These Waterloo region voters have their say about what top issues in this Ontario election
With just over two weeks until ballots are cast for the Ontario election, voters are starting to hone in on the key issues affecting them in their ridings.
In CBC K-W's second voter panel, hosted Monday on The Morning Edition with Craig Norris, voters from Perth-Wellington and Waterloo gathered to share their views on what matters most to them.
For Stratford's Ron Garland and Waterloo's Carol Moogk-Soulis and Rodney Chan, those issues were health care, public transit and social housing.
Health care under strain
Garland emphasized that a lack of primary care and hospital beds in Perth-Wellington are creating a crisis for his community.
"Emergency rooms shut down on a regular basis," said Garland, adding "hospitals are struggling to keep their beds open."
Garland said thousands of people in Perth-Wellington don't have access to a primary care provider.
"That's a crime, in my opinion."
Transit funding
For Chan, the key issue in this election is public transportation. He highlighted how essential public transit is for accessing health care, education, work and groceries.
"It's a key lifeline for people and it's just been starved of funding for the past few decades in this province," said Chan.
The Ontario Progressive Conservatives have promised ambitious GO transit expansion and funding if re-elected, but Chan said big capital spending isn't enough to maintain a higher standard of public transportation.
"We see that upper levels of government love to fund big infrastructure projects so they can cut the ribbon, but the key day-to-day operations funding is what is needed to run frequent service, reliable service," he said.
He said inter-city transit between Waterloo region, Guelph and Brantford is needed, and "there's currently no frequent direct connection between all of them."
The decline of social housing
For Moogk-Soulis, the supply of social housing has declined drastically since she used it herself as a student in her youth.
Referencing NDP MP Charlie Angus's book A Dangerous Memory, she said she was amazed to read that in Toronto in the 1980s, "between 20,000 and 30,000 social housing units were built per year."
"I remember having grown up here, so many social housing programs, projects," she said. "And then they stopped."
Moogk-Soulis said that for some people, social housing was a forever home and for others like herself, it's a transitional phase.
"We didn't have people living in tents. It makes me very sad to see that," she said.
"When did we stop being concerned enough about people to look at the past, look at some of the solutions?"
Deciding at the ballot box
When asked whether their local candidates were addressing these key issues, the panelists were largely disappointed.
Garland said he feels his local Ontario Liberal candidate works with seniors and that she's "definitely advocating for healthcare."
Moogk-Soulis noted, "I'm just hearing big things, big things," from the Ontario PCs. She worries they aren't focusing enough on the smaller needs of the community.
Chan mentioned that while the NDP, Greens and Liberals have proposed ideas that align well with his ideas of public building and local transit support, the promises remain unproven. On the other hand, Chan said the PCs have the most ambitious vision of building out the broader transit network.
When it came down to the decisions the panelists would be making on their ballot, there was less conviction and more uncertainty.
Garland said he's decided, Moogk-Soulis said she knows who she will not be voting for, and Chan said it's still a toss up.
CBC K-W wants to hear from you in this election
What is at stake for you personally as you head to the polls?
Fill out our Ontario election survey below:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
01-06-2025
- National Post
Ontario strong mayor powers has some councils concerned about local governance
A month after Ontario's government extended strong mayor powers to a swath of new municipalities, some leaders are promising never to use the measures — but a chorus of small-town councillors warn that local democracy is under threat. Article content Article content As of May 1, another 169 mayors in the province can now veto bylaws, pass new ones with just one-third of council in favour and hire or fire municipal department heads unilaterally. Article content Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack said last month that the province decided to more than triple the number of mayors who can access the powers in an effort to build housing faster and streamline local governance. Article content Article content The measures were first introduced in 2022 and initially only applied to the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario's two most populous cities. Article content Several municipalities are taking active steps to reject the powers now that they have been granted more widely. Article content Mark Hunter, one of 10 city councillors in Stratford, recently got unanimous support for his motion to reject the new powers. Hunter said it was symbolic and designed to show that municipal democracy shouldn't be 'subject to provincial whim.' Article content 'What it effectively does is get rid of majority rule in our council,' he said. Article content 'It's the expectation of the residents in our community that their representatives are able to fully represent them, and this change puts some level of diminishment on that.' Article content Article content Hunter said his fellow councillors can have strong disagreements at council, but lively discussions result in better decisions for the community. Anything that diminishes that discussion is worse for residents, he said. Article content Article content Councillors aren't concerned about Stratford's current mayor abusing his power, said Hunter, but they are worried about what could happen in the future. Article content 'It's another example of concentrating power in fewer hands. Unfortunately, in human history, that doesn't always work out so well,' he said. Article content David O'Neil, a councillor in Quinte West, said he is also concerned about strong mayor powers, adding they represent 'a real misdirection' by the province. Article content 'I think this decision is on par with the crazy idea of building a tunnel under the 401,' O'Neil said, referring to Premier Doug Ford's promise to add a tunnel under the major Ontario highway. Article content He added he is skeptical that strong mayor powers would lead to new housing being built in his community, and thinks the province should waive development fees if it wants to see more housing built.
