logo
You be the judge: should my girlfriend stop using my earphones?

You be the judge: should my girlfriend stop using my earphones?

The Guardian15-05-2025

It's gross – I wouldn't use her toothbrush, so why would I use her earphones?
I've been going out with my girlfriend, Lila, for three years. We obviously know each other intimately, but I just can't get on board with sharing earphones. There's something so gross about it. I hate cleaning off someone else's earwax afterwards and Lila's ears are generally stickier than mine.
Lila thinks I'm overreacting. She thinks that because we're dating it's weird to be so grossed out by this. But I wouldn't use her toothbrush, so why would I use her earphones?
We both have cheap pairs and leave them around the flat. But Lila treats both sets as if they are hers, even though I deliberately bought blue ones to distinguish them. I only use mine, so when I see her connecting to my set for a run, or walking out the door with them, I make her swap.
This isn't just me being fussy, it's actually backed by science. Earwax carries bacteria and earphones can trap moisture. I read an article that said shared earphones can increase the risk of ear infections. Maybe I'm a neurotic germophobe, but I'd rather that than get an ear infection.
Lila has lost her earphones twice. She used to have some expensive Apple ones, which she left in a bar. Since then, she's only had cheaper ones, but she's lost those too. I don't want her to lose mine.
Sometimes she forgets to bring hers on a journey. Once, on a trip to Wales to see my parents, she wanted to listen to my playlist. I reluctantly gave her my earphones, even though I didn't want to. I ended up disinfecting them afterwards, which offended her. Lila framed it as if I had rejected a sweet romantic gesture, but I just didn't like the idea of shared ear goo.
There are lots of other ways to connect, after all. We cuddle, we cook together, we watch movies and I'm affectionate. I just don't want to be guilt-tripped for keeping my earphones to myself. If I have to start hiding them, I will, but I'd rather Lila just stick to the earphone rules of our home.
We kiss and do all the normal things couples do – so why are earphones a step too far?
Tim is a bit more of a clean freak than me, but I'm not dirty. I always do the lion's share of the cleaning in our flat and I shower just as often as Tim, which is once a day (sometimes more, if I've exercised). But I don't see sharing earphones as being risky or gross.
In the past, when I've lost mine, I've had no choice but to use his, and then I just got used to it. Tim says sharing is unhygienic, but that feels overblown. We kiss and do all the normal things couples do. But for some reason earphones are a step too far for him.
I'm sure there are more bacteria in our mouths. Whenever I use Tim's earphones he makes this big show of wiping them down with his sleeve, or gets out this special spray. He physically stops me and makes me take his earphones out if he sees me using them.
He's had a few ear infections in his life, from swimming. I've never had one, so I don't know the pain of that. But I'm pretty sure you can't get an infection from sharing earphones.
When Tim once disinfected his earphones after we shared them on a train journey, I was mildly offended but also quite amused. I didn't leave any earwax on them and I don't agree with the notion that my ears are more sticky than his. I clean them regularly, it's just something he's conjured up to justify not sharing.
I also think sharing earphones on a journey is quite romantic. I'm not trying to infect him, I'm inviting him to watch a show that I'm enjoying. It's a form of connection, and I don't think humans get enough of that any more – we are always rushing, or listening to separate shows and playlists on the go. Why not share earphones on a plane and be connected to the same thing?
For me, it's not a big deal – if you live together everything is fair game. When you're in a relationship, you share things. I'm not asking to borrow his toothbrush or razor, and even that wouldn't be the end of the world to me. I just want to live safe in the knowledge that if I have to listen to the music for 10 minutes I won't be treated as though I'm some kind of sticky-eared monster.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
Should Lila only use her own earphones?
I relate to Lila, but she should respect Tim's wishes. I don't think sharing things in a relationship is a big deal, and agree that it can create a sense of intimacy. But it sounds like this matters more to Tim than it does to Lila, so she should respect his boundaries.Joe, 28
Tim is overreacting. How likely is it really that you'd get an ear infection from sharing earphones? When you're in a long-term relationship, you become a team and it's nice to feel comfortable enough to share things that you wouldn't with other people.Grace, 25
I do understand where Lila is coming from, and if I were her I'd feel a bit put out too. But it seems like this is a red line for Tim. If Lila wants to share earphones, they should buy a splitter. Then they can share music but keep their own earphones.Ife, 36
We all have odd quirks in relationships, and this is clearly Tim's. Lila might not think it's a big deal, but if it makes him uncomfortable enough to disinfect his earphones, Lila shouldn't pressure him into sharing.Elisa, 45
I wouldn't think twice about sharing earphones with my girlfriend, but I still think Lila is in the wrong. If Tim feels that strongly about it, Lila should respect that.Alistair, 31
In our online poll, tell us who you think is in the wrong?
The poll closes on Wednesday 21 May at 10am BST
We asked if Neil should stop tracking his daughter on his phone
97% of you said yes – Neil is guilty
3% of you said no – Neil is not guilty

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Firefighters work through the night at Co-op fire in Tavistock
Firefighters work through the night at Co-op fire in Tavistock

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Firefighters work through the night at Co-op fire in Tavistock

Firefighters worked through the night to tackle a fire at a shop in fire service said nine crews attended the blaze in the Co-op store on Market Street when a fire alarm alerted them shortly after 19:00 BST on said they found the fire at the back of the shop which was filling the premises with took firefighters wearing breathing apparatus until 05:00 Thursday to clear. A spokesperson for the fire service said the store would be closed for some time due to the amount of damage from the fire which was believed had been started by an electrical spokesperson said the incident served as a reminder of the importance of a working fire alarm.

