Tamil Nadu government forms city-level authority for urban disaster management
The State government has constituted a seven-member Chennai City Urban Disaster Management Authority (CCUDMA) under Section 41A of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
The Commissioner of the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) would be the ex-officio Chairperson, and the Chennai Collector, the ex-officio Vice-Chairperson of the CCUDMA.
Greater Chennai Police Commissioner, GCC Deputy Commissioner (Works), GCC City Health Officer, Chief Executive Officer of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), and Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Chennai Region, will be the ex-officio members of the panel.
The Revenue and Disaster Management Department issued a Government Order (G.O.) in this regard last week. Though a State-level disaster management authority, with the Chief Minister as its Chairperson, as well as district-level disaster management authorities, with the respective Collectors as chairpersons, are in place, this is the first time a city-level panel has been constituted specifically for 'urban disasters' for the State capital.
The constitution of the committee for Chennai followed the Disaster Management (Amendment) Bill, 2024, which was adopted by both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. It was this Bill that envisaged the creation of a 'separate urban disaster management authority' for State capitals and all cities having a municipal corporation (except Delhi and the Union Territory of Chandigarh).
According to the legislation, the urban authority would be responsible for the preparation and implementation of the disaster management plan that was to be approved by the State authority.
The topography of Chennai and the erratic climate conditions have made the city prone to disasters such as cyclones, floods due to heavy downpour, cloud burst, earthquakes, and tsunami, according to the City Disaster Management Perspective Plan 2024 drafted by the GCC.
The plan also underlined that some of the areas in Chennai were below mean sea level, which posed challenges to effective management of inundation during heavy rainfall.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
If used properly, Waqf Amendment Act is pro-Muslim: Chandrababu Naidu
Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu reiterated his party's support to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, saying that if used properly, this law is pro-Muslim. Naidu's Telugu Desam Party (TDP) voted in Parliament in support of the contentious law enacted by the Modi government, which got the President's nod in April. The TDP is part of the ruling NDA alliance in the Centre, alongside Nitish Kumar's JDU, Chirag Paswan's LJP and Jayant Chaudhary's RLD, among others. Speaking exclusively to India Today TV on Sunday, the TDP chief recalled the work done by his previous governments for Muslim minorities in the state and said that his party is fully committed to the welfare of all religions and communities. "If used properly, the Waqf law is pro-Muslim," Naidu said. The Amendment to the 1995 law was challenged by several opposition parties in the Supreme Court, who, after hearing all sides, has the verdict reserved. Naidu also touched upon a range of issues of national significance as well as those concerning Andhra Pradesh. Watch the full interview.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
District Collectors to have wide powers in registering new Waqf properties and deciding on Waqf claims on government properties
The District Collectors will have a crucial role in registering new Waqf properties and looking into complaints of government properties being identified or declared as Waqf, according to the draft Waqf rules. The Union government has sought the views of the State governments and the State Waqf Boards on the draft rules for the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025, which was passed by Parliament in April. The Rules will come into force once they are notified in the Gazette of India. The Collector shall inquire into the genuineness and validity of the application for registering a new Waqf in accordance with the revenue laws and confirm that the Waqif (the one who is making the Waqf) is a lawful owner of the property and competent to dedicate it as a Waqf. The Collector will also ascertain that the proposed property is not a government property, a protected monument or protected area under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 or the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, and does not belong to Scheduled Tribes, according to the draft rules. Kerala had been keenly awaiting the introduction of the Rules as Kiran Rijiju, the Union Minister for Minority Affairs, had stated earlier this year that the enactment of the Rules would help the Munambam residents in their legal fight for restoring the revenue rights of their holdings. The residents had opposed the decision of the Kerala Waqf Board in notifying the land as a Waqf property. Two petitions challenging the decision of the Board are pending before the Waqf Tribunal. The residents, who claimed that they had purchased the holding from Farook College, Kozhikode, have been protesting for 240 days. Portal, database The 15-point Rules also speak about setting up a portal and a database for filing the details of Waqf and registration of new Waqf. There shall be provisions for real-time monitoring of registration of new Waqf and filing the details of the Waqf, court cases and dispute resolution and resources management. The District Collector can order an inquiry when it comes to the notice of the official that any government property has been identified or declared as a Waqf. The designated officer shall hear all persons concerned or any person having any interest in the property, including the government and mutawalli of the Waqf and ask them to submit their claims and counter-claims within a specified period. The inquiry should be completed within one year, say the draft rules. Kerala government has sought time to file its response.
India Today
16 hours ago
- India Today
Assam to skip tribunals, use 1950 law to deport illegal immigrants: Himanta Sarma
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Saturday announced that the state will no longer be required to rely on Foreigners Tribunals (FTs) to identify and deport illegal immigrants, invoking a 1950 law to expedite the to reporters in Nalbari district, Sarma said the state government plans to act under the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Order, 1950, which remains legally valid and empowers district commissioners to issue immediate expulsion Supreme Court, during the hearing of the Clause 6A matter under a Constitution Bench, clearly observed that Assam does not always need to go through the judiciary to identify and deport foreigners," the Chief Minister said. "There is an existing law — the Immigrants Expulsion Order — which permits district authorities to act directly. We were unaware of this until recently, as our lawyers had not flagged it. But we will now act on it," he BJP leader also pointed out that many pushbacks had already taken place, but in cases pending before the courts, the state had refrained from acting. "The numbers are increasing, and they will continue to rise if we don't act. From now on, when someone is identified as a foreigner, and the case is not already in court, we won't wait — we will push them back. And if needed, we will do it repeatedly," he acknowledged that the NRC (National Register of Citizens) exercise had slowed down the state's efforts in identifying and deporting undocumented migrants. With the Supreme Court's recent observations and the rediscovery of the 1950 order, he said the government is preparing to resume and intensify its currently operates 100 Foreigners Tribunals, first set up in 2005, to adjudicate the citizenship of people flagged by the Assam Police's Border Wing. These tribunals have long been the primary mechanism for determining citizenship status, particularly of those suspected to be Bangladeshi nationals residing illegally in the Chief Minister clarified that the new approach would not interfere with ongoing legal proceedings but would apply in cases where no judicial process is currently Watch