CBC
01-06-2025
- CBC
Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns
A month after Ontario's government extended strong mayor powers to a swath of new municipalities, some leaders are promising never to use the measures — but a chorus of small-town councillors warn that local democracy is under threat. As of May 1, another 169 mayors in the province can now veto bylaws, pass new ones with just one-third of council in favour and hire or fire municipal department heads unilaterally. Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack said last month that the province decided to more than triple the number of mayors who can access the powers in an effort to build housing faster and streamline local governance. The measures were first introduced in 2022 and initially only applied to the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario's two most populous cities. Several municipalities are taking active steps to reject the powers now that they have been granted more widely. Mark Hunter, one of 10 city councillors in Stratford, recently got unanimous support for his motion to reject the new powers. Hunter said it was symbolic and designed to show that municipal democracy shouldn't be "subject to provincial whim." "What it effectively does is get rid of majority rule in our council," he said. "It's the expectation of the residents in our community that their representatives are able to fully represent them and this change puts some level of diminishment on that." Hunter said his fellow councillors can have strong disagreements at council, but lively discussions result in better decisions for the community. Anything that diminishes that discussion is worse for residents, he said. Councillors aren't concerned about Stratford's current mayor abusing his power, said Hunter, but they are worried about what could happen in the future. "It's another example of concentrating power in fewer hands. Unfortunately in human history, that doesn't always work out so well," he said. Worries about democratic processes David O'Neil, a councillor in Quinte West, said he is also concerned about strong mayor powers, adding they represent "a real misdirection" by the province. "I think this decision is on par with the crazy idea of building a tunnel under the 401," O'Neil said, referring to Premier Doug Ford's promise to add a tunnel under the major Ontario highway. He added he is skeptical that strong mayor powers would lead to new housing being built in his community, and thinks the province should waive development fees if it wants to see more housing built. Zack Card, another councillor for Quinte West, said he believes the expansion of the strong mayor powers will "erode the democratic traditions of municipal councils in Ontario." "I believe effective councils work collaboratively and with an understanding that all voices carry equal weight. Tipping that balance could potentially hinder governance and make solving issues within our communities more difficult," Card wrote in an email. Neither O'Neil nor Card would speak to the recent dismissal of the municipality's chief administration officer, which was described on the municipality's website as a "mayoral decision" pursuant to the legislation, made on the first day the powers were available. Quinte West Mayor Jim Harrison said in an email to The Canadian Press that "the decision was made in close collaboration and consensus with council, utilizing strong mayor powers to move forward." Less than a week after the decision, he told a council meeting that he wasn't planning to make use of the strong mayor powers. O'Neil suggested his concern is more future-oriented: it's unclear what could a different sort of mayor do with these powers five, 10 or 20 years down the road. 'It's changed the dynamic' for non-partisan staff David Arbuckle, executive director of the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, said unilateral power threatens a local government's administrative authority and staffers' ability to give non-partisan, evidence-based advice. "It's changed the dynamic where (a city staffer) now has to be mindful of the fact that they could be hired or fired by the mayor at any point in time," Arbuckle said in a recent interview. "The advice they're bringing forward may not be as neutral as possible because ultimately they are now responding to one individual." Corey Engelsdorfer, a councillor from Prince Edward County, said he's worried the powers will exacerbate existing divisions on his council and, should they be used, could "sideline" constituents even as the community experiences a boom in development. The traditional model of majority rule is already divisive, Engelsdorfer said — especially when it comes to housing decisions — so decisions being made with even less support could lead to even more public cynicism. "The way we build homes is by working together as a council and not by one person or a third of council pushing through what they want to push through," he said. "I always hear Premier Ford say that these changes cut red tape, but democracy to me is not red tape. I don't think it's something that needs to be in place at all." Mayor Steve Ferguson said in an interview that he was working to defer several of the strong mayor powers, including personnel decisions, back to council. The council also unanimously passed a resolution asking the province to rescind strong mayor legislation, Engelsdorfer said. 'Underwhelming' uptake of new powers Despite the concerns, Matti Siemiatycki, director of the University of Toronto's Infrastructure Institute and a professor of geography and planning, said the uptake of the powers has been "fairly underwhelming." Before last month, there were only 46 so-called strong mayors in Ontario. Only a few made use of their powers. High-profile examples include Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath advancing affordable housing development on two municipal parking lots in April 2024, and Mississauga's former mayor Bonnie Crombie passing bylaws to build fourplexes in October 2023. But Siemiatycki said he fears there's greater risk for strong mayor powers to go unchecked in smaller municipalities, where there is less oversight and, often, less journalistic scrutiny. "We've seen an erosion and a decline of the local presses across Canada, and it's no more visible than in small communities," he said. "If you're concentrating powers, what's really needed is external oversight bodies. And the media is one of those, so smaller communities might struggle to have that accountability and people being aware of what's happening." Siemiatycki said while he sympathizes with the province's desire to tackle a housing and infrastructure crisis, he agrees with the councillors who have raised concerns. "It doesn't necessarily mean you'll go further just because you're aiming to go faster," he said. "The thing that's more sustainable over the long term is acceleration through processes that have very clear accountabilities and timelines to them."