You be the judge: my partner painted the walls, but left me to do the edges. Am I right to be angry?
You be the judge: my partner painted the walls, but left me to do the edges. Am I right to be angry?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

You be the judge: my partner painted the walls, but left me to do the edges. Am I right to be angry?

I'd broken my wrist – if you offer to decorate for someone who is injured, you should do it all I've always been the designated DIY person in our home. I care about interiors and like things to look nice. Freddie, my boyfriend of six years, is the chef. We like hosting friends, so it works well. As it's coming up to summer, I wanted to refresh our home and get our living room and hallway painted before we have friends round for barbecues and dinner parties. However, I recently broke my wrist, so I asked Freddie if he could take up the mantle (or paintbrush). I then went away to see my sister and her new baby for the weekend, leaving him with strict instructions and all the paint. Imagine my shock when I came back and saw he had done half a job. The walls were mostly painted, but he had skipped the skirting boards and all the edges. He had just rolled over the main bits of wall with a roller. He said he wasn't able to do the smaller areas as he doesn't have a 'delicate hand'. I said: 'Well I've only got one hand.' The bits he did were fine, but the point is it's not complete. I'm also glad I wasn't around to watch Freddie pootle along because it would have frustrated me. When we decided to repaint, I was touched when Freddie gallantly announced: 'I'll do it – you just rest.' But when I came back and expressed disappointment, he just handed me the brush and said: 'You're better at the fiddly bits.' I ended up painting the edges myself with my one working hand. Freddie insists he has done the main part, which is what counts. But he did everything except the bits that take time and patience. It's a cop-out. If you ask someone to do a job, they can't do half of it and call it finished. If you offer to paint a wall for someone who's injured, you should do it all, including the bits that require you to crouch or switch to a smaller brush. This isn't really about walls. It's lucky that Freddie is a good partner, because this is weaponised incompetence. He now says he will be telling our friends that he did the painting, but I'm not having that. I'm the one who took it over the finish line. She knows I'm not a details guy – I don't want to mess up the part I know she can do perfectly I am taking credit for painting most of the walls as that's what I did. And they look good, as Helen said. We're not talking slapdash bits of paint all over the sockets. I really took my time: I moved the furniture, I put down sheets and I did the main event: two coats, all the way through the living room and in the hallway. I think Helen is fake-outraged over the fact I left the edges – we both know she is better at that anyway. And I actually did 80% of the job, which is better than nothing. She went away and left me with instructions, and I delivered. But she knows I'm not a details guy; I'm the roller, not the artist. Edges, fiddly bits, skirting boards are all precision work. That's where I lose confidence. I don't want to mess up the part I know she can do perfectly, and it's not really my forte. I would get in trouble for doing it wrong if I tried. It felt more respectful to do what I could and let Helen finesse the finish. She is the design expert, after all. When she came back and I handed her a paintbrush for the edges, I could tell by her expression she wasn't impressed. She said: 'What? It's not done.' I had to talk her into my way of thinking. I know my strengths, and neat edges aren't one of them. This isn't weaponised incompetence, it's self-awareness. I wasn't trying to get out of it; I just didn't want to be shouted at for getting it wrong. Cutting in the edges is a huge job and it requires a steady hand. Helen's one hand is better than both of mine put together. As for me claiming the paint job, I will absolutely be telling our friends we painted it together. I was joking when I said I'll tell everyone I did it all. Helen wants to out me in front of everyone and tell them I did half a job, but really I did the majority. However, I am in favour of telling everyone it was a team effort. I did the big strokes, Helen brought the magic. It's like cooking and plating: if I make the curry and Helen adds the coriander, she can't take credit for the whole thing. It's a collaboration. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Should Freddie have finished the job himself? Freddie himself says the detailing is a 'huge job' – and then he goes and leaves it all for Helen, who has a broken wrist. Come on, Freddie – there's lazy, and then there's out of 28 'Weaponised incompetence' is a tad strong Helen! Freddie stepped up in my view. He could have said 'no, it's not my forte', but he took the plunge and had a go instead. He's not quite a have-a-go hero but he's certainly not 34 I can just picture Freddie, bigging himself up as a 'can do' man', but it's all a facade. If I were Helen, I'd be so irate I'd be tempted to throw the rest of the paint over 49 I can understand Helen's disappointment at Freddie for not finishing the job after he'd offered to paint the walls. But if he really is that incompetent, she probably should have given him some training before letting him loose. At least he did 43 Even if Helen had broken the wrist of her non-writing hand, cutting-in requires ladders and that's risky single-handed. Plus, how do you carry paint with one hand? Either Helen's broken wrist had healed, so Freddie disregarded it, or he's lazy and unfeeling. A bizarre situation: on balance, it's Freddie's bad, or very 29 In our online poll, tell us: should Freddie have tackled the corners? The poll closes on Wednesday 18 June at 10am BST We asked whether Jim should put food on his wife's plate with a little more finesse, rather than just dollop it on.64% of you said yes – Jim is guilty 36% of you said no – Jim is not guilty

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store