the prison crisis. The early announcement was essential because it came alongside an announcement that the government would put a limit on how long hundreds of repeat offenders can be recalled to prison amid Whitehall predictions that jails will be full again in November.


STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist, says Swinney
John Swinney has said Scots who voted for Reform in a by-election last week were 'angry', not racist. The First Minister was asked on the BBC Scotland's Sunday Show if those who backed Reform were 'gullible' or 'racist' – a term the SNP leader has previously used to describe the party. Swinney said the 7,088 people who backed Reform – more than a quarter of the vote – in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse ballot were 'neither', but were instead 'angry at the cost-of-living crisis'. He added: 'I think that's what motivates the Reform vote. People have got poorer because of one central thing – Brexit, and the author of that is (Reform UK leader Nigel) Farage. 'I'm standing up to Farage. I'm going to make no apology for it.' PA Media John Swinney said those who voted Reform in Hamilton were 'angry' (PA). He said the SNP is 'in the process of recovery' and he had come into office as First Minister a year ago 'inheriting some significant difficulties' within the party, and that it needs to get stronger before the Holyrood election in 2026. He said voters are 'having to work hard for less' and are concerned about public services, particularly the NHS. Swinney was asked about comments he made prior to the vote saying 'Labour were not at the races' and claiming it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie. The First Minister said that since the general election campaign last year, people he has met have pledged never to vote Labour due to the winter fuel allowance being cut, while Reform's support increased. PA Media Reform UK came third in the by-election (Jane Barlow/PA). Swinney said: 'People were telling us on the doorsteps, they were giving us reasons why they weren't supporting Labour. We could also see that Farage's support was rising dramatically and that's happening across the United Kingdom, it's not unique to Hamilton. 'I positioned the SNP to be strong enough to stop Farage, and that's what we were determined to do.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has branded the SNP's campaign 'dishonest and disgraceful' and said it had put the spotlight on Reform. Those comments were put to the First Minister, who said he had previously been allies with Mr Sarwar in a campaign to 'stand up to far-right thinking'. Swinney said: 'That was months ago and then we found ourselves in the aftermath of the UK local authority elections, the English local authority elections where Farage surged to a leading position and won a by-election south of the border. 'So the dynamic of our politics change in front of us. 'I've been standing up to Farage for months, I've been warning about the dangers of Farage for months, and they crystallised in the rise of Farage during the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country