Winnipeg Free Press
21-05-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Things to know about ‘no tax on tips,' Trump's tax pledge that's included in GOP budget bill
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's ' no tax on tips ' pledge became a catchphrase for his 2024 campaign. Now it's inching closer to reality. The idea is firmly planted in the sprawling tax cuts package Republicans are hashing out in the House and aiming to pass in the coming days. And in a surprise move, the Senate voted this week to unanimously approve the idea. The proposal has widespread support from the public, lawmakers in both parties and employers who believe such a law will bring relief to the working class. But many critics say that it would come with an enormous cost to the government while doing little to help the workers who need it most. Here's a look at the proposal and its potential impact: What's in the 'No Tax on Tips' provision? It would create a new tax deduction eliminating federal income taxes on tips for people working in jobs that have traditionally received them, as long as they make less than $160,000 in 2025. The Trump administration would publish a list of qualifying occupations within 90 days of the bill's signing. Only tips reported to the employer and noted on a worker's W-2, their end-of-year tax summary, would qualify. Payroll taxes, which pay for Social Security and Medicare, would still be collected. If adopted, the proposed deduction is set to expire after four years. Congressional budget analysts project the provision would increase the deficit by $40 billion through 2028. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, an advocacy group, projects the cost would be $120 billion over a decade if the tip exemption is made permanent. What did Trump say during the campaign about eliminating federal taxes on tips? Trump made the promise during a campaign stop in Las Vegas, where the service sector drives the economy, as part of his pitch to working-class voters struggling with rising costs. Segments of his base eagerly spread the word, writing the catchphrase on their restaurant receipts or talking to their barbers about it while getting a trim. Trump offered few details at the time, but later made similar pledges to eliminate taxes on other forms of income, including overtime wages and Social Security payments. Those ideas, along with a tax deduction for auto loan interest, are also included in the GOP's budget bill. 'No tax on tips' was later embraced — with limits — by the influential Culinary Union, which represents Las Vegas Strip hospitality workers, Nevada's Democratic senators and Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump's Democratic rival. How could it impact workers? Experts say some middle-income service workers would benefit from a tax break but warn that it could potentially heighten inequities. 'If your goal is to help the poorest service workers, this is probably not the way to do it,' said Michael Lynn, a professor of services marketing at Cornell University whose research largely focuses on tipping and other consumer behavior. About a third of tipped workers make too little to owe income taxes. Those workers won't benefit from the tax break, so its benefits will accrue to tipped workers with higher incomes, Lynn said. 'It's overlooking non-tipped workers who need the help just as badly, and it's giving the benefit predominantly to the least needy of the tipped workers,' Lynn said. The median age for tipped workers is 31, a decade younger than the median non-tipped worker, and they tend to make lower wages, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Among tipped workers who make enough to owe Uncle Sam, the average tax cut would be about $1,800, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. The measure also would be complicated to enact. What do employers say? The National Restaurant Association is among industry groups that have been strong backers of a 'No Tax on Tips' provision. When reached for comment Wednesday, a spokesperson pointed The Associated Press to a previous statement following the legislation's introduction in January. 'Eliminating taxes on tips would put cash back in the pocket of a significant number of workers in the restaurant and food service industry and could help restaurant operators recruit industry workforce,' Sean Kennedy, executive vice president of public affairs for the association, said at the time — calling the No Tax on Tips Act 'sensible legislation' that he said includes 'fiscally responsible' protections. And in Nevada, the Culinary Workers Union specifically credited the state's two Democratic senators, Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen, with working with Republicans to push the legislation forward — and called on the House to 'get this done for working families.' The union represents about 60,000 casino and hotel workers across the state, including bartenders, food servers and cocktail servers who rely on tips. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. But other groups representing workers shared criticism of the legislation. One Fair Wage, an advocacy group made up of nearly 300,000 service workers and over 1,000 restaurant employers pushing to raise the minimum wage, said the measure would offer 'moderate relief for some' but is part of a tax package that 'just helps the richest while leaving the vast majority behind.' 'For all the bipartisan celebration … this bill is a distraction from the real fight,' Saru Jayaraman, president of One Fair Wage, stated — again stressing that it was time to raise the minimum wage. The nonprofit also calls for ending tip credits that allow lower base wages for tipped workers in many states. ______ Cooper reported from Phoenix. AP Writer Rio Yamat contributed to this report from Las Vegas.